A comparative study on the physical fitness of college students from different grades and majors in Jiangxi province

Research to date has not provided a clear understanding of how different grades and majors affect the physical fitness of college students. It is postulated that there are significant disparities in physical health among college students of different grades and majors. The purpose of this study was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2024-10, Vol.19 (10), p.e0308483
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Jianzhong, Lin, Chan, Wang, Lei, Bi, Cunjian, Qiao, Bin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0308483
container_title PloS one
container_volume 19
creator Sun, Jianzhong
Lin, Chan
Wang, Lei
Bi, Cunjian
Qiao, Bin
description Research to date has not provided a clear understanding of how different grades and majors affect the physical fitness of college students. It is postulated that there are significant disparities in physical health among college students of different grades and majors. The purpose of this study was to evidence these health disparities and to engage in an extensive analysis and discussion thereof. A sample of 8,772 (2,404 boys and 6,368 girls) Chinese college students from freshman to junior years, aged 17-22, including 12 different majors in four colleges, were recruited in Jiangxi Province. All seven physical fitness indicators (body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity, 50-m dash, standing long jump, sit and reach, upper body muscle strength, and endurance runs) were conducted for all participants. One-way ANOVA and LSD tests were conducted to compare the physical fitness scores of different grades in the same major. Independent sample t-tests were utilized to compare the differences in every physical fitness indicator for different majors. Pearson's correlations among 12 majors for every grade were conducted to study the significant corrections between the two physical fitness indicators. The body mass index (BMI) and physical fitness indicator (PFI) for college students of different grade were investigated using a nonlinear regression model. The current state of physical fitness among college students is concerning, as the majority of students were barely passing (with a passing rate of 75.3%). Specifically, junior students exhibited lower scores than freshman and sophomore students across all 12 majors. From freshman to junior year, majors of music (78.01±4.58), English (79.29±5.03), and education (76.26±4.81) had the highest scores, respectively, but major art consistently scored the lowest, which were 73.85±6.02, 74.97±5.53, and 72.59±4.84, respectively. Pairwise comparisons revealed more significant differences in individual physical fitness indicators among the three grades in humanities than in sciences. Pearson's correlations showed significant correlations among seven physical fitness indicators in all three grades. PFI had a parabolic trend with BMI both for boy and girl college students in Jiangxi province. The physical fitness indicators of college students in Jiangxi province significantly differed in grades and majors, showing undesirable phenomena. The physical fitness of senior and humanities major college students was much weaker and
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0308483
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3117357271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A812466027</galeid><sourcerecordid>A812466027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4698c9c753524cebaf641e525f596f8126e35086ca1d3895e5f2a57c304823db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2LEzEUhgdR3HX1H4gGBNGL1mQyycxcSVn8WFlY8Os2pJmTNiWTjEmmbP-9KZ1dWtkLyUW-nvecnJO3KF4SPCe0Jh82fgxO2vngHcwxxU3V0EfFOWlpOeMlpo-P1mfFsxg3GDPacP60OKNtRShuy_MiLZDy_SCDTGYLKKax2yHvUFoDGta7aJS0SJvkIEbkdYathdUBBJci0sH3qDNaQ8h7tAqyg4ik61AvNz5EZBz6ZqRb3Ro0BL81TsHz4omWNsKLab4ofn3-9PPy6-z65svV5eJ6phjmaVbxtlGtqhllZaVgKTWvCLCSadZy3ZCSA2W44UqSjjYtA6ZLyWpFcdWUtFvSi-L1Ie5gfRRTw6KghNSU1WVNMvFxIsZlD53KJQRpxRBML8NOeGnE6Y0za7HyW0FIzsFbliO8myIE_2eEmERvogJrpQM_HpJxUmG2T_bmH_ThJ03USloQxmmfE6t9ULHINVec47LO1PwBKo8OeqOyJbTJ5yeC9yeCzCS4TSs5xiiufnz_f_bm9yn79ohdg7RpHb0dk_EunoLVAVTBxxhA33eZYLF39F03xN7RYnJ0lr06_qF70Z2F6V8evPEv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3117357271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study on the physical fitness of college students from different grades and majors in Jiangxi province</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Sun, Jianzhong ; Lin, Chan ; Wang, Lei ; Bi, Cunjian ; Qiao, Bin</creator><contributor>Vall-llosera Camps, Miquel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jianzhong ; Lin, Chan ; Wang, Lei ; Bi, Cunjian ; Qiao, Bin ; Vall-llosera Camps, Miquel</creatorcontrib><description>Research to date has not provided a clear understanding of how different grades and majors affect the physical fitness of college students. It is postulated that there are significant disparities in physical health among college students of different grades and majors. The purpose of this study was to evidence these health disparities and to engage in an extensive analysis and discussion thereof. A sample of 8,772 (2,404 boys and 6,368 girls) Chinese college students from freshman to junior years, aged 17-22, including 12 different majors in four colleges, were recruited in Jiangxi Province. All seven physical fitness indicators (body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity, 50-m dash, standing long jump, sit and reach, upper body muscle strength, and endurance runs) were conducted for all participants. One-way ANOVA and LSD tests were conducted to compare the physical fitness scores of different grades in the same major. Independent sample t-tests were utilized to compare the differences in every physical fitness indicator for different majors. Pearson's correlations among 12 majors for every grade were conducted to study the significant corrections between the two physical fitness indicators. The body mass index (BMI) and physical fitness indicator (PFI) for college students of different grade were investigated using a nonlinear regression model. The current state of physical fitness among college students is concerning, as the majority of students were barely passing (with a passing rate of 75.3%). Specifically, junior students exhibited lower scores than freshman and sophomore students across all 12 majors. From freshman to junior year, majors of music (78.01±4.58), English (79.29±5.03), and education (76.26±4.81) had the highest scores, respectively, but major art consistently scored the lowest, which were 73.85±6.02, 74.97±5.53, and 72.59±4.84, respectively. Pairwise comparisons revealed more significant differences in individual physical fitness indicators among the three grades in humanities than in sciences. Pearson's correlations showed significant correlations among seven physical fitness indicators in all three grades. PFI had a parabolic trend with BMI both for boy and girl college students in Jiangxi province. The physical fitness indicators of college students in Jiangxi province significantly differed in grades and majors, showing undesirable phenomena. The physical fitness of senior and humanities major college students was much weaker and needs sufficient attention. The relationship between BMI and PFI presented an inverted "U"-shaped change characteristic. Continued nationwide interventions are needed to promote physical activity and other healthy lifestyle behaviors in China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308483</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39413092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Body size ; China ; College students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Comparative studies ; Correlation ; Exercise ; Fatigue tests ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health disparities ; Humans ; Indicators ; Life style ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Muscle strength ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Obesity ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Physical Fitness - physiology ; Physiological aspects ; Regression models ; Sedentary behavior ; Social aspects ; Social Sciences ; Students ; Universities ; Variance analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-10, Vol.19 (10), p.e0308483</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Sun et al 2024 Sun et al</rights><rights>2024 Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4698c9c753524cebaf641e525f596f8126e35086ca1d3895e5f2a57c304823db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1720-9850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482695/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482695/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39413092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Vall-llosera Camps, Miquel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jianzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bi, Cunjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Bin</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on the physical fitness of college students from different grades and majors in Jiangxi province</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Research to date has not provided a clear understanding of how different grades and majors affect the physical fitness of college students. It is postulated that there are significant disparities in physical health among college students of different grades and majors. The purpose of this study was to evidence these health disparities and to engage in an extensive analysis and discussion thereof. A sample of 8,772 (2,404 boys and 6,368 girls) Chinese college students from freshman to junior years, aged 17-22, including 12 different majors in four colleges, were recruited in Jiangxi Province. All seven physical fitness indicators (body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity, 50-m dash, standing long jump, sit and reach, upper body muscle strength, and endurance runs) were conducted for all participants. One-way ANOVA and LSD tests were conducted to compare the physical fitness scores of different grades in the same major. Independent sample t-tests were utilized to compare the differences in every physical fitness indicator for different majors. Pearson's correlations among 12 majors for every grade were conducted to study the significant corrections between the two physical fitness indicators. The body mass index (BMI) and physical fitness indicator (PFI) for college students of different grade were investigated using a nonlinear regression model. The current state of physical fitness among college students is concerning, as the majority of students were barely passing (with a passing rate of 75.3%). Specifically, junior students exhibited lower scores than freshman and sophomore students across all 12 majors. From freshman to junior year, majors of music (78.01±4.58), English (79.29±5.03), and education (76.26±4.81) had the highest scores, respectively, but major art consistently scored the lowest, which were 73.85±6.02, 74.97±5.53, and 72.59±4.84, respectively. Pairwise comparisons revealed more significant differences in individual physical fitness indicators among the three grades in humanities than in sciences. Pearson's correlations showed significant correlations among seven physical fitness indicators in all three grades. PFI had a parabolic trend with BMI both for boy and girl college students in Jiangxi province. The physical fitness indicators of college students in Jiangxi province significantly differed in grades and majors, showing undesirable phenomena. The physical fitness of senior and humanities major college students was much weaker and needs sufficient attention. The relationship between BMI and PFI presented an inverted "U"-shaped change characteristic. Continued nationwide interventions are needed to promote physical activity and other healthy lifestyle behaviors in China.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Fatigue tests</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Life style</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Fitness - physiology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Sedentary behavior</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2LEzEUhgdR3HX1H4gGBNGL1mQyycxcSVn8WFlY8Os2pJmTNiWTjEmmbP-9KZ1dWtkLyUW-nvecnJO3KF4SPCe0Jh82fgxO2vngHcwxxU3V0EfFOWlpOeMlpo-P1mfFsxg3GDPacP60OKNtRShuy_MiLZDy_SCDTGYLKKax2yHvUFoDGta7aJS0SJvkIEbkdYathdUBBJci0sH3qDNaQ8h7tAqyg4ik61AvNz5EZBz6ZqRb3Ro0BL81TsHz4omWNsKLab4ofn3-9PPy6-z65svV5eJ6phjmaVbxtlGtqhllZaVgKTWvCLCSadZy3ZCSA2W44UqSjjYtA6ZLyWpFcdWUtFvSi-L1Ie5gfRRTw6KghNSU1WVNMvFxIsZlD53KJQRpxRBML8NOeGnE6Y0za7HyW0FIzsFbliO8myIE_2eEmERvogJrpQM_HpJxUmG2T_bmH_ThJ03USloQxmmfE6t9ULHINVec47LO1PwBKo8OeqOyJbTJ5yeC9yeCzCS4TSs5xiiufnz_f_bm9yn79ohdg7RpHb0dk_EunoLVAVTBxxhA33eZYLF39F03xN7RYnJ0lr06_qF70Z2F6V8evPEv</recordid><startdate>20241016</startdate><enddate>20241016</enddate><creator>Sun, Jianzhong</creator><creator>Lin, Chan</creator><creator>Wang, Lei</creator><creator>Bi, Cunjian</creator><creator>Qiao, Bin</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-9850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241016</creationdate><title>A comparative study on the physical fitness of college students from different grades and majors in Jiangxi province</title><author>Sun, Jianzhong ; Lin, Chan ; Wang, Lei ; Bi, Cunjian ; Qiao, Bin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-4698c9c753524cebaf641e525f596f8126e35086ca1d3895e5f2a57c304823db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Fatigue tests</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Life style</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Fitness - physiology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Sedentary behavior</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jianzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bi, Cunjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Bin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Jianzhong</au><au>Lin, Chan</au><au>Wang, Lei</au><au>Bi, Cunjian</au><au>Qiao, Bin</au><au>Vall-llosera Camps, Miquel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on the physical fitness of college students from different grades and majors in Jiangxi province</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-10-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0308483</spage><pages>e0308483-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Research to date has not provided a clear understanding of how different grades and majors affect the physical fitness of college students. It is postulated that there are significant disparities in physical health among college students of different grades and majors. The purpose of this study was to evidence these health disparities and to engage in an extensive analysis and discussion thereof. A sample of 8,772 (2,404 boys and 6,368 girls) Chinese college students from freshman to junior years, aged 17-22, including 12 different majors in four colleges, were recruited in Jiangxi Province. All seven physical fitness indicators (body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity, 50-m dash, standing long jump, sit and reach, upper body muscle strength, and endurance runs) were conducted for all participants. One-way ANOVA and LSD tests were conducted to compare the physical fitness scores of different grades in the same major. Independent sample t-tests were utilized to compare the differences in every physical fitness indicator for different majors. Pearson's correlations among 12 majors for every grade were conducted to study the significant corrections between the two physical fitness indicators. The body mass index (BMI) and physical fitness indicator (PFI) for college students of different grade were investigated using a nonlinear regression model. The current state of physical fitness among college students is concerning, as the majority of students were barely passing (with a passing rate of 75.3%). Specifically, junior students exhibited lower scores than freshman and sophomore students across all 12 majors. From freshman to junior year, majors of music (78.01±4.58), English (79.29±5.03), and education (76.26±4.81) had the highest scores, respectively, but major art consistently scored the lowest, which were 73.85±6.02, 74.97±5.53, and 72.59±4.84, respectively. Pairwise comparisons revealed more significant differences in individual physical fitness indicators among the three grades in humanities than in sciences. Pearson's correlations showed significant correlations among seven physical fitness indicators in all three grades. PFI had a parabolic trend with BMI both for boy and girl college students in Jiangxi province. The physical fitness indicators of college students in Jiangxi province significantly differed in grades and majors, showing undesirable phenomena. The physical fitness of senior and humanities major college students was much weaker and needs sufficient attention. The relationship between BMI and PFI presented an inverted "U"-shaped change characteristic. Continued nationwide interventions are needed to promote physical activity and other healthy lifestyle behaviors in China.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39413092</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0308483</doi><tpages>e0308483</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-9850</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2024-10, Vol.19 (10), p.e0308483
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3117357271
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adolescent
Biology and Life Sciences
Body Mass Index
Body size
China
College students
Colleges & universities
Comparative studies
Correlation
Exercise
Fatigue tests
Female
Health aspects
Health disparities
Humans
Indicators
Life style
Male
Medicine and Health Sciences
Muscle strength
Muscle Strength - physiology
Obesity
Physical activity
Physical fitness
Physical Fitness - physiology
Physiological aspects
Regression models
Sedentary behavior
Social aspects
Social Sciences
Students
Universities
Variance analysis
Young Adult
title A comparative study on the physical fitness of college students from different grades and majors in Jiangxi province
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20the%20physical%20fitness%20of%20college%20students%20from%20different%20grades%20and%20majors%20in%20Jiangxi%20province&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sun,%20Jianzhong&rft.date=2024-10-16&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0308483&rft.pages=e0308483-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0308483&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA812466027%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3117357271&rft_id=info:pmid/39413092&rft_galeid=A812466027&rfr_iscdi=true