Differential induction of defense genes in hexaploid wheat roots by the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei

Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei are among the most destructive root lesion nematodes of wheat in the Pacific Northwest, United States of America and throughout the world. The aim of this study was to determine whether both nematode species were similar in their ability to induce defense genes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2024-08, Vol.19 (8), p.e0306533
Hauptverfasser: Okubara, Patricia A, Sharpe, Richard M, Peetz, Amy B, Li, Xianran, Zasada, Inga A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0306533
container_title PloS one
container_volume 19
creator Okubara, Patricia A
Sharpe, Richard M
Peetz, Amy B
Li, Xianran
Zasada, Inga A
description Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei are among the most destructive root lesion nematodes of wheat in the Pacific Northwest, United States of America and throughout the world. The aim of this study was to determine whether both nematode species were similar in their ability to induce defense genes in roots of wheat genotype Scarlet, and whether a combination of both species induced a different pattern of gene induction than each species alone. The long-term aspect of the research was to identify nematode-inducible promoters for deploying defense genes in roots in breeding programs. The root transcriptomes of genotype Scarlet were obtained after a one-week infection period with each nematode species separately, or both species combined. Root defense gene expression was induced for all three treatments relative to the no-nematode control, but P. thornei affected expression to a greater extent compared to P. neglectus. The species combination induced the highest number of defense genes. This result was not predicted from nematode enumeration studies, in which P. thornei colonization was substantially lower than that of P. neglectus, and the nematode combination did not show a significant difference. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays for Dehydrin2, Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, 1-cys-Peroxiredoxin, Pathogenesis-related protein 1 and Late embryogenesis-abundant proteins 76 and group 3 authenticated the induction observed in the transcriptome data. In addition, a near-isogenic line of Scarlet harboring genetic resistance to fungal soilborne pathogens, called Scarlet-Rz1, showed similar or higher levels of defense gene expression compared to fungus-susceptible Scarlet in qRT-PCR assays. Finally, transcriptome expression patterns revealed nematode-inducible promoters that are responsive to both P. neglectus and P. thornei.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0306533
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3098716097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A806591337</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_39b0f61961e84945b9ec95e51c504953</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A806591337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-4d3cdbffd5cd598c5d256339cb4f85c39cd9d70f91a3b7eb27ffbd5bbe44ec6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEomXhDRBEQkJw2MWO4yQ-oap8rVSpFV9Xy7HHWVdZe2s70H0CXhtvN602qAfkg0fj33_sGc9k2XOMFpjU-N2lG7wV_WLjLCwQQRUl5EF2jBkp5lWByMMD-yh7EsIlQpQ0VfU4OyKsQA0pyuPszwejNXiw0Yg-N1YNMhpnc6dzBRpsgLwDCyEd5Su4FpveGZX_XoGIuXcuhrzd5nEF-aYXNs43wotgopG5hbWITiXlhRdx24OVqyEkd9eDjMkSVuUXi6R13oJ5mj3Sog_wbNxn2Y9PH7-ffpmfnX9enp6czSWtizgvFZGq1VpRqShrJFUFrQhhsi11Q2UyFFM10gwL0tbQFrXWraJtC2UJstJklr3cx02JBD7WMHCCWFPjCrE6Ecs9oZy45Btv1sJvuROG3zic77jwKcMeOGEt0hVmFYamZCVtGUhGgWJJUcnSf8yy9-NtQ7sGJVOZvegnQacn1qx4535xjEmFqwanCG_GCN5dDRAiX5sgoU_VBjfcPJzVjOGCJfTVP-j96Y1UJ1IGxmqXLpa7oPykSU3EMCE7anEPlZaCtZGp47RJ_ong7USQmAjXsRNDCHz57ev_s-c_p-zrAza1XR9XwfXDrknDFCz3oPQuBA_6rsoY8d3A3FaD7waGjwOTZC8Of-hOdDsh5C8bShNb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098716097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential induction of defense genes in hexaploid wheat roots by the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Okubara, Patricia A ; Sharpe, Richard M ; Peetz, Amy B ; Li, Xianran ; Zasada, Inga A</creator><contributor>Shokoohi, Ebrahim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Okubara, Patricia A ; Sharpe, Richard M ; Peetz, Amy B ; Li, Xianran ; Zasada, Inga A ; Shokoohi, Ebrahim</creatorcontrib><description>Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei are among the most destructive root lesion nematodes of wheat in the Pacific Northwest, United States of America and throughout the world. The aim of this study was to determine whether both nematode species were similar in their ability to induce defense genes in roots of wheat genotype Scarlet, and whether a combination of both species induced a different pattern of gene induction than each species alone. The long-term aspect of the research was to identify nematode-inducible promoters for deploying defense genes in roots in breeding programs. The root transcriptomes of genotype Scarlet were obtained after a one-week infection period with each nematode species separately, or both species combined. Root defense gene expression was induced for all three treatments relative to the no-nematode control, but P. thornei affected expression to a greater extent compared to P. neglectus. The species combination induced the highest number of defense genes. This result was not predicted from nematode enumeration studies, in which P. thornei colonization was substantially lower than that of P. neglectus, and the nematode combination did not show a significant difference. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays for Dehydrin2, Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, 1-cys-Peroxiredoxin, Pathogenesis-related protein 1 and Late embryogenesis-abundant proteins 76 and group 3 authenticated the induction observed in the transcriptome data. In addition, a near-isogenic line of Scarlet harboring genetic resistance to fungal soilborne pathogens, called Scarlet-Rz1, showed similar or higher levels of defense gene expression compared to fungus-susceptible Scarlet in qRT-PCR assays. Finally, transcriptome expression patterns revealed nematode-inducible promoters that are responsive to both P. neglectus and P. thornei.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306533</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39208324</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Breeding ; Cold ; Crop rotation ; Cultivars ; Defense ; Diseases and pests ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Embryogenesis ; Embryonic growth stage ; Enumeration ; Experiments ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant ; Genes ; Genetic aspects ; Genotypes ; Glucan ; Glucan 1,3-b-glucosidase ; Glucosidase ; Growth ; Host-Parasite Interactions - genetics ; Kinases ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Nematodes ; Pathogenesis ; Pathogens ; People and places ; Peroxiredoxin ; Plant Diseases - genetics ; Plant Diseases - parasitology ; Plant Roots - genetics ; Plant Roots - parasitology ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polyploidy ; Pratylenchus neglectus ; Prevention ; Promoters ; Proteins ; Risk factors ; Roots ; Roundworm infections ; Salinity ; Species ; Transcriptome ; Transcriptomes ; Triticum - genetics ; Triticum - parasitology ; Tylenchoidea - physiology ; Variance analysis ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-08, Vol.19 (8), p.e0306533</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-4d3cdbffd5cd598c5d256339cb4f85c39cd9d70f91a3b7eb27ffbd5bbe44ec6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4252-6911 ; 0000-0002-8513-4862</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361681/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361681/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23870,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39208324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Shokoohi, Ebrahim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Okubara, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peetz, Amy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xianran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zasada, Inga A</creatorcontrib><title>Differential induction of defense genes in hexaploid wheat roots by the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei are among the most destructive root lesion nematodes of wheat in the Pacific Northwest, United States of America and throughout the world. The aim of this study was to determine whether both nematode species were similar in their ability to induce defense genes in roots of wheat genotype Scarlet, and whether a combination of both species induced a different pattern of gene induction than each species alone. The long-term aspect of the research was to identify nematode-inducible promoters for deploying defense genes in roots in breeding programs. The root transcriptomes of genotype Scarlet were obtained after a one-week infection period with each nematode species separately, or both species combined. Root defense gene expression was induced for all three treatments relative to the no-nematode control, but P. thornei affected expression to a greater extent compared to P. neglectus. The species combination induced the highest number of defense genes. This result was not predicted from nematode enumeration studies, in which P. thornei colonization was substantially lower than that of P. neglectus, and the nematode combination did not show a significant difference. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays for Dehydrin2, Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, 1-cys-Peroxiredoxin, Pathogenesis-related protein 1 and Late embryogenesis-abundant proteins 76 and group 3 authenticated the induction observed in the transcriptome data. In addition, a near-isogenic line of Scarlet harboring genetic resistance to fungal soilborne pathogens, called Scarlet-Rz1, showed similar or higher levels of defense gene expression compared to fungus-susceptible Scarlet in qRT-PCR assays. Finally, transcriptome expression patterns revealed nematode-inducible promoters that are responsive to both P. neglectus and P. thornei.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>Diseases and pests</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Embryogenesis</subject><subject>Embryonic growth stage</subject><subject>Enumeration</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Glucan</subject><subject>Glucan 1,3-b-glucosidase</subject><subject>Glucosidase</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Host-Parasite Interactions - genetics</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Pathogenesis</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Peroxiredoxin</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Plant Roots - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Roots - parasitology</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polyploidy</subject><subject>Pratylenchus neglectus</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Promoters</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Roundworm infections</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Transcriptome</subject><subject>Transcriptomes</subject><subject>Triticum - genetics</subject><subject>Triticum - parasitology</subject><subject>Tylenchoidea - physiology</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk81u1DAQxyMEomXhDRBEQkJw2MWO4yQ-oap8rVSpFV9Xy7HHWVdZe2s70H0CXhtvN602qAfkg0fj33_sGc9k2XOMFpjU-N2lG7wV_WLjLCwQQRUl5EF2jBkp5lWByMMD-yh7EsIlQpQ0VfU4OyKsQA0pyuPszwejNXiw0Yg-N1YNMhpnc6dzBRpsgLwDCyEd5Su4FpveGZX_XoGIuXcuhrzd5nEF-aYXNs43wotgopG5hbWITiXlhRdx24OVqyEkd9eDjMkSVuUXi6R13oJ5mj3Sog_wbNxn2Y9PH7-ffpmfnX9enp6czSWtizgvFZGq1VpRqShrJFUFrQhhsi11Q2UyFFM10gwL0tbQFrXWraJtC2UJstJklr3cx02JBD7WMHCCWFPjCrE6Ecs9oZy45Btv1sJvuROG3zic77jwKcMeOGEt0hVmFYamZCVtGUhGgWJJUcnSf8yy9-NtQ7sGJVOZvegnQacn1qx4535xjEmFqwanCG_GCN5dDRAiX5sgoU_VBjfcPJzVjOGCJfTVP-j96Y1UJ1IGxmqXLpa7oPykSU3EMCE7anEPlZaCtZGp47RJ_ong7USQmAjXsRNDCHz57ev_s-c_p-zrAza1XR9XwfXDrknDFCz3oPQuBA_6rsoY8d3A3FaD7waGjwOTZC8Of-hOdDsh5C8bShNb</recordid><startdate>20240829</startdate><enddate>20240829</enddate><creator>Okubara, Patricia A</creator><creator>Sharpe, Richard M</creator><creator>Peetz, Amy B</creator><creator>Li, Xianran</creator><creator>Zasada, Inga A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6911</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-4862</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240829</creationdate><title>Differential induction of defense genes in hexaploid wheat roots by the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei</title><author>Okubara, Patricia A ; Sharpe, Richard M ; Peetz, Amy B ; Li, Xianran ; Zasada, Inga A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-4d3cdbffd5cd598c5d256339cb4f85c39cd9d70f91a3b7eb27ffbd5bbe44ec6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>Diseases and pests</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Embryogenesis</topic><topic>Embryonic growth stage</topic><topic>Enumeration</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Glucan</topic><topic>Glucan 1,3-b-glucosidase</topic><topic>Glucosidase</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Host-Parasite Interactions - genetics</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Pathogenesis</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Peroxiredoxin</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Plant Roots - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Roots - parasitology</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polyploidy</topic><topic>Pratylenchus neglectus</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Promoters</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Roundworm infections</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Transcriptome</topic><topic>Transcriptomes</topic><topic>Triticum - genetics</topic><topic>Triticum - parasitology</topic><topic>Tylenchoidea - physiology</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Okubara, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peetz, Amy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xianran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zasada, Inga A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Okubara, Patricia A</au><au>Sharpe, Richard M</au><au>Peetz, Amy B</au><au>Li, Xianran</au><au>Zasada, Inga A</au><au>Shokoohi, Ebrahim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential induction of defense genes in hexaploid wheat roots by the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-08-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0306533</spage><pages>e0306533-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei are among the most destructive root lesion nematodes of wheat in the Pacific Northwest, United States of America and throughout the world. The aim of this study was to determine whether both nematode species were similar in their ability to induce defense genes in roots of wheat genotype Scarlet, and whether a combination of both species induced a different pattern of gene induction than each species alone. The long-term aspect of the research was to identify nematode-inducible promoters for deploying defense genes in roots in breeding programs. The root transcriptomes of genotype Scarlet were obtained after a one-week infection period with each nematode species separately, or both species combined. Root defense gene expression was induced for all three treatments relative to the no-nematode control, but P. thornei affected expression to a greater extent compared to P. neglectus. The species combination induced the highest number of defense genes. This result was not predicted from nematode enumeration studies, in which P. thornei colonization was substantially lower than that of P. neglectus, and the nematode combination did not show a significant difference. Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays for Dehydrin2, Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase, 1-cys-Peroxiredoxin, Pathogenesis-related protein 1 and Late embryogenesis-abundant proteins 76 and group 3 authenticated the induction observed in the transcriptome data. In addition, a near-isogenic line of Scarlet harboring genetic resistance to fungal soilborne pathogens, called Scarlet-Rz1, showed similar or higher levels of defense gene expression compared to fungus-susceptible Scarlet in qRT-PCR assays. Finally, transcriptome expression patterns revealed nematode-inducible promoters that are responsive to both P. neglectus and P. thornei.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39208324</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0306533</doi><tpages>e0306533</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6911</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-4862</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2024-08, Vol.19 (8), p.e0306533
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3098716097
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Animals
Biology and Life Sciences
Breeding
Cold
Crop rotation
Cultivars
Defense
Diseases and pests
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Embryogenesis
Embryonic growth stage
Enumeration
Experiments
Gene expression
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Genes
Genetic aspects
Genotypes
Glucan
Glucan 1,3-b-glucosidase
Glucosidase
Growth
Host-Parasite Interactions - genetics
Kinases
Medicine and Health Sciences
Nematodes
Pathogenesis
Pathogens
People and places
Peroxiredoxin
Plant Diseases - genetics
Plant Diseases - parasitology
Plant Roots - genetics
Plant Roots - parasitology
Polymerase chain reaction
Polyploidy
Pratylenchus neglectus
Prevention
Promoters
Proteins
Risk factors
Roots
Roundworm infections
Salinity
Species
Transcriptome
Transcriptomes
Triticum - genetics
Triticum - parasitology
Tylenchoidea - physiology
Variance analysis
Wheat
title Differential induction of defense genes in hexaploid wheat roots by the plant-parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20induction%20of%20defense%20genes%20in%20hexaploid%20wheat%20roots%20by%20the%20plant-parasitic%20nematodes%20Pratylenchus%20neglectus%20and%20P.%20thornei&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Okubara,%20Patricia%20A&rft.date=2024-08-29&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0306533&rft.pages=e0306533-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0306533&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA806591337%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098716097&rft_id=info:pmid/39208324&rft_galeid=A806591337&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_39b0f61961e84945b9ec95e51c504953&rfr_iscdi=true