Comparing birth experiences and satisfaction with midwifery care before and after the implementation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU)

Globally, midwifery-led birthing units are associated with favourable clinical outcomes and positive birth experiences. As part of our evaluation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU) at Markham Stouffville Hospital, we sought to explore and compare birth experiences and satisfaction...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2024-08, Vol.19 (8), p.e0306916
Hauptverfasser: Murray-Davis, Beth, Grenier, Lindsay N, Li, Jenifer, Malott, Anne M, Mattison, Cristina A, Cameron, Carol, Hutton, Eileen K, Darling, Elizabeth K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0306916
container_title PloS one
container_volume 19
creator Murray-Davis, Beth
Grenier, Lindsay N
Li, Jenifer
Malott, Anne M
Mattison, Cristina A
Cameron, Carol
Hutton, Eileen K
Darling, Elizabeth K
description Globally, midwifery-led birthing units are associated with favourable clinical outcomes and positive birth experiences. As part of our evaluation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU) at Markham Stouffville Hospital, we sought to explore and compare birth experiences and satisfaction among midwifery clients who gave birth on the AMU with midwifery clients who gave birth on the traditional obstetric unit prior to AMU implementation. We conducted a structured, online, cross-sectional survey of midwifery clients in the six months before, and up to 18 months after, opening of the AMU at Markham Stouffville Hospital, Ontario Canada. The survey contained validated measures of satisfaction including personal capacity and participation; perceived safety, control, and security; professional support; and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were completed in SPSS. A total of 193 responses were included in our analyses (pre-AMU n = 47, post-AMU n = 146). All participants had positive experiences in the four domains assessed. Compared to those who gave birth with midwives on the Labour unit, those who gave birth on the AMU indicated more positive experiences for some measures. Perceptions pertaining to being an active participant in care, to security and sense of control were more positive among those who gave birth on the AMU. The AMU in Ontario is associated with high levels of satisfaction during birth, particularly the perception of being actively engaged in decision making, having a sense of control and safety, and having confidence in the care provider team. Care received on the AMU does not compromise birth experiences or satisfaction and may be associated with greater autonomy and agency for the person giving birth.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0306916
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3095463288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A805636234</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3afced2376254782a47dd95fb4f2efd2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A805636234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-1bb4593651b2089cb396991bc21162457e00fdc5efc0f64cf61ef306b73a1c2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk81uEzEUhUcIREvgDRBYQoJ2keCfGc_MCkURP5FaVQLC1vJ4rhNHM3ZqO7R9EN4Xp0mjBHWBvLBlf-fYPvbNstcEjwgrycelW3sru9HKWRhhhnlN-JPslNSMDjnF7OnB-CR7EcIS44JVnD_PTlhiy6Kmp9mfietX0hs7R43xcYHgdgXegFUQkLQtCjKaoKWKxll0YxLRm_bGaPB3SEkPqAHtUrdhpY7gUVwAMv2qgx5slPc6p9FEWtnKDwFp40NE487ZeTAtoMu93cyaiM7Gl7Pzl9kzLbsAr3b9IJt9-fxz8m14cfV1OhlfDFVBeRySpsmLmvGCNBRXtWpYzeuaNIoSwmlelICxblUBWmHNc6U5AZ2SakomiaKKDbK3W99V54LYJRoEw3WRc0arKhHTLdE6uRQrb3rp74STRtxPOD8X0kejOhBMagUtZSWnRV5WVOZl29aFbnJNQaeFQfZpt9u66aFVKR4vuyPT4xVrFmLufgtCGKtyViaHs52Dd9drCFH0JijoOmnBrbcHTw-bM5LQd_-gj19vR81luoGx2qWN1cZUjCtccMYpyxM1eoRKrYXeqPT_tEnzR4LzI0FiItzGuVyHIKY_vv8_e_XrmH1_wC5AdnERXLfefLJwDOZbUHkXgge9T5lgsSmfhzTEpnzErnyS7M3hC-1FD_XC_gITbxaL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3095463288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing birth experiences and satisfaction with midwifery care before and after the implementation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU)</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Murray-Davis, Beth ; Grenier, Lindsay N ; Li, Jenifer ; Malott, Anne M ; Mattison, Cristina A ; Cameron, Carol ; Hutton, Eileen K ; Darling, Elizabeth K</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray-Davis, Beth ; Grenier, Lindsay N ; Li, Jenifer ; Malott, Anne M ; Mattison, Cristina A ; Cameron, Carol ; Hutton, Eileen K ; Darling, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><description>Globally, midwifery-led birthing units are associated with favourable clinical outcomes and positive birth experiences. As part of our evaluation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU) at Markham Stouffville Hospital, we sought to explore and compare birth experiences and satisfaction among midwifery clients who gave birth on the AMU with midwifery clients who gave birth on the traditional obstetric unit prior to AMU implementation. We conducted a structured, online, cross-sectional survey of midwifery clients in the six months before, and up to 18 months after, opening of the AMU at Markham Stouffville Hospital, Ontario Canada. The survey contained validated measures of satisfaction including personal capacity and participation; perceived safety, control, and security; professional support; and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were completed in SPSS. A total of 193 responses were included in our analyses (pre-AMU n = 47, post-AMU n = 146). All participants had positive experiences in the four domains assessed. Compared to those who gave birth with midwives on the Labour unit, those who gave birth on the AMU indicated more positive experiences for some measures. Perceptions pertaining to being an active participant in care, to security and sense of control were more positive among those who gave birth on the AMU. The AMU in Ontario is associated with high levels of satisfaction during birth, particularly the perception of being actively engaged in decision making, having a sense of control and safety, and having confidence in the care provider team. Care received on the AMU does not compromise birth experiences or satisfaction and may be associated with greater autonomy and agency for the person giving birth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306916</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39167592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Attended births ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth ; Births ; Canada ; Childbirth ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Clients ; Continuity of care ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision making ; Delivery, Obstetric - psychology ; Demographics ; Female ; Hospitalists ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Midwifery ; Midwives ; Obstetrics ; Ontario ; Participation ; Parturition - psychology ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Practice ; Pregnancy ; Primary care ; Public opinion ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research ethics ; Security ; Social Sciences ; Statistical tests ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-08, Vol.19 (8), p.e0306916</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Murray-Davis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Murray-Davis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Murray-Davis et al 2024 Murray-Davis et al</rights><rights>2024 Murray-Davis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-1bb4593651b2089cb396991bc21162457e00fdc5efc0f64cf61ef306b73a1c2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9963-7313 ; 0000-0003-2697-9686</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338437/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338437/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39167592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray-Davis, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenier, Lindsay N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jenifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malott, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattison, Cristina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutton, Eileen K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing birth experiences and satisfaction with midwifery care before and after the implementation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU)</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Globally, midwifery-led birthing units are associated with favourable clinical outcomes and positive birth experiences. As part of our evaluation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU) at Markham Stouffville Hospital, we sought to explore and compare birth experiences and satisfaction among midwifery clients who gave birth on the AMU with midwifery clients who gave birth on the traditional obstetric unit prior to AMU implementation. We conducted a structured, online, cross-sectional survey of midwifery clients in the six months before, and up to 18 months after, opening of the AMU at Markham Stouffville Hospital, Ontario Canada. The survey contained validated measures of satisfaction including personal capacity and participation; perceived safety, control, and security; professional support; and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were completed in SPSS. A total of 193 responses were included in our analyses (pre-AMU n = 47, post-AMU n = 146). All participants had positive experiences in the four domains assessed. Compared to those who gave birth with midwives on the Labour unit, those who gave birth on the AMU indicated more positive experiences for some measures. Perceptions pertaining to being an active participant in care, to security and sense of control were more positive among those who gave birth on the AMU. The AMU in Ontario is associated with high levels of satisfaction during birth, particularly the perception of being actively engaged in decision making, having a sense of control and safety, and having confidence in the care provider team. Care received on the AMU does not compromise birth experiences or satisfaction and may be associated with greater autonomy and agency for the person giving birth.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attended births</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Clients</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - psychology</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalists</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Midwives</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Parturition - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk81uEzEUhUcIREvgDRBYQoJ2keCfGc_MCkURP5FaVQLC1vJ4rhNHM3ZqO7R9EN4Xp0mjBHWBvLBlf-fYPvbNstcEjwgrycelW3sru9HKWRhhhnlN-JPslNSMDjnF7OnB-CR7EcIS44JVnD_PTlhiy6Kmp9mfietX0hs7R43xcYHgdgXegFUQkLQtCjKaoKWKxll0YxLRm_bGaPB3SEkPqAHtUrdhpY7gUVwAMv2qgx5slPc6p9FEWtnKDwFp40NE487ZeTAtoMu93cyaiM7Gl7Pzl9kzLbsAr3b9IJt9-fxz8m14cfV1OhlfDFVBeRySpsmLmvGCNBRXtWpYzeuaNIoSwmlelICxblUBWmHNc6U5AZ2SakomiaKKDbK3W99V54LYJRoEw3WRc0arKhHTLdE6uRQrb3rp74STRtxPOD8X0kejOhBMagUtZSWnRV5WVOZl29aFbnJNQaeFQfZpt9u66aFVKR4vuyPT4xVrFmLufgtCGKtyViaHs52Dd9drCFH0JijoOmnBrbcHTw-bM5LQd_-gj19vR81luoGx2qWN1cZUjCtccMYpyxM1eoRKrYXeqPT_tEnzR4LzI0FiItzGuVyHIKY_vv8_e_XrmH1_wC5AdnERXLfefLJwDOZbUHkXgge9T5lgsSmfhzTEpnzErnyS7M3hC-1FD_XC_gITbxaL</recordid><startdate>20240821</startdate><enddate>20240821</enddate><creator>Murray-Davis, Beth</creator><creator>Grenier, Lindsay N</creator><creator>Li, Jenifer</creator><creator>Malott, Anne M</creator><creator>Mattison, Cristina A</creator><creator>Cameron, Carol</creator><creator>Hutton, Eileen K</creator><creator>Darling, Elizabeth K</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9963-7313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-9686</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240821</creationdate><title>Comparing birth experiences and satisfaction with midwifery care before and after the implementation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU)</title><author>Murray-Davis, Beth ; Grenier, Lindsay N ; Li, Jenifer ; Malott, Anne M ; Mattison, Cristina A ; Cameron, Carol ; Hutton, Eileen K ; Darling, Elizabeth K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-1bb4593651b2089cb396991bc21162457e00fdc5efc0f64cf61ef306b73a1c2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attended births</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Clients</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - psychology</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalists</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Midwives</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Parturition - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray-Davis, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grenier, Lindsay N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jenifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malott, Anne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattison, Cristina A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutton, Eileen K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darling, Elizabeth K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray-Davis, Beth</au><au>Grenier, Lindsay N</au><au>Li, Jenifer</au><au>Malott, Anne M</au><au>Mattison, Cristina A</au><au>Cameron, Carol</au><au>Hutton, Eileen K</au><au>Darling, Elizabeth K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing birth experiences and satisfaction with midwifery care before and after the implementation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-08-21</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0306916</spage><pages>e0306916-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Globally, midwifery-led birthing units are associated with favourable clinical outcomes and positive birth experiences. As part of our evaluation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU) at Markham Stouffville Hospital, we sought to explore and compare birth experiences and satisfaction among midwifery clients who gave birth on the AMU with midwifery clients who gave birth on the traditional obstetric unit prior to AMU implementation. We conducted a structured, online, cross-sectional survey of midwifery clients in the six months before, and up to 18 months after, opening of the AMU at Markham Stouffville Hospital, Ontario Canada. The survey contained validated measures of satisfaction including personal capacity and participation; perceived safety, control, and security; professional support; and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and tests of significance were completed in SPSS. A total of 193 responses were included in our analyses (pre-AMU n = 47, post-AMU n = 146). All participants had positive experiences in the four domains assessed. Compared to those who gave birth with midwives on the Labour unit, those who gave birth on the AMU indicated more positive experiences for some measures. Perceptions pertaining to being an active participant in care, to security and sense of control were more positive among those who gave birth on the AMU. The AMU in Ontario is associated with high levels of satisfaction during birth, particularly the perception of being actively engaged in decision making, having a sense of control and safety, and having confidence in the care provider team. Care received on the AMU does not compromise birth experiences or satisfaction and may be associated with greater autonomy and agency for the person giving birth.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39167592</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0306916</doi><tpages>e0306916</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9963-7313</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-9686</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2024-08, Vol.19 (8), p.e0306916
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3095463288
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Analysis
Attended births
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Biology and Life Sciences
Birth
Births
Canada
Childbirth
Childbirth & labor
Clients
Continuity of care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision making
Delivery, Obstetric - psychology
Demographics
Female
Hospitalists
Hospitals
Humans
Medicine and Health Sciences
Midwifery
Midwives
Obstetrics
Ontario
Participation
Parturition - psychology
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Practice
Pregnancy
Primary care
Public opinion
Research and Analysis Methods
Research ethics
Security
Social Sciences
Statistical tests
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Comparing birth experiences and satisfaction with midwifery care before and after the implementation of Canada's first Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20birth%20experiences%20and%20satisfaction%20with%20midwifery%20care%20before%20and%20after%20the%20implementation%20of%20Canada's%20first%20Alongside%20Midwifery%20Unit%20(AMU)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Murray-Davis,%20Beth&rft.date=2024-08-21&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0306916&rft.pages=e0306916-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0306916&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA805636234%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3095463288&rft_id=info:pmid/39167592&rft_galeid=A805636234&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3afced2376254782a47dd95fb4f2efd2&rfr_iscdi=true