Challenges in clinical diagnosis of Clade I Mpox: Highlighting the need for enhanced diagnostic approaches

Due to limited diagnostic capacity and availability of point-of-care tests, diagnosis of Clade I mpox in the geographical regions most affected is usually on clinical grounds. This may be complicated due to the similarity between mpox and varicella (chickenpox) lesions. Visual assessment of lesions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2024-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0012087
Hauptverfasser: Bourner, Josephine, Garcia-Gallo, Esteban, Mbrenga, Festus, Boum, 2nd, Yap, Nakouné, Emmanuel, Paterson, Amy, Jones, Benjamin, Olliaro, Piero, Rojek, Amanda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0012087
container_title PLoS neglected tropical diseases
container_volume 18
creator Bourner, Josephine
Garcia-Gallo, Esteban
Mbrenga, Festus
Boum, 2nd, Yap
Nakouné, Emmanuel
Paterson, Amy
Jones, Benjamin
Olliaro, Piero
Rojek, Amanda
description Due to limited diagnostic capacity and availability of point-of-care tests, diagnosis of Clade I mpox in the geographical regions most affected is usually on clinical grounds. This may be complicated due to the similarity between mpox and varicella (chickenpox) lesions. Visual assessment of lesions is also used for determining clinical progress and to assess patient outcomes in clinical trials. However, there has been no investigation into whether clinicians can (i) identify Clade I mpox compared to other viral lesions (ii) differentiate between Clade I mpox lesion stages. The objective of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability and agreement between clinicians assessing lesions in patients with Clade I mpox. We presented experienced clinicians with 17 images of Clade I mpox or varicella and asked them to independently indicate the most likely diagnosis-mpox or varicella-and to categorise the lesions according to their stage. When selecting the most likely diagnosis, accuracy varied across all images, the inter-rater reliability was poor (κ = 0.223; z = 10.1) and agreement was moderate (Po = 68%). When categorising lesions according to their type, if a single lesion type was present in the image, inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.671, z = 40.6) and agreement was good (Po = 78%), but when multiple lesion types were shown in an image, both inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.153, z = 10.5) and agreement (Po = 29%) decreased substantially. This study demonstrates that there are presently limitations in using visual assessment to diagnose Clade I mpox and evaluate lesion stage and treatment outcomes, which have an impact on clinical practice, public health and clinical trials. More robust indicators and tools are required to inform clinical, public-health, and research priorities, but these must be implementable in countries affected by mpox.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012087
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3086959666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A799956098</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_43c065e9257b4aabbbe6d43cb9a5878f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A799956098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-23ca93cc33c8b2fcfaf6371ceda89d578d76fc31a76a8b11a0d25aeb6e1505893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgngzY9JM0sQbWQZ1B1a80etwmp62GTJJbTqi_96M011mZAkl7enzvueDUxQvGV0yXrH327gfA_jlEKZmSSkrqaoeFZdMc7EoKy4en7xfFM9S2lIqtFDsaXHBlc4eJbsstusevMfQYSIuEOtdcBY8aRx0ISaXSGzJ2kODZEO-DvH3B3Ljut7nZ3KhI1OPJCA2pI0jwdBDsPljVk_OEhiGMYLtMT0vnrTgE76Y76vix-dP39c3i9tvXzbr69uFFXQ1LUpuQXNrObeqLlvbQitzv9kWlG5EpZpKtpYzqCSomjGgTSkAa4lMUKE0vypeH30HH5OZx5QMp0pqoaWUmdgciSbC1gyj28H4x0Rw5l8gjp2BMRfv0ay4pVKgLkVVrwDqukbZ5GCtQahKtdnr45xtX--wsRimEfyZ6fmf4HrTxV-GsbKUlNHs8G52GOPPPabJ7Fyy6D0EjPtD4RXTWnPFMvrmP_Th9maqg9yBC23Mie3B1FxX2UlIqlWmlg9Q-TS4czYGbF2Onwnengh6BD_1Kfr95GJI5-DqCNoxpjRiez8NRs1hd--qNofdNfPuZtmr00nei-6Wlf8FmaHsJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086959666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges in clinical diagnosis of Clade I Mpox: Highlighting the need for enhanced diagnostic approaches</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Bourner, Josephine ; Garcia-Gallo, Esteban ; Mbrenga, Festus ; Boum, 2nd, Yap ; Nakouné, Emmanuel ; Paterson, Amy ; Jones, Benjamin ; Olliaro, Piero ; Rojek, Amanda</creator><contributor>Guo, Wen-Ping</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bourner, Josephine ; Garcia-Gallo, Esteban ; Mbrenga, Festus ; Boum, 2nd, Yap ; Nakouné, Emmanuel ; Paterson, Amy ; Jones, Benjamin ; Olliaro, Piero ; Rojek, Amanda ; Guo, Wen-Ping</creatorcontrib><description>Due to limited diagnostic capacity and availability of point-of-care tests, diagnosis of Clade I mpox in the geographical regions most affected is usually on clinical grounds. This may be complicated due to the similarity between mpox and varicella (chickenpox) lesions. Visual assessment of lesions is also used for determining clinical progress and to assess patient outcomes in clinical trials. However, there has been no investigation into whether clinicians can (i) identify Clade I mpox compared to other viral lesions (ii) differentiate between Clade I mpox lesion stages. The objective of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability and agreement between clinicians assessing lesions in patients with Clade I mpox. We presented experienced clinicians with 17 images of Clade I mpox or varicella and asked them to independently indicate the most likely diagnosis-mpox or varicella-and to categorise the lesions according to their stage. When selecting the most likely diagnosis, accuracy varied across all images, the inter-rater reliability was poor (κ = 0.223; z = 10.1) and agreement was moderate (Po = 68%). When categorising lesions according to their type, if a single lesion type was present in the image, inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.671, z = 40.6) and agreement was good (Po = 78%), but when multiple lesion types were shown in an image, both inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.153, z = 10.5) and agreement (Po = 29%) decreased substantially. This study demonstrates that there are presently limitations in using visual assessment to diagnose Clade I mpox and evaluate lesion stage and treatment outcomes, which have an impact on clinical practice, public health and clinical trials. More robust indicators and tools are required to inform clinical, public-health, and research priorities, but these must be implementable in countries affected by mpox.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38913721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Biology and life sciences ; Chicken pox ; Chickenpox ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Data collection ; Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Epidemics ; Human monkeypox ; Lesions ; Medical imaging ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methods ; Monkeypox ; Mpox ; Patients ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Public health ; Public opinion ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Varicella</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0012087</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Bourner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Bourner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Bourner et al 2024 Bourner et al</rights><rights>2024 Bourner et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-23ca93cc33c8b2fcfaf6371ceda89d578d76fc31a76a8b11a0d25aeb6e1505893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4687-8380</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226010/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226010/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38913721$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Guo, Wen-Ping</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bourner, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gallo, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbrenga, Festus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boum, 2nd, Yap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakouné, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olliaro, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojek, Amanda</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges in clinical diagnosis of Clade I Mpox: Highlighting the need for enhanced diagnostic approaches</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>Due to limited diagnostic capacity and availability of point-of-care tests, diagnosis of Clade I mpox in the geographical regions most affected is usually on clinical grounds. This may be complicated due to the similarity between mpox and varicella (chickenpox) lesions. Visual assessment of lesions is also used for determining clinical progress and to assess patient outcomes in clinical trials. However, there has been no investigation into whether clinicians can (i) identify Clade I mpox compared to other viral lesions (ii) differentiate between Clade I mpox lesion stages. The objective of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability and agreement between clinicians assessing lesions in patients with Clade I mpox. We presented experienced clinicians with 17 images of Clade I mpox or varicella and asked them to independently indicate the most likely diagnosis-mpox or varicella-and to categorise the lesions according to their stage. When selecting the most likely diagnosis, accuracy varied across all images, the inter-rater reliability was poor (κ = 0.223; z = 10.1) and agreement was moderate (Po = 68%). When categorising lesions according to their type, if a single lesion type was present in the image, inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.671, z = 40.6) and agreement was good (Po = 78%), but when multiple lesion types were shown in an image, both inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.153, z = 10.5) and agreement (Po = 29%) decreased substantially. This study demonstrates that there are presently limitations in using visual assessment to diagnose Clade I mpox and evaluate lesion stage and treatment outcomes, which have an impact on clinical practice, public health and clinical trials. More robust indicators and tools are required to inform clinical, public-health, and research priorities, but these must be implementable in countries affected by mpox.</description><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and life sciences</subject><subject>Chicken pox</subject><subject>Chickenpox</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Human monkeypox</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Monkeypox</subject><subject>Mpox</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Varicella</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgngzY9JM0sQbWQZ1B1a80etwmp62GTJJbTqi_96M011mZAkl7enzvueDUxQvGV0yXrH327gfA_jlEKZmSSkrqaoeFZdMc7EoKy4en7xfFM9S2lIqtFDsaXHBlc4eJbsstusevMfQYSIuEOtdcBY8aRx0ISaXSGzJ2kODZEO-DvH3B3Ljut7nZ3KhI1OPJCA2pI0jwdBDsPljVk_OEhiGMYLtMT0vnrTgE76Y76vix-dP39c3i9tvXzbr69uFFXQ1LUpuQXNrObeqLlvbQitzv9kWlG5EpZpKtpYzqCSomjGgTSkAa4lMUKE0vypeH30HH5OZx5QMp0pqoaWUmdgciSbC1gyj28H4x0Rw5l8gjp2BMRfv0ay4pVKgLkVVrwDqukbZ5GCtQahKtdnr45xtX--wsRimEfyZ6fmf4HrTxV-GsbKUlNHs8G52GOPPPabJ7Fyy6D0EjPtD4RXTWnPFMvrmP_Th9maqg9yBC23Mie3B1FxX2UlIqlWmlg9Q-TS4czYGbF2Onwnengh6BD_1Kfr95GJI5-DqCNoxpjRiez8NRs1hd--qNofdNfPuZtmr00nei-6Wlf8FmaHsJg</recordid><startdate>20240624</startdate><enddate>20240624</enddate><creator>Bourner, Josephine</creator><creator>Garcia-Gallo, Esteban</creator><creator>Mbrenga, Festus</creator><creator>Boum, 2nd, Yap</creator><creator>Nakouné, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Paterson, Amy</creator><creator>Jones, Benjamin</creator><creator>Olliaro, Piero</creator><creator>Rojek, Amanda</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-8380</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240624</creationdate><title>Challenges in clinical diagnosis of Clade I Mpox: Highlighting the need for enhanced diagnostic approaches</title><author>Bourner, Josephine ; Garcia-Gallo, Esteban ; Mbrenga, Festus ; Boum, 2nd, Yap ; Nakouné, Emmanuel ; Paterson, Amy ; Jones, Benjamin ; Olliaro, Piero ; Rojek, Amanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-23ca93cc33c8b2fcfaf6371ceda89d578d76fc31a76a8b11a0d25aeb6e1505893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and life sciences</topic><topic>Chicken pox</topic><topic>Chickenpox</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Human monkeypox</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Monkeypox</topic><topic>Mpox</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Varicella</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bourner, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gallo, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbrenga, Festus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boum, 2nd, Yap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakouné, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olliaro, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojek, Amanda</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bourner, Josephine</au><au>Garcia-Gallo, Esteban</au><au>Mbrenga, Festus</au><au>Boum, 2nd, Yap</au><au>Nakouné, Emmanuel</au><au>Paterson, Amy</au><au>Jones, Benjamin</au><au>Olliaro, Piero</au><au>Rojek, Amanda</au><au>Guo, Wen-Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges in clinical diagnosis of Clade I Mpox: Highlighting the need for enhanced diagnostic approaches</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2024-06-24</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0012087</spage><pages>e0012087-</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>Due to limited diagnostic capacity and availability of point-of-care tests, diagnosis of Clade I mpox in the geographical regions most affected is usually on clinical grounds. This may be complicated due to the similarity between mpox and varicella (chickenpox) lesions. Visual assessment of lesions is also used for determining clinical progress and to assess patient outcomes in clinical trials. However, there has been no investigation into whether clinicians can (i) identify Clade I mpox compared to other viral lesions (ii) differentiate between Clade I mpox lesion stages. The objective of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability and agreement between clinicians assessing lesions in patients with Clade I mpox. We presented experienced clinicians with 17 images of Clade I mpox or varicella and asked them to independently indicate the most likely diagnosis-mpox or varicella-and to categorise the lesions according to their stage. When selecting the most likely diagnosis, accuracy varied across all images, the inter-rater reliability was poor (κ = 0.223; z = 10.1) and agreement was moderate (Po = 68%). When categorising lesions according to their type, if a single lesion type was present in the image, inter-rater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.671, z = 40.6) and agreement was good (Po = 78%), but when multiple lesion types were shown in an image, both inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.153, z = 10.5) and agreement (Po = 29%) decreased substantially. This study demonstrates that there are presently limitations in using visual assessment to diagnose Clade I mpox and evaluate lesion stage and treatment outcomes, which have an impact on clinical practice, public health and clinical trials. More robust indicators and tools are required to inform clinical, public-health, and research priorities, but these must be implementable in countries affected by mpox.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38913721</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0012087</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-8380</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-2735
ispartof PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0012087
issn 1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3086959666
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Biology and life sciences
Chicken pox
Chickenpox
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Data collection
Diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Epidemics
Human monkeypox
Lesions
Medical imaging
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Medicine, Experimental
Methods
Monkeypox
Mpox
Patients
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Public health
Public opinion
Questionnaires
Reliability
Research and Analysis Methods
Varicella
title Challenges in clinical diagnosis of Clade I Mpox: Highlighting the need for enhanced diagnostic approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20in%20clinical%20diagnosis%20of%20Clade%20I%20Mpox:%20Highlighting%20the%20need%20for%20enhanced%20diagnostic%20approaches&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=Bourner,%20Josephine&rft.date=2024-06-24&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0012087&rft.pages=e0012087-&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012087&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA799956098%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086959666&rft_id=info:pmid/38913721&rft_galeid=A799956098&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_43c065e9257b4aabbbe6d43cb9a5878f&rfr_iscdi=true