Effects of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizer on potato and wheat yields under rotation cropping system
Integrated nutrient management and crop rotation are important farming practices, which enhance the nutrient use efficiency of crops and reduce the incidence of diseases and insect pests. The study was carried out to address the gap in using integrated nutrient management in crop rotation systems fo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0306625 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | e0306625 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Addis, Zelalem Amare, Tadele Kerebih, Bitewlgn Abewa, Anteneh Feyisa, Tesfaye Awoke, Abrham Tenagne, Abere |
| description | Integrated nutrient management and crop rotation are important farming practices, which enhance the nutrient use efficiency of crops and reduce the incidence of diseases and insect pests. The study was carried out to address the gap in using integrated nutrient management in crop rotation systems for soil qualities and crop yield improvement. That was done by adjusting the balance ratio of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizers. The experiment was containing ten levels; Control (0,0), recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry, 100% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry+25% recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry+50% recommended nitrogen, 25% dry-bio slurry+75% recommended nitrogen, 100% dry-bio slurry + 25% recommended nitrogen and 100% dry-bio slurry + 50% recommended nitrogen that was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications for three years. The data on soil properties and yield components of potatoes and wheat were collected and analyzed using statistical analysis system software 9.4. An application of dry bio-slurry with nitrogen fertilizer was significantly affected both crop yield and soil properties in the rotation system. The application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen gave the highest tuber yield of potato (27.6 tha-1) as compared to control. Similarly, using 100% and 75% sole dry bio-slurry resulted in the highest grain yield (3.85 tha-1) and above-ground biomass (9.59 tha-1) of wheat. The combination of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen scored the highest net benefit (2889.2 US$) with an acceptable marginal return (4463.3%) via by improving crops yield in the system. So, an application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen could be promoted for yield-soil improvement in the study area and similar agroecology. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0306625 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3086815748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A803346792</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b9990505b8e24825bcec00d1f94edf89</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A803346792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-3fe6eb37587a568ecfec780b7b6c8b0c5fa9fe6997acb58f87b14d25490392b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9-P1CAQxxuj8c7T_8BoExOjD7vSUlp4MpfLqZtccom_XglQ6LKy0AOqrn-9dLd32Zp7MDxAmM98mRlmsux5AZYFbIp3Gzd4y8yyd1YuAQR1XaIH2WlBYLmoSwAfHp1PsichbABAENf14-wEEoAhQuA0-3GplBQx5E7lrd_lXLtFMINPR2bb3OroXSdtrqSP2ug_0ufO5r2LLLo98WstWcx3Wpo25INtE-BHq06Y8K7vte3ysAtRbp9mjxQzQT6b9rPs24fLrxefFlfXH1cX51cLgZoyLqCSteSwQbhhqMZSpAAbDHjDa4E5EEgxkhBCGiY4wgo3vKjaElUEQFLyEp5lLw-6vXGBTnUKFAJc4wI1FU7E6kC0jm1o7_WW-R11TNP9hfMdZSlfYSTlhBCAAOJYlhUuERdSANAWilSyVZgkrffTawPfylZIGz0zM9G5xeo17dxPWhQlAfVe4c2k4N3NIEOkWx2ENIZZ6YZD4ARVVTmm9uof9P70JqpjKQNtlUsPi1GUnmMAYVU3ZNRa3kOl1cqtFqmrlE73M4e3M4fERPk7dmwIga6-fP5_9vr7nH19xKZ-MnEdnBnGHgpzsDqAqbFC8FLdVbkAdByK22rQcSjoNBTJ7cXxD9053U4B_AvxAQiO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086815748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizer on potato and wheat yields under rotation cropping system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Addis, Zelalem ; Amare, Tadele ; Kerebih, Bitewlgn ; Abewa, Anteneh ; Feyisa, Tesfaye ; Awoke, Abrham ; Tenagne, Abere</creator><contributor>Kumar, Ravinder</contributor><creatorcontrib>Addis, Zelalem ; Amare, Tadele ; Kerebih, Bitewlgn ; Abewa, Anteneh ; Feyisa, Tesfaye ; Awoke, Abrham ; Tenagne, Abere ; Kumar, Ravinder</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated nutrient management and crop rotation are important farming practices, which enhance the nutrient use efficiency of crops and reduce the incidence of diseases and insect pests. The study was carried out to address the gap in using integrated nutrient management in crop rotation systems for soil qualities and crop yield improvement. That was done by adjusting the balance ratio of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizers. The experiment was containing ten levels; Control (0,0), recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry, 100% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry+25% recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry+50% recommended nitrogen, 25% dry-bio slurry+75% recommended nitrogen, 100% dry-bio slurry + 25% recommended nitrogen and 100% dry-bio slurry + 50% recommended nitrogen that was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications for three years. The data on soil properties and yield components of potatoes and wheat were collected and analyzed using statistical analysis system software 9.4. An application of dry bio-slurry with nitrogen fertilizer was significantly affected both crop yield and soil properties in the rotation system. The application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen gave the highest tuber yield of potato (27.6 tha-1) as compared to control. Similarly, using 100% and 75% sole dry bio-slurry resulted in the highest grain yield (3.85 tha-1) and above-ground biomass (9.59 tha-1) of wheat. The combination of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen scored the highest net benefit (2889.2 US$) with an acceptable marginal return (4463.3%) via by improving crops yield in the system. So, an application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen could be promoted for yield-soil improvement in the study area and similar agroecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306625</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39083550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture - methods ; Agroecology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Corn ; Crop diseases ; Crop Production - methods ; Crop rotation ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; Crops, Agricultural - growth & development ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Fertilizers ; Fertilizers - analysis ; Insect pests ; Insects ; Manures ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Nitrogen fertilizers ; Nutrients ; Organic fertilizers ; Pests ; Physical Sciences ; Potatoes ; Productivity ; Slurries ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil analysis ; Soil fertility ; Soil improvement ; Soil properties ; Soil quality ; Solanum tuberosum - growth & development ; Solanum tuberosum - metabolism ; Sorghum ; Statistical analysis ; Triticum - growth & development ; Triticum - metabolism ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0306625</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Addis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Addis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Addis et al 2024 Addis et al</rights><rights>2024 Addis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-3fe6eb37587a568ecfec780b7b6c8b0c5fa9fe6997acb58f87b14d25490392b23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1869-8596</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290689/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290689/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2101,2927,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79471,79472</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39083550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kumar, Ravinder</contributor><creatorcontrib>Addis, Zelalem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amare, Tadele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerebih, Bitewlgn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abewa, Anteneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyisa, Tesfaye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awoke, Abrham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenagne, Abere</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizer on potato and wheat yields under rotation cropping system</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Integrated nutrient management and crop rotation are important farming practices, which enhance the nutrient use efficiency of crops and reduce the incidence of diseases and insect pests. The study was carried out to address the gap in using integrated nutrient management in crop rotation systems for soil qualities and crop yield improvement. That was done by adjusting the balance ratio of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizers. The experiment was containing ten levels; Control (0,0), recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry, 100% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry+25% recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry+50% recommended nitrogen, 25% dry-bio slurry+75% recommended nitrogen, 100% dry-bio slurry + 25% recommended nitrogen and 100% dry-bio slurry + 50% recommended nitrogen that was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications for three years. The data on soil properties and yield components of potatoes and wheat were collected and analyzed using statistical analysis system software 9.4. An application of dry bio-slurry with nitrogen fertilizer was significantly affected both crop yield and soil properties in the rotation system. The application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen gave the highest tuber yield of potato (27.6 tha-1) as compared to control. Similarly, using 100% and 75% sole dry bio-slurry resulted in the highest grain yield (3.85 tha-1) and above-ground biomass (9.59 tha-1) of wheat. The combination of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen scored the highest net benefit (2889.2 US$) with an acceptable marginal return (4463.3%) via by improving crops yield in the system. So, an application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen could be promoted for yield-soil improvement in the study area and similar agroecology.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Crop Production - methods</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - growth & development</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fertilizers - analysis</subject><subject>Insect pests</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic fertilizers</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Slurries</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Solanum tuberosum - growth & development</subject><subject>Solanum tuberosum - metabolism</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Triticum - growth & development</subject><subject>Triticum - metabolism</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9-P1CAQxxuj8c7T_8BoExOjD7vSUlp4MpfLqZtccom_XglQ6LKy0AOqrn-9dLd32Zp7MDxAmM98mRlmsux5AZYFbIp3Gzd4y8yyd1YuAQR1XaIH2WlBYLmoSwAfHp1PsichbABAENf14-wEEoAhQuA0-3GplBQx5E7lrd_lXLtFMINPR2bb3OroXSdtrqSP2ug_0ufO5r2LLLo98WstWcx3Wpo25INtE-BHq06Y8K7vte3ysAtRbp9mjxQzQT6b9rPs24fLrxefFlfXH1cX51cLgZoyLqCSteSwQbhhqMZSpAAbDHjDa4E5EEgxkhBCGiY4wgo3vKjaElUEQFLyEp5lLw-6vXGBTnUKFAJc4wI1FU7E6kC0jm1o7_WW-R11TNP9hfMdZSlfYSTlhBCAAOJYlhUuERdSANAWilSyVZgkrffTawPfylZIGz0zM9G5xeo17dxPWhQlAfVe4c2k4N3NIEOkWx2ENIZZ6YZD4ARVVTmm9uof9P70JqpjKQNtlUsPi1GUnmMAYVU3ZNRa3kOl1cqtFqmrlE73M4e3M4fERPk7dmwIga6-fP5_9vr7nH19xKZ-MnEdnBnGHgpzsDqAqbFC8FLdVbkAdByK22rQcSjoNBTJ7cXxD9053U4B_AvxAQiO</recordid><startdate>20240731</startdate><enddate>20240731</enddate><creator>Addis, Zelalem</creator><creator>Amare, Tadele</creator><creator>Kerebih, Bitewlgn</creator><creator>Abewa, Anteneh</creator><creator>Feyisa, Tesfaye</creator><creator>Awoke, Abrham</creator><creator>Tenagne, Abere</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-8596</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240731</creationdate><title>Effects of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizer on potato and wheat yields under rotation cropping system</title><author>Addis, Zelalem ; Amare, Tadele ; Kerebih, Bitewlgn ; Abewa, Anteneh ; Feyisa, Tesfaye ; Awoke, Abrham ; Tenagne, Abere</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-3fe6eb37587a568ecfec780b7b6c8b0c5fa9fe6997acb58f87b14d25490392b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Crop Production - methods</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - growth & development</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fertilizers - analysis</topic><topic>Insect pests</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic fertilizers</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Slurries</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Solanum tuberosum - growth & development</topic><topic>Solanum tuberosum - metabolism</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Triticum - growth & development</topic><topic>Triticum - metabolism</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Addis, Zelalem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amare, Tadele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerebih, Bitewlgn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abewa, Anteneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feyisa, Tesfaye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awoke, Abrham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenagne, Abere</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Addis, Zelalem</au><au>Amare, Tadele</au><au>Kerebih, Bitewlgn</au><au>Abewa, Anteneh</au><au>Feyisa, Tesfaye</au><au>Awoke, Abrham</au><au>Tenagne, Abere</au><au>Kumar, Ravinder</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizer on potato and wheat yields under rotation cropping system</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-07-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0306625</spage><pages>e0306625-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Integrated nutrient management and crop rotation are important farming practices, which enhance the nutrient use efficiency of crops and reduce the incidence of diseases and insect pests. The study was carried out to address the gap in using integrated nutrient management in crop rotation systems for soil qualities and crop yield improvement. That was done by adjusting the balance ratio of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizers. The experiment was containing ten levels; Control (0,0), recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry, 100% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry, 75% dry-bio slurry+25% recommended nitrogen, 50% dry-bio slurry+50% recommended nitrogen, 25% dry-bio slurry+75% recommended nitrogen, 100% dry-bio slurry + 25% recommended nitrogen and 100% dry-bio slurry + 50% recommended nitrogen that was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications for three years. The data on soil properties and yield components of potatoes and wheat were collected and analyzed using statistical analysis system software 9.4. An application of dry bio-slurry with nitrogen fertilizer was significantly affected both crop yield and soil properties in the rotation system. The application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen gave the highest tuber yield of potato (27.6 tha-1) as compared to control. Similarly, using 100% and 75% sole dry bio-slurry resulted in the highest grain yield (3.85 tha-1) and above-ground biomass (9.59 tha-1) of wheat. The combination of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen scored the highest net benefit (2889.2 US$) with an acceptable marginal return (4463.3%) via by improving crops yield in the system. So, an application of 25% dry bio-slurry with 75% recommended nitrogen could be promoted for yield-soil improvement in the study area and similar agroecology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39083550</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0306625</doi><tpages>e0306625</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-8596</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0306625 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3086815748 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Agricultural practices Agricultural production Agriculture - methods Agroecology Biology and Life Sciences Corn Crop diseases Crop Production - methods Crop rotation Crop yield Cropping systems Crops Crops, Agricultural - growth & development Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Fertilizers Fertilizers - analysis Insect pests Insects Manures Medical research Medicine, Experimental Nitrogen Nitrogen - analysis Nitrogen - metabolism Nitrogen fertilizers Nutrients Organic fertilizers Pests Physical Sciences Potatoes Productivity Slurries Soil - chemistry Soil analysis Soil fertility Soil improvement Soil properties Soil quality Solanum tuberosum - growth & development Solanum tuberosum - metabolism Sorghum Statistical analysis Triticum - growth & development Triticum - metabolism Wheat |
| title | Effects of dry bio-slurry and nitrogen fertilizer on potato and wheat yields under rotation cropping system |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A30%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20dry%20bio-slurry%20and%20nitrogen%20fertilizer%20on%20potato%20and%20wheat%20yields%20under%20rotation%20cropping%20system&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Addis,%20Zelalem&rft.date=2024-07-31&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0306625&rft.pages=e0306625-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0306625&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA803346792%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086815748&rft_id=info:pmid/39083550&rft_galeid=A803346792&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_b9990505b8e24825bcec00d1f94edf89&rfr_iscdi=true |