Assessment and development of physical education teachers' physical literacy: A systematic review
In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children's physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students' participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teach...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307505 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | e0307505 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Yin, Hang Omar Dev, Roxana Dev Soh, Kim Geok Li, Fangyi Lian, Menglong |
| description | In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children's physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students' participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teachers. This study aims to offer information for PE teachers to improve their PL levels and for the future development of tools to assess the PL of PE teachers through a systematic review of studies assessing PL of PE teachers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was used to conduct a comprehensive and systematic search in six databases-Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest; and SportDiscus, and a total of 671 papers were retrieved, but after removing duplicates, article identification, and screening only eight papers met the inclusion criteria. This study's results indicate a paucity of research related to PL among PE teachers, focusing on children, students, older adults, and children with disabilities. PE teachers performed poorly in the physical competence domain and better in the cognitive and affective domains, with a moderate level of overall PL. Only one instrument is currently available to assess PE teachers' (perceived) PL, and other studies have used instrument components. Therefore, it was concluded that the current PE teachers' PL level is not high. Also, because the concept of PL among PE teachers has not been standardized, no tool has been developed to evaluate the PL of PE teachers comprehensively and systematically. The CPD (continuing professional development) is considered an effective means of enhancing PL among PE teachers, and research should prioritize the development of CPD programs and tools that are specifically tailored to assess PL among PE teachers in the future. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0307505 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3082558088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A801798181</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5b5ed3382aa2472689680748011bb1a7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A801798181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-b0af8640303cd4d843794886b54bb58f3e2a4153b211310865c778993182a9453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpfCGyCIhMThosXHxOEGVSsOlVZaidOt5TiT1pUTBzsp9O1xt9mlQXuBcpHY_ub3zJ-ZJHmK0QLTHL_dusG3yi4618ICUZRzxO8l57igZJ4RRO-ffJ8lj0LYIsSpyLKHyRktEGGU8PNELUOAEBpo-1S1VVrBDqzrrteuTrvNPhitbArVoFVvXJv2oPQGfHj199CaHrzS-3fpMg370EMTUZ162Bn49Th5UCsb4Mn4niXfP374dvF5fnn1aXWxvJxrnpN-XiJVi4zFQqiuWCUYzQsmRFZyVpZc1BSIYpjTkmBMMRIZ13kuioJiQVTBOJ0lz4-6nXVBju4ESZEgnAskRCRWR6Jyais7bxrl99IpI683nF9L5WPiFiQvOVSURmlFWE4yUWQC5UwgjMsSqzxqvR9vG8oGKh398spORKcnrdnItdtJjEmslx_yfT0qePdzgNDLxgQN1qoW3HBMPCMcRSdmyYt_0LvLG6m1ihWYtnbxYn0QlcuYeF4ILHCkFndQ8amgMTr2Um3i_iTgzSQgMj387tdqCEGuvn75f_bqx5R9ecJuQNl-E5wdDk0WpiA7gtq7EDzUty5jJA-jcOOGPIyCHEchhj07_UO3QTe9T_8AQbYBnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082558088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment and development of physical education teachers' physical literacy: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Yin, Hang ; Omar Dev, Roxana Dev ; Soh, Kim Geok ; Li, Fangyi ; Lian, Menglong</creator><contributor>Chang, Jindong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hang ; Omar Dev, Roxana Dev ; Soh, Kim Geok ; Li, Fangyi ; Lian, Menglong ; Chang, Jindong</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children's physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students' participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teachers. This study aims to offer information for PE teachers to improve their PL levels and for the future development of tools to assess the PL of PE teachers through a systematic review of studies assessing PL of PE teachers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was used to conduct a comprehensive and systematic search in six databases-Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest; and SportDiscus, and a total of 671 papers were retrieved, but after removing duplicates, article identification, and screening only eight papers met the inclusion criteria. This study's results indicate a paucity of research related to PL among PE teachers, focusing on children, students, older adults, and children with disabilities. PE teachers performed poorly in the physical competence domain and better in the cognitive and affective domains, with a moderate level of overall PL. Only one instrument is currently available to assess PE teachers' (perceived) PL, and other studies have used instrument components. Therefore, it was concluded that the current PE teachers' PL level is not high. Also, because the concept of PL among PE teachers has not been standardized, no tool has been developed to evaluate the PL of PE teachers comprehensively and systematically. The CPD (continuing professional development) is considered an effective means of enhancing PL among PE teachers, and research should prioritize the development of CPD programs and tools that are specifically tailored to assess PL among PE teachers in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307505</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39024325</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Canada ; Child ; Children ; Continuing professional development ; Curricula ; Disabled children ; Education ; Educational evaluation ; Exercise ; Humans ; Learning ; Literacy ; Literacy programs ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental health ; Meta-analysis ; Methods ; Older people ; People and Places ; Physical activity ; Physical education ; Physical Education and Training ; Physical fitness ; Professional development ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Reviews ; School Teachers - psychology ; Social Sciences ; Sports facilities ; Students ; Systematic review ; Teachers ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307505</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Yin et al 2024 Yin et al</rights><rights>2024 Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-b0af8640303cd4d843794886b54bb58f3e2a4153b211310865c778993182a9453</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8456-5268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257255/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257255/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,2098,2917,23853,27911,27912,53778,53780,79355,79356</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39024325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chang, Jindong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar Dev, Roxana Dev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soh, Kim Geok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Menglong</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment and development of physical education teachers' physical literacy: A systematic review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children's physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students' participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teachers. This study aims to offer information for PE teachers to improve their PL levels and for the future development of tools to assess the PL of PE teachers through a systematic review of studies assessing PL of PE teachers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was used to conduct a comprehensive and systematic search in six databases-Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest; and SportDiscus, and a total of 671 papers were retrieved, but after removing duplicates, article identification, and screening only eight papers met the inclusion criteria. This study's results indicate a paucity of research related to PL among PE teachers, focusing on children, students, older adults, and children with disabilities. PE teachers performed poorly in the physical competence domain and better in the cognitive and affective domains, with a moderate level of overall PL. Only one instrument is currently available to assess PE teachers' (perceived) PL, and other studies have used instrument components. Therefore, it was concluded that the current PE teachers' PL level is not high. Also, because the concept of PL among PE teachers has not been standardized, no tool has been developed to evaluate the PL of PE teachers comprehensively and systematically. The CPD (continuing professional development) is considered an effective means of enhancing PL among PE teachers, and research should prioritize the development of CPD programs and tools that are specifically tailored to assess PL among PE teachers in the future.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Continuing professional development</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Disabled children</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy programs</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical education</subject><subject>Physical Education and Training</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>School Teachers - psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sports facilities</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9uO0zAQhiMEYpfCGyCIhMThosXHxOEGVSsOlVZaidOt5TiT1pUTBzsp9O1xt9mlQXuBcpHY_ub3zJ-ZJHmK0QLTHL_dusG3yi4618ICUZRzxO8l57igZJ4RRO-ffJ8lj0LYIsSpyLKHyRktEGGU8PNELUOAEBpo-1S1VVrBDqzrrteuTrvNPhitbArVoFVvXJv2oPQGfHj199CaHrzS-3fpMg370EMTUZ162Bn49Th5UCsb4Mn4niXfP374dvF5fnn1aXWxvJxrnpN-XiJVi4zFQqiuWCUYzQsmRFZyVpZc1BSIYpjTkmBMMRIZ13kuioJiQVTBOJ0lz4-6nXVBju4ESZEgnAskRCRWR6Jyais7bxrl99IpI683nF9L5WPiFiQvOVSURmlFWE4yUWQC5UwgjMsSqzxqvR9vG8oGKh398spORKcnrdnItdtJjEmslx_yfT0qePdzgNDLxgQN1qoW3HBMPCMcRSdmyYt_0LvLG6m1ihWYtnbxYn0QlcuYeF4ILHCkFndQ8amgMTr2Um3i_iTgzSQgMj387tdqCEGuvn75f_bqx5R9ecJuQNl-E5wdDk0WpiA7gtq7EDzUty5jJA-jcOOGPIyCHEchhj07_UO3QTe9T_8AQbYBnw</recordid><startdate>20240718</startdate><enddate>20240718</enddate><creator>Yin, Hang</creator><creator>Omar Dev, Roxana Dev</creator><creator>Soh, Kim Geok</creator><creator>Li, Fangyi</creator><creator>Lian, Menglong</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-5268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240718</creationdate><title>Assessment and development of physical education teachers' physical literacy: A systematic review</title><author>Yin, Hang ; Omar Dev, Roxana Dev ; Soh, Kim Geok ; Li, Fangyi ; Lian, Menglong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-b0af8640303cd4d843794886b54bb58f3e2a4153b211310865c778993182a9453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Continuing professional development</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Disabled children</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy programs</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical education</topic><topic>Physical Education and Training</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>School Teachers - psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sports facilities</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar Dev, Roxana Dev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soh, Kim Geok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Menglong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Hang</au><au>Omar Dev, Roxana Dev</au><au>Soh, Kim Geok</au><au>Li, Fangyi</au><au>Lian, Menglong</au><au>Chang, Jindong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment and development of physical education teachers' physical literacy: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-07-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0307505</spage><pages>e0307505-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children's physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students' participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teachers. This study aims to offer information for PE teachers to improve their PL levels and for the future development of tools to assess the PL of PE teachers through a systematic review of studies assessing PL of PE teachers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was used to conduct a comprehensive and systematic search in six databases-Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest; and SportDiscus, and a total of 671 papers were retrieved, but after removing duplicates, article identification, and screening only eight papers met the inclusion criteria. This study's results indicate a paucity of research related to PL among PE teachers, focusing on children, students, older adults, and children with disabilities. PE teachers performed poorly in the physical competence domain and better in the cognitive and affective domains, with a moderate level of overall PL. Only one instrument is currently available to assess PE teachers' (perceived) PL, and other studies have used instrument components. Therefore, it was concluded that the current PE teachers' PL level is not high. Also, because the concept of PL among PE teachers has not been standardized, no tool has been developed to evaluate the PL of PE teachers comprehensively and systematically. The CPD (continuing professional development) is considered an effective means of enhancing PL among PE teachers, and research should prioritize the development of CPD programs and tools that are specifically tailored to assess PL among PE teachers in the future.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39024325</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0307505</doi><tpages>e0307505</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-5268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307505 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3082558088 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Canada Child Children Continuing professional development Curricula Disabled children Education Educational evaluation Exercise Humans Learning Literacy Literacy programs Medicine and Health Sciences Mental health Meta-analysis Methods Older people People and Places Physical activity Physical education Physical Education and Training Physical fitness Professional development Research and Analysis Methods Reviews School Teachers - psychology Social Sciences Sports facilities Students Systematic review Teachers United Kingdom |
| title | Assessment and development of physical education teachers' physical literacy: A systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A29%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20and%20development%20of%20physical%20education%20teachers'%20physical%20literacy:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Yin,%20Hang&rft.date=2024-07-18&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0307505&rft.pages=e0307505-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0307505&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA801798181%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082558088&rft_id=info:pmid/39024325&rft_galeid=A801798181&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5b5ed3382aa2472689680748011bb1a7&rfr_iscdi=true |