Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders
With the overall objective of providing implication for clinical and research practices regarding the identification and measurement of modifiable predicting factors for return to work (RTW) in people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs), this study 1) systematica...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307284 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | e0307284 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Villotti, Patrizia Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin Roy, Jean-Sébastien Corbière, Marc Negrini, Alessia Larivière, Christian |
| description | With the overall objective of providing implication for clinical and research practices regarding the identification and measurement of modifiable predicting factors for return to work (RTW) in people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs), this study 1) systematically examined and synthetized the research evidence available in the literature on the topic, and 2) critically evaluated the tools used to measure each identified factor. A systematic search of prognostic studies was conducted, considering four groups of keywords: 1) population (i.e., MSDs or CMDs), 2) study design (prospective), 3) modifiable factors, 4) outcomes of interest (i.e., RTW). Studies showing high risk of bias were eliminated. Tools used to measure prognostic factors were assessed using psychometric and usability criteria. From the 78 studies that met inclusion criteria, 19 (for MSDs) and 5 (for CMDs) factors reaching moderate or strong evidence were extracted. These factors included work accommodations, RTW expectations, job demands (physical), job demands (psychological), job strain, work ability, RTW self-efficacy, expectations of recovery, locus of control, referred pain (back pain), activities as assessed with disability questionnaires, pain catastrophizing, coping strategies, fears, illness behaviours, mental vitality, a positive health change, sleep quality, and participation. Measurement tools ranged from single-item tools to multi-item standardized questionnaires or subscales. The former generally showed low psychometric properties but excellent usability, whereas the later showed good to excellent psychometric properties and variable usability. The rigorous approach to the selection of eligible studies allowed the identification of a relatively small set of prognostic factors, but with a higher level of certainty. For each factor, the present tool assessment allows an informed choice to balance psychometric and usability criteria. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0307284 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3082200232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A801676388</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_658d6eefb6654aa2b3e71ae7f63fbe26</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A801676388</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c1b49d643e7cd734b7241fe4de23c656b84bc7296775b3a2dfcfa6281098c5353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWHxEmuUFVxWKlSJQrcWo493vXWiYOdbOmj8LY43bTaoF4gX9gaf_PPwZ4keYnREtMCf9i6wbfCLjvXwhJRVJAye5Qc44qSBSOIPj44HyXPQtgilNOSsafJEa0QLilix8mfy5vQQyN6I1MPOwPXqWhV2jtnQyq6zgsThE2dTjvv1q0LI6iF7J0Po9VDH9OIfHrt_FVq2tsdxss2DUZepRbEDlI1wAg1Q5CDdeEKLPRRd4wlXdNEuIF2tCgTnFdR4HnyRAsb4MW0nyQ_Pn_6fvZ1cX7xZXV2er6QOWH9QuI6qxTLKBRSFTSrC5JhDZkCQiXLWV1mtSxIxYoir6kgSkstGCkxqkqZ05yeJK_3ul3Mi09dDZyikhCECCWRWO0J5cSWd940wt9wJwy_NTi_5sLHvljgLC8VA9A1Y3kmBKljWlhAoRnVNRAWtT5O0Ya6ASVj0V7Ymej8pjUbvnY7jjHJaVWOCu8mBe9-DRB63pggwVrRghv2iVOUVziL6Jt_0IfLm6i1iBWYVrsYWI6i_LREmBWMlmWklg9QcSlojIx_UJtonzm8nzlEpoff_VoMIfDV5bf_Zy9-ztm3B-wGhO03wdmhN64NczDbg9K7EDzo-y5jxMcRuusGH0eITyMU3V4dvtC9093M0L-R0BnE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082200232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Villotti, Patrizia ; Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin ; Roy, Jean-Sébastien ; Corbière, Marc ; Negrini, Alessia ; Larivière, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Villotti, Patrizia ; Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin ; Roy, Jean-Sébastien ; Corbière, Marc ; Negrini, Alessia ; Larivière, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>With the overall objective of providing implication for clinical and research practices regarding the identification and measurement of modifiable predicting factors for return to work (RTW) in people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs), this study 1) systematically examined and synthetized the research evidence available in the literature on the topic, and 2) critically evaluated the tools used to measure each identified factor. A systematic search of prognostic studies was conducted, considering four groups of keywords: 1) population (i.e., MSDs or CMDs), 2) study design (prospective), 3) modifiable factors, 4) outcomes of interest (i.e., RTW). Studies showing high risk of bias were eliminated. Tools used to measure prognostic factors were assessed using psychometric and usability criteria. From the 78 studies that met inclusion criteria, 19 (for MSDs) and 5 (for CMDs) factors reaching moderate or strong evidence were extracted. These factors included work accommodations, RTW expectations, job demands (physical), job demands (psychological), job strain, work ability, RTW self-efficacy, expectations of recovery, locus of control, referred pain (back pain), activities as assessed with disability questionnaires, pain catastrophizing, coping strategies, fears, illness behaviours, mental vitality, a positive health change, sleep quality, and participation. Measurement tools ranged from single-item tools to multi-item standardized questionnaires or subscales. The former generally showed low psychometric properties but excellent usability, whereas the later showed good to excellent psychometric properties and variable usability. The rigorous approach to the selection of eligible studies allowed the identification of a relatively small set of prognostic factors, but with a higher level of certainty. For each factor, the present tool assessment allows an informed choice to balance psychometric and usability criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307284</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39018306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Backache ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Coping ; Criteria ; Disability ; Employee benefits ; Engineering and Technology ; Humans ; Locus of control ; Medical prognosis ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Medicine, Experimental ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation ; Occupational health ; Pain ; Population studies ; Prognosis ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Return to Work - psychology ; Return to Work - statistics & numerical data ; Sick leave ; Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data ; Social Sciences ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Usability</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307284</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Villotti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Villotti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Villotti et al 2024 Villotti et al</rights><rights>2024 Villotti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c1b49d643e7cd734b7241fe4de23c656b84bc7296775b3a2dfcfa6281098c5353</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4528-6340 ; 0000-0003-2853-9940</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253986/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253986/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39018306$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Villotti, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Jean-Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbière, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negrini, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larivière, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>With the overall objective of providing implication for clinical and research practices regarding the identification and measurement of modifiable predicting factors for return to work (RTW) in people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs), this study 1) systematically examined and synthetized the research evidence available in the literature on the topic, and 2) critically evaluated the tools used to measure each identified factor. A systematic search of prognostic studies was conducted, considering four groups of keywords: 1) population (i.e., MSDs or CMDs), 2) study design (prospective), 3) modifiable factors, 4) outcomes of interest (i.e., RTW). Studies showing high risk of bias were eliminated. Tools used to measure prognostic factors were assessed using psychometric and usability criteria. From the 78 studies that met inclusion criteria, 19 (for MSDs) and 5 (for CMDs) factors reaching moderate or strong evidence were extracted. These factors included work accommodations, RTW expectations, job demands (physical), job demands (psychological), job strain, work ability, RTW self-efficacy, expectations of recovery, locus of control, referred pain (back pain), activities as assessed with disability questionnaires, pain catastrophizing, coping strategies, fears, illness behaviours, mental vitality, a positive health change, sleep quality, and participation. Measurement tools ranged from single-item tools to multi-item standardized questionnaires or subscales. The former generally showed low psychometric properties but excellent usability, whereas the later showed good to excellent psychometric properties and variable usability. The rigorous approach to the selection of eligible studies allowed the identification of a relatively small set of prognostic factors, but with a higher level of certainty. For each factor, the present tool assessment allows an informed choice to balance psychometric and usability criteria.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Backache</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Employee benefits</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Locus of control</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Return to Work - psychology</subject><subject>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Sick leave</subject><subject>Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWHxEmuUFVxWKlSJQrcWo493vXWiYOdbOmj8LY43bTaoF4gX9gaf_PPwZ4keYnREtMCf9i6wbfCLjvXwhJRVJAye5Qc44qSBSOIPj44HyXPQtgilNOSsafJEa0QLilix8mfy5vQQyN6I1MPOwPXqWhV2jtnQyq6zgsThE2dTjvv1q0LI6iF7J0Po9VDH9OIfHrt_FVq2tsdxss2DUZepRbEDlI1wAg1Q5CDdeEKLPRRd4wlXdNEuIF2tCgTnFdR4HnyRAsb4MW0nyQ_Pn_6fvZ1cX7xZXV2er6QOWH9QuI6qxTLKBRSFTSrC5JhDZkCQiXLWV1mtSxIxYoir6kgSkstGCkxqkqZ05yeJK_3ul3Mi09dDZyikhCECCWRWO0J5cSWd940wt9wJwy_NTi_5sLHvljgLC8VA9A1Y3kmBKljWlhAoRnVNRAWtT5O0Ya6ASVj0V7Ymej8pjUbvnY7jjHJaVWOCu8mBe9-DRB63pggwVrRghv2iVOUVziL6Jt_0IfLm6i1iBWYVrsYWI6i_LREmBWMlmWklg9QcSlojIx_UJtonzm8nzlEpoff_VoMIfDV5bf_Zy9-ztm3B-wGhO03wdmhN64NczDbg9K7EDzo-y5jxMcRuusGH0eITyMU3V4dvtC9093M0L-R0BnE</recordid><startdate>20240717</startdate><enddate>20240717</enddate><creator>Villotti, Patrizia</creator><creator>Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin</creator><creator>Roy, Jean-Sébastien</creator><creator>Corbière, Marc</creator><creator>Negrini, Alessia</creator><creator>Larivière, Christian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4528-6340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2853-9940</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240717</creationdate><title>Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders</title><author>Villotti, Patrizia ; Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin ; Roy, Jean-Sébastien ; Corbière, Marc ; Negrini, Alessia ; Larivière, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-c1b49d643e7cd734b7241fe4de23c656b84bc7296775b3a2dfcfa6281098c5353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Backache</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Employee benefits</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Locus of control</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Return to Work - psychology</topic><topic>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Sick leave</topic><topic>Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Villotti, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Jean-Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbière, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negrini, Alessia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larivière, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Villotti, Patrizia</au><au>Kordsmeyer, Ann-Christin</au><au>Roy, Jean-Sébastien</au><au>Corbière, Marc</au><au>Negrini, Alessia</au><au>Larivière, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-07-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0307284</spage><pages>e0307284-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>With the overall objective of providing implication for clinical and research practices regarding the identification and measurement of modifiable predicting factors for return to work (RTW) in people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and common mental disorders (CMDs), this study 1) systematically examined and synthetized the research evidence available in the literature on the topic, and 2) critically evaluated the tools used to measure each identified factor. A systematic search of prognostic studies was conducted, considering four groups of keywords: 1) population (i.e., MSDs or CMDs), 2) study design (prospective), 3) modifiable factors, 4) outcomes of interest (i.e., RTW). Studies showing high risk of bias were eliminated. Tools used to measure prognostic factors were assessed using psychometric and usability criteria. From the 78 studies that met inclusion criteria, 19 (for MSDs) and 5 (for CMDs) factors reaching moderate or strong evidence were extracted. These factors included work accommodations, RTW expectations, job demands (physical), job demands (psychological), job strain, work ability, RTW self-efficacy, expectations of recovery, locus of control, referred pain (back pain), activities as assessed with disability questionnaires, pain catastrophizing, coping strategies, fears, illness behaviours, mental vitality, a positive health change, sleep quality, and participation. Measurement tools ranged from single-item tools to multi-item standardized questionnaires or subscales. The former generally showed low psychometric properties but excellent usability, whereas the later showed good to excellent psychometric properties and variable usability. The rigorous approach to the selection of eligible studies allowed the identification of a relatively small set of prognostic factors, but with a higher level of certainty. For each factor, the present tool assessment allows an informed choice to balance psychometric and usability criteria.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>39018306</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0307284</doi><tpages>e0307284</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4528-6340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2853-9940</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.e0307284 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3082200232 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Back pain Backache Biology and Life Sciences Coping Criteria Disability Employee benefits Engineering and Technology Humans Locus of control Medical prognosis Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Medicine, Experimental Mental disorders Mental Disorders - psychology Musculoskeletal diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases - psychology Musculoskeletal Diseases - rehabilitation Occupational health Pain Population studies Prognosis Psychometrics - methods Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Research and Analysis Methods Return to Work - psychology Return to Work - statistics & numerical data Sick leave Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data Social Sciences Surveys and Questionnaires Usability |
| title | Systematic review and tools appraisal of prognostic factors of return to work in workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal and common mental disorders |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20review%20and%20tools%20appraisal%20of%20prognostic%20factors%20of%20return%20to%20work%20in%20workers%20on%20sick%20leave%20due%20to%20musculoskeletal%20and%20common%20mental%20disorders&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Villotti,%20Patrizia&rft.date=2024-07-17&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0307284&rft.pages=e0307284-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0307284&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA801676388%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082200232&rft_id=info:pmid/39018306&rft_galeid=A801676388&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_658d6eefb6654aa2b3e71ae7f63fbe26&rfr_iscdi=true |