The association between major gastrointestinal cancers and red and processed meat and fish consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies
The association between red meat, fish, and processed meat consumption and the risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains inconclusive despite several investigations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to update the existing scientifi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0305994 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0305994 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Poorolajal, Jalal Mohammadi, Younes Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh |
description | The association between red meat, fish, and processed meat consumption and the risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains inconclusive despite several investigations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to update the existing scientific evidence.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases until May 20, 2023. We analyzed observational studies that examined the associations between red and processed meat and fish consumption and GI cancers. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using the χ2 and τ2 tests, as well as I2 statistics. We explored the likelihood of publication bias using Begg's and Egger's tests and trim-and-fill analysis. We reported the overall effect sizes as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model.
Of the 21,004 studies identified, 95 studies involving 5,794,219 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The consumption of high levels of red meat, as compared to low levels, was found to significantly increase the risk of developing esophageal, pancreatic, liver, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. Similarly, the consumption of high levels of processed meat, as compared to low levels, significantly increased the risk of pancreatic, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. In contrast, the consumption of high levels of fish, as compared to low levels, significantly reduced the risk of colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers.
This meta-analysis provides updated evidence on the association between red meat, processed meat, and fish consumption and the risk of developing five major types of GI cancers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0305994 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3072690140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A799076663</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_806a42cf3e6e495fabfb5f8a04554213</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A799076663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-f6a93617c65813ad10298879ca4f2ef03f8288422571bf6f5fc8f5779a8cd4203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggiISG4aLGdxEm4QdPER6VJk2Bwa506x62rJO58nI29Ek-J03ZTi3aBcuH45Hf-5ysnSV5yNuVZyT-s3OB7aKdr1-OUZayo6_xRcszrTEykYNnjvfej5BnRirEiq6R8mhxlVS1yVuTHyZ_LJaZA5LSFYF2fzjHcIPZpByvn0wVQ8M72ASnYGC3V0Gv0lELfpB6bzbn2TiNRvHUIYWMylpapdj0N3XqU_ZiepnRLAbsYRUfPa4s3G7LDABOI0rdkKXUmDTEhNyf015uEYkwKQ2ORnidPDLSEL3bnSfLzy-fLs2-T84uvs7PT84mWuQgTI6HOJC-1LCqeQcOZqKuqrDXkRqBhmalEVeVCFCWfG2kKoytTlGUNlW7y2KyT5PVWd906Urs2k8pYKWTNeD4Ssy3ROFiptbcd-FvlwKqNwfmFAh_rbFFVTEIutMlQYl4XBuZmXpgKWF4UueBZ1Pq0izbMO2w09sFDeyB6-KW3S7Vw14pzwUpe8Kjwbqfg3dUQB6U6SxrbFnp0wzbxijHBRUTf_IM-XN6OWkCswPbGxcB6FFWnZV2zUko5Jj59gIpPg52No0djo_3A4f2BQ2QC_g4LGIjU7Mf3_2cvfh2yb_fYJUIbluTaYfx76BDMt6D2jsijue8yZ2rcqbtuqHGn1G6notur_QndO90tUfYXEHwfKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072690140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The association between major gastrointestinal cancers and red and processed meat and fish consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Poorolajal, Jalal ; Mohammadi, Younes ; Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh ; Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Poorolajal, Jalal ; Mohammadi, Younes ; Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh ; Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><description>The association between red meat, fish, and processed meat consumption and the risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains inconclusive despite several investigations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to update the existing scientific evidence.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases until May 20, 2023. We analyzed observational studies that examined the associations between red and processed meat and fish consumption and GI cancers. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using the χ2 and τ2 tests, as well as I2 statistics. We explored the likelihood of publication bias using Begg's and Egger's tests and trim-and-fill analysis. We reported the overall effect sizes as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model.
Of the 21,004 studies identified, 95 studies involving 5,794,219 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The consumption of high levels of red meat, as compared to low levels, was found to significantly increase the risk of developing esophageal, pancreatic, liver, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. Similarly, the consumption of high levels of processed meat, as compared to low levels, significantly increased the risk of pancreatic, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. In contrast, the consumption of high levels of fish, as compared to low levels, significantly reduced the risk of colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers.
This meta-analysis provides updated evidence on the association between red meat, processed meat, and fish consumption and the risk of developing five major types of GI cancers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305994</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38924054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cancer ; Colon ; Colorectal cancer ; Consumption ; Diet ; Diet - adverse effects ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophagus ; Fatalities ; Fish ; Fish as food ; Fishes ; Food consumption ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - etiology ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Meat ; Meat - adverse effects ; Meat products ; Meat Products - adverse effects ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Meta-analysis ; Observational studies ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Oncology, Experimental ; Pancreas ; Pancreatic cancer ; Prevention ; Rectum ; Red Meat - adverse effects ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; Risk reduction ; Seafood ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Stomach ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0305994</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-f6a93617c65813ad10298879ca4f2ef03f8288422571bf6f5fc8f5779a8cd4203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3758-3006 ; 0000-0001-6985-3712</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11207151/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11207151/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38924054$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poorolajal, Jalal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Younes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><title>The association between major gastrointestinal cancers and red and processed meat and fish consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The association between red meat, fish, and processed meat consumption and the risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains inconclusive despite several investigations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to update the existing scientific evidence.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases until May 20, 2023. We analyzed observational studies that examined the associations between red and processed meat and fish consumption and GI cancers. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using the χ2 and τ2 tests, as well as I2 statistics. We explored the likelihood of publication bias using Begg's and Egger's tests and trim-and-fill analysis. We reported the overall effect sizes as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model.
Of the 21,004 studies identified, 95 studies involving 5,794,219 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The consumption of high levels of red meat, as compared to low levels, was found to significantly increase the risk of developing esophageal, pancreatic, liver, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. Similarly, the consumption of high levels of processed meat, as compared to low levels, significantly increased the risk of pancreatic, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. In contrast, the consumption of high levels of fish, as compared to low levels, significantly reduced the risk of colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers.
This meta-analysis provides updated evidence on the association between red meat, processed meat, and fish consumption and the risk of developing five major types of GI cancers.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish as food</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat - adverse effects</subject><subject>Meat products</subject><subject>Meat Products - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreatic cancer</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Red Meat - adverse effects</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Seafood</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYmPwBggiISG4aLGdxEm4QdPER6VJk2Bwa506x62rJO58nI29Ek-J03ZTi3aBcuH45Hf-5ysnSV5yNuVZyT-s3OB7aKdr1-OUZayo6_xRcszrTEykYNnjvfej5BnRirEiq6R8mhxlVS1yVuTHyZ_LJaZA5LSFYF2fzjHcIPZpByvn0wVQ8M72ASnYGC3V0Gv0lELfpB6bzbn2TiNRvHUIYWMylpapdj0N3XqU_ZiepnRLAbsYRUfPa4s3G7LDABOI0rdkKXUmDTEhNyf015uEYkwKQ2ORnidPDLSEL3bnSfLzy-fLs2-T84uvs7PT84mWuQgTI6HOJC-1LCqeQcOZqKuqrDXkRqBhmalEVeVCFCWfG2kKoytTlGUNlW7y2KyT5PVWd906Urs2k8pYKWTNeD4Ssy3ROFiptbcd-FvlwKqNwfmFAh_rbFFVTEIutMlQYl4XBuZmXpgKWF4UueBZ1Pq0izbMO2w09sFDeyB6-KW3S7Vw14pzwUpe8Kjwbqfg3dUQB6U6SxrbFnp0wzbxijHBRUTf_IM-XN6OWkCswPbGxcB6FFWnZV2zUko5Jj59gIpPg52No0djo_3A4f2BQ2QC_g4LGIjU7Mf3_2cvfh2yb_fYJUIbluTaYfx76BDMt6D2jsijue8yZ2rcqbtuqHGn1G6notur_QndO90tUfYXEHwfKw</recordid><startdate>20240626</startdate><enddate>20240626</enddate><creator>Poorolajal, Jalal</creator><creator>Mohammadi, Younes</creator><creator>Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh</creator><creator>Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-3006</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-3712</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240626</creationdate><title>The association between major gastrointestinal cancers and red and processed meat and fish consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies</title><author>Poorolajal, Jalal ; Mohammadi, Younes ; Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh ; Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-f6a93617c65813ad10298879ca4f2ef03f8288422571bf6f5fc8f5779a8cd4203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish as food</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat - adverse effects</topic><topic>Meat products</topic><topic>Meat Products - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreatic cancer</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Red Meat - adverse effects</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Seafood</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poorolajal, Jalal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammadi, Younes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poorolajal, Jalal</au><au>Mohammadi, Younes</au><au>Fattahi-Darghlou, Marzieh</au><au>Almasi-Moghadam, Fatemeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The association between major gastrointestinal cancers and red and processed meat and fish consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-06-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0305994</spage><pages>e0305994-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The association between red meat, fish, and processed meat consumption and the risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers remains inconclusive despite several investigations. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to update the existing scientific evidence.
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases until May 20, 2023. We analyzed observational studies that examined the associations between red and processed meat and fish consumption and GI cancers. We assessed between-study heterogeneity using the χ2 and τ2 tests, as well as I2 statistics. We explored the likelihood of publication bias using Begg's and Egger's tests and trim-and-fill analysis. We reported the overall effect sizes as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model.
Of the 21,004 studies identified, 95 studies involving 5,794,219 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The consumption of high levels of red meat, as compared to low levels, was found to significantly increase the risk of developing esophageal, pancreatic, liver, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. Similarly, the consumption of high levels of processed meat, as compared to low levels, significantly increased the risk of pancreatic, colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers. In contrast, the consumption of high levels of fish, as compared to low levels, significantly reduced the risk of colon, rectal, and colorectal cancers.
This meta-analysis provides updated evidence on the association between red meat, processed meat, and fish consumption and the risk of developing five major types of GI cancers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38924054</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0305994</doi><tpages>e0305994</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-3006</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6985-3712</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0305994 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3072690140 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Analysis Animals Biology and Life Sciences Cancer Colon Colorectal cancer Consumption Diet Diet - adverse effects Esophageal cancer Esophagus Fatalities Fish Fish as food Fishes Food consumption Gastrointestinal cancer Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - etiology Heterogeneity Humans Liver Liver cancer Meat Meat - adverse effects Meat products Meat Products - adverse effects Medicine and Health Sciences Meta-analysis Observational studies Observational Studies as Topic Oncology, Experimental Pancreas Pancreatic cancer Prevention Rectum Red Meat - adverse effects Risk Risk Factors Risk reduction Seafood Software Statistical analysis Stomach Systematic review |
title | The association between major gastrointestinal cancers and red and processed meat and fish consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A14%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20association%20between%20major%20gastrointestinal%20cancers%20and%20red%20and%20processed%20meat%20and%20fish%20consumption:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20the%20observational%20studies&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Poorolajal,%20Jalal&rft.date=2024-06-26&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0305994&rft.pages=e0305994-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0305994&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA799076663%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072690140&rft_id=info:pmid/38924054&rft_galeid=A799076663&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_806a42cf3e6e495fabfb5f8a04554213&rfr_iscdi=true |