Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review
There is currently no systematic review of the growing body of literature on using social robots in early developmental research. Designing appropriate methods for early childhood research is crucial for broadening our understanding of young children's social and cognitive development. This sco...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-05, Vol.19 (5), p.e0303704 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0303704 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Flatebø, Solveig Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson Bongo, Lars Ailo |
description | There is currently no systematic review of the growing body of literature on using social robots in early developmental research. Designing appropriate methods for early childhood research is crucial for broadening our understanding of young children's social and cognitive development. This scoping review systematically examines the existing literature on using social robots to study social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers aged between 2 and 35 months. Moreover, it aims to identify the research focus, findings, and reported gaps and challenges when using robots in research. We included empirical studies published between 1990 and May 29, 2023. We searched for literature in PsychINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and PsyArXiv. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were mapped using the scoping review method. Our findings reveal that most studies were quantitative, with experimental designs conducted in a laboratory setting where children were exposed to physically present or virtual robots in a one-to-one situation. We found that robots were used to investigate four main concepts: animacy concept, action understanding, imitation, and early conversational skills. Many studies focused on whether young children regard robots as agents or social partners. The studies demonstrated that young children could learn from and understand social robots in some situations but not always. For instance, children's understanding of social robots was often facilitated by robots that behaved interactively and contingently. This scoping review highlights the need to design social robots that can engage in interactive and contingent social behaviors for early developmental research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0303704 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069288013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793941444</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4c290c1d8787486fb777088edb1ad2bc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A793941444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c666t-a0e145acc3b23a9fb0d4df364b5335c5f9e1af18af02e6e14ab8dceec49300023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLgujDjEmTtokvMiz-GVhYcNXXkKa3nQyZZEzSUb-9qTOzTmUfpA8tye-c3Jzbm2VPMZpjUuM3azd4K8186yzMEUGkRvRedo45KWZVgcj9k--z7FEIa4RKwqrqYXZGWE1ZXRTnWX_jlJYm965xMeTa5h4CSK9WubN52G9K2-bK9VZHvYO8hR0Yt92AjSOvbSdtko5QdG1rwIe3-SIPym217ZPfTsOPx9mDTpoATw7vi-zrh_dfLj_Nrq4_Li8XVzNVVVWcSQSYllIp0hRE8q5BLW07UtGmJKRUZccByw4z2aECqsTKhrUKQFFOEEIFucie7323xgVxyCgIgipeMIYwScRyT7ROrsXW6430v4STWvxZcL4X0ketDAiqCo4Ublk95lV1TV3XiDFoGyzbolHJ693htKHZQCrERi_NxHS6Y_VK9G4nMEa8rAn_W6_yOkRthXVeCoxSOwWhjKNEvDqc4d33AUIUGx0UGCMtuGG8WlkyTmtWJvTFP-jdARyoXqY7pva5VJoaTcWi5oRTTClN1PwOKj0tbLRK_1yn0_pE8HoiSEyEn7GXQwhiefP5_9nrb1P25Qm7AmniKjgzRO1smIL0GKULwUN32weMxDgyxzTEODLiMDJJ9uy0h7ei44yQ389MEFU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069288013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Flatebø, Solveig ; Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha ; Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson ; Bongo, Lars Ailo</creator><creatorcontrib>Flatebø, Solveig ; Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha ; Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson ; Bongo, Lars Ailo</creatorcontrib><description>There is currently no systematic review of the growing body of literature on using social robots in early developmental research. Designing appropriate methods for early childhood research is crucial for broadening our understanding of young children's social and cognitive development. This scoping review systematically examines the existing literature on using social robots to study social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers aged between 2 and 35 months. Moreover, it aims to identify the research focus, findings, and reported gaps and challenges when using robots in research. We included empirical studies published between 1990 and May 29, 2023. We searched for literature in PsychINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and PsyArXiv. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were mapped using the scoping review method. Our findings reveal that most studies were quantitative, with experimental designs conducted in a laboratory setting where children were exposed to physically present or virtual robots in a one-to-one situation. We found that robots were used to investigate four main concepts: animacy concept, action understanding, imitation, and early conversational skills. Many studies focused on whether young children regard robots as agents or social partners. The studies demonstrated that young children could learn from and understand social robots in some situations but not always. For instance, children's understanding of social robots was often facilitated by robots that behaved interactively and contingently. This scoping review highlights the need to design social robots that can engage in interactive and contingent social behaviors for early developmental research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303704</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38748722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Book publishing ; Child development ; Child Development - physiology ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children & youth ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognition in children ; Cognitive development ; Conversation ; Design ; Engineering and Technology ; Humans ; Imitation ; Inclusion ; Infant ; Infants ; International economic relations ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and Places ; Preprints ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological research ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research design ; Research methodology ; Research robots ; Reviews ; Robotics ; Robots ; Social aspects ; Social Behavior ; Social interaction ; Social Sciences ; Toddlers</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-05, Vol.19 (5), p.e0303704</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Flatebø et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Flatebø et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>2024 Flatebø et al 2024 Flatebø et al</rights><rights>2024 Flatebø et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c666t-a0e145acc3b23a9fb0d4df364b5335c5f9e1af18af02e6e14ab8dceec49300023</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-7373-0209 ; 0000-0002-7787-916X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095739/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095739/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,26544,27321,27901,27902,33751,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38748722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flatebø, Solveig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongo, Lars Ailo</creatorcontrib><title>Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>There is currently no systematic review of the growing body of literature on using social robots in early developmental research. Designing appropriate methods for early childhood research is crucial for broadening our understanding of young children's social and cognitive development. This scoping review systematically examines the existing literature on using social robots to study social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers aged between 2 and 35 months. Moreover, it aims to identify the research focus, findings, and reported gaps and challenges when using robots in research. We included empirical studies published between 1990 and May 29, 2023. We searched for literature in PsychINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and PsyArXiv. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were mapped using the scoping review method. Our findings reveal that most studies were quantitative, with experimental designs conducted in a laboratory setting where children were exposed to physically present or virtual robots in a one-to-one situation. We found that robots were used to investigate four main concepts: animacy concept, action understanding, imitation, and early conversational skills. Many studies focused on whether young children regard robots as agents or social partners. The studies demonstrated that young children could learn from and understand social robots in some situations but not always. For instance, children's understanding of social robots was often facilitated by robots that behaved interactively and contingently. This scoping review highlights the need to design social robots that can engage in interactive and contingent social behaviors for early developmental research.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition in children</subject><subject>Cognitive development</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imitation</subject><subject>Inclusion</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>International economic relations</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Preprints</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research robots</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Toddlers</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLgujDjEmTtokvMiz-GVhYcNXXkKa3nQyZZEzSUb-9qTOzTmUfpA8tye-c3Jzbm2VPMZpjUuM3azd4K8186yzMEUGkRvRedo45KWZVgcj9k--z7FEIa4RKwqrqYXZGWE1ZXRTnWX_jlJYm965xMeTa5h4CSK9WubN52G9K2-bK9VZHvYO8hR0Yt92AjSOvbSdtko5QdG1rwIe3-SIPym217ZPfTsOPx9mDTpoATw7vi-zrh_dfLj_Nrq4_Li8XVzNVVVWcSQSYllIp0hRE8q5BLW07UtGmJKRUZccByw4z2aECqsTKhrUKQFFOEEIFucie7323xgVxyCgIgipeMIYwScRyT7ROrsXW6430v4STWvxZcL4X0ketDAiqCo4Ublk95lV1TV3XiDFoGyzbolHJ693htKHZQCrERi_NxHS6Y_VK9G4nMEa8rAn_W6_yOkRthXVeCoxSOwWhjKNEvDqc4d33AUIUGx0UGCMtuGG8WlkyTmtWJvTFP-jdARyoXqY7pva5VJoaTcWi5oRTTClN1PwOKj0tbLRK_1yn0_pE8HoiSEyEn7GXQwhiefP5_9nrb1P25Qm7AmniKjgzRO1smIL0GKULwUN32weMxDgyxzTEODLiMDJJ9uy0h7ei44yQ389MEFU</recordid><startdate>20240515</startdate><enddate>20240515</enddate><creator>Flatebø, Solveig</creator><creator>Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha</creator><creator>Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson</creator><creator>Bongo, Lars Ailo</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>PLOS</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7373-0209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-916X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240515</creationdate><title>Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review</title><author>Flatebø, Solveig ; Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha ; Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson ; Bongo, Lars Ailo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c666t-a0e145acc3b23a9fb0d4df364b5335c5f9e1af18af02e6e14ab8dceec49300023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition in children</topic><topic>Cognitive development</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imitation</topic><topic>Inclusion</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>International economic relations</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Preprints</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research robots</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Toddlers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flatebø, Solveig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongo, Lars Ailo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flatebø, Solveig</au><au>Tran, Vi Ngoc-Nha</au><au>Wang, Catharina Elisabeth Arfwedson</au><au>Bongo, Lars Ailo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-05-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0303704</spage><pages>e0303704-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>There is currently no systematic review of the growing body of literature on using social robots in early developmental research. Designing appropriate methods for early childhood research is crucial for broadening our understanding of young children's social and cognitive development. This scoping review systematically examines the existing literature on using social robots to study social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers aged between 2 and 35 months. Moreover, it aims to identify the research focus, findings, and reported gaps and challenges when using robots in research. We included empirical studies published between 1990 and May 29, 2023. We searched for literature in PsychINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and PsyArXiv. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were mapped using the scoping review method. Our findings reveal that most studies were quantitative, with experimental designs conducted in a laboratory setting where children were exposed to physically present or virtual robots in a one-to-one situation. We found that robots were used to investigate four main concepts: animacy concept, action understanding, imitation, and early conversational skills. Many studies focused on whether young children regard robots as agents or social partners. The studies demonstrated that young children could learn from and understand social robots in some situations but not always. For instance, children's understanding of social robots was often facilitated by robots that behaved interactively and contingently. This scoping review highlights the need to design social robots that can engage in interactive and contingent social behaviors for early developmental research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38748722</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0303704</doi><tpages>e0303704</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7373-0209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-916X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2024-05, Vol.19 (5), p.e0303704 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3069288013 |
source | MEDLINE; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Sociological Abstracts; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Book publishing Child development Child Development - physiology Child, Preschool Children Children & youth Cognition - physiology Cognition in children Cognitive development Conversation Design Engineering and Technology Humans Imitation Inclusion Infant Infants International economic relations Medicine and Health Sciences People and Places Preprints Psychological aspects Psychological research R&D Research & development Research design Research methodology Research robots Reviews Robotics Robots Social aspects Social Behavior Social interaction Social Sciences Toddlers |
title | Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A32%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20robots%20in%20research%20on%20social%20and%20cognitive%20development%20in%20infants%20and%20toddlers:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Flateb%C3%B8,%20Solveig&rft.date=2024-05-15&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0303704&rft.pages=e0303704-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0303704&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA793941444%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069288013&rft_id=info:pmid/38748722&rft_galeid=A793941444&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4c290c1d8787486fb777088edb1ad2bc&rfr_iscdi=true |