Individual differences in cooperative and competitive play strategies

Cooperation and competition are common in social interactions. It is not clear how individual differences in personality may predict performance strategies under these two contexts. We evaluated whether instructions to play cooperatively and competitively would differentially affect dyads playing a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2023-11, Vol.18 (11), p.e0293583-e0293583
Hauptverfasser: Hauge, Theresa C, Ferris, Daniel P, Seidler, Rachael D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0293583
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0293583
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator Hauge, Theresa C
Ferris, Daniel P
Seidler, Rachael D
description Cooperation and competition are common in social interactions. It is not clear how individual differences in personality may predict performance strategies under these two contexts. We evaluated whether instructions to play cooperatively and competitively would differentially affect dyads playing a Pong video game. We hypothesized that instructions to play cooperatively would result in lower overall points scored and differences in paddle control kinematics relative to when participants were instructed to play competitively. We also predicted that higher scores in prosociality and Sportspersonship would be related to better performance during cooperative than competitive conditions. Pairs of participants played a Pong video game under cooperative and competitive instructions. During competitive trials, participants were instructed to score more points against one another to win the game. During the cooperative trials, participants were instructed to work together to score as few points against one another as possible. After game play, each participant completed surveys so we could measure their trait prosociality and Sportspersonship. Condition was a significant predictor of where along the paddle participants hit the ball, which controlled ball exit angles. Specifically, during cooperation participants concentrated ball contacts on the paddle towards the center to produce more consistent rebound angles. We found a significant correlation of Sex and the average points scored by participants during cooperative games, competitive games, and across all trials. Sex was also significantly correlated with paddle kinematics during cooperative games. The overall scores on the prosociality and Sportspersonship surveys were not significantly correlated with the performance outcomes in cooperative and competitive games. The dimension of prosociality assessing empathic concern was significantly correlated with performance outcomes during cooperative video game play. No Sportspersonship survey score was able to predict cooperative or competitive game performance, suggesting that Sportspersonship personality assessments are not reliable predictors of cooperative or competitive behaviors translated to a virtual game setting. Survey items and dimensions probing broader empathic concern may be more effective predictors of cooperative and competitive performance during interactive video game play. Further testing is encouraged to assess the efficacy of prosocial personality
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0293583
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069280632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772190630</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d501dd6f01d44c6780a67e53971c5969</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A772190630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-f35677da985794d6e8b1557d1943b26599b1ff6745e70a7aaba00e8752fec3553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4so3rn6HwgWBNGHXZOmSZonOY5TFw4O_PUasslkN0ua1KZdvP_e7G2Vq9yDBJLM5DPfzAxTFC8xWmHC8ft9HPug_KqLAVaoEoQ25FFxjgWplqxC5PG9-1nxLKU9QpQ0jD0tzggXdb6S8-JqHYw7ODMqXxpnLfQQNKTShVLH2EGvBneAUgWT7baDwd3ZnVe3ZRryK2wdpOfFE6t8ghfTuSi-f7z6dvl5eX3zaX15cb3UDIthaQllnBslGpoTMAyaDaaUG5yz2VSMCrHB1jJeU-BIcaU2CiFoOK0saEIpWRSvTrqdj0lOHUiSICaqBjFSZWJ9IkxUe9n1rlX9rYzKyTtH7LdS9YPTHqShCBvDbN7rWjPeIMU4UCI41lQwkbU-TL-NmxaMhpAL9jPR-UtwO7mNB4lzKpTWPCu8nRT6-HOENMjWJQ3eqwBxTLJqGlGRps71L4rX_6APlzdRW5UrcMHG_LE-isoLzissMoUytXqAystA63SeF-uyfxbwbhaQmQF-DVs1piTXX7_8P3vzY86-ucfuQPlhl6IfBxdDmoP1CdR9TKkH-7fLGMnjuP_phjyOu5zGnfwGWL7vBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069280632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual differences in cooperative and competitive play strategies</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hauge, Theresa C ; Ferris, Daniel P ; Seidler, Rachael D</creator><contributor>Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Theresa C ; Ferris, Daniel P ; Seidler, Rachael D ; Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván</creatorcontrib><description>Cooperation and competition are common in social interactions. It is not clear how individual differences in personality may predict performance strategies under these two contexts. We evaluated whether instructions to play cooperatively and competitively would differentially affect dyads playing a Pong video game. We hypothesized that instructions to play cooperatively would result in lower overall points scored and differences in paddle control kinematics relative to when participants were instructed to play competitively. We also predicted that higher scores in prosociality and Sportspersonship would be related to better performance during cooperative than competitive conditions. Pairs of participants played a Pong video game under cooperative and competitive instructions. During competitive trials, participants were instructed to score more points against one another to win the game. During the cooperative trials, participants were instructed to work together to score as few points against one another as possible. After game play, each participant completed surveys so we could measure their trait prosociality and Sportspersonship. Condition was a significant predictor of where along the paddle participants hit the ball, which controlled ball exit angles. Specifically, during cooperation participants concentrated ball contacts on the paddle towards the center to produce more consistent rebound angles. We found a significant correlation of Sex and the average points scored by participants during cooperative games, competitive games, and across all trials. Sex was also significantly correlated with paddle kinematics during cooperative games. The overall scores on the prosociality and Sportspersonship surveys were not significantly correlated with the performance outcomes in cooperative and competitive games. The dimension of prosociality assessing empathic concern was significantly correlated with performance outcomes during cooperative video game play. No Sportspersonship survey score was able to predict cooperative or competitive game performance, suggesting that Sportspersonship personality assessments are not reliable predictors of cooperative or competitive behaviors translated to a virtual game setting. Survey items and dimensions probing broader empathic concern may be more effective predictors of cooperative and competitive performance during interactive video game play. Further testing is encouraged to assess the efficacy of prosocial personality traits as predictors of cooperative and competitive video game behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37943863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Business competition ; Competition (Psychology) ; Computer &amp; video games ; Contact angle ; Cooperation ; Cooperation (Economics) ; Correlation ; Evaluation ; Game theory ; Gamers ; Human performance ; Individual differences ; Kinematics ; Methods ; Morality ; Personality ; Personality tests ; Personality traits ; Physical Sciences ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Preferences ; Prosocial behavior ; Rehabilitation ; Sex ; Social aspects ; Social behavior ; Social interaction ; Social interactions ; Social Sciences ; Surveys ; Video games</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-11, Vol.18 (11), p.e0293583-e0293583</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Hauge et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Hauge et al 2023 Hauge et al</rights><rights>2023 Hauge et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-f35677da985794d6e8b1557d1943b26599b1ff6745e70a7aaba00e8752fec3553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8203-7397 ; 0000-0001-6373-6021 ; 0000-0003-2452-9024</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635547/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635547/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,2932,23875,27353,27933,27934,33783,53800,53802</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Theresa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidler, Rachael D</creatorcontrib><title>Individual differences in cooperative and competitive play strategies</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Cooperation and competition are common in social interactions. It is not clear how individual differences in personality may predict performance strategies under these two contexts. We evaluated whether instructions to play cooperatively and competitively would differentially affect dyads playing a Pong video game. We hypothesized that instructions to play cooperatively would result in lower overall points scored and differences in paddle control kinematics relative to when participants were instructed to play competitively. We also predicted that higher scores in prosociality and Sportspersonship would be related to better performance during cooperative than competitive conditions. Pairs of participants played a Pong video game under cooperative and competitive instructions. During competitive trials, participants were instructed to score more points against one another to win the game. During the cooperative trials, participants were instructed to work together to score as few points against one another as possible. After game play, each participant completed surveys so we could measure their trait prosociality and Sportspersonship. Condition was a significant predictor of where along the paddle participants hit the ball, which controlled ball exit angles. Specifically, during cooperation participants concentrated ball contacts on the paddle towards the center to produce more consistent rebound angles. We found a significant correlation of Sex and the average points scored by participants during cooperative games, competitive games, and across all trials. Sex was also significantly correlated with paddle kinematics during cooperative games. The overall scores on the prosociality and Sportspersonship surveys were not significantly correlated with the performance outcomes in cooperative and competitive games. The dimension of prosociality assessing empathic concern was significantly correlated with performance outcomes during cooperative video game play. No Sportspersonship survey score was able to predict cooperative or competitive game performance, suggesting that Sportspersonship personality assessments are not reliable predictors of cooperative or competitive behaviors translated to a virtual game setting. Survey items and dimensions probing broader empathic concern may be more effective predictors of cooperative and competitive performance during interactive video game play. Further testing is encouraged to assess the efficacy of prosocial personality traits as predictors of cooperative and competitive video game behavior.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Business competition</subject><subject>Competition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Computer &amp; video games</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperation (Economics)</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Gamers</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality tests</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prosocial behavior</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Video games</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-L1DAQx4so3rn6HwgWBNGHXZOmSZonOY5TFw4O_PUasslkN0ua1KZdvP_e7G2Vq9yDBJLM5DPfzAxTFC8xWmHC8ft9HPug_KqLAVaoEoQ25FFxjgWplqxC5PG9-1nxLKU9QpQ0jD0tzggXdb6S8-JqHYw7ODMqXxpnLfQQNKTShVLH2EGvBneAUgWT7baDwd3ZnVe3ZRryK2wdpOfFE6t8ghfTuSi-f7z6dvl5eX3zaX15cb3UDIthaQllnBslGpoTMAyaDaaUG5yz2VSMCrHB1jJeU-BIcaU2CiFoOK0saEIpWRSvTrqdj0lOHUiSICaqBjFSZWJ9IkxUe9n1rlX9rYzKyTtH7LdS9YPTHqShCBvDbN7rWjPeIMU4UCI41lQwkbU-TL-NmxaMhpAL9jPR-UtwO7mNB4lzKpTWPCu8nRT6-HOENMjWJQ3eqwBxTLJqGlGRps71L4rX_6APlzdRW5UrcMHG_LE-isoLzissMoUytXqAystA63SeF-uyfxbwbhaQmQF-DVs1piTXX7_8P3vzY86-ucfuQPlhl6IfBxdDmoP1CdR9TKkH-7fLGMnjuP_phjyOu5zGnfwGWL7vBA</recordid><startdate>20231109</startdate><enddate>20231109</enddate><creator>Hauge, Theresa C</creator><creator>Ferris, Daniel P</creator><creator>Seidler, Rachael D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-7397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-6021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-9024</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231109</creationdate><title>Individual differences in cooperative and competitive play strategies</title><author>Hauge, Theresa C ; Ferris, Daniel P ; Seidler, Rachael D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-f35677da985794d6e8b1557d1943b26599b1ff6745e70a7aaba00e8752fec3553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Business competition</topic><topic>Competition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Computer &amp; video games</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperation (Economics)</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Gamers</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality tests</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prosocial behavior</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Video games</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauge, Theresa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Daniel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidler, Rachael D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauge, Theresa C</au><au>Ferris, Daniel P</au><au>Seidler, Rachael D</au><au>Barreda-Tarrazona, Iván</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Individual differences in cooperative and competitive play strategies</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-11-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0293583</spage><epage>e0293583</epage><pages>e0293583-e0293583</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Cooperation and competition are common in social interactions. It is not clear how individual differences in personality may predict performance strategies under these two contexts. We evaluated whether instructions to play cooperatively and competitively would differentially affect dyads playing a Pong video game. We hypothesized that instructions to play cooperatively would result in lower overall points scored and differences in paddle control kinematics relative to when participants were instructed to play competitively. We also predicted that higher scores in prosociality and Sportspersonship would be related to better performance during cooperative than competitive conditions. Pairs of participants played a Pong video game under cooperative and competitive instructions. During competitive trials, participants were instructed to score more points against one another to win the game. During the cooperative trials, participants were instructed to work together to score as few points against one another as possible. After game play, each participant completed surveys so we could measure their trait prosociality and Sportspersonship. Condition was a significant predictor of where along the paddle participants hit the ball, which controlled ball exit angles. Specifically, during cooperation participants concentrated ball contacts on the paddle towards the center to produce more consistent rebound angles. We found a significant correlation of Sex and the average points scored by participants during cooperative games, competitive games, and across all trials. Sex was also significantly correlated with paddle kinematics during cooperative games. The overall scores on the prosociality and Sportspersonship surveys were not significantly correlated with the performance outcomes in cooperative and competitive games. The dimension of prosociality assessing empathic concern was significantly correlated with performance outcomes during cooperative video game play. No Sportspersonship survey score was able to predict cooperative or competitive game performance, suggesting that Sportspersonship personality assessments are not reliable predictors of cooperative or competitive behaviors translated to a virtual game setting. Survey items and dimensions probing broader empathic concern may be more effective predictors of cooperative and competitive performance during interactive video game play. Further testing is encouraged to assess the efficacy of prosocial personality traits as predictors of cooperative and competitive video game behavior.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37943863</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0293583</doi><tpages>e0293583</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-7397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6373-6021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-9024</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-11, Vol.18 (11), p.e0293583-e0293583
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3069280632
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Analysis
Behavior
Biology and Life Sciences
Business competition
Competition (Psychology)
Computer & video games
Contact angle
Cooperation
Cooperation (Economics)
Correlation
Evaluation
Game theory
Gamers
Human performance
Individual differences
Kinematics
Methods
Morality
Personality
Personality tests
Personality traits
Physical Sciences
Polls & surveys
Preferences
Prosocial behavior
Rehabilitation
Sex
Social aspects
Social behavior
Social interaction
Social interactions
Social Sciences
Surveys
Video games
title Individual differences in cooperative and competitive play strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-30T03%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20differences%20in%20cooperative%20and%20competitive%20play%20strategies&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hauge,%20Theresa%20C&rft.date=2023-11-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0293583&rft.epage=e0293583&rft.pages=e0293583-e0293583&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0293583&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA772190630%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069280632&rft_id=info:pmid/37943863&rft_galeid=A772190630&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d501dd6f01d44c6780a67e53971c5969&rfr_iscdi=true