Prospective cohort study of surgical site infections following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India
Caesarean section (CS) is considered to be a life-saving operative intervention for women and new-borns in certain antepartum and intrapartum conditions. Caesarean delivery may be accompanied by several complications including surgical site infections (SSI). However, there is a significant lack of u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0286165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0286165 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Basany, Kalpana Chaudhuri, Sirshendu Shailaja P, Lakshmi Agiwal, Varun Angaali, Neelima A Y, Nirupama D, Shailendra Haggerty, Catherine Reddy, P S |
description | Caesarean section (CS) is considered to be a life-saving operative intervention for women and new-borns in certain antepartum and intrapartum conditions. Caesarean delivery may be accompanied by several complications including surgical site infections (SSI). However, there is a significant lack of uniformity in the administration of antibiotics for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) following caesarean deliveries. The present study was conducted to determine the incidence of post CS SSI following the adoption of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis as recommended by WHO at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India. Also, to identify the risk factors of SSI and reported the bacteriological profiles and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the culture positive isolates.
To estimate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI's) according to CDC criteria following WHO-recommended single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India.
A prospective hospital-based study was conducted between June 2017 and December 2019, in which women who underwent caesarean delivery were followed up for 30 days post-delivery. Clinical details were collected using a structured questionnaire, and participants were followed up weekly after discharge to document any signs and symptoms of SSI. Symptomatic patients were requested to come to the hospital for further investigation and treatment. Standard microbiological tests were conducted to detect microorganisms and their antibiotic sensitivity.
The study included 2,015 participants with a mean age of 24.1 years. The majority were multigravida (n = 1,274, 63.2%) and underwent emergency caesarean delivery (n = 1,232, 61.1%). Ninety two participants (4.6%, 95% CI: 3.7% to 5.6%) developed surgical site infections, with 91 (98.9%) having superficial and 1 (1.1%) having a deep infection. Among those who developed an SSI, 84 (91.3%) did so during their hospital stay, while 8 (8.7%) developed an SSI at home. The adjusted relative risk (a RR) for developing an SSI was 2.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 4.6; power 99.9%) among obese women and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.1 to 4.7; power 100%) among women aged 25 years or younger. Microbial growth in culture was observed from 55 (75.8%) out of total 66 samples. The most common organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7(12.3%)23, 46.0%), Klebsiella sp. (n = 13, 26.0%), and Escherichia coli (n = 12, 24.0%).
The rate of SSI follo |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0286165 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069269609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780401206</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3115194245994373a22b9df77a4d8d84</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A780401206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-55e2efc783d1bf5ede49275be7cf4f8ef12516d0eea7cc23603bc93dc34c25913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISGQ2MWHnHyFqorDSkVFnG4trz1JvPLGwXZK96F4R7zdbbVBvUC5SOL55p-DZ7LsKcFzwiryduVG30s7H1wPc0zrkpTFveyYcEZnJcXs_sH3UfYohBXGBavL8mF2xGpaEVbz4-zPF-_CACqaS0DKdc5HFOKoN8g1KIy-NUpaFEwEZPpmy7k-oMZZ636bvk2WvrWAtAuAZB_N0rhoFBq8G7qNlVcmJD-kJATpQfYo7CSQjEiiCD4a6TfJ7iH9SdVtNbuUkYkpbPL8DFp10r5Bi14b-Th70Egb4Mn-fZL9-PD--9mn2fnFx8XZ6flMlTmNs6IACo2qaqbJsilAQ85pVSyhUk3e1NAQWpBSYwBZKUVZidlScaYVyxUtOGEn2fOd7mBdEPtOB8FwyWnJS8wTsdgR2smVGLxZpzqEk0ZcHzjfCpmKUxYEI6QgPKd5wXnOKiYpXXLdVJXMda3rPGm920cbl-tUL_TRSzsRnVp604nWXQqCa4ILus331V7Bu18jhCjWJiiwVvbgxiAoJ7zKU95FQl_8g95d3p5qZaog3bxLgdVWVJxWNc4xobhM1PwOKj0a1kaluWxMOp84vJ44JCbCVWzlGIJYfPv6_-zFzyn78oDtQNrYBWfH62mdgvkOVGnsg4fmtssEi-1a3XRDbNdK7NcquT07vKFbp5s9Yn8Bz2gggQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069269609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective cohort study of surgical site infections following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Basany, Kalpana ; Chaudhuri, Sirshendu ; Shailaja P, Lakshmi ; Agiwal, Varun ; Angaali, Neelima ; A Y, Nirupama ; D, Shailendra ; Haggerty, Catherine ; Reddy, P S</creator><contributor>Das, Arghya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Basany, Kalpana ; Chaudhuri, Sirshendu ; Shailaja P, Lakshmi ; Agiwal, Varun ; Angaali, Neelima ; A Y, Nirupama ; D, Shailendra ; Haggerty, Catherine ; Reddy, P S ; Das, Arghya</creatorcontrib><description>Caesarean section (CS) is considered to be a life-saving operative intervention for women and new-borns in certain antepartum and intrapartum conditions. Caesarean delivery may be accompanied by several complications including surgical site infections (SSI). However, there is a significant lack of uniformity in the administration of antibiotics for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) following caesarean deliveries. The present study was conducted to determine the incidence of post CS SSI following the adoption of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis as recommended by WHO at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India. Also, to identify the risk factors of SSI and reported the bacteriological profiles and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the culture positive isolates.
To estimate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI's) according to CDC criteria following WHO-recommended single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India.
A prospective hospital-based study was conducted between June 2017 and December 2019, in which women who underwent caesarean delivery were followed up for 30 days post-delivery. Clinical details were collected using a structured questionnaire, and participants were followed up weekly after discharge to document any signs and symptoms of SSI. Symptomatic patients were requested to come to the hospital for further investigation and treatment. Standard microbiological tests were conducted to detect microorganisms and their antibiotic sensitivity.
The study included 2,015 participants with a mean age of 24.1 years. The majority were multigravida (n = 1,274, 63.2%) and underwent emergency caesarean delivery (n = 1,232, 61.1%). Ninety two participants (4.6%, 95% CI: 3.7% to 5.6%) developed surgical site infections, with 91 (98.9%) having superficial and 1 (1.1%) having a deep infection. Among those who developed an SSI, 84 (91.3%) did so during their hospital stay, while 8 (8.7%) developed an SSI at home. The adjusted relative risk (a RR) for developing an SSI was 2.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 4.6; power 99.9%) among obese women and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.1 to 4.7; power 100%) among women aged 25 years or younger. Microbial growth in culture was observed from 55 (75.8%) out of total 66 samples. The most common organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7(12.3%)23, 46.0%), Klebsiella sp. (n = 13, 26.0%), and Escherichia coli (n = 12, 24.0%).
The rate of SSI following caesarean deliveries subjected to single dose antibiotic prophylaxis was low. Young women and obese women were at high risk of developing SSI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38271389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - adverse effects ; Antibiotics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body mass index ; Care and treatment ; Cesarean section ; Cesarean Section - adverse effects ; Complications and side effects ; Disease prevention ; Drug dosages ; E coli ; Female ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Klebsiella ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Microorganisms ; Obesity - etiology ; Patient outcomes ; Pregnancy ; Prophylaxis ; Prospective Studies ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Signs and symptoms ; Surgery ; Surgical site infections ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Surgical wound infections ; Teaching hospitals ; Tertiary Healthcare ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0286165</ispartof><rights>Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-55e2efc783d1bf5ede49275be7cf4f8ef12516d0eea7cc23603bc93dc34c25913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5037-214X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810521/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810521/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38271389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Das, Arghya</contributor><creatorcontrib>Basany, Kalpana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Sirshendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shailaja P, Lakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agiwal, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angaali, Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A Y, Nirupama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D, Shailendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, P S</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective cohort study of surgical site infections following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Caesarean section (CS) is considered to be a life-saving operative intervention for women and new-borns in certain antepartum and intrapartum conditions. Caesarean delivery may be accompanied by several complications including surgical site infections (SSI). However, there is a significant lack of uniformity in the administration of antibiotics for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) following caesarean deliveries. The present study was conducted to determine the incidence of post CS SSI following the adoption of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis as recommended by WHO at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India. Also, to identify the risk factors of SSI and reported the bacteriological profiles and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the culture positive isolates.
To estimate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI's) according to CDC criteria following WHO-recommended single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India.
A prospective hospital-based study was conducted between June 2017 and December 2019, in which women who underwent caesarean delivery were followed up for 30 days post-delivery. Clinical details were collected using a structured questionnaire, and participants were followed up weekly after discharge to document any signs and symptoms of SSI. Symptomatic patients were requested to come to the hospital for further investigation and treatment. Standard microbiological tests were conducted to detect microorganisms and their antibiotic sensitivity.
The study included 2,015 participants with a mean age of 24.1 years. The majority were multigravida (n = 1,274, 63.2%) and underwent emergency caesarean delivery (n = 1,232, 61.1%). Ninety two participants (4.6%, 95% CI: 3.7% to 5.6%) developed surgical site infections, with 91 (98.9%) having superficial and 1 (1.1%) having a deep infection. Among those who developed an SSI, 84 (91.3%) did so during their hospital stay, while 8 (8.7%) developed an SSI at home. The adjusted relative risk (a RR) for developing an SSI was 2.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 4.6; power 99.9%) among obese women and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.1 to 4.7; power 100%) among women aged 25 years or younger. Microbial growth in culture was observed from 55 (75.8%) out of total 66 samples. The most common organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7(12.3%)23, 46.0%), Klebsiella sp. (n = 13, 26.0%), and Escherichia coli (n = 12, 24.0%).
The rate of SSI following caesarean deliveries subjected to single dose antibiotic prophylaxis was low. Young women and obese women were at high risk of developing SSI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Klebsiella</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Obesity - etiology</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical site infections</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Surgical wound infections</subject><subject>Teaching hospitals</subject><subject>Tertiary Healthcare</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsISGQ2MWHnHyFqorDSkVFnG4trz1JvPLGwXZK96F4R7zdbbVBvUC5SOL55p-DZ7LsKcFzwiryduVG30s7H1wPc0zrkpTFveyYcEZnJcXs_sH3UfYohBXGBavL8mF2xGpaEVbz4-zPF-_CACqaS0DKdc5HFOKoN8g1KIy-NUpaFEwEZPpmy7k-oMZZ636bvk2WvrWAtAuAZB_N0rhoFBq8G7qNlVcmJD-kJATpQfYo7CSQjEiiCD4a6TfJ7iH9SdVtNbuUkYkpbPL8DFp10r5Bi14b-Th70Egb4Mn-fZL9-PD--9mn2fnFx8XZ6flMlTmNs6IACo2qaqbJsilAQ85pVSyhUk3e1NAQWpBSYwBZKUVZidlScaYVyxUtOGEn2fOd7mBdEPtOB8FwyWnJS8wTsdgR2smVGLxZpzqEk0ZcHzjfCpmKUxYEI6QgPKd5wXnOKiYpXXLdVJXMda3rPGm920cbl-tUL_TRSzsRnVp604nWXQqCa4ILus331V7Bu18jhCjWJiiwVvbgxiAoJ7zKU95FQl_8g95d3p5qZaog3bxLgdVWVJxWNc4xobhM1PwOKj0a1kaluWxMOp84vJ44JCbCVWzlGIJYfPv6_-zFzyn78oDtQNrYBWfH62mdgvkOVGnsg4fmtssEi-1a3XRDbNdK7NcquT07vKFbp5s9Yn8Bz2gggQ</recordid><startdate>20240125</startdate><enddate>20240125</enddate><creator>Basany, Kalpana</creator><creator>Chaudhuri, Sirshendu</creator><creator>Shailaja P, Lakshmi</creator><creator>Agiwal, Varun</creator><creator>Angaali, Neelima</creator><creator>A Y, Nirupama</creator><creator>D, Shailendra</creator><creator>Haggerty, Catherine</creator><creator>Reddy, P S</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5037-214X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240125</creationdate><title>Prospective cohort study of surgical site infections following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India</title><author>Basany, Kalpana ; Chaudhuri, Sirshendu ; Shailaja P, Lakshmi ; Agiwal, Varun ; Angaali, Neelima ; A Y, Nirupama ; D, Shailendra ; Haggerty, Catherine ; Reddy, P S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-55e2efc783d1bf5ede49275be7cf4f8ef12516d0eea7cc23603bc93dc34c25913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Klebsiella</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Obesity - etiology</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical site infections</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Surgical wound infections</topic><topic>Teaching hospitals</topic><topic>Tertiary Healthcare</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basany, Kalpana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhuri, Sirshendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shailaja P, Lakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agiwal, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angaali, Neelima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A Y, Nirupama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D, Shailendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haggerty, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, P S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basany, Kalpana</au><au>Chaudhuri, Sirshendu</au><au>Shailaja P, Lakshmi</au><au>Agiwal, Varun</au><au>Angaali, Neelima</au><au>A Y, Nirupama</au><au>D, Shailendra</au><au>Haggerty, Catherine</au><au>Reddy, P S</au><au>Das, Arghya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective cohort study of surgical site infections following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-01-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0286165</spage><pages>e0286165-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Caesarean section (CS) is considered to be a life-saving operative intervention for women and new-borns in certain antepartum and intrapartum conditions. Caesarean delivery may be accompanied by several complications including surgical site infections (SSI). However, there is a significant lack of uniformity in the administration of antibiotics for preventing surgical site infections (SSI) following caesarean deliveries. The present study was conducted to determine the incidence of post CS SSI following the adoption of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis as recommended by WHO at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India. Also, to identify the risk factors of SSI and reported the bacteriological profiles and the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the culture positive isolates.
To estimate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI's) according to CDC criteria following WHO-recommended single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India.
A prospective hospital-based study was conducted between June 2017 and December 2019, in which women who underwent caesarean delivery were followed up for 30 days post-delivery. Clinical details were collected using a structured questionnaire, and participants were followed up weekly after discharge to document any signs and symptoms of SSI. Symptomatic patients were requested to come to the hospital for further investigation and treatment. Standard microbiological tests were conducted to detect microorganisms and their antibiotic sensitivity.
The study included 2,015 participants with a mean age of 24.1 years. The majority were multigravida (n = 1,274, 63.2%) and underwent emergency caesarean delivery (n = 1,232, 61.1%). Ninety two participants (4.6%, 95% CI: 3.7% to 5.6%) developed surgical site infections, with 91 (98.9%) having superficial and 1 (1.1%) having a deep infection. Among those who developed an SSI, 84 (91.3%) did so during their hospital stay, while 8 (8.7%) developed an SSI at home. The adjusted relative risk (a RR) for developing an SSI was 2.5 (95% CI: 1.4 to 4.6; power 99.9%) among obese women and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.1 to 4.7; power 100%) among women aged 25 years or younger. Microbial growth in culture was observed from 55 (75.8%) out of total 66 samples. The most common organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 7(12.3%)23, 46.0%), Klebsiella sp. (n = 13, 26.0%), and Escherichia coli (n = 12, 24.0%).
The rate of SSI following caesarean deliveries subjected to single dose antibiotic prophylaxis was low. Young women and obese women were at high risk of developing SSI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38271389</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0286165</doi><tpages>e0286165</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5037-214X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0286165 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3069269609 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adult Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotic Prophylaxis - adverse effects Antibiotics Biology and Life Sciences Body mass index Care and treatment Cesarean section Cesarean Section - adverse effects Complications and side effects Disease prevention Drug dosages E coli Female Hospitals Hospitals, Teaching Humans Infectious diseases Klebsiella Medicine and Health Sciences Microorganisms Obesity - etiology Patient outcomes Pregnancy Prophylaxis Prospective Studies Questionnaires Regression analysis Risk factors Signs and symptoms Surgery Surgical site infections Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control Surgical wound infections Teaching hospitals Tertiary Healthcare Young Adult |
title | Prospective cohort study of surgical site infections following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Medchal, India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T00%3A14%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20cohort%20study%20of%20surgical%20site%20infections%20following%20single%20dose%20antibiotic%20prophylaxis%20in%20caesarean%20section%20at%20a%20tertiary%20care%20teaching%20hospital%20in%20Medchal,%20India&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Basany,%20Kalpana&rft.date=2024-01-25&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0286165&rft.pages=e0286165-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0286165&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA780401206%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069269609&rft_id=info:pmid/38271389&rft_galeid=A780401206&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3115194245994373a22b9df77a4d8d84&rfr_iscdi=true |