Exploring pathways to optimise care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): Protocol for a three-phase critical realist approach to theory-led intervention development for shared decision-making
Malignant bowel obstruction is a distressing complication of cancer, causing pain, nausea and vomiting, and often has a poor prognosis. Severe and rapidly developing symptoms, a lack of robust clinical guidelines and the need for multidisciplinary input make treatment decision-making challenging. Sh...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0294218 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e0294218 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Bravington, Alison Boland, Jason W Greenley, Sarah Lind, Michael Murtagh, Fliss E M Patterson, Michael Pearson, Mark Johnson, Miriam J |
| description | Malignant bowel obstruction is a distressing complication of cancer, causing pain, nausea and vomiting, and often has a poor prognosis. Severe and rapidly developing symptoms, a lack of robust clinical guidelines and the need for multidisciplinary input make treatment decision-making challenging. Sharing decision-making with people with malignant bowel obstruction and their caregivers can be difficult, and inconsistent communication creates serious deficiencies in care by amplifying patients' distress and uncertainty. Little attention has been paid to the implicit influences on this process-for example, the role of discipline-related norms and the beliefs of decision-makers. This study will explore how these processes work and develop interventions to improve shared decision-making.
Exploring Pathways to Optimise Care (EPOC) is a three-phase study set within a critical realist framework: (i) realist review, to develop explanatory theory describing collaborative decision-making in the management of malignant bowel obstruction; (ii) an in-depth interview study using modified grounded theory to explore the active ingredients of this collaboration in practice settings; and (iii) the presentation to stakeholders (practitioners, patients and caregivers) of integrated results from Phase I (theory developed from the literature) and Phase II (theory developed from current practice) as a basis for intervention mapping. We aim to produce recommendations to address the challenges, and to develop a set of tools to (i) aid interaction around shared decision-making and (ii) aid interprofessional interaction around the management of this condition. Registration details: The realist review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022308251). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0294218 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069269607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780401224</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6a074bce1c014116aef5c21f4d9d11ca</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A780401224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-40eecedead47215989dee619b4ea57685dda71d649d09ce24c4e1b3ef9bce8e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggscSmHLLbjODEXVFUFKlVqD3C2Zu3JxiWJg-1t2cfjzfC226pFVQ6Jx_98M_NniuItowtWNezTpV-HCYbF7CdcUK4EZ-2zYp-pipeS0-r5g--94lWMl5TWVSvly2KvannDhGT7xd-TP_Pgg5tWZIbUX8MmkuSJn5MbXURiICBxExlhcKsJpkSW_hoH4pcxhbVJzk_k8OTi_PjjZ3IRfPLGD6TzgQBJfUAs5x62mOCSMzCQgBkUE4F5Dh5Mvy2WevRhUw5oc6WE4QqnG67FKxz8PObjDTL2uRmbw8bFfF-O8Cv3_bp40cEQ8c3ufVD8_Hry4_h7eXb-7fT46Kw0tahSKSiiQYtgRcNZrVplESVTS4FQN7KtrYWGWSmUpcogF0YgW1bYqaXBFml1ULy_5Wa_ot65H3VFpeJSSdpkxemtwnq41HNwI4SN9uD0TcCHlYaQbRhQS6CNyGBmKBOMScCuNpx1wirLmIHM-rKrtl6OaE32IMDwCPr4ZnK9XvkrzWjLqKi3_R7uCMH_XmNMOv9Qg8MAE_p11Fwx1QjJG5mlH_6TPj3eTrWCPIGbOp8Lmy1UHzUtFZRxLrJq8YQqPxZHZ_Kudi7HHyWI2wQTfIwBu_shGdXbTb9rRm83Xe82Pae9e2jQfdLdalf_ANw5AQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069269607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring pathways to optimise care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): Protocol for a three-phase critical realist approach to theory-led intervention development for shared decision-making</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bravington, Alison ; Boland, Jason W ; Greenley, Sarah ; Lind, Michael ; Murtagh, Fliss E M ; Patterson, Michael ; Pearson, Mark ; Johnson, Miriam J</creator><contributor>Pruller, Johanna</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bravington, Alison ; Boland, Jason W ; Greenley, Sarah ; Lind, Michael ; Murtagh, Fliss E M ; Patterson, Michael ; Pearson, Mark ; Johnson, Miriam J ; Pruller, Johanna</creatorcontrib><description>Malignant bowel obstruction is a distressing complication of cancer, causing pain, nausea and vomiting, and often has a poor prognosis. Severe and rapidly developing symptoms, a lack of robust clinical guidelines and the need for multidisciplinary input make treatment decision-making challenging. Sharing decision-making with people with malignant bowel obstruction and their caregivers can be difficult, and inconsistent communication creates serious deficiencies in care by amplifying patients' distress and uncertainty. Little attention has been paid to the implicit influences on this process-for example, the role of discipline-related norms and the beliefs of decision-makers. This study will explore how these processes work and develop interventions to improve shared decision-making.
Exploring Pathways to Optimise Care (EPOC) is a three-phase study set within a critical realist framework: (i) realist review, to develop explanatory theory describing collaborative decision-making in the management of malignant bowel obstruction; (ii) an in-depth interview study using modified grounded theory to explore the active ingredients of this collaboration in practice settings; and (iii) the presentation to stakeholders (practitioners, patients and caregivers) of integrated results from Phase I (theory developed from the literature) and Phase II (theory developed from current practice) as a basis for intervention mapping. We aim to produce recommendations to address the challenges, and to develop a set of tools to (i) aid interaction around shared decision-making and (ii) aid interprofessional interaction around the management of this condition. Registration details: The realist review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022308251).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294218</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38271461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Caregivers ; Clinical decision making ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Decision making ; Diagnosis ; Gastrointestinal cancer ; Health aspects ; Intervention ; Intestinal obstruction ; Intestine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Nausea ; Palliative care ; Patients ; Physical Sciences ; Practice ; Quality of life ; Realism ; Social Sciences ; Stakeholders ; Study Protocol ; Surgery ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0294218</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Bravington et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Bravington et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Bravington et al 2024 Bravington et al</rights><rights>2024 Bravington et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-40eecedead47215989dee619b4ea57685dda71d649d09ce24c4e1b3ef9bce8e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7628-7421 ; 0000-0001-6204-9158 ; 0000-0002-3788-6437 ; 0000-0002-0680-2093</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810450/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810450/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38271461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pruller, Johanna</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bravington, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boland, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtagh, Fliss E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Miriam J</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring pathways to optimise care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): Protocol for a three-phase critical realist approach to theory-led intervention development for shared decision-making</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Malignant bowel obstruction is a distressing complication of cancer, causing pain, nausea and vomiting, and often has a poor prognosis. Severe and rapidly developing symptoms, a lack of robust clinical guidelines and the need for multidisciplinary input make treatment decision-making challenging. Sharing decision-making with people with malignant bowel obstruction and their caregivers can be difficult, and inconsistent communication creates serious deficiencies in care by amplifying patients' distress and uncertainty. Little attention has been paid to the implicit influences on this process-for example, the role of discipline-related norms and the beliefs of decision-makers. This study will explore how these processes work and develop interventions to improve shared decision-making.
Exploring Pathways to Optimise Care (EPOC) is a three-phase study set within a critical realist framework: (i) realist review, to develop explanatory theory describing collaborative decision-making in the management of malignant bowel obstruction; (ii) an in-depth interview study using modified grounded theory to explore the active ingredients of this collaboration in practice settings; and (iii) the presentation to stakeholders (practitioners, patients and caregivers) of integrated results from Phase I (theory developed from the literature) and Phase II (theory developed from current practice) as a basis for intervention mapping. We aim to produce recommendations to address the challenges, and to develop a set of tools to (i) aid interaction around shared decision-making and (ii) aid interprofessional interaction around the management of this condition. Registration details: The realist review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022308251).</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal cancer</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Intestinal obstruction</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Study Protocol</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggscSmHLLbjODEXVFUFKlVqD3C2Zu3JxiWJg-1t2cfjzfC226pFVQ6Jx_98M_NniuItowtWNezTpV-HCYbF7CdcUK4EZ-2zYp-pipeS0-r5g--94lWMl5TWVSvly2KvannDhGT7xd-TP_Pgg5tWZIbUX8MmkuSJn5MbXURiICBxExlhcKsJpkSW_hoH4pcxhbVJzk_k8OTi_PjjZ3IRfPLGD6TzgQBJfUAs5x62mOCSMzCQgBkUE4F5Dh5Mvy2WevRhUw5oc6WE4QqnG67FKxz8PObjDTL2uRmbw8bFfF-O8Cv3_bp40cEQ8c3ufVD8_Hry4_h7eXb-7fT46Kw0tahSKSiiQYtgRcNZrVplESVTS4FQN7KtrYWGWSmUpcogF0YgW1bYqaXBFml1ULy_5Wa_ot65H3VFpeJSSdpkxemtwnq41HNwI4SN9uD0TcCHlYaQbRhQS6CNyGBmKBOMScCuNpx1wirLmIHM-rKrtl6OaE32IMDwCPr4ZnK9XvkrzWjLqKi3_R7uCMH_XmNMOv9Qg8MAE_p11Fwx1QjJG5mlH_6TPj3eTrWCPIGbOp8Lmy1UHzUtFZRxLrJq8YQqPxZHZ_Kudi7HHyWI2wQTfIwBu_shGdXbTb9rRm83Xe82Pae9e2jQfdLdalf_ANw5AQU</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Bravington, Alison</creator><creator>Boland, Jason W</creator><creator>Greenley, Sarah</creator><creator>Lind, Michael</creator><creator>Murtagh, Fliss E M</creator><creator>Patterson, Michael</creator><creator>Pearson, Mark</creator><creator>Johnson, Miriam J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7628-7421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-9158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-6437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-2093</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Exploring pathways to optimise care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): Protocol for a three-phase critical realist approach to theory-led intervention development for shared decision-making</title><author>Bravington, Alison ; Boland, Jason W ; Greenley, Sarah ; Lind, Michael ; Murtagh, Fliss E M ; Patterson, Michael ; Pearson, Mark ; Johnson, Miriam J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-40eecedead47215989dee619b4ea57685dda71d649d09ce24c4e1b3ef9bce8e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal cancer</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Intestinal obstruction</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Study Protocol</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravington, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boland, Jason W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenley, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtagh, Fliss E M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Miriam J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravington, Alison</au><au>Boland, Jason W</au><au>Greenley, Sarah</au><au>Lind, Michael</au><au>Murtagh, Fliss E M</au><au>Patterson, Michael</au><au>Pearson, Mark</au><au>Johnson, Miriam J</au><au>Pruller, Johanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring pathways to optimise care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): Protocol for a three-phase critical realist approach to theory-led intervention development for shared decision-making</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0294218</spage><pages>e0294218-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Malignant bowel obstruction is a distressing complication of cancer, causing pain, nausea and vomiting, and often has a poor prognosis. Severe and rapidly developing symptoms, a lack of robust clinical guidelines and the need for multidisciplinary input make treatment decision-making challenging. Sharing decision-making with people with malignant bowel obstruction and their caregivers can be difficult, and inconsistent communication creates serious deficiencies in care by amplifying patients' distress and uncertainty. Little attention has been paid to the implicit influences on this process-for example, the role of discipline-related norms and the beliefs of decision-makers. This study will explore how these processes work and develop interventions to improve shared decision-making.
Exploring Pathways to Optimise Care (EPOC) is a three-phase study set within a critical realist framework: (i) realist review, to develop explanatory theory describing collaborative decision-making in the management of malignant bowel obstruction; (ii) an in-depth interview study using modified grounded theory to explore the active ingredients of this collaboration in practice settings; and (iii) the presentation to stakeholders (practitioners, patients and caregivers) of integrated results from Phase I (theory developed from the literature) and Phase II (theory developed from current practice) as a basis for intervention mapping. We aim to produce recommendations to address the challenges, and to develop a set of tools to (i) aid interaction around shared decision-making and (ii) aid interprofessional interaction around the management of this condition. Registration details: The realist review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022308251).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38271461</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0294218</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7628-7421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-9158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-6437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0680-2093</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0294218 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3069269607 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Cancer Care and treatment Caregivers Clinical decision making Collaboration Communication Decision making Diagnosis Gastrointestinal cancer Health aspects Intervention Intestinal obstruction Intestine Medicine and Health Sciences Nausea Palliative care Patients Physical Sciences Practice Quality of life Realism Social Sciences Stakeholders Study Protocol Surgery Vomiting |
| title | Exploring pathways to optimise care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): Protocol for a three-phase critical realist approach to theory-led intervention development for shared decision-making |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T07%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20pathways%20to%20optimise%20care%20in%20malignant%20bowel%20obstruction%20(EPOC):%20Protocol%20for%20a%20three-phase%20critical%20realist%20approach%20to%20theory-led%20intervention%20development%20for%20shared%20decision-making&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bravington,%20Alison&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0294218&rft.pages=e0294218-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0294218&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA780401224%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069269607&rft_id=info:pmid/38271461&rft_galeid=A780401224&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6a074bce1c014116aef5c21f4d9d11ca&rfr_iscdi=true |