Divergent responses of human intestinal organoid monolayers using commercial in vitro cytotoxicity assays

In vitro models, such as primary cells and continuous cell lines routinely used for evaluating drug candidates, have limitations in their translational relevance to human diseases. Organotypic cultures are increasingly being used to assess therapeutics for various cancers and infectious diseases. Mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0304526
Hauptverfasser: Lewis, Miranda A, Patil, Ketki, Ettayebi, Khalil, Estes, Mary K, Atmar, Robert L, Ramani, Sasirekha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0304526
container_title PloS one
container_volume 19
creator Lewis, Miranda A
Patil, Ketki
Ettayebi, Khalil
Estes, Mary K
Atmar, Robert L
Ramani, Sasirekha
description In vitro models, such as primary cells and continuous cell lines routinely used for evaluating drug candidates, have limitations in their translational relevance to human diseases. Organotypic cultures are increasingly being used to assess therapeutics for various cancers and infectious diseases. Monitoring drug cytotoxicity in cell cultures is crucial in drug development, and several commercially available kits for cytotoxicity assessment offer distinct advantages and limitations. Given the complexity of organoid cultures, including donor-driven variability, we investigated drug-treated, tissue stem cell-derived human intestinal organoid responses with commonly used cell cytotoxicity assay kits. Using seven different compounds, we compared the cytotoxicity assay performance of two different leaky membrane-based and two metabolism-based assays. Significant variability was seen in reported viability outcomes across assays and organoid lines. High baseline activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in four human intestinal organoid lines required modification of the standard LDH assay protocol. Additionally, the LDH assay reported unique resilience to damage in a genetically-modified line contrasting results compared to other assays. This study highlights factors that can impact the measurement of cell cytotoxicity in intestinal organoid models, which are emerging as valuable new tools for research and pre-clinical drug testing and suggest the need for using multiple assay types to ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0304526
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069267069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A797208192</galeid><sourcerecordid>A797208192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g461t-98fe47052465f0f9a9bfcac45956dc6cbb00aefdc45d00dc4e350af61670d7d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIHqxaz5mksmVlLZqoVDw6zZkM8lsSiZZk8zS-femOsqO9EJyccLJc95z8nKq6jmCa0QYencTxuilW--C12tIYN1g-qA6RpzgFcWQPDy4H1VPUrqBsCEtpY-rI9K2DcMYHVf23O517LXPIOpUtJJOIBiwHQfpgfVZp2xLGxBiL32wHRiCD05OOiYwJut7oMIw6KhsgawHe5tjAGrKIYdbq2yegExJTulp9chIl_SzOZ5U3z5cfD37tLq6_nh5dnq16muK8oq3RtcMNrimjYGGS74xSqq64Q3tFFWbDYRSm65kOghL0KSB0lBEGexYV5OT6uVv3Z0LScwuJUEg5bgwlBfi_UyMm0F3qnw-Sid20Q4yTiJIK5Yv3m5FH_YCIURrwpqi8GZWiOHHWCwSg01KOye9DuOvZpRxVOO7cV79g94_0kz10mlhvQmlsboTFaeMMwxbxHGh1vdQ5XR6sKrsgbElvyh4uygoTNa3uZdjSuLyy-f_Z6-_L9nXB-xWS5e3Kbgx27JAS_DFodV_Pf6zgOQnFDbeWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069267069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent responses of human intestinal organoid monolayers using commercial in vitro cytotoxicity assays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lewis, Miranda A ; Patil, Ketki ; Ettayebi, Khalil ; Estes, Mary K ; Atmar, Robert L ; Ramani, Sasirekha</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Miranda A ; Patil, Ketki ; Ettayebi, Khalil ; Estes, Mary K ; Atmar, Robert L ; Ramani, Sasirekha</creatorcontrib><description>In vitro models, such as primary cells and continuous cell lines routinely used for evaluating drug candidates, have limitations in their translational relevance to human diseases. Organotypic cultures are increasingly being used to assess therapeutics for various cancers and infectious diseases. Monitoring drug cytotoxicity in cell cultures is crucial in drug development, and several commercially available kits for cytotoxicity assessment offer distinct advantages and limitations. Given the complexity of organoid cultures, including donor-driven variability, we investigated drug-treated, tissue stem cell-derived human intestinal organoid responses with commonly used cell cytotoxicity assay kits. Using seven different compounds, we compared the cytotoxicity assay performance of two different leaky membrane-based and two metabolism-based assays. Significant variability was seen in reported viability outcomes across assays and organoid lines. High baseline activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in four human intestinal organoid lines required modification of the standard LDH assay protocol. Additionally, the LDH assay reported unique resilience to damage in a genetically-modified line contrasting results compared to other assays. This study highlights factors that can impact the measurement of cell cytotoxicity in intestinal organoid models, which are emerging as valuable new tools for research and pre-clinical drug testing and suggest the need for using multiple assay types to ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304526</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38857221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Assaying ; Auranofin ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cell culture ; Cell lines ; Cell Survival - drug effects ; Cells ; Cytotoxicity ; Dehydrogenases ; Drug development ; Drug interactions ; Drug testing ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Genetic modification ; Genetically modified organisms ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Intestinal Mucosa - cytology ; Intestinal Mucosa - drug effects ; Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism ; Intestine ; Intestines - cytology ; L-Lactate dehydrogenase ; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - metabolism ; Lactate dehydrogenase ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Metabolism ; Organoids ; Organoids - cytology ; Organoids - drug effects ; Organoids - metabolism ; Regression analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Stem cells ; Toxic diseases ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0304526</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Lewis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Lewis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Lewis et al 2024 Lewis et al</rights><rights>2024 Lewis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5631-8534</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164375/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164375/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,23864,27922,27923,53789,53791,79370,79371</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38857221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Miranda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Ketki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettayebi, Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, Mary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmar, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramani, Sasirekha</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent responses of human intestinal organoid monolayers using commercial in vitro cytotoxicity assays</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In vitro models, such as primary cells and continuous cell lines routinely used for evaluating drug candidates, have limitations in their translational relevance to human diseases. Organotypic cultures are increasingly being used to assess therapeutics for various cancers and infectious diseases. Monitoring drug cytotoxicity in cell cultures is crucial in drug development, and several commercially available kits for cytotoxicity assessment offer distinct advantages and limitations. Given the complexity of organoid cultures, including donor-driven variability, we investigated drug-treated, tissue stem cell-derived human intestinal organoid responses with commonly used cell cytotoxicity assay kits. Using seven different compounds, we compared the cytotoxicity assay performance of two different leaky membrane-based and two metabolism-based assays. Significant variability was seen in reported viability outcomes across assays and organoid lines. High baseline activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in four human intestinal organoid lines required modification of the standard LDH assay protocol. Additionally, the LDH assay reported unique resilience to damage in a genetically-modified line contrasting results compared to other assays. This study highlights factors that can impact the measurement of cell cytotoxicity in intestinal organoid models, which are emerging as valuable new tools for research and pre-clinical drug testing and suggest the need for using multiple assay types to ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessment.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Auranofin</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Cell Survival - drug effects</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Dehydrogenases</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Drug interactions</subject><subject>Drug testing</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Genetic modification</subject><subject>Genetically modified organisms</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - cytology</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - drug effects</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Intestines - cytology</subject><subject>L-Lactate dehydrogenase</subject><subject>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - metabolism</subject><subject>Lactate dehydrogenase</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Organoids</subject><subject>Organoids - cytology</subject><subject>Organoids - drug effects</subject><subject>Organoids - metabolism</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Toxic diseases</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIHqxaz5mksmVlLZqoVDw6zZkM8lsSiZZk8zS-femOsqO9EJyccLJc95z8nKq6jmCa0QYencTxuilW--C12tIYN1g-qA6RpzgFcWQPDy4H1VPUrqBsCEtpY-rI9K2DcMYHVf23O517LXPIOpUtJJOIBiwHQfpgfVZp2xLGxBiL32wHRiCD05OOiYwJut7oMIw6KhsgawHe5tjAGrKIYdbq2yegExJTulp9chIl_SzOZ5U3z5cfD37tLq6_nh5dnq16muK8oq3RtcMNrimjYGGS74xSqq64Q3tFFWbDYRSm65kOghL0KSB0lBEGexYV5OT6uVv3Z0LScwuJUEg5bgwlBfi_UyMm0F3qnw-Sid20Q4yTiJIK5Yv3m5FH_YCIURrwpqi8GZWiOHHWCwSg01KOye9DuOvZpRxVOO7cV79g94_0kz10mlhvQmlsboTFaeMMwxbxHGh1vdQ5XR6sKrsgbElvyh4uygoTNa3uZdjSuLyy-f_Z6-_L9nXB-xWS5e3Kbgx27JAS_DFodV_Pf6zgOQnFDbeWA</recordid><startdate>20240610</startdate><enddate>20240610</enddate><creator>Lewis, Miranda A</creator><creator>Patil, Ketki</creator><creator>Ettayebi, Khalil</creator><creator>Estes, Mary K</creator><creator>Atmar, Robert L</creator><creator>Ramani, Sasirekha</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5631-8534</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240610</creationdate><title>Divergent responses of human intestinal organoid monolayers using commercial in vitro cytotoxicity assays</title><author>Lewis, Miranda A ; Patil, Ketki ; Ettayebi, Khalil ; Estes, Mary K ; Atmar, Robert L ; Ramani, Sasirekha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g461t-98fe47052465f0f9a9bfcac45956dc6cbb00aefdc45d00dc4e350af61670d7d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Auranofin</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Cell Survival - drug effects</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Dehydrogenases</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Drug interactions</topic><topic>Drug testing</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Genetic modification</topic><topic>Genetically modified organisms</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - cytology</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - drug effects</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Intestines - cytology</topic><topic>L-Lactate dehydrogenase</topic><topic>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - metabolism</topic><topic>Lactate dehydrogenase</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Organoids</topic><topic>Organoids - cytology</topic><topic>Organoids - drug effects</topic><topic>Organoids - metabolism</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Toxic diseases</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Miranda A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patil, Ketki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettayebi, Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, Mary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmar, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramani, Sasirekha</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Miranda A</au><au>Patil, Ketki</au><au>Ettayebi, Khalil</au><au>Estes, Mary K</au><au>Atmar, Robert L</au><au>Ramani, Sasirekha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent responses of human intestinal organoid monolayers using commercial in vitro cytotoxicity assays</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-06-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0304526</spage><pages>e0304526-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In vitro models, such as primary cells and continuous cell lines routinely used for evaluating drug candidates, have limitations in their translational relevance to human diseases. Organotypic cultures are increasingly being used to assess therapeutics for various cancers and infectious diseases. Monitoring drug cytotoxicity in cell cultures is crucial in drug development, and several commercially available kits for cytotoxicity assessment offer distinct advantages and limitations. Given the complexity of organoid cultures, including donor-driven variability, we investigated drug-treated, tissue stem cell-derived human intestinal organoid responses with commonly used cell cytotoxicity assay kits. Using seven different compounds, we compared the cytotoxicity assay performance of two different leaky membrane-based and two metabolism-based assays. Significant variability was seen in reported viability outcomes across assays and organoid lines. High baseline activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in four human intestinal organoid lines required modification of the standard LDH assay protocol. Additionally, the LDH assay reported unique resilience to damage in a genetically-modified line contrasting results compared to other assays. This study highlights factors that can impact the measurement of cell cytotoxicity in intestinal organoid models, which are emerging as valuable new tools for research and pre-clinical drug testing and suggest the need for using multiple assay types to ensure reliable cytotoxicity assessment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38857221</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0304526</doi><tpages>e0304526</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5631-8534</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2024-06, Vol.19 (6), p.e0304526
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_3069267069
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Assaying
Auranofin
Biology and Life Sciences
Cell culture
Cell lines
Cell Survival - drug effects
Cells
Cytotoxicity
Dehydrogenases
Drug development
Drug interactions
Drug testing
Gastrointestinal surgery
Genetic modification
Genetically modified organisms
Humans
Infectious diseases
Intestinal Mucosa - cytology
Intestinal Mucosa - drug effects
Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism
Intestine
Intestines - cytology
L-Lactate dehydrogenase
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - metabolism
Lactate dehydrogenase
Medicine and Health Sciences
Metabolism
Organoids
Organoids - cytology
Organoids - drug effects
Organoids - metabolism
Regression analysis
Research and Analysis Methods
Stem cells
Toxic diseases
Toxicity
title Divergent responses of human intestinal organoid monolayers using commercial in vitro cytotoxicity assays
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20responses%20of%20human%20intestinal%20organoid%20monolayers%20using%20commercial%20in%20vitro%20cytotoxicity%20assays&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lewis,%20Miranda%20A&rft.date=2024-06-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0304526&rft.pages=e0304526-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0304526&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA797208192%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069267069&rft_id=info:pmid/38857221&rft_galeid=A797208192&rfr_iscdi=true