Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol
Scientific Initiation (SI) is an educational activity that allows students to begin their scientific training and research under the guidance of an experienced researcher. While several studies have examined students' perceptions of SI, research on the perspective of researchers working in this...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0297186 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | e0297186 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Costa, Woska Pires da Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão Memon, Aamir Raoof Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva Sousa, Marcos de Moraes Noll, Matias |
| description | Scientific Initiation (SI) is an educational activity that allows students to begin their scientific training and research under the guidance of an experienced researcher. While several studies have examined students' perceptions of SI, research on the perspective of researchers working in this field is currently lacking. Thus, this study's aim is to describe the protocol design for conducting a systematic review. At the same time, the review aims also to identify factors influencing the work of researchers in SI and explore the motivations leading researchers to engage in research projects within institutions and their respective impacts.
Literature search will be done using the bibliographic databases, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycNet, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, SocINDEX, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was guided by the PICo framework (Population, phenomenon of Interest, and Context). The preparation and development of this protocol following guidelines were employed: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies 2015 (PRESS 2015), and PRISMA-Search (PRISMA-S). Original, peer-reviewed articles that examine the factors related to the work of researchers in SI will be included without any language or publication date restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies will be screened by two independent researchers. The included studies will be analyzed to identify factors, policies, and their impacts obtained analytically. Findings will be objectively categorized and synthetically represented through figures, diagrams, and graphic models. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and the Downs and Black checklists. A third senior reviewer will resolve any discrepancies.
We aim to understand the factors that drive researchers to engage in SI research through the dissemination of the findings of this systematic review. This may aid the development of institutional strategies and actions that can support the enhancement of SI programs and encourage greater researcher participation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0297186 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069265470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A781032820</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_de8b5d40149c4e8ab2fe23327f8ab939</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A781032820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9e05950a13e0e0617085fc462ac75c2a6f0dee9c332ea14fcc5e300bcf70f0c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJw2MUf-TIXtKoorFSpEgWulncyznrJxovttPTf43TTaoN6QDnEdp73ncx4JkleUjKnvKQfNrZ3nWrnO9vhnDBR0qp4lBxTwdmsYIQ_PlgfJc-83xCS86ooniZHvGIiJ3l5nKzOFATrfGo63fbYgemaNKwxvbbuV2p16tCjcrDGWya9BINdMNpAuuxMMCoY231MF6m_8QG3cQtRcmXwOt05GyzY9nnyRKvW44vxfZL8OPv8_fTr7Pziy_J0cT6DQvAwE0jy-FOKciRIClqSKteQFUxBmQNThSY1ogDOGSqaaYAcOSEr0CXRBAQ_SV7vfXet9XIsj5ecFIIVeVaSSCz3RG3VRu6c2Sp3I60y8vbAukYqFzNoUdZYrfI6IzQTkGGlVkwji6FLHdeCD9E-jdH61RZriFVxqp2YTr90Zi0beyUpicUXgkaHd6ODs7979EFujQdsW9Wh7b1kglFKc8bLiL75B304vZFqVMwgXqiNgWEwlYuyooSzig3U_AEqPjVuDcRm0iaeTwTvJ4LIBPwTGtV7L5eX3_6fvfg5Zd8esGtUbVh72_ZDR_kpmO1BcNZ7h_q-ypTIYRbuqiGHWZDjLETZq8MbuhfdNT__C02ABLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069265470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Costa, Woska Pires da ; Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão ; Memon, Aamir Raoof ; Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva ; Sousa, Marcos de Moraes ; Noll, Matias</creator><creatorcontrib>Costa, Woska Pires da ; Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão ; Memon, Aamir Raoof ; Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva ; Sousa, Marcos de Moraes ; Noll, Matias</creatorcontrib><description>Scientific Initiation (SI) is an educational activity that allows students to begin their scientific training and research under the guidance of an experienced researcher. While several studies have examined students' perceptions of SI, research on the perspective of researchers working in this field is currently lacking. Thus, this study's aim is to describe the protocol design for conducting a systematic review. At the same time, the review aims also to identify factors influencing the work of researchers in SI and explore the motivations leading researchers to engage in research projects within institutions and their respective impacts.
Literature search will be done using the bibliographic databases, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycNet, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, SocINDEX, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was guided by the PICo framework (Population, phenomenon of Interest, and Context). The preparation and development of this protocol following guidelines were employed: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies 2015 (PRESS 2015), and PRISMA-Search (PRISMA-S). Original, peer-reviewed articles that examine the factors related to the work of researchers in SI will be included without any language or publication date restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies will be screened by two independent researchers. The included studies will be analyzed to identify factors, policies, and their impacts obtained analytically. Findings will be objectively categorized and synthetically represented through figures, diagrams, and graphic models. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and the Downs and Black checklists. A third senior reviewer will resolve any discrepancies.
We aim to understand the factors that drive researchers to engage in SI research through the dissemination of the findings of this systematic review. This may aid the development of institutional strategies and actions that can support the enhancement of SI programs and encourage greater researcher participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38295057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Check lists ; College students ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Engineering and Technology ; Evaluation ; Forecasts and trends ; Graphical representations ; Knowledge ; Management ; People and Places ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research projects ; Researchers ; Reviews ; Science ; Science Policy ; Scientific development ; Search methods ; Social Sciences ; Society ; Students ; Study Protocol ; Systematic review ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0297186</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Costa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2024 Costa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 Costa et al 2024 Costa et al</rights><rights>2024 Costa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9e05950a13e0e0617085fc462ac75c2a6f0dee9c332ea14fcc5e300bcf70f0c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9e05950a13e0e0617085fc462ac75c2a6f0dee9c332ea14fcc5e300bcf70f0c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8841-2039 ; 0000-0003-3715-1956 ; 0000-0002-1482-0718 ; 0000-0002-0901-0550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10829991/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10829991/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38295057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costa, Woska Pires da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memon, Aamir Raoof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Marcos de Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Matias</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Scientific Initiation (SI) is an educational activity that allows students to begin their scientific training and research under the guidance of an experienced researcher. While several studies have examined students' perceptions of SI, research on the perspective of researchers working in this field is currently lacking. Thus, this study's aim is to describe the protocol design for conducting a systematic review. At the same time, the review aims also to identify factors influencing the work of researchers in SI and explore the motivations leading researchers to engage in research projects within institutions and their respective impacts.
Literature search will be done using the bibliographic databases, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycNet, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, SocINDEX, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was guided by the PICo framework (Population, phenomenon of Interest, and Context). The preparation and development of this protocol following guidelines were employed: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies 2015 (PRESS 2015), and PRISMA-Search (PRISMA-S). Original, peer-reviewed articles that examine the factors related to the work of researchers in SI will be included without any language or publication date restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies will be screened by two independent researchers. The included studies will be analyzed to identify factors, policies, and their impacts obtained analytically. Findings will be objectively categorized and synthetically represented through figures, diagrams, and graphic models. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and the Downs and Black checklists. A third senior reviewer will resolve any discrepancies.
We aim to understand the factors that drive researchers to engage in SI research through the dissemination of the findings of this systematic review. This may aid the development of institutional strategies and actions that can support the enhancement of SI programs and encourage greater researcher participation.</description><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Graphical representations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Scientific development</subject><subject>Search methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Study Protocol</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJw2MUf-TIXtKoorFSpEgWulncyznrJxovttPTf43TTaoN6QDnEdp73ncx4JkleUjKnvKQfNrZ3nWrnO9vhnDBR0qp4lBxTwdmsYIQ_PlgfJc-83xCS86ooniZHvGIiJ3l5nKzOFATrfGo63fbYgemaNKwxvbbuV2p16tCjcrDGWya9BINdMNpAuuxMMCoY231MF6m_8QG3cQtRcmXwOt05GyzY9nnyRKvW44vxfZL8OPv8_fTr7Pziy_J0cT6DQvAwE0jy-FOKciRIClqSKteQFUxBmQNThSY1ogDOGSqaaYAcOSEr0CXRBAQ_SV7vfXet9XIsj5ecFIIVeVaSSCz3RG3VRu6c2Sp3I60y8vbAukYqFzNoUdZYrfI6IzQTkGGlVkwji6FLHdeCD9E-jdH61RZriFVxqp2YTr90Zi0beyUpicUXgkaHd6ODs7979EFujQdsW9Wh7b1kglFKc8bLiL75B304vZFqVMwgXqiNgWEwlYuyooSzig3U_AEqPjVuDcRm0iaeTwTvJ4LIBPwTGtV7L5eX3_6fvfg5Zd8esGtUbVh72_ZDR_kpmO1BcNZ7h_q-ypTIYRbuqiGHWZDjLETZq8MbuhfdNT__C02ABLw</recordid><startdate>20240131</startdate><enddate>20240131</enddate><creator>Costa, Woska Pires da</creator><creator>Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão</creator><creator>Memon, Aamir Raoof</creator><creator>Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva</creator><creator>Sousa, Marcos de Moraes</creator><creator>Noll, Matias</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-2039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-1956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-0718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0901-0550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240131</creationdate><title>Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol</title><author>Costa, Woska Pires da ; Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão ; Memon, Aamir Raoof ; Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva ; Sousa, Marcos de Moraes ; Noll, Matias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9e05950a13e0e0617085fc462ac75c2a6f0dee9c332ea14fcc5e300bcf70f0c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Graphical representations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Scientific development</topic><topic>Search methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Study Protocol</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costa, Woska Pires da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Memon, Aamir Raoof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Marcos de Moraes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Matias</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costa, Woska Pires da</au><au>Fernandes, Michele da Silva Valadão</au><au>Memon, Aamir Raoof</au><au>Noll, Priscilla Rayanne E Silva</au><au>Sousa, Marcos de Moraes</au><au>Noll, Matias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2024-01-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0297186</spage><pages>e0297186-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Scientific Initiation (SI) is an educational activity that allows students to begin their scientific training and research under the guidance of an experienced researcher. While several studies have examined students' perceptions of SI, research on the perspective of researchers working in this field is currently lacking. Thus, this study's aim is to describe the protocol design for conducting a systematic review. At the same time, the review aims also to identify factors influencing the work of researchers in SI and explore the motivations leading researchers to engage in research projects within institutions and their respective impacts.
Literature search will be done using the bibliographic databases, including Academic Search Premier, APA PsycNet, CINAHL Plus, ERIC, SocINDEX, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was guided by the PICo framework (Population, phenomenon of Interest, and Context). The preparation and development of this protocol following guidelines were employed: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies 2015 (PRESS 2015), and PRISMA-Search (PRISMA-S). Original, peer-reviewed articles that examine the factors related to the work of researchers in SI will be included without any language or publication date restrictions. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies will be screened by two independent researchers. The included studies will be analyzed to identify factors, policies, and their impacts obtained analytically. Findings will be objectively categorized and synthetically represented through figures, diagrams, and graphic models. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and the Downs and Black checklists. A third senior reviewer will resolve any discrepancies.
We aim to understand the factors that drive researchers to engage in SI research through the dissemination of the findings of this systematic review. This may aid the development of institutional strategies and actions that can support the enhancement of SI programs and encourage greater researcher participation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>38295057</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0297186</doi><tpages>e0297186</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-2039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-1956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-0718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0901-0550</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2024-01, Vol.19 (1), p.e0297186 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3069265470 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Check lists College students Computer and Information Sciences Engineering and Technology Evaluation Forecasts and trends Graphical representations Knowledge Management People and Places R&D Research & development Research and Analysis Methods Research projects Researchers Reviews Science Science Policy Scientific development Search methods Social Sciences Society Students Study Protocol Systematic review Work environment |
| title | Factors influencing the work of researchers in Scientific Initiation: A systematic review protocol |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T20%3A53%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20the%20work%20of%20researchers%20in%20Scientific%20Initiation:%20A%20systematic%20review%20protocol&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Costa,%20Woska%20Pires%20da&rft.date=2024-01-31&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0297186&rft.pages=e0297186-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0297186&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA781032820%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069265470&rft_id=info:pmid/38295057&rft_galeid=A781032820&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_de8b5d40149c4e8ab2fe23327f8ab939&rfr_iscdi=true |