Contact tracing: Characteristics of COVID-19 cases that provided contacts
This cross-sectional study evaluated COVID-19 contact tracing efforts to identify variations in contact tracing outcomes in different population subgroups. Contact tracing was a critical tool to slow the COVID-19 epidemic. A literature gap evaluating contact tracing elicitation exits, particularly o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-11, Vol.18 (11), p.e0293208-e0293208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0293208 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0293208 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Dorabawila, Vajeera Maduka, Doris Barnes, Virgile Ramesh, Nirmala Hoefer, Dina |
description | This cross-sectional study evaluated COVID-19 contact tracing efforts to identify variations in contact tracing outcomes in different population subgroups. Contact tracing was a critical tool to slow the COVID-19 epidemic. A literature gap evaluating contact tracing elicitation exits, particularly on prioritized groups. We analyzed data from COVID-19 cases linking statewide case management, immunization, laboratory testing, and hospitalization databases in New York State (NYS) outside of New York City from February 1 to November 30, 2021. Focus was cases in home-based residential settings (excluding congregate care) and prioritized groups (educational institutions, large households, close quarters, higher-risk persons, hospitalized). The primary outcome was completed interviews that provided a contact. Of the 550,850 cases interviewed during the study period, 316,645 (57.5%) provided at least one contact. Adults aged 18 to 49 years were most likely to provide contacts than those aged 65 years and older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.45). Compared to unvaccinated cases, boosted individuals (aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.50-1.73) were most likely to provide contacts, followed by persons with only a primary vaccine series (aOR, 1.3; 95%CI, 1.28-1.33) and partially vaccinated (aOR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.18-1.24). Repeat cases (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.01-1.14), pregnant persons (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1,19-1.34), those with underlying conditions (aOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.20-1.23), and those in K-12 settings (aOR 1.55; 95%CI, 1.50-1.61) were more likely to provide contacts. There was no clear association between hospitalized, while zip code level income may (aOR, 1.006; 95%CI, 1.003, 1.009). Persons from larger households were more likely to provide contacts: aOR for two or more persons vs. one person households ranged from 2.49 to 4.7 (95%CI, 2.20-4.78). Our findings indicate success in eliciting contacts from prioritized groups and identify variable contact elicitation outcomes from different population groups. These results may serve as a tool for future contact tracing efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0293208 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_3069192047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771217831</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8db72c41fdfa48edb67263f10a5a7bfa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A771217831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-6040feceb065258ecc5afc680cf26b4e780a12ff5fb493f347ad54b4e9a5fe1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktuKFDEQhhtRcF19A8EGQfRixhy6k7Q3soyngYUFD3sbqtOVmQw9nTFJL_r2ZpxWtmUvJBcpqr784a-qonhKyZJySV_v_BgG6JcHP-CSsIYzou4VZzQHC8EIv38rflg8inFHSM2VEGfFeuWHBCaVKYBxw-ZNudpCDhMGF5MzsfS2XF1dr98taFMaiBjLtIVUHoK_cR12pTkJxMfFAwt9xCfTfV58-_D-6-rT4vLq43p1cbkwgjZpIUhFLBpsiahZrdCYGqwRihjLRFuhVAQos7a2bdVwyysJXV3lQgO1RYr8vHh20j30PurJetSciIY2jFQyE-sT0XnY6UNwewg_tQenfyd82GgI2VuPWnWtZKaitrNQKexaIZnglhKoQbYWstbb6bex3WNncMiN6mei88rgtnrjbzQlgtFGsazwclII_vuIMem9iwb7Hgb0Y9RMKcGZkKLJ6PN_0LvtTdQGsgM3WH-c3VFUX0hJGZWK00wt76Dy6XDv8szQupyfPXg1e3CcK_5IGxhj1Osvn_-fvbqesy9usVuEPm2j78fk_BDnYHUCTfAxBrR_u0yJPu75n27o457rac_5L9DQ76c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069192047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contact tracing: Characteristics of COVID-19 cases that provided contacts</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dorabawila, Vajeera ; Maduka, Doris ; Barnes, Virgile ; Ramesh, Nirmala ; Hoefer, Dina</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorabawila, Vajeera ; Maduka, Doris ; Barnes, Virgile ; Ramesh, Nirmala ; Hoefer, Dina</creatorcontrib><description>This cross-sectional study evaluated COVID-19 contact tracing efforts to identify variations in contact tracing outcomes in different population subgroups. Contact tracing was a critical tool to slow the COVID-19 epidemic. A literature gap evaluating contact tracing elicitation exits, particularly on prioritized groups. We analyzed data from COVID-19 cases linking statewide case management, immunization, laboratory testing, and hospitalization databases in New York State (NYS) outside of New York City from February 1 to November 30, 2021. Focus was cases in home-based residential settings (excluding congregate care) and prioritized groups (educational institutions, large households, close quarters, higher-risk persons, hospitalized). The primary outcome was completed interviews that provided a contact. Of the 550,850 cases interviewed during the study period, 316,645 (57.5%) provided at least one contact. Adults aged 18 to 49 years were most likely to provide contacts than those aged 65 years and older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.45). Compared to unvaccinated cases, boosted individuals (aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.50-1.73) were most likely to provide contacts, followed by persons with only a primary vaccine series (aOR, 1.3; 95%CI, 1.28-1.33) and partially vaccinated (aOR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.18-1.24). Repeat cases (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.01-1.14), pregnant persons (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1,19-1.34), those with underlying conditions (aOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.20-1.23), and those in K-12 settings (aOR 1.55; 95%CI, 1.50-1.61) were more likely to provide contacts. There was no clear association between hospitalized, while zip code level income may (aOR, 1.006; 95%CI, 1.003, 1.009). Persons from larger households were more likely to provide contacts: aOR for two or more persons vs. one person households ranged from 2.49 to 4.7 (95%CI, 2.20-4.78). Our findings indicate success in eliciting contacts from prioritized groups and identify variable contact elicitation outcomes from different population groups. These results may serve as a tool for future contact tracing efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antigens ; Asymptomatic ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Case management ; Contact tracing ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Cross-sectional studies ; Disease transmission ; Earth Sciences ; Ethnicity ; Hospital patients ; Households ; Immunization ; Laboratory tests ; Management ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Native North Americans ; Non-binary gender ; People and places ; Postal codes ; Pregnancy ; Social Sciences ; Subgroups ; Transgender persons ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-11, Vol.18 (11), p.e0293208-e0293208</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Dorabawila et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Dorabawila et al 2023 Dorabawila et al</rights><rights>2023 Dorabawila et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-6040feceb065258ecc5afc680cf26b4e780a12ff5fb493f347ad54b4e9a5fe1e3</cites><orcidid>0009-0009-0372-4606</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621982/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10621982/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorabawila, Vajeera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maduka, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Virgile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, Nirmala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoefer, Dina</creatorcontrib><title>Contact tracing: Characteristics of COVID-19 cases that provided contacts</title><title>PloS one</title><description>This cross-sectional study evaluated COVID-19 contact tracing efforts to identify variations in contact tracing outcomes in different population subgroups. Contact tracing was a critical tool to slow the COVID-19 epidemic. A literature gap evaluating contact tracing elicitation exits, particularly on prioritized groups. We analyzed data from COVID-19 cases linking statewide case management, immunization, laboratory testing, and hospitalization databases in New York State (NYS) outside of New York City from February 1 to November 30, 2021. Focus was cases in home-based residential settings (excluding congregate care) and prioritized groups (educational institutions, large households, close quarters, higher-risk persons, hospitalized). The primary outcome was completed interviews that provided a contact. Of the 550,850 cases interviewed during the study period, 316,645 (57.5%) provided at least one contact. Adults aged 18 to 49 years were most likely to provide contacts than those aged 65 years and older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.45). Compared to unvaccinated cases, boosted individuals (aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.50-1.73) were most likely to provide contacts, followed by persons with only a primary vaccine series (aOR, 1.3; 95%CI, 1.28-1.33) and partially vaccinated (aOR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.18-1.24). Repeat cases (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.01-1.14), pregnant persons (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1,19-1.34), those with underlying conditions (aOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.20-1.23), and those in K-12 settings (aOR 1.55; 95%CI, 1.50-1.61) were more likely to provide contacts. There was no clear association between hospitalized, while zip code level income may (aOR, 1.006; 95%CI, 1.003, 1.009). Persons from larger households were more likely to provide contacts: aOR for two or more persons vs. one person households ranged from 2.49 to 4.7 (95%CI, 2.20-4.78). Our findings indicate success in eliciting contacts from prioritized groups and identify variable contact elicitation outcomes from different population groups. These results may serve as a tool for future contact tracing efforts.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Case management</subject><subject>Contact tracing</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Non-binary gender</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Postal codes</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Transgender persons</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktuKFDEQhhtRcF19A8EGQfRixhy6k7Q3soyngYUFD3sbqtOVmQw9nTFJL_r2ZpxWtmUvJBcpqr784a-qonhKyZJySV_v_BgG6JcHP-CSsIYzou4VZzQHC8EIv38rflg8inFHSM2VEGfFeuWHBCaVKYBxw-ZNudpCDhMGF5MzsfS2XF1dr98taFMaiBjLtIVUHoK_cR12pTkJxMfFAwt9xCfTfV58-_D-6-rT4vLq43p1cbkwgjZpIUhFLBpsiahZrdCYGqwRihjLRFuhVAQos7a2bdVwyysJXV3lQgO1RYr8vHh20j30PurJetSciIY2jFQyE-sT0XnY6UNwewg_tQenfyd82GgI2VuPWnWtZKaitrNQKexaIZnglhKoQbYWstbb6bex3WNncMiN6mei88rgtnrjbzQlgtFGsazwclII_vuIMem9iwb7Hgb0Y9RMKcGZkKLJ6PN_0LvtTdQGsgM3WH-c3VFUX0hJGZWK00wt76Dy6XDv8szQupyfPXg1e3CcK_5IGxhj1Osvn_-fvbqesy9usVuEPm2j78fk_BDnYHUCTfAxBrR_u0yJPu75n27o457rac_5L9DQ76c</recordid><startdate>20231102</startdate><enddate>20231102</enddate><creator>Dorabawila, Vajeera</creator><creator>Maduka, Doris</creator><creator>Barnes, Virgile</creator><creator>Ramesh, Nirmala</creator><creator>Hoefer, Dina</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0372-4606</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231102</creationdate><title>Contact tracing: Characteristics of COVID-19 cases that provided contacts</title><author>Dorabawila, Vajeera ; Maduka, Doris ; Barnes, Virgile ; Ramesh, Nirmala ; Hoefer, Dina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-6040feceb065258ecc5afc680cf26b4e780a12ff5fb493f347ad54b4e9a5fe1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Case management</topic><topic>Contact tracing</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Non-binary gender</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Postal codes</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Transgender persons</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorabawila, Vajeera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maduka, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Virgile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, Nirmala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoefer, Dina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorabawila, Vajeera</au><au>Maduka, Doris</au><au>Barnes, Virgile</au><au>Ramesh, Nirmala</au><au>Hoefer, Dina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contact tracing: Characteristics of COVID-19 cases that provided contacts</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-11-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0293208</spage><epage>e0293208</epage><pages>e0293208-e0293208</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This cross-sectional study evaluated COVID-19 contact tracing efforts to identify variations in contact tracing outcomes in different population subgroups. Contact tracing was a critical tool to slow the COVID-19 epidemic. A literature gap evaluating contact tracing elicitation exits, particularly on prioritized groups. We analyzed data from COVID-19 cases linking statewide case management, immunization, laboratory testing, and hospitalization databases in New York State (NYS) outside of New York City from February 1 to November 30, 2021. Focus was cases in home-based residential settings (excluding congregate care) and prioritized groups (educational institutions, large households, close quarters, higher-risk persons, hospitalized). The primary outcome was completed interviews that provided a contact. Of the 550,850 cases interviewed during the study period, 316,645 (57.5%) provided at least one contact. Adults aged 18 to 49 years were most likely to provide contacts than those aged 65 years and older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.45). Compared to unvaccinated cases, boosted individuals (aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.50-1.73) were most likely to provide contacts, followed by persons with only a primary vaccine series (aOR, 1.3; 95%CI, 1.28-1.33) and partially vaccinated (aOR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.18-1.24). Repeat cases (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.01-1.14), pregnant persons (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1,19-1.34), those with underlying conditions (aOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.20-1.23), and those in K-12 settings (aOR 1.55; 95%CI, 1.50-1.61) were more likely to provide contacts. There was no clear association between hospitalized, while zip code level income may (aOR, 1.006; 95%CI, 1.003, 1.009). Persons from larger households were more likely to provide contacts: aOR for two or more persons vs. one person households ranged from 2.49 to 4.7 (95%CI, 2.20-4.78). Our findings indicate success in eliciting contacts from prioritized groups and identify variable contact elicitation outcomes from different population groups. These results may serve as a tool for future contact tracing efforts.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0293208</doi><tpages>e0293208</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0372-4606</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-11, Vol.18 (11), p.e0293208-e0293208 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_3069192047 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Antigens Asymptomatic Biology and Life Sciences Case management Contact tracing Coronaviruses COVID-19 Cross-sectional studies Disease transmission Earth Sciences Ethnicity Hospital patients Households Immunization Laboratory tests Management Medicine and Health Sciences Native North Americans Non-binary gender People and places Postal codes Pregnancy Social Sciences Subgroups Transgender persons Vaccination |
title | Contact tracing: Characteristics of COVID-19 cases that provided contacts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T03%3A50%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contact%20tracing:%20Characteristics%20of%20COVID-19%20cases%20that%20provided%20contacts&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dorabawila,%20Vajeera&rft.date=2023-11-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0293208&rft.epage=e0293208&rft.pages=e0293208-e0293208&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0293208&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA771217831%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069192047&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771217831&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8db72c41fdfa48edb67263f10a5a7bfa&rfr_iscdi=true |