Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without chronic neck pain
People with chronic neck pain (CNP) often present with impaired neck proprioception. The most widely used clinical test for assessing neck proprioception is cervical joint position sense which measures joint position error (JPE). This clinical test is typically performed using a laser pointer to exa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292798-e0292798 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0292798 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0292798 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | AlDahas, Ahmad Devecchi, Valter Deane, Janet A Falla, Deborah |
description | People with chronic neck pain (CNP) often present with impaired neck proprioception. The most widely used clinical test for assessing neck proprioception is cervical joint position sense which measures joint position error (JPE). This clinical test is typically performed using a laser pointer to examine the accuracy of returning to a neutral head position (NHP) or target head position (THP) following active neck movements. The aim of this study was to determine the measurement properties of JPE using a laser pointer when tested in people with and without CNP under a variety of different testing conditions (i.e., different movement directions, sitting versus standing, NHP versus THP). Forty-three participants (23 asymptomatic and 20 with CNP) underwent neck proprioception testing, returning to a NHP and THP in both sitting and standing positions (six trials for each test). A laser pointer was secured on the participant's forehead and inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors were placed beneath the laser pointer and at the level of the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra. Both the absolute and the constant JPE were assessed. For the asymptomatic participants, good reliability (ICC: 0.79) was found only for right rotation of the THP task in sitting. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found in flexion for the THP task. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found for right rotation of the THP for the absolute JPE and left rotation (ICC: 0.85) for the constant error of the NHP task. In those with CNP, when tested in sitting, good reliability was found for flexion (ICC: 0.8) for the absolute JPE and good reliability (ICC range: 0.8-0.84) was found for flexion, extension, and right rotation for the constant JPE. In standing, good reliability (ICC range: 0.81-0.88) was found for flexion, and rotation for the absolute JPE. The constant JPE showed good reliability (ICC: 0.85) for right rotation and excellent reliability (ICC: 0.93) for flexion. Validity was weak to strong (r range: 0.26-0.83) and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.47-0.93) for absolute and constant error respectively, when tested in sitting. In standing, the validity was weak to very strong (0.38-0.96) for the absolute JPE and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.54-0.92) for the constant JPE. The reliability of the measure of JPE when tested in sitting and standing in both groups showed good reliability, but not for all movements. The results of the current s |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0292798 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2876449455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A768669049</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6b7bb3a3b06b4777a44515e0a64f4882</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A768669049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c670t-bba0f9211a08bb11731c59728f26f25a440d1068b659ef13aff268888caeefcd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12P1CAUhhujievoPzCRxMToxYxAW2ivzGbjxyRrNvHrlgA9zDAy0IV21X8vM1PN1uyF5aKE8_AezgunKJ4SvCIlJ693YYxeulUfPKwwbSlvm3vFGWlLumQUl_dvzR8Wj1LaYVyXDWNnRfcRZBoj7MEPqI-hhzhYSCgYpCHeWC0d2gV7CIZkBxs8ghhDRNajHkLvAP2wwxZJ3x0nYRyQ3sbgrUYe9HfUS-sfFw-MdAmeTP9F8fXd2y8XH5aXV-_XF-eXS804HpZKSWxaSojEjVKE8JLouuW0MZQZWsuqwh3BrFGsbsGQUpocaPKnJYDRXbkonp10exeSmFxJgjacVVVb1XUm1ieiC3In-mj3Mv4SQVpxXAhxI2Q2QDsQTHGlSlkqzFTFOc_pa1IDlqwyVdPQrPVmyjaqPXQ6Oxilm4nOI95uxSbcCIJr1ta5vEXxclKI4XqENIi9TRqckx7CeDw4LxtMqzajz_9B7y5vojYyV2C9CTmxPoiKc87yhbf4qLW6g8qjg73V-Q0Zm9dnG17NNmRmgJ_DRo4pifXnT__PXn2bsy9usVuQbtim4MbDM0tzsDqBOoaUIpi_LhMsDi3wxw1xaAExtUD5G_dz-gA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876449455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without chronic neck pain</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>AlDahas, Ahmad ; Devecchi, Valter ; Deane, Janet A ; Falla, Deborah</creator><contributor>Reddy, Ravi Shankar Yerragonda</contributor><creatorcontrib>AlDahas, Ahmad ; Devecchi, Valter ; Deane, Janet A ; Falla, Deborah ; Reddy, Ravi Shankar Yerragonda</creatorcontrib><description>People with chronic neck pain (CNP) often present with impaired neck proprioception. The most widely used clinical test for assessing neck proprioception is cervical joint position sense which measures joint position error (JPE). This clinical test is typically performed using a laser pointer to examine the accuracy of returning to a neutral head position (NHP) or target head position (THP) following active neck movements. The aim of this study was to determine the measurement properties of JPE using a laser pointer when tested in people with and without CNP under a variety of different testing conditions (i.e., different movement directions, sitting versus standing, NHP versus THP). Forty-three participants (23 asymptomatic and 20 with CNP) underwent neck proprioception testing, returning to a NHP and THP in both sitting and standing positions (six trials for each test). A laser pointer was secured on the participant's forehead and inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors were placed beneath the laser pointer and at the level of the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra. Both the absolute and the constant JPE were assessed. For the asymptomatic participants, good reliability (ICC: 0.79) was found only for right rotation of the THP task in sitting. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found in flexion for the THP task. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found for right rotation of the THP for the absolute JPE and left rotation (ICC: 0.85) for the constant error of the NHP task. In those with CNP, when tested in sitting, good reliability was found for flexion (ICC: 0.8) for the absolute JPE and good reliability (ICC range: 0.8-0.84) was found for flexion, extension, and right rotation for the constant JPE. In standing, good reliability (ICC range: 0.81-0.88) was found for flexion, and rotation for the absolute JPE. The constant JPE showed good reliability (ICC: 0.85) for right rotation and excellent reliability (ICC: 0.93) for flexion. Validity was weak to strong (r range: 0.26-0.83) and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.47-0.93) for absolute and constant error respectively, when tested in sitting. In standing, the validity was weak to very strong (0.38-0.96) for the absolute JPE and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.54-0.92) for the constant JPE. The reliability of the measure of JPE when tested in sitting and standing in both groups showed good reliability, but not for all movements. The results of the current study also showed that the laser pointer correlated well with the Noraxon IMUs, but not for all movements. The results of the current study support the use of the JPE using a laser pointer in clinical and research settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Asymptomatic ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Chronic pain ; Clinical trials ; Engineering and Technology ; Error analysis ; Forehead ; Head ; Health aspects ; Inertial platforms ; Inertial sensing devices ; Lasers ; Measurement ; Measuring instruments ; Medical screening ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Neck ; Neck pain ; Pain ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological aspects ; Position errors ; Position measurement ; Posture ; Proprioception ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Rotation ; Sensors ; Social Sciences ; Validity ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292798-e0292798</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 AlDahas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 AlDahas et al 2023 AlDahas et al</rights><rights>2023 AlDahas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c670t-bba0f9211a08bb11731c59728f26f25a440d1068b659ef13aff268888caeefcd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c670t-bba0f9211a08bb11731c59728f26f25a440d1068b659ef13aff268888caeefcd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8872-2419 ; 0000-0003-1689-6190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569517/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10569517/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Reddy, Ravi Shankar Yerragonda</contributor><creatorcontrib>AlDahas, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devecchi, Valter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deane, Janet A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falla, Deborah</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without chronic neck pain</title><title>PloS one</title><description>People with chronic neck pain (CNP) often present with impaired neck proprioception. The most widely used clinical test for assessing neck proprioception is cervical joint position sense which measures joint position error (JPE). This clinical test is typically performed using a laser pointer to examine the accuracy of returning to a neutral head position (NHP) or target head position (THP) following active neck movements. The aim of this study was to determine the measurement properties of JPE using a laser pointer when tested in people with and without CNP under a variety of different testing conditions (i.e., different movement directions, sitting versus standing, NHP versus THP). Forty-three participants (23 asymptomatic and 20 with CNP) underwent neck proprioception testing, returning to a NHP and THP in both sitting and standing positions (six trials for each test). A laser pointer was secured on the participant's forehead and inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors were placed beneath the laser pointer and at the level of the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra. Both the absolute and the constant JPE were assessed. For the asymptomatic participants, good reliability (ICC: 0.79) was found only for right rotation of the THP task in sitting. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found in flexion for the THP task. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found for right rotation of the THP for the absolute JPE and left rotation (ICC: 0.85) for the constant error of the NHP task. In those with CNP, when tested in sitting, good reliability was found for flexion (ICC: 0.8) for the absolute JPE and good reliability (ICC range: 0.8-0.84) was found for flexion, extension, and right rotation for the constant JPE. In standing, good reliability (ICC range: 0.81-0.88) was found for flexion, and rotation for the absolute JPE. The constant JPE showed good reliability (ICC: 0.85) for right rotation and excellent reliability (ICC: 0.93) for flexion. Validity was weak to strong (r range: 0.26-0.83) and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.47-0.93) for absolute and constant error respectively, when tested in sitting. In standing, the validity was weak to very strong (0.38-0.96) for the absolute JPE and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.54-0.92) for the constant JPE. The reliability of the measure of JPE when tested in sitting and standing in both groups showed good reliability, but not for all movements. The results of the current study also showed that the laser pointer correlated well with the Noraxon IMUs, but not for all movements. The results of the current study support the use of the JPE using a laser pointer in clinical and research settings.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Forehead</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Inertial platforms</subject><subject>Inertial sensing devices</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Neck pain</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Position errors</subject><subject>Position measurement</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12P1CAUhhujievoPzCRxMToxYxAW2ivzGbjxyRrNvHrlgA9zDAy0IV21X8vM1PN1uyF5aKE8_AezgunKJ4SvCIlJ693YYxeulUfPKwwbSlvm3vFGWlLumQUl_dvzR8Wj1LaYVyXDWNnRfcRZBoj7MEPqI-hhzhYSCgYpCHeWC0d2gV7CIZkBxs8ghhDRNajHkLvAP2wwxZJ3x0nYRyQ3sbgrUYe9HfUS-sfFw-MdAmeTP9F8fXd2y8XH5aXV-_XF-eXS804HpZKSWxaSojEjVKE8JLouuW0MZQZWsuqwh3BrFGsbsGQUpocaPKnJYDRXbkonp10exeSmFxJgjacVVVb1XUm1ieiC3In-mj3Mv4SQVpxXAhxI2Q2QDsQTHGlSlkqzFTFOc_pa1IDlqwyVdPQrPVmyjaqPXQ6Oxilm4nOI95uxSbcCIJr1ta5vEXxclKI4XqENIi9TRqckx7CeDw4LxtMqzajz_9B7y5vojYyV2C9CTmxPoiKc87yhbf4qLW6g8qjg73V-Q0Zm9dnG17NNmRmgJ_DRo4pifXnT__PXn2bsy9usVuQbtim4MbDM0tzsDqBOoaUIpi_LhMsDi3wxw1xaAExtUD5G_dz-gA</recordid><startdate>20231012</startdate><enddate>20231012</enddate><creator>AlDahas, Ahmad</creator><creator>Devecchi, Valter</creator><creator>Deane, Janet A</creator><creator>Falla, Deborah</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-2419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1689-6190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231012</creationdate><title>Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without chronic neck pain</title><author>AlDahas, Ahmad ; Devecchi, Valter ; Deane, Janet A ; Falla, Deborah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c670t-bba0f9211a08bb11731c59728f26f25a440d1068b659ef13aff268888caeefcd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Forehead</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Inertial platforms</topic><topic>Inertial sensing devices</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Neck pain</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Position errors</topic><topic>Position measurement</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AlDahas, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devecchi, Valter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deane, Janet A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falla, Deborah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AlDahas, Ahmad</au><au>Devecchi, Valter</au><au>Deane, Janet A</au><au>Falla, Deborah</au><au>Reddy, Ravi Shankar Yerragonda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without chronic neck pain</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-10-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0292798</spage><epage>e0292798</epage><pages>e0292798-e0292798</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>People with chronic neck pain (CNP) often present with impaired neck proprioception. The most widely used clinical test for assessing neck proprioception is cervical joint position sense which measures joint position error (JPE). This clinical test is typically performed using a laser pointer to examine the accuracy of returning to a neutral head position (NHP) or target head position (THP) following active neck movements. The aim of this study was to determine the measurement properties of JPE using a laser pointer when tested in people with and without CNP under a variety of different testing conditions (i.e., different movement directions, sitting versus standing, NHP versus THP). Forty-three participants (23 asymptomatic and 20 with CNP) underwent neck proprioception testing, returning to a NHP and THP in both sitting and standing positions (six trials for each test). A laser pointer was secured on the participant's forehead and inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors were placed beneath the laser pointer and at the level of the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra. Both the absolute and the constant JPE were assessed. For the asymptomatic participants, good reliability (ICC: 0.79) was found only for right rotation of the THP task in sitting. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found in flexion for the THP task. In standing, good reliability (ICC: 0.77) was only found for right rotation of the THP for the absolute JPE and left rotation (ICC: 0.85) for the constant error of the NHP task. In those with CNP, when tested in sitting, good reliability was found for flexion (ICC: 0.8) for the absolute JPE and good reliability (ICC range: 0.8-0.84) was found for flexion, extension, and right rotation for the constant JPE. In standing, good reliability (ICC range: 0.81-0.88) was found for flexion, and rotation for the absolute JPE. The constant JPE showed good reliability (ICC: 0.85) for right rotation and excellent reliability (ICC: 0.93) for flexion. Validity was weak to strong (r range: 0.26-0.83) and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.47-0.93) for absolute and constant error respectively, when tested in sitting. In standing, the validity was weak to very strong (0.38-0.96) for the absolute JPE and moderate to very strong (r range: 0.54-0.92) for the constant JPE. The reliability of the measure of JPE when tested in sitting and standing in both groups showed good reliability, but not for all movements. The results of the current study also showed that the laser pointer correlated well with the Noraxon IMUs, but not for all movements. The results of the current study support the use of the JPE using a laser pointer in clinical and research settings.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0292798</doi><tpages>e0292798</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-2419</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1689-6190</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292798-e0292798 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2876449455 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Asymptomatic Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Chronic pain Clinical trials Engineering and Technology Error analysis Forehead Head Health aspects Inertial platforms Inertial sensing devices Lasers Measurement Measuring instruments Medical screening Medicine and Health Sciences Neck Neck pain Pain Patient outcomes Physiological aspects Position errors Position measurement Posture Proprioception Questionnaires Reliability Research and Analysis Methods Rotation Sensors Social Sciences Validity Vertebrae |
title | Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without chronic neck pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A09%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20properties%20of%20cervical%20joint%20position%20error%20in%20people%20with%20and%20without%20chronic%20neck%20pain&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=AlDahas,%20Ahmad&rft.date=2023-10-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0292798&rft.epage=e0292798&rft.pages=e0292798-e0292798&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0292798&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA768669049%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876449455&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A768669049&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6b7bb3a3b06b4777a44515e0a64f4882&rfr_iscdi=true |