An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research
ChatGPT is the first large language model (LLM) to reach a large, mainstream audience. Its rapid adoption and exploration by the population at large has sparked a wide range of discussions regarding its acceptable and optimal integration in different areas. In a hybrid (virtual and in-person) panel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292216-e0292216 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0292216 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0292216 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Hosseini, Mohammad Gao, Catherine A Liebovitz, David M Carvalho, Alexandre M Ahmad, Faraz S Luo, Yuan MacDonald, Ngan Holmes, Kristi L Kho, Abel |
| description | ChatGPT is the first large language model (LLM) to reach a large, mainstream audience. Its rapid adoption and exploration by the population at large has sparked a wide range of discussions regarding its acceptable and optimal integration in different areas. In a hybrid (virtual and in-person) panel discussion event, we examined various perspectives regarding the use of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare.
We surveyed in-person and online attendees using an audience interaction platform (Slido). We quantitatively analyzed received responses on questions about the use of ChatGPT in various contexts. We compared pairwise categorical groups with a Fisher's Exact. Furthermore, we used qualitative methods to analyze and code discussions.
We received 420 responses from an estimated 844 participants (response rate 49.7%). Only 40% of the audience had tried ChatGPT. More trainees had tried ChatGPT compared with faculty. Those who had used ChatGPT were more interested in using it in a wider range of contexts going forwards. Of the three discussed contexts, the greatest uncertainty was shown about using ChatGPT in education. Pros and cons were raised during discussion for the use of this technology in education, research, and healthcare.
There was a range of perspectives around the uses of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare, with still much uncertainty around its acceptability and optimal uses. There were different perspectives from respondents of different roles (trainee vs faculty vs staff). More discussion is needed to explore perceptions around the use of LLMs such as ChatGPT in vital sectors such as education, healthcare and research. Given involved risks and unforeseen challenges, taking a thoughtful and measured approach in adoption would reduce the likelihood of harm. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0292216 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2873244991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A767847112</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2795328a50b84f22b0d0d190c1f0727c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A767847112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-6f46c4d31412b03abced0c27a8ff242eed41594eebb0049e9aab917a7fd0044d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEYmPwDRBEQkIgrcX_EsdPqKpgVJq0CQav1o1z06ZK4852pu3b467Z1KA9oDw4tn_n-Pr6JMlbSqaUS_plbXvXQTvd2g6nhCnGaP4sOaaKs0nOCH9-8H-UvPJ-TUjGizx_mRxxKVUui_w4uZx1Kd5uW-sgWHeX-t7d4F0Kpe1D2vumW6bzFYSzy6u0iWTVGwiN7U7TFUIbVgYcnqbQValDj-DM6nXyoobW45thPEl-f_92Nf8xOb84W8xn5xOTKx4meS1yIypOBWUl4VAarIhhEoq6ZoIhVoJmSiCWJSFCoQIoFZUg6yrOo_Akeb_3jbV7PTTDa1ZIzoRQikZisScqC2u9dc0G3J220Oj7BeuWGlxoTIuaSZVxVkBGykLULFZUkYoqYmhNJJMmen0dTuvLDVYGu-CgHZmOd7pmpZf2RlOSZZzzLDp8Ghycve7RB71pvMG2hQ5tf1-4YDmTYod--Ad9-noDtYR4g6arbTzY7Ez1TMbHFZJSFqnpE1T8Ktw0JkanbuL6SPB5JIhMwNuwhN57vfj18__Ziz9j9uMBu0-Pt22_S5Mfg2IPGme9d1g_dpkSvUv-Qzf0Lvl6SH6UvTt8oUfRQ9T5X7kO_Pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2873244991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hosseini, Mohammad ; Gao, Catherine A ; Liebovitz, David M ; Carvalho, Alexandre M ; Ahmad, Faraz S ; Luo, Yuan ; MacDonald, Ngan ; Holmes, Kristi L ; Kho, Abel</creator><contributor>Clark, Mary Diane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Mohammad ; Gao, Catherine A ; Liebovitz, David M ; Carvalho, Alexandre M ; Ahmad, Faraz S ; Luo, Yuan ; MacDonald, Ngan ; Holmes, Kristi L ; Kho, Abel ; Clark, Mary Diane</creatorcontrib><description>ChatGPT is the first large language model (LLM) to reach a large, mainstream audience. Its rapid adoption and exploration by the population at large has sparked a wide range of discussions regarding its acceptable and optimal integration in different areas. In a hybrid (virtual and in-person) panel discussion event, we examined various perspectives regarding the use of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare.
We surveyed in-person and online attendees using an audience interaction platform (Slido). We quantitatively analyzed received responses on questions about the use of ChatGPT in various contexts. We compared pairwise categorical groups with a Fisher's Exact. Furthermore, we used qualitative methods to analyze and code discussions.
We received 420 responses from an estimated 844 participants (response rate 49.7%). Only 40% of the audience had tried ChatGPT. More trainees had tried ChatGPT compared with faculty. Those who had used ChatGPT were more interested in using it in a wider range of contexts going forwards. Of the three discussed contexts, the greatest uncertainty was shown about using ChatGPT in education. Pros and cons were raised during discussion for the use of this technology in education, research, and healthcare.
There was a range of perspectives around the uses of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare, with still much uncertainty around its acceptability and optimal uses. There were different perspectives from respondents of different roles (trainee vs faculty vs staff). More discussion is needed to explore perceptions around the use of LLMs such as ChatGPT in vital sectors such as education, healthcare and research. Given involved risks and unforeseen challenges, taking a thoughtful and measured approach in adoption would reduce the likelihood of harm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37796786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Academic publications ; Acceptability ; Artificial intelligence ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chatbots ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Consent ; Disclosure ; Education ; Educational services industry ; Educational Status ; Faculty ; Feedback ; Forecasts and trends ; Health care ; Health care industry ; Health Facilities ; Humans ; Innovations ; Large language models ; Learning ; Mainstreaming, Education ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and Places ; Plagiarism ; Probability ; Qualitative analysis ; Social Sciences ; Students ; Teaching ; Technology application ; Training ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292216-e0292216</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Hosseini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Hosseini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Hosseini et al 2023 Hosseini et al</rights><rights>2023 Hosseini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-6f46c4d31412b03abced0c27a8ff242eed41594eebb0049e9aab917a7fd0044d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-6f46c4d31412b03abced0c27a8ff242eed41594eebb0049e9aab917a7fd0044d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5576-3943 ; 0000-0002-2385-985X ; 0000-0003-0268-7224 ; 0000-0001-8420-5254 ; 0000-0002-6961-7004 ; 0000-0002-2518-5940 ; 0000-0002-2613-2541 ; 0000-0003-0195-7456 ; 0000-0003-1993-5634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553335/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10553335/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Clark, Mary Diane</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Catherine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebovitz, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Alexandre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Faraz S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Ngan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Kristi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kho, Abel</creatorcontrib><title>An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>ChatGPT is the first large language model (LLM) to reach a large, mainstream audience. Its rapid adoption and exploration by the population at large has sparked a wide range of discussions regarding its acceptable and optimal integration in different areas. In a hybrid (virtual and in-person) panel discussion event, we examined various perspectives regarding the use of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare.
We surveyed in-person and online attendees using an audience interaction platform (Slido). We quantitatively analyzed received responses on questions about the use of ChatGPT in various contexts. We compared pairwise categorical groups with a Fisher's Exact. Furthermore, we used qualitative methods to analyze and code discussions.
We received 420 responses from an estimated 844 participants (response rate 49.7%). Only 40% of the audience had tried ChatGPT. More trainees had tried ChatGPT compared with faculty. Those who had used ChatGPT were more interested in using it in a wider range of contexts going forwards. Of the three discussed contexts, the greatest uncertainty was shown about using ChatGPT in education. Pros and cons were raised during discussion for the use of this technology in education, research, and healthcare.
There was a range of perspectives around the uses of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare, with still much uncertainty around its acceptability and optimal uses. There were different perspectives from respondents of different roles (trainee vs faculty vs staff). More discussion is needed to explore perceptions around the use of LLMs such as ChatGPT in vital sectors such as education, healthcare and research. Given involved risks and unforeseen challenges, taking a thoughtful and measured approach in adoption would reduce the likelihood of harm.</description><subject>Academic publications</subject><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chatbots</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational services industry</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Large language models</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mainstreaming, Education</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9v0zAUxSMEYmPwDRBEQkIgrcX_EsdPqKpgVJq0CQav1o1z06ZK4852pu3b467Z1KA9oDw4tn_n-Pr6JMlbSqaUS_plbXvXQTvd2g6nhCnGaP4sOaaKs0nOCH9-8H-UvPJ-TUjGizx_mRxxKVUui_w4uZx1Kd5uW-sgWHeX-t7d4F0Kpe1D2vumW6bzFYSzy6u0iWTVGwiN7U7TFUIbVgYcnqbQValDj-DM6nXyoobW45thPEl-f_92Nf8xOb84W8xn5xOTKx4meS1yIypOBWUl4VAarIhhEoq6ZoIhVoJmSiCWJSFCoQIoFZUg6yrOo_Akeb_3jbV7PTTDa1ZIzoRQikZisScqC2u9dc0G3J220Oj7BeuWGlxoTIuaSZVxVkBGykLULFZUkYoqYmhNJJMmen0dTuvLDVYGu-CgHZmOd7pmpZf2RlOSZZzzLDp8Ghycve7RB71pvMG2hQ5tf1-4YDmTYod--Ad9-noDtYR4g6arbTzY7Ez1TMbHFZJSFqnpE1T8Ktw0JkanbuL6SPB5JIhMwNuwhN57vfj18__Ziz9j9uMBu0-Pt22_S5Mfg2IPGme9d1g_dpkSvUv-Qzf0Lvl6SH6UvTt8oUfRQ9T5X7kO_Pg</recordid><startdate>20231005</startdate><enddate>20231005</enddate><creator>Hosseini, Mohammad</creator><creator>Gao, Catherine A</creator><creator>Liebovitz, David M</creator><creator>Carvalho, Alexandre M</creator><creator>Ahmad, Faraz S</creator><creator>Luo, Yuan</creator><creator>MacDonald, Ngan</creator><creator>Holmes, Kristi L</creator><creator>Kho, Abel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5576-3943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-985X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-7224</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-5254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-7004</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-5940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2613-2541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0195-7456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-5634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231005</creationdate><title>An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research</title><author>Hosseini, Mohammad ; Gao, Catherine A ; Liebovitz, David M ; Carvalho, Alexandre M ; Ahmad, Faraz S ; Luo, Yuan ; MacDonald, Ngan ; Holmes, Kristi L ; Kho, Abel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-6f46c4d31412b03abced0c27a8ff242eed41594eebb0049e9aab917a7fd0044d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic publications</topic><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chatbots</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational services industry</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Large language models</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mainstreaming, Education</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Catherine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebovitz, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Alexandre M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Faraz S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, Ngan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Kristi L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kho, Abel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hosseini, Mohammad</au><au>Gao, Catherine A</au><au>Liebovitz, David M</au><au>Carvalho, Alexandre M</au><au>Ahmad, Faraz S</au><au>Luo, Yuan</au><au>MacDonald, Ngan</au><au>Holmes, Kristi L</au><au>Kho, Abel</au><au>Clark, Mary Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-10-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0292216</spage><epage>e0292216</epage><pages>e0292216-e0292216</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>ChatGPT is the first large language model (LLM) to reach a large, mainstream audience. Its rapid adoption and exploration by the population at large has sparked a wide range of discussions regarding its acceptable and optimal integration in different areas. In a hybrid (virtual and in-person) panel discussion event, we examined various perspectives regarding the use of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare.
We surveyed in-person and online attendees using an audience interaction platform (Slido). We quantitatively analyzed received responses on questions about the use of ChatGPT in various contexts. We compared pairwise categorical groups with a Fisher's Exact. Furthermore, we used qualitative methods to analyze and code discussions.
We received 420 responses from an estimated 844 participants (response rate 49.7%). Only 40% of the audience had tried ChatGPT. More trainees had tried ChatGPT compared with faculty. Those who had used ChatGPT were more interested in using it in a wider range of contexts going forwards. Of the three discussed contexts, the greatest uncertainty was shown about using ChatGPT in education. Pros and cons were raised during discussion for the use of this technology in education, research, and healthcare.
There was a range of perspectives around the uses of ChatGPT in education, research, and healthcare, with still much uncertainty around its acceptability and optimal uses. There were different perspectives from respondents of different roles (trainee vs faculty vs staff). More discussion is needed to explore perceptions around the use of LLMs such as ChatGPT in vital sectors such as education, healthcare and research. Given involved risks and unforeseen challenges, taking a thoughtful and measured approach in adoption would reduce the likelihood of harm.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37796786</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0292216</doi><tpages>e0292216</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5576-3943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-985X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-7224</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-5254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-7004</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-5940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2613-2541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0195-7456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-5634</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2023-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292216-e0292216 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2873244991 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Academic publications Acceptability Artificial intelligence Biology and Life Sciences Chatbots Computer and Information Sciences Consent Disclosure Education Educational services industry Educational Status Faculty Feedback Forecasts and trends Health care Health care industry Health Facilities Humans Innovations Large language models Learning Mainstreaming, Education Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences People and Places Plagiarism Probability Qualitative analysis Social Sciences Students Teaching Technology application Training Uncertainty |
| title | An exploratory survey about using ChatGPT in education, healthcare, and research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T03%3A42%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20exploratory%20survey%20about%20using%20ChatGPT%20in%20education,%20healthcare,%20and%20research&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hosseini,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2023-10-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0292216&rft.epage=e0292216&rft.pages=e0292216-e0292216&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0292216&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA767847112%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2873244991&rft_id=info:pmid/37796786&rft_galeid=A767847112&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2795328a50b84f22b0d0d190c1f0727c&rfr_iscdi=true |