Social context matters: The role of social support and social norms in support for solidarity in healthcare financing
In many European countries, including the Netherlands, the healthcare system is financed according to the principles of solidarity. It is important, therefore, that public support for solidarity in healthcare financing is sufficient in order to ensure that people remain willing to contribute towards...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-09, Vol.18 (9), p.e0291530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0291530 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Meijer, Marloes A Brabers, Anne E. M de Jong, Judith D |
description | In many European countries, including the Netherlands, the healthcare system is financed according to the principles of solidarity. It is important, therefore, that public support for solidarity in healthcare financing is sufficient in order to ensure that people remain willing to contribute towards solidarity-based systems. The high willingness to contribute to the healthcare costs of others in the Netherlands suggests that support is generally high. However, there are differences between groups. Previous research has focused on mechanisms at the individual and institutional level to explain these differences. However, people’s social context may also play a role. Little research has been conducted into this. To fill this gap, we examined the role of perceived social support and social norms in order to explain differences in the willingness to contribute to other people’s healthcare costs. In November 2021, we conducted a survey study in which a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1,500 members of the Dutch Healthcare Consumer Panel. This was returned by 837 panel members (56% response rate). Using logistic regression analysis, we showed that people who perceive higher levels of social support are more willing to contribute to the healthcare costs of others. We also found that the willingness to contribute is higher when someone’s social context is more supportive of healthcare systems that are financed according to the principles of solidarity. This effect does not differ between people who perceive low and high levels of social support. Our results suggest that, next to the individual and institutional level, the social context of people has to be taken into consideration in policy and research addressing support for solidarity in healthcare financing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0291530 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2864885973</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A765314729</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_09cbd207aa014ea5ba2aeb8f48dedc1e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A765314729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-23c307830237890623b031683b88629d9488c3f75c0765d864a280d17be7fd7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRsFb_A8EFQezDnfmxu8n6UkqpelAo2OprmE2ydzmyyZlkxf735nrb0pU-SB4SZj7zncwwUxRvMVpiyvCnrR-DA7vceaeXiLS4puhZcYRbShYNQfT5o_fL4lWMW4RqypvmqBivvTRgS-ld0n9SOUBKOsTP5c1Gl8FbXfq-jAcmjrudD6kEp-5NzochlsY9-Hofss8aBcGk271no8GmjYSgy944cNK49eviRQ826jfTfVz8-HJxc_5tcXn1dXV-drmQDW7TglBJEeMUEcp4ixpCO0Rxw2nHeUNa1VacS9qzWiLW1Io3FRCOFGadZr1ikh4X7w66O-ujmNoUBckk53XLaCZWB0J52IpdMAOEW-HBiDuDD2sBIRlptUCt7BRBDADhSkPdAQHd8b7iSiuJddY6nbKN3ZBN2qUAdiY69zizEWv_W2BUI9xQnhU-TgrB_xp1TGIwUWprwWk_3n28Zpzgqs7o-3_Qp8ubqDXkCozrfU4s96LiLLeM4oqRNlPLJ6h8lB5Mngzdm2yfBZzMAqbpWcMYo1hdf_9_9urnnP3wiD1MTp6mMRnv4hysDqAMPsag-4cuYyT2O3HfDbHfCTHtBP0LXVf_TQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864885973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social context matters: The role of social support and social norms in support for solidarity in healthcare financing</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Meijer, Marloes A ; Brabers, Anne E. M ; de Jong, Judith D</creator><contributor>Chima, Sylvester Chidi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Marloes A ; Brabers, Anne E. M ; de Jong, Judith D ; Chima, Sylvester Chidi</creatorcontrib><description>In many European countries, including the Netherlands, the healthcare system is financed according to the principles of solidarity. It is important, therefore, that public support for solidarity in healthcare financing is sufficient in order to ensure that people remain willing to contribute towards solidarity-based systems. The high willingness to contribute to the healthcare costs of others in the Netherlands suggests that support is generally high. However, there are differences between groups. Previous research has focused on mechanisms at the individual and institutional level to explain these differences. However, people’s social context may also play a role. Little research has been conducted into this. To fill this gap, we examined the role of perceived social support and social norms in order to explain differences in the willingness to contribute to other people’s healthcare costs. In November 2021, we conducted a survey study in which a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1,500 members of the Dutch Healthcare Consumer Panel. This was returned by 837 panel members (56% response rate). Using logistic regression analysis, we showed that people who perceive higher levels of social support are more willing to contribute to the healthcare costs of others. We also found that the willingness to contribute is higher when someone’s social context is more supportive of healthcare systems that are financed according to the principles of solidarity. This effect does not differ between people who perceive low and high levels of social support. Our results suggest that, next to the individual and institutional level, the social context of people has to be taken into consideration in policy and research addressing support for solidarity in healthcare financing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Context ; Economic aspects ; Financing ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health care expenditures ; Hypotheses ; Medical care, Cost of ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Norms ; People and places ; Perceptions ; Physical Sciences ; Regression analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social aspects ; Social interactions ; Social networks ; Social norms ; Social Sciences ; Social support ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-09, Vol.18 (9), p.e0291530</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Meijer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Meijer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>2023 Meijer et al 2023 Meijer et al</rights><rights>2023 Meijer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-23c307830237890623b031683b88629d9488c3f75c0765d864a280d17be7fd7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1945-0530</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501638/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501638/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Chima, Sylvester Chidi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Marloes A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brabers, Anne E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Judith D</creatorcontrib><title>Social context matters: The role of social support and social norms in support for solidarity in healthcare financing</title><title>PloS one</title><description>In many European countries, including the Netherlands, the healthcare system is financed according to the principles of solidarity. It is important, therefore, that public support for solidarity in healthcare financing is sufficient in order to ensure that people remain willing to contribute towards solidarity-based systems. The high willingness to contribute to the healthcare costs of others in the Netherlands suggests that support is generally high. However, there are differences between groups. Previous research has focused on mechanisms at the individual and institutional level to explain these differences. However, people’s social context may also play a role. Little research has been conducted into this. To fill this gap, we examined the role of perceived social support and social norms in order to explain differences in the willingness to contribute to other people’s healthcare costs. In November 2021, we conducted a survey study in which a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1,500 members of the Dutch Healthcare Consumer Panel. This was returned by 837 panel members (56% response rate). Using logistic regression analysis, we showed that people who perceive higher levels of social support are more willing to contribute to the healthcare costs of others. We also found that the willingness to contribute is higher when someone’s social context is more supportive of healthcare systems that are financed according to the principles of solidarity. This effect does not differ between people who perceive low and high levels of social support. Our results suggest that, next to the individual and institutional level, the social context of people has to be taken into consideration in policy and research addressing support for solidarity in healthcare financing.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Medical care, Cost of</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRsFb_A8EFQezDnfmxu8n6UkqpelAo2OprmE2ydzmyyZlkxf735nrb0pU-SB4SZj7zncwwUxRvMVpiyvCnrR-DA7vceaeXiLS4puhZcYRbShYNQfT5o_fL4lWMW4RqypvmqBivvTRgS-ld0n9SOUBKOsTP5c1Gl8FbXfq-jAcmjrudD6kEp-5NzochlsY9-Hofss8aBcGk271no8GmjYSgy944cNK49eviRQ826jfTfVz8-HJxc_5tcXn1dXV-drmQDW7TglBJEeMUEcp4ixpCO0Rxw2nHeUNa1VacS9qzWiLW1Io3FRCOFGadZr1ikh4X7w66O-ujmNoUBckk53XLaCZWB0J52IpdMAOEW-HBiDuDD2sBIRlptUCt7BRBDADhSkPdAQHd8b7iSiuJddY6nbKN3ZBN2qUAdiY69zizEWv_W2BUI9xQnhU-TgrB_xp1TGIwUWprwWk_3n28Zpzgqs7o-3_Qp8ubqDXkCozrfU4s96LiLLeM4oqRNlPLJ6h8lB5Mngzdm2yfBZzMAqbpWcMYo1hdf_9_9urnnP3wiD1MTp6mMRnv4hysDqAMPsag-4cuYyT2O3HfDbHfCTHtBP0LXVf_TQ</recordid><startdate>20230914</startdate><enddate>20230914</enddate><creator>Meijer, Marloes A</creator><creator>Brabers, Anne E. M</creator><creator>de Jong, Judith D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-0530</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230914</creationdate><title>Social context matters: The role of social support and social norms in support for solidarity in healthcare financing</title><author>Meijer, Marloes A ; Brabers, Anne E. M ; de Jong, Judith D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-23c307830237890623b031683b88629d9488c3f75c0765d864a280d17be7fd7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Medical care, Cost of</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Marloes A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brabers, Anne E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Judith D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meijer, Marloes A</au><au>Brabers, Anne E. M</au><au>de Jong, Judith D</au><au>Chima, Sylvester Chidi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social context matters: The role of social support and social norms in support for solidarity in healthcare financing</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-09-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0291530</spage><pages>e0291530-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In many European countries, including the Netherlands, the healthcare system is financed according to the principles of solidarity. It is important, therefore, that public support for solidarity in healthcare financing is sufficient in order to ensure that people remain willing to contribute towards solidarity-based systems. The high willingness to contribute to the healthcare costs of others in the Netherlands suggests that support is generally high. However, there are differences between groups. Previous research has focused on mechanisms at the individual and institutional level to explain these differences. However, people’s social context may also play a role. Little research has been conducted into this. To fill this gap, we examined the role of perceived social support and social norms in order to explain differences in the willingness to contribute to other people’s healthcare costs. In November 2021, we conducted a survey study in which a questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1,500 members of the Dutch Healthcare Consumer Panel. This was returned by 837 panel members (56% response rate). Using logistic regression analysis, we showed that people who perceive higher levels of social support are more willing to contribute to the healthcare costs of others. We also found that the willingness to contribute is higher when someone’s social context is more supportive of healthcare systems that are financed according to the principles of solidarity. This effect does not differ between people who perceive low and high levels of social support. Our results suggest that, next to the individual and institutional level, the social context of people has to be taken into consideration in policy and research addressing support for solidarity in healthcare financing.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0291530</doi><tpages>e0291530</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-0530</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-09, Vol.18 (9), p.e0291530 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2864885973 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Attitudes Biology and Life Sciences Context Economic aspects Financing Health aspects Health care Health care expenditures Hypotheses Medical care, Cost of Medicine and Health Sciences Norms People and places Perceptions Physical Sciences Regression analysis Research and Analysis Methods Social aspects Social interactions Social networks Social norms Social Sciences Social support Surveys |
title | Social context matters: The role of social support and social norms in support for solidarity in healthcare financing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A47%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20context%20matters:%20The%20role%20of%20social%20support%20and%20social%20norms%20in%20support%20for%20solidarity%20in%20healthcare%20financing&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Meijer,%20Marloes%20A&rft.date=2023-09-14&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0291530&rft.pages=e0291530-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0291530&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA765314729%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864885973&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A765314729&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_09cbd207aa014ea5ba2aeb8f48dedc1e&rfr_iscdi=true |