The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT)
Misconceptions about the health risks of cannabis remain prevalent, indicating the need to improve public health messaging and determine the effectiveness of educational programming. Our objective was to develop a standardized questionnaire to measure knowledge about cannabis in the context of canna...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-09, Vol.18 (9), p.e0291113-e0291113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0291113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0291113 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Bayat, Ava Mansell, Holly Taylor, Jeff Szafron, Michael Mansell, Kerry |
description | Misconceptions about the health risks of cannabis remain prevalent, indicating the need to improve public health messaging and determine the effectiveness of educational programming. Our objective was to develop a standardized questionnaire to measure knowledge about cannabis in the context of cannabis legalization. A Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT) was created using the Delphi method. A purposive sample of healthcare professionals, policymakers, academics, patients, and students served as the content and development experts. Principal component analysis from the codes identified from open-ended feedback guided the item development. Upon completion, the CKAT was administered as a pre- and post-test in four schools (7.sup.th and 9.sup.th Grade) in Canada. The data were analysed to determine whether knowledge scores changed after participating in a cannabis education program. Twenty-four experts initially participated in the Delphi process and 18 (75% retention) continued throughout. Principal component analysis identified 3 domains: 1) effects of cannabis on the individual, 2) general information about cannabis, and 3) cannabis harm reduction. The final questionnaire consisted of 16 multiple-true-false questions (64 items) and received a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 6.3, and a SMOG index score of 7.6. The CKAT was completed by 132 students; seventy-three 7.sup.th grade and fifty-nine 9.sup.th grade students. The baseline mean CKAT score was 46.2 (SD:5.5), which increased to 50.7 (SD:4.6) after the cannabis educational program (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0291113 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2859970610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A762984528</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a768bd52b96c4010863ebef41fb3ed25</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A762984528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-1c2d1190a13807c9c0bcee7f4546925db833dd7ed0b2a3a1261ae0462ecd210e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9r2zAUxc3YYF23bzCYYTDah2RXki1bLxsh7E9oobBlexWydO0oKFZq2d367as03qhHH4YeJK5-OlfncpLkNYE5YQV5v_VD1yo33_sW50AFIYQ9SU6IYHTGKbCnD87PkxchbAFyVnJ-knxYbzA1eIPO73fY9qmvU5UuVduqyob0ovW_HJoG00UIGMI9svbepWfLi8X6_GXyrFYu4KtxP01-fP60Xn6dXV59WS0XlzPNiehnRFNDiABFWAmFFhoqjVjUWZ5xQXNTlYwZU6CBiiqmCOVEIWScojaUALLT5M1Rd-98kKPfIGmZC1EAJxCJ1ZEwXm3lvrM71d1Kr6y8L_iukarrrXYoVcHLyuS0ElxnQKDkDCusM1JXDA3No9bHsdtQ7dDoaLpTbiI6vWntRjb-RhLICpYzHhXORoXOXw8YermzQaNzqkU_HD7OIQOItiP69h_0cXsj1ajowLa1j431QVQuCk5FmeW0jNT8ESougzurYzpqG-uTB-eTB5Hp8XffqCEEufr-7f_Zq59T9t0DdoPK9Zvg3dBb34YpmB1B3fkQOqz_TpmAPIT7zzTkIdxyDDe7AxtR6ds</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2859970610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bayat, Ava ; Mansell, Holly ; Taylor, Jeff ; Szafron, Michael ; Mansell, Kerry</creator><contributor>Szaflarski, Magdalena</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bayat, Ava ; Mansell, Holly ; Taylor, Jeff ; Szafron, Michael ; Mansell, Kerry ; Szaflarski, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><description>Misconceptions about the health risks of cannabis remain prevalent, indicating the need to improve public health messaging and determine the effectiveness of educational programming. Our objective was to develop a standardized questionnaire to measure knowledge about cannabis in the context of cannabis legalization. A Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT) was created using the Delphi method. A purposive sample of healthcare professionals, policymakers, academics, patients, and students served as the content and development experts. Principal component analysis from the codes identified from open-ended feedback guided the item development. Upon completion, the CKAT was administered as a pre- and post-test in four schools (7.sup.th and 9.sup.th Grade) in Canada. The data were analysed to determine whether knowledge scores changed after participating in a cannabis education program. Twenty-four experts initially participated in the Delphi process and 18 (75% retention) continued throughout. Principal component analysis identified 3 domains: 1) effects of cannabis on the individual, 2) general information about cannabis, and 3) cannabis harm reduction. The final questionnaire consisted of 16 multiple-true-false questions (64 items) and received a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 6.3, and a SMOG index score of 7.6. The CKAT was completed by 132 students; seventy-three 7.sup.th grade and fifty-nine 9.sup.th grade students. The baseline mean CKAT score was 46.2 (SD:5.5), which increased to 50.7 (SD:4.6) after the cannabis educational program (p<0.05). A novel tool to measure knowledge of cannabis was developed and piloted in 7.sup.th grade and 9.sup.th grade students. Future studies are required to test usability and validity of the CKAT in other contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Cannabis ; Delphi method ; Education ; Evaluation ; Feedback ; Harm reduction ; Health aspects ; Health literacy ; Health risks ; Health surveys ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legalization of narcotics ; Marijuana ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and places ; Physical Sciences ; Principal components analysis ; Psychosis ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Schools ; Smog ; Social Sciences ; Students ; Surveys ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-09, Vol.18 (9), p.e0291113-e0291113</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Bayat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Bayat et al 2023 Bayat et al</rights><rights>2023 Bayat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-1c2d1190a13807c9c0bcee7f4546925db833dd7ed0b2a3a1261ae0462ecd210e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3425-0425</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473536/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473536/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Szaflarski, Magdalena</contributor><creatorcontrib>Bayat, Ava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansell, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szafron, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansell, Kerry</creatorcontrib><title>The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT)</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Misconceptions about the health risks of cannabis remain prevalent, indicating the need to improve public health messaging and determine the effectiveness of educational programming. Our objective was to develop a standardized questionnaire to measure knowledge about cannabis in the context of cannabis legalization. A Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT) was created using the Delphi method. A purposive sample of healthcare professionals, policymakers, academics, patients, and students served as the content and development experts. Principal component analysis from the codes identified from open-ended feedback guided the item development. Upon completion, the CKAT was administered as a pre- and post-test in four schools (7.sup.th and 9.sup.th Grade) in Canada. The data were analysed to determine whether knowledge scores changed after participating in a cannabis education program. Twenty-four experts initially participated in the Delphi process and 18 (75% retention) continued throughout. Principal component analysis identified 3 domains: 1) effects of cannabis on the individual, 2) general information about cannabis, and 3) cannabis harm reduction. The final questionnaire consisted of 16 multiple-true-false questions (64 items) and received a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 6.3, and a SMOG index score of 7.6. The CKAT was completed by 132 students; seventy-three 7.sup.th grade and fifty-nine 9.sup.th grade students. The baseline mean CKAT score was 46.2 (SD:5.5), which increased to 50.7 (SD:4.6) after the cannabis educational program (p<0.05). A novel tool to measure knowledge of cannabis was developed and piloted in 7.sup.th grade and 9.sup.th grade students. Future studies are required to test usability and validity of the CKAT in other contexts.</description><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Harm reduction</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legalization of narcotics</subject><subject>Marijuana</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Smog</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9r2zAUxc3YYF23bzCYYTDah2RXki1bLxsh7E9oobBlexWydO0oKFZq2d367as03qhHH4YeJK5-OlfncpLkNYE5YQV5v_VD1yo33_sW50AFIYQ9SU6IYHTGKbCnD87PkxchbAFyVnJ-knxYbzA1eIPO73fY9qmvU5UuVduqyob0ovW_HJoG00UIGMI9svbepWfLi8X6_GXyrFYu4KtxP01-fP60Xn6dXV59WS0XlzPNiehnRFNDiABFWAmFFhoqjVjUWZ5xQXNTlYwZU6CBiiqmCOVEIWScojaUALLT5M1Rd-98kKPfIGmZC1EAJxCJ1ZEwXm3lvrM71d1Kr6y8L_iukarrrXYoVcHLyuS0ElxnQKDkDCusM1JXDA3No9bHsdtQ7dDoaLpTbiI6vWntRjb-RhLICpYzHhXORoXOXw8YermzQaNzqkU_HD7OIQOItiP69h_0cXsj1ajowLa1j431QVQuCk5FmeW0jNT8ESougzurYzpqG-uTB-eTB5Hp8XffqCEEufr-7f_Zq59T9t0DdoPK9Zvg3dBb34YpmB1B3fkQOqz_TpmAPIT7zzTkIdxyDDe7AxtR6ds</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Bayat, Ava</creator><creator>Mansell, Holly</creator><creator>Taylor, Jeff</creator><creator>Szafron, Michael</creator><creator>Mansell, Kerry</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3425-0425</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT)</title><author>Bayat, Ava ; Mansell, Holly ; Taylor, Jeff ; Szafron, Michael ; Mansell, Kerry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-1c2d1190a13807c9c0bcee7f4546925db833dd7ed0b2a3a1261ae0462ecd210e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Harm reduction</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legalization of narcotics</topic><topic>Marijuana</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Smog</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bayat, Ava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansell, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szafron, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansell, Kerry</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bayat, Ava</au><au>Mansell, Holly</au><au>Taylor, Jeff</au><au>Szafron, Michael</au><au>Mansell, Kerry</au><au>Szaflarski, Magdalena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0291113</spage><epage>e0291113</epage><pages>e0291113-e0291113</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Misconceptions about the health risks of cannabis remain prevalent, indicating the need to improve public health messaging and determine the effectiveness of educational programming. Our objective was to develop a standardized questionnaire to measure knowledge about cannabis in the context of cannabis legalization. A Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT) was created using the Delphi method. A purposive sample of healthcare professionals, policymakers, academics, patients, and students served as the content and development experts. Principal component analysis from the codes identified from open-ended feedback guided the item development. Upon completion, the CKAT was administered as a pre- and post-test in four schools (7.sup.th and 9.sup.th Grade) in Canada. The data were analysed to determine whether knowledge scores changed after participating in a cannabis education program. Twenty-four experts initially participated in the Delphi process and 18 (75% retention) continued throughout. Principal component analysis identified 3 domains: 1) effects of cannabis on the individual, 2) general information about cannabis, and 3) cannabis harm reduction. The final questionnaire consisted of 16 multiple-true-false questions (64 items) and received a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 6.3, and a SMOG index score of 7.6. The CKAT was completed by 132 students; seventy-three 7.sup.th grade and fifty-nine 9.sup.th grade students. The baseline mean CKAT score was 46.2 (SD:5.5), which increased to 50.7 (SD:4.6) after the cannabis educational program (p<0.05). A novel tool to measure knowledge of cannabis was developed and piloted in 7.sup.th grade and 9.sup.th grade students. Future studies are required to test usability and validity of the CKAT in other contexts.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0291113</doi><tpages>e0291113</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3425-0425</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-09, Vol.18 (9), p.e0291113-e0291113 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2859970610 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Cannabis Delphi method Education Evaluation Feedback Harm reduction Health aspects Health literacy Health risks Health surveys Laws, regulations and rules Legalization of narcotics Marijuana Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences People and places Physical Sciences Principal components analysis Psychosis Public health Questionnaires Research and Analysis Methods Schools Smog Social Sciences Students Surveys Young adults |
title | The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A14%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20of%20a%20Cannabis%20Knowledge%20Assessment%20Tool%20(CKAT)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Bayat,%20Ava&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0291113&rft.epage=e0291113&rft.pages=e0291113-e0291113&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0291113&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA762984528%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2859970610&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A762984528&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a768bd52b96c4010863ebef41fb3ed25&rfr_iscdi=true |