Exploring differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L and WHOQOL-OLD in recipients of aged care services in Germany
European countries more than ever face shifts towards aging societies with accompanying challenges for health and aged care services. Economic evaluation has mainly relied on health measures such as EQ-5D across populations and conditions. We want to know how well the EQ-5D performs in the target po...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0290606-e0290606 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0290606 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | e0290606 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Marten, Ole Greiner, Wolfgang |
| description | European countries more than ever face shifts towards aging societies with accompanying challenges for health and aged care services. Economic evaluation has mainly relied on health measures such as EQ-5D across populations and conditions. We want to know how well the EQ-5D performs in the target population to avoid bias to the disadvantage of older adults and care-dependents. Therefore, we aim to explore differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in comparison to the old-age specific WHOQOL-OLD instrument in a sample of older adults receiving aged care services. We collected data from n = 329 older adults (≥65 years) receiving aged care services in Germany; the majority was at least 80 years and had varying care needs. We assessed instruments’ feasibility, test-retest reliability, instruments’ association and sensitivity to known-group differences. In terms of feasibility and test-retest reliability both EQ-5D versions performed better than the WHOQOL-OLD. All measures differentiated well between groups based on aspects of general health and care levels. The analysis of relationship between measures indicated that EQ-5D and WHOQOL-OLD assess partially overlapping, but distinct constructs. We found no clear evidence of superiority of either EQ-5D version over the other. The EQ-5D-5L performed better in terms of test-retest reliability and stronger correlations with WHOQOL-OLD facets. We conclude that using the WHOQOL-OLD alongside EQ-5D in this sample added further information on different aspects of quality of life. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0290606 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2857401885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A762191803</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2c5e0c5b370c4e99921925b5f97aebdf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A762191803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6210-e9bba18588a79388ec6fbb5e0a21e5a954e1848de0f11ef4daf4ee508d7a9bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1Fr1TAUx4sobk6_gWBBEAV7TZqmTZ9kbNftQuEyHfoY0vSkN6NNrkk7Nj-9ufdWWWUPkoeEk9_5n_wPOVH0GqMFJgX-dGNHZ0S32FoDC5SWKEf5k-gYlyRN8hSRpw_OR9EL728QooTl-fPoiBR5mjFaHEe_lnfbzjpt2rjRSoEDI8HHwjSx173uhNODDgGr4uVVQs8TUn2cTrTaYz8u11frKllX57E2sQOptxrMsE8RLTSxFA5iD-5W75QDcwGuF-b-ZfRMic7Dq2k_ia6_LK_PLpNqfbE6O60SmacYJVDWtcCMMiaKkjAGMld1TQGJFAMVJc0As4w1gBTGoLJGqAyAItYUIqSSk-jNQTb49HzqmudpsJ8hzBgNxOpANFbc8K3TvXD33ArN9wHrWi7coGUHPJWhsKQ1KZDMoCzLFJcprakqCwF1o4LW56naWPfQyNAJJ7qZ6PzG6A1v7S3HKKM5ZjgovJ8UnP05gh94r72ErhMG7Hh4ePDL8A59-w_6uL2JakVwoI2yobDcifLT8A9wiRkigVo8QoXVQK9l-GNKh_gs4cMsITAD3A2tGL3nq29f_59df5-z7x6wGxDdsPG2GwdtjZ-D2QGUznrvQP3tMkZ8NyJ_usF3I8KnESG_AU1B_7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857401885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L and WHOQOL-OLD in recipients of aged care services in Germany</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Marten, Ole ; Greiner, Wolfgang</creator><contributor>Konerding, Uwe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Marten, Ole ; Greiner, Wolfgang ; Konerding, Uwe</creatorcontrib><description>European countries more than ever face shifts towards aging societies with accompanying challenges for health and aged care services. Economic evaluation has mainly relied on health measures such as EQ-5D across populations and conditions. We want to know how well the EQ-5D performs in the target population to avoid bias to the disadvantage of older adults and care-dependents. Therefore, we aim to explore differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in comparison to the old-age specific WHOQOL-OLD instrument in a sample of older adults receiving aged care services. We collected data from n = 329 older adults (≥65 years) receiving aged care services in Germany; the majority was at least 80 years and had varying care needs. We assessed instruments’ feasibility, test-retest reliability, instruments’ association and sensitivity to known-group differences. In terms of feasibility and test-retest reliability both EQ-5D versions performed better than the WHOQOL-OLD. All measures differentiated well between groups based on aspects of general health and care levels. The analysis of relationship between measures indicated that EQ-5D and WHOQOL-OLD assess partially overlapping, but distinct constructs. We found no clear evidence of superiority of either EQ-5D version over the other. The EQ-5D-5L performed better in terms of test-retest reliability and stronger correlations with WHOQOL-OLD facets. We conclude that using the WHOQOL-OLD alongside EQ-5D in this sample added further information on different aspects of quality of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290606</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37624857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Adults ; Age ; Aged patients ; Aging ; Ambulatory care ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Comparative analysis ; Cooperation ; Elder care ; Feasibility studies ; Health aspects ; Health surveys ; Medical care ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; People and Places ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Similarity ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Surveys ; Utilization</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0290606-e0290606</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Marten, Greiner. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Marten, Greiner 2023 Marten, Greiner</rights><rights>2023 Marten, Greiner. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6210-e9bba18588a79388ec6fbb5e0a21e5a954e1848de0f11ef4daf4ee508d7a9bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6210-e9bba18588a79388ec6fbb5e0a21e5a954e1848de0f11ef4daf4ee508d7a9bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456181/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10456181/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Konerding, Uwe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Marten, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L and WHOQOL-OLD in recipients of aged care services in Germany</title><title>PloS one</title><description>European countries more than ever face shifts towards aging societies with accompanying challenges for health and aged care services. Economic evaluation has mainly relied on health measures such as EQ-5D across populations and conditions. We want to know how well the EQ-5D performs in the target population to avoid bias to the disadvantage of older adults and care-dependents. Therefore, we aim to explore differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in comparison to the old-age specific WHOQOL-OLD instrument in a sample of older adults receiving aged care services. We collected data from n = 329 older adults (≥65 years) receiving aged care services in Germany; the majority was at least 80 years and had varying care needs. We assessed instruments’ feasibility, test-retest reliability, instruments’ association and sensitivity to known-group differences. In terms of feasibility and test-retest reliability both EQ-5D versions performed better than the WHOQOL-OLD. All measures differentiated well between groups based on aspects of general health and care levels. The analysis of relationship between measures indicated that EQ-5D and WHOQOL-OLD assess partially overlapping, but distinct constructs. We found no clear evidence of superiority of either EQ-5D version over the other. The EQ-5D-5L performed better in terms of test-retest reliability and stronger correlations with WHOQOL-OLD facets. We conclude that using the WHOQOL-OLD alongside EQ-5D in this sample added further information on different aspects of quality of life.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Elder care</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Similarity</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1Fr1TAUx4sobk6_gWBBEAV7TZqmTZ9kbNftQuEyHfoY0vSkN6NNrkk7Nj-9ufdWWWUPkoeEk9_5n_wPOVH0GqMFJgX-dGNHZ0S32FoDC5SWKEf5k-gYlyRN8hSRpw_OR9EL728QooTl-fPoiBR5mjFaHEe_lnfbzjpt2rjRSoEDI8HHwjSx173uhNODDgGr4uVVQs8TUn2cTrTaYz8u11frKllX57E2sQOptxrMsE8RLTSxFA5iD-5W75QDcwGuF-b-ZfRMic7Dq2k_ia6_LK_PLpNqfbE6O60SmacYJVDWtcCMMiaKkjAGMld1TQGJFAMVJc0As4w1gBTGoLJGqAyAItYUIqSSk-jNQTb49HzqmudpsJ8hzBgNxOpANFbc8K3TvXD33ArN9wHrWi7coGUHPJWhsKQ1KZDMoCzLFJcprakqCwF1o4LW56naWPfQyNAJJ7qZ6PzG6A1v7S3HKKM5ZjgovJ8UnP05gh94r72ErhMG7Hh4ePDL8A59-w_6uL2JakVwoI2yobDcifLT8A9wiRkigVo8QoXVQK9l-GNKh_gs4cMsITAD3A2tGL3nq29f_59df5-z7x6wGxDdsPG2GwdtjZ-D2QGUznrvQP3tMkZ8NyJ_usF3I8KnESG_AU1B_7w</recordid><startdate>20230825</startdate><enddate>20230825</enddate><creator>Marten, Ole</creator><creator>Greiner, Wolfgang</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230825</creationdate><title>Exploring differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L and WHOQOL-OLD in recipients of aged care services in Germany</title><author>Marten, Ole ; Greiner, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6210-e9bba18588a79388ec6fbb5e0a21e5a954e1848de0f11ef4daf4ee508d7a9bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Elder care</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Similarity</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marten, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marten, Ole</au><au>Greiner, Wolfgang</au><au>Konerding, Uwe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L and WHOQOL-OLD in recipients of aged care services in Germany</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-08-25</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0290606</spage><epage>e0290606</epage><pages>e0290606-e0290606</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>European countries more than ever face shifts towards aging societies with accompanying challenges for health and aged care services. Economic evaluation has mainly relied on health measures such as EQ-5D across populations and conditions. We want to know how well the EQ-5D performs in the target population to avoid bias to the disadvantage of older adults and care-dependents. Therefore, we aim to explore differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in comparison to the old-age specific WHOQOL-OLD instrument in a sample of older adults receiving aged care services. We collected data from n = 329 older adults (≥65 years) receiving aged care services in Germany; the majority was at least 80 years and had varying care needs. We assessed instruments’ feasibility, test-retest reliability, instruments’ association and sensitivity to known-group differences. In terms of feasibility and test-retest reliability both EQ-5D versions performed better than the WHOQOL-OLD. All measures differentiated well between groups based on aspects of general health and care levels. The analysis of relationship between measures indicated that EQ-5D and WHOQOL-OLD assess partially overlapping, but distinct constructs. We found no clear evidence of superiority of either EQ-5D version over the other. The EQ-5D-5L performed better in terms of test-retest reliability and stronger correlations with WHOQOL-OLD facets. We conclude that using the WHOQOL-OLD alongside EQ-5D in this sample added further information on different aspects of quality of life.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37624857</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0290606</doi><tpages>e0290606</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0290606-e0290606 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2857401885 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Activities of daily living Adults Age Aged patients Aging Ambulatory care Biology and Life Sciences Comparative analysis Cooperation Elder care Feasibility studies Health aspects Health surveys Medical care Medicine and Health Sciences Nursing homes Older people People and Places Quality of life Questionnaires Reliability Research and Analysis Methods Similarity Social Sciences Sociodemographics Surveys Utilization |
| title | Exploring differences and similarities of EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L and WHOQOL-OLD in recipients of aged care services in Germany |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A27%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20differences%20and%20similarities%20of%20EQ-5D-3L,%20EQ-5D-5L%20and%20WHOQOL-OLD%20in%20recipients%20of%20aged%20care%20services%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Marten,%20Ole&rft.date=2023-08-25&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0290606&rft.epage=e0290606&rft.pages=e0290606-e0290606&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0290606&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA762191803%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857401885&rft_id=info:pmid/37624857&rft_galeid=A762191803&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2c5e0c5b370c4e99921925b5f97aebdf&rfr_iscdi=true |