Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States

In the United States, increasing access to the internet, the increasing costs of large-scale face-to-face data collections, and the general reluctance of the public to participate in intrusive in-person data collections all mean that new approaches to nationally representative surveys are urgently n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0289695-e0289695
Hauptverfasser: West, Brady T, Zhang, Shiyu, Wagner, James, Gatward, Rebecca, Saw, Htay-Wah, Axinn, William G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0289695
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0289695
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator West, Brady T
Zhang, Shiyu
Wagner, James
Gatward, Rebecca
Saw, Htay-Wah
Axinn, William G
description In the United States, increasing access to the internet, the increasing costs of large-scale face-to-face data collections, and the general reluctance of the public to participate in intrusive in-person data collections all mean that new approaches to nationally representative surveys are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the need for faster, higher-quality alternatives to face-to-face data collection. These trends place a high priority on the evaluation of innovative web-based data collection methods that are convenient for the U.S. public and yield scientific information of high quality. The web mode is particularly appealing because it is relatively inexpensive, it is logistically flexible to implement, and it affords a high level of privacy and confidentiality when correctly implemented. With this study, we aimed to conduct a methodological evaluation of a sequential mixed-mode web/mail data collection protocol, including modular survey design concepts, which was implemented on a national probability sample in the U.S. in 2020-2021. We implemented randomized experiments to test theoretically-informed hypotheses that 1) the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that did not respond to an invitation to complete a household screening questionnaire online would help to recruit different types of households; and 2) the use of modular survey design, which involves splitting a lengthy self-administered survey up into multiple parts that can be completed at a respondent's convenience, would improve survey completion rates. We find support for the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that have not responded to a web-based screening questionnaire. We did not find support for the use of modular design in this context. Simple descriptive analyses also suggest that attempted telephone reminders may be helpful for the main survey.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0289695
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2846187025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A759586646</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_136df22bf877434c9f1174b862a12822</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A759586646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9636cf804f76cce620dc6290814ec9f0bfc6aa417fb840401efbedfbd35cb60a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJw2K0_EifhgqqqwEpFlSjlajnOeNdVYqe2s7D_Hmd3W21QD8gHfz3zemY8kySvMZpjWuDTWzs4I9p5bw3MESkrVuVPkmNcUTJjBNGnB-uj5IX3twjltGTseXJEizxDrCiPk813CCvb-FRZl-qud3atzTLthQta6l4EbU3qRACfapOa7V60qYdWzUTTaaN9AAdN-hvq007oeDW4NWz8p_RirRswElLlbJeGFaQ3RoeIXodR72XyTInWw6v9fJLcfLn4ef5tdnn1dXF-djmTrKJhVjHKpCpRpgomJcRoGslIhUqcgawUqpVkQmS4UHWZoQxhUDU0qm5oLmuGBD1J3u50-9Z6vs-a56TMGC4LRPJILHZEY8Ut753uhNtwKzTfHli35Nt0tMAxZY0ipFZlUWQ0iw5gXGR1yYjApCQkan3evzbUHTQSTHCinYhOb4xe8aVdcxx9p3ir8GGv4OzdAD7wTnsJbSsM2GHneEUKVozou3_Qx8PbU0sRI9BG2fiwHEX5WZFXeSyJjEVq_ggVRwOdlrHGlI7nE4OPE4PIBPgTlmLwni-uf_w_e_Vryr4_YFcg2rDyth3GyvNTMNuB0lnvHaiHLGPExxa5zwYfW4TvWySavTn8oQej-56gfwF2tw2k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2846187025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>West, Brady T ; Zhang, Shiyu ; Wagner, James ; Gatward, Rebecca ; Saw, Htay-Wah ; Axinn, William G</creator><contributor>Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan</contributor><creatorcontrib>West, Brady T ; Zhang, Shiyu ; Wagner, James ; Gatward, Rebecca ; Saw, Htay-Wah ; Axinn, William G ; Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan</creatorcontrib><description>In the United States, increasing access to the internet, the increasing costs of large-scale face-to-face data collections, and the general reluctance of the public to participate in intrusive in-person data collections all mean that new approaches to nationally representative surveys are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the need for faster, higher-quality alternatives to face-to-face data collection. These trends place a high priority on the evaluation of innovative web-based data collection methods that are convenient for the U.S. public and yield scientific information of high quality. The web mode is particularly appealing because it is relatively inexpensive, it is logistically flexible to implement, and it affords a high level of privacy and confidentiality when correctly implemented. With this study, we aimed to conduct a methodological evaluation of a sequential mixed-mode web/mail data collection protocol, including modular survey design concepts, which was implemented on a national probability sample in the U.S. in 2020-2021. We implemented randomized experiments to test theoretically-informed hypotheses that 1) the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that did not respond to an invitation to complete a household screening questionnaire online would help to recruit different types of households; and 2) the use of modular survey design, which involves splitting a lengthy self-administered survey up into multiple parts that can be completed at a respondent's convenience, would improve survey completion rates. We find support for the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that have not responded to a web-based screening questionnaire. We did not find support for the use of modular design in this context. Simple descriptive analyses also suggest that attempted telephone reminders may be helpful for the main survey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289695</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37540678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Computer and Information Sciences ; Costs ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Data Accuracy ; Data collection ; Energy consumption ; Households ; Humans ; Incentives ; Internet ; Internet access ; Mail ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Modular design ; Pandemics ; Participation ; People and places ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Postal Service ; Public participation ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Response rates ; Screening ; Social aspects ; Social exchange theory ; Social Sciences ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0289695-e0289695</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 West et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 West et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 West et al 2023 West et al</rights><rights>2023 West et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9636cf804f76cce620dc6290814ec9f0bfc6aa417fb840401efbedfbd35cb60a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9636cf804f76cce620dc6290814ec9f0bfc6aa417fb840401efbedfbd35cb60a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0160-1388</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37540678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan</contributor><creatorcontrib>West, Brady T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatward, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saw, Htay-Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axinn, William G</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In the United States, increasing access to the internet, the increasing costs of large-scale face-to-face data collections, and the general reluctance of the public to participate in intrusive in-person data collections all mean that new approaches to nationally representative surveys are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the need for faster, higher-quality alternatives to face-to-face data collection. These trends place a high priority on the evaluation of innovative web-based data collection methods that are convenient for the U.S. public and yield scientific information of high quality. The web mode is particularly appealing because it is relatively inexpensive, it is logistically flexible to implement, and it affords a high level of privacy and confidentiality when correctly implemented. With this study, we aimed to conduct a methodological evaluation of a sequential mixed-mode web/mail data collection protocol, including modular survey design concepts, which was implemented on a national probability sample in the U.S. in 2020-2021. We implemented randomized experiments to test theoretically-informed hypotheses that 1) the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that did not respond to an invitation to complete a household screening questionnaire online would help to recruit different types of households; and 2) the use of modular survey design, which involves splitting a lengthy self-administered survey up into multiple parts that can be completed at a respondent's convenience, would improve survey completion rates. We find support for the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that have not responded to a web-based screening questionnaire. We did not find support for the use of modular design in this context. Simple descriptive analyses also suggest that attempted telephone reminders may be helpful for the main survey.</description><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Data Accuracy</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Mail</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Modular design</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Postal Service</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJw2K0_EifhgqqqwEpFlSjlajnOeNdVYqe2s7D_Hmd3W21QD8gHfz3zemY8kySvMZpjWuDTWzs4I9p5bw3MESkrVuVPkmNcUTJjBNGnB-uj5IX3twjltGTseXJEizxDrCiPk813CCvb-FRZl-qud3atzTLthQta6l4EbU3qRACfapOa7V60qYdWzUTTaaN9AAdN-hvq007oeDW4NWz8p_RirRswElLlbJeGFaQ3RoeIXodR72XyTInWw6v9fJLcfLn4ef5tdnn1dXF-djmTrKJhVjHKpCpRpgomJcRoGslIhUqcgawUqpVkQmS4UHWZoQxhUDU0qm5oLmuGBD1J3u50-9Z6vs-a56TMGC4LRPJILHZEY8Ut753uhNtwKzTfHli35Nt0tMAxZY0ipFZlUWQ0iw5gXGR1yYjApCQkan3evzbUHTQSTHCinYhOb4xe8aVdcxx9p3ir8GGv4OzdAD7wTnsJbSsM2GHneEUKVozou3_Qx8PbU0sRI9BG2fiwHEX5WZFXeSyJjEVq_ggVRwOdlrHGlI7nE4OPE4PIBPgTlmLwni-uf_w_e_Vryr4_YFcg2rDyth3GyvNTMNuB0lnvHaiHLGPExxa5zwYfW4TvWySavTn8oQej-56gfwF2tw2k</recordid><startdate>20230804</startdate><enddate>20230804</enddate><creator>West, Brady T</creator><creator>Zhang, Shiyu</creator><creator>Wagner, James</creator><creator>Gatward, Rebecca</creator><creator>Saw, Htay-Wah</creator><creator>Axinn, William G</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-1388</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230804</creationdate><title>Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States</title><author>West, Brady T ; Zhang, Shiyu ; Wagner, James ; Gatward, Rebecca ; Saw, Htay-Wah ; Axinn, William G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-9636cf804f76cce620dc6290814ec9f0bfc6aa417fb840401efbedfbd35cb60a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Data Accuracy</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Mail</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Modular design</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Postal Service</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>West, Brady T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatward, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saw, Htay-Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axinn, William G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>West, Brady T</au><au>Zhang, Shiyu</au><au>Wagner, James</au><au>Gatward, Rebecca</au><au>Saw, Htay-Wah</au><au>Axinn, William G</au><au>Mahapatra, Bidhubhusan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-08-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0289695</spage><epage>e0289695</epage><pages>e0289695-e0289695</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In the United States, increasing access to the internet, the increasing costs of large-scale face-to-face data collections, and the general reluctance of the public to participate in intrusive in-person data collections all mean that new approaches to nationally representative surveys are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the need for faster, higher-quality alternatives to face-to-face data collection. These trends place a high priority on the evaluation of innovative web-based data collection methods that are convenient for the U.S. public and yield scientific information of high quality. The web mode is particularly appealing because it is relatively inexpensive, it is logistically flexible to implement, and it affords a high level of privacy and confidentiality when correctly implemented. With this study, we aimed to conduct a methodological evaluation of a sequential mixed-mode web/mail data collection protocol, including modular survey design concepts, which was implemented on a national probability sample in the U.S. in 2020-2021. We implemented randomized experiments to test theoretically-informed hypotheses that 1) the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that did not respond to an invitation to complete a household screening questionnaire online would help to recruit different types of households; and 2) the use of modular survey design, which involves splitting a lengthy self-administered survey up into multiple parts that can be completed at a respondent's convenience, would improve survey completion rates. We find support for the use of mail and increased incentives to follow up with households that have not responded to a web-based screening questionnaire. We did not find support for the use of modular design in this context. Simple descriptive analyses also suggest that attempted telephone reminders may be helpful for the main survey.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37540678</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0289695</doi><tpages>e0289695</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-1388</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0289695-e0289695
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2846187025
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Computer and Information Sciences
Costs
COVID-19
COVID-19 - epidemiology
Data Accuracy
Data collection
Energy consumption
Households
Humans
Incentives
Internet
Internet access
Mail
Medicine and Health Sciences
Modular design
Pandemics
Participation
People and places
Polls & surveys
Postal Service
Public participation
Questionnaires
Research and Analysis Methods
Response rates
Screening
Social aspects
Social exchange theory
Social Sciences
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title Methods for improving participation rates in national self-administered web/mail surveys: Evidence from the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A34%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20improving%20participation%20rates%20in%20national%20self-administered%20web/mail%20surveys:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=West,%20Brady%20T&rft.date=2023-08-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0289695&rft.epage=e0289695&rft.pages=e0289695-e0289695&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0289695&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA759586646%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2846187025&rft_id=info:pmid/37540678&rft_galeid=A759586646&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_136df22bf877434c9f1174b862a12822&rfr_iscdi=true