Potential sources of contamination on textiles and hard surfaces identified as high-touch sites near the patient environment
The hospital environment represents an important mediator for the transmission of healthcare-associated infections through direct and indirect hand contact with hard surfaces and textiles. In this study, bacteria on high-touch sites, including textiles and hard surfaces in two care wards in Sweden,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0287855-e0287855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0287855 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e0287855 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Nygren, Erik Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia Logenius, Jenny Husmark, Ulrika Löfström, Charlotta Bergström, Birgitta |
description | The hospital environment represents an important mediator for the transmission of healthcare-associated infections through direct and indirect hand contact with hard surfaces and textiles. In this study, bacteria on high-touch sites, including textiles and hard surfaces in two care wards in Sweden, were identified using microbiological culture methods and 16S rDNA sequencing. During a cross-sectional study, 176 high-touch hard surfaces and textiles were identified and further analysed using microbiological culture for quantification of total aerobic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile and Enterobacteriacae. The bacterial population structures were further analysed in 26 samples using 16S rDNA sequencing. The study showed a higher frequency of unique direct hand-textile contacts (36 per hour), compared to hard surfaces (2.2 per hour). Hard surfaces met the recommended standard of ≤ 5 CFU/cm2 for aerobic bacteria and ≤ 1 CFU/cm2 for S. aureus (53% and 35%, respectively) to a higher extent compared to textiles (19% and 30%, respectively) (P = 0.0488). The number of bacterial genera was higher on textiles than on the hard surfaces. Staphylococcus (30.4%) and Corynebacterium (10.9%) were the most representative genera for textiles and Streptococcus (13.3%) for hard surfaces. The fact that a big percentage of the textiles did not fulfil the criteria for cleanliness, combined with the higher bacterial diversity, compared to hard surfaces, are indicators that textiles were bacterial reservoirs and potential risk vectors for bacterial transmission. However, since most of the bacteria found in the study belonged to the normal flora, it was not possible to draw conclusions of textiles and hard surfaces as sources of healthcare associated infections. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0287855 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2834455627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A756313500</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_073f2be43e124e94a971eebdcc22b019</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A756313500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-d5a1ee3e9dade438e294bc79aed07b7204f75cd71f54b9e366356be2374fcb993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk2uL1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgigyYy5N036SYb0NLKx42a8hTU6nWTrJbJKuCv5405nZZSr7QVpoSJ73zTmn52TZU4zmmHL89tIN3sp-vnEW5ohUvGLsXnaMa0pmJUH0_sH6KHsUwiVCjFZl-TA7orzAVcHwcfbni4tgo5F9HpKhgpC7NlfORrk2VkbjbJ7eCL-i6dOhtDrvpNd5GHwrR9zoUd8a0LkMeWdW3Sy6QXV5MDEdW5A-jx3km2SWyBzstfHOrtP6cfaglX2AJ_vvSfbj44fvp59nZ-eflqeLs5nipI4zzSQGoFBrqaGgFZC6aBSvJWjEG05Q0XKmNMctK5oaaFlSVjZAUpatauqanmTPd76b3gWxL1wQpKJFwVhJeCKWO0I7eSk23qyl_y2cNGK74fxKSB-N6kEgTlvSpDgAkwLqQtY8RddopQhpEB5ve7PzCj9hMzQTt_fmYrF180aULGWX6Hf72IZmDVqlsnjZT0TTE2s6sXLXAiNKKlLg5PBq7-Dd1QAhirUJCvpeWnDDNk1GeKJZQl_8g95djD21kilfY1uXLlajqVhwVlJMGUKJmt9BpUfD2qQGgjY1zFTweiIYmyy11UoOIYjlt6__z55fTNmXB2wHso9dcP0w9m6YgsUOVN6F4KG9rTJGYpypm2qIcabEfqaS7NnhH7oV3QwR_QsD8R6V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2834455627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential sources of contamination on textiles and hard surfaces identified as high-touch sites near the patient environment</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SWEPUB Freely available online</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Nygren, Erik ; Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia ; Logenius, Jenny ; Husmark, Ulrika ; Löfström, Charlotta ; Bergström, Birgitta</creator><creatorcontrib>Nygren, Erik ; Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia ; Logenius, Jenny ; Husmark, Ulrika ; Löfström, Charlotta ; Bergström, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><description>The hospital environment represents an important mediator for the transmission of healthcare-associated infections through direct and indirect hand contact with hard surfaces and textiles. In this study, bacteria on high-touch sites, including textiles and hard surfaces in two care wards in Sweden, were identified using microbiological culture methods and 16S rDNA sequencing. During a cross-sectional study, 176 high-touch hard surfaces and textiles were identified and further analysed using microbiological culture for quantification of total aerobic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile and Enterobacteriacae. The bacterial population structures were further analysed in 26 samples using 16S rDNA sequencing. The study showed a higher frequency of unique direct hand-textile contacts (36 per hour), compared to hard surfaces (2.2 per hour). Hard surfaces met the recommended standard of ≤ 5 CFU/cm2 for aerobic bacteria and ≤ 1 CFU/cm2 for S. aureus (53% and 35%, respectively) to a higher extent compared to textiles (19% and 30%, respectively) (P = 0.0488). The number of bacterial genera was higher on textiles than on the hard surfaces. Staphylococcus (30.4%) and Corynebacterium (10.9%) were the most representative genera for textiles and Streptococcus (13.3%) for hard surfaces. The fact that a big percentage of the textiles did not fulfil the criteria for cleanliness, combined with the higher bacterial diversity, compared to hard surfaces, are indicators that textiles were bacterial reservoirs and potential risk vectors for bacterial transmission. However, since most of the bacteria found in the study belonged to the normal flora, it was not possible to draw conclusions of textiles and hard surfaces as sources of healthcare associated infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287855</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37418451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aerobic bacteria ; aerobic bacterium ; Bacteria ; bacterial transmission ; bacterium ; bacterium culture ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Clostridioides difficile ; Clostridium difficile ; colony forming unit ; Contamination ; controlled study ; Corynebacterium ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; cross-sectional study ; disease carrier ; Disease control ; Disease transmission ; DNA 16S ; DNA sequencing ; Enterobacteriaceae ; Evaluation ; Flora ; genetics ; Health aspects ; Health care ; healthcare associated infection ; hospital ; Hospitals ; human ; Humans ; Infection ; Infectious diseases ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methicillin ; microbial community ; microbial diversity ; Microbiological culture ; Microorganisms ; Mortality ; Newborn babies ; nonhuman ; Nosocomial infections ; observational study ; Occupational health and safety ; Patients ; population structure ; quantitative analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; risk factor ; Risk factors ; rRNA 16S ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus infections ; surface property ; Sweden ; Textiles ; Touch ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0287855-e0287855</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Nygren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Nygren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Nygren et al 2023 Nygren et al</rights><rights>2023 Nygren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-d5a1ee3e9dade438e294bc79aed07b7204f75cd71f54b9e366356be2374fcb993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-d5a1ee3e9dade438e294bc79aed07b7204f75cd71f54b9e366356be2374fcb993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7441-8483 ; 0000-0001-6492-1245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328241/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328241/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,550,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418451$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-65729$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nygren, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logenius, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husmark, Ulrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löfström, Charlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergström, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><title>Potential sources of contamination on textiles and hard surfaces identified as high-touch sites near the patient environment</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The hospital environment represents an important mediator for the transmission of healthcare-associated infections through direct and indirect hand contact with hard surfaces and textiles. In this study, bacteria on high-touch sites, including textiles and hard surfaces in two care wards in Sweden, were identified using microbiological culture methods and 16S rDNA sequencing. During a cross-sectional study, 176 high-touch hard surfaces and textiles were identified and further analysed using microbiological culture for quantification of total aerobic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile and Enterobacteriacae. The bacterial population structures were further analysed in 26 samples using 16S rDNA sequencing. The study showed a higher frequency of unique direct hand-textile contacts (36 per hour), compared to hard surfaces (2.2 per hour). Hard surfaces met the recommended standard of ≤ 5 CFU/cm2 for aerobic bacteria and ≤ 1 CFU/cm2 for S. aureus (53% and 35%, respectively) to a higher extent compared to textiles (19% and 30%, respectively) (P = 0.0488). The number of bacterial genera was higher on textiles than on the hard surfaces. Staphylococcus (30.4%) and Corynebacterium (10.9%) were the most representative genera for textiles and Streptococcus (13.3%) for hard surfaces. The fact that a big percentage of the textiles did not fulfil the criteria for cleanliness, combined with the higher bacterial diversity, compared to hard surfaces, are indicators that textiles were bacterial reservoirs and potential risk vectors for bacterial transmission. However, since most of the bacteria found in the study belonged to the normal flora, it was not possible to draw conclusions of textiles and hard surfaces as sources of healthcare associated infections.</description><subject>Aerobic bacteria</subject><subject>aerobic bacterium</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial transmission</subject><subject>bacterium</subject><subject>bacterium culture</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Clostridioides difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>colony forming unit</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>controlled study</subject><subject>Corynebacterium</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>cross-sectional study</subject><subject>disease carrier</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>DNA 16S</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>genetics</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>healthcare associated infection</subject><subject>hospital</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>microbial community</subject><subject>microbial diversity</subject><subject>Microbiological culture</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>nonhuman</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>observational study</subject><subject>Occupational health and safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>population structure</subject><subject>quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>risk factor</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>surface property</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Textiles</subject><subject>Touch</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>D8T</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk2uL1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgigyYy5N036SYb0NLKx42a8hTU6nWTrJbJKuCv5405nZZSr7QVpoSJ73zTmn52TZU4zmmHL89tIN3sp-vnEW5ohUvGLsXnaMa0pmJUH0_sH6KHsUwiVCjFZl-TA7orzAVcHwcfbni4tgo5F9HpKhgpC7NlfORrk2VkbjbJ7eCL-i6dOhtDrvpNd5GHwrR9zoUd8a0LkMeWdW3Sy6QXV5MDEdW5A-jx3km2SWyBzstfHOrtP6cfaglX2AJ_vvSfbj44fvp59nZ-eflqeLs5nipI4zzSQGoFBrqaGgFZC6aBSvJWjEG05Q0XKmNMctK5oaaFlSVjZAUpatauqanmTPd76b3gWxL1wQpKJFwVhJeCKWO0I7eSk23qyl_y2cNGK74fxKSB-N6kEgTlvSpDgAkwLqQtY8RddopQhpEB5ve7PzCj9hMzQTt_fmYrF180aULGWX6Hf72IZmDVqlsnjZT0TTE2s6sXLXAiNKKlLg5PBq7-Dd1QAhirUJCvpeWnDDNk1GeKJZQl_8g95djD21kilfY1uXLlajqVhwVlJMGUKJmt9BpUfD2qQGgjY1zFTweiIYmyy11UoOIYjlt6__z55fTNmXB2wHso9dcP0w9m6YgsUOVN6F4KG9rTJGYpypm2qIcabEfqaS7NnhH7oV3QwR_QsD8R6V</recordid><startdate>20230707</startdate><enddate>20230707</enddate><creator>Nygren, Erik</creator><creator>Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia</creator><creator>Logenius, Jenny</creator><creator>Husmark, Ulrika</creator><creator>Löfström, Charlotta</creator><creator>Bergström, Birgitta</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-8483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-1245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230707</creationdate><title>Potential sources of contamination on textiles and hard surfaces identified as high-touch sites near the patient environment</title><author>Nygren, Erik ; Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia ; Logenius, Jenny ; Husmark, Ulrika ; Löfström, Charlotta ; Bergström, Birgitta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-d5a1ee3e9dade438e294bc79aed07b7204f75cd71f54b9e366356be2374fcb993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aerobic bacteria</topic><topic>aerobic bacterium</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial transmission</topic><topic>bacterium</topic><topic>bacterium culture</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Clostridioides difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>colony forming unit</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>controlled study</topic><topic>Corynebacterium</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>cross-sectional study</topic><topic>disease carrier</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>DNA 16S</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>genetics</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>healthcare associated infection</topic><topic>hospital</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>microbial community</topic><topic>microbial diversity</topic><topic>Microbiological culture</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>nonhuman</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>observational study</topic><topic>Occupational health and safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>population structure</topic><topic>quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>risk factor</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>surface property</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Textiles</topic><topic>Touch</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nygren, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logenius, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husmark, Ulrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löfström, Charlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergström, Birgitta</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nygren, Erik</au><au>Gonzales Strömberg, Lucia</au><au>Logenius, Jenny</au><au>Husmark, Ulrika</au><au>Löfström, Charlotta</au><au>Bergström, Birgitta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential sources of contamination on textiles and hard surfaces identified as high-touch sites near the patient environment</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-07-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0287855</spage><epage>e0287855</epage><pages>e0287855-e0287855</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The hospital environment represents an important mediator for the transmission of healthcare-associated infections through direct and indirect hand contact with hard surfaces and textiles. In this study, bacteria on high-touch sites, including textiles and hard surfaces in two care wards in Sweden, were identified using microbiological culture methods and 16S rDNA sequencing. During a cross-sectional study, 176 high-touch hard surfaces and textiles were identified and further analysed using microbiological culture for quantification of total aerobic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile and Enterobacteriacae. The bacterial population structures were further analysed in 26 samples using 16S rDNA sequencing. The study showed a higher frequency of unique direct hand-textile contacts (36 per hour), compared to hard surfaces (2.2 per hour). Hard surfaces met the recommended standard of ≤ 5 CFU/cm2 for aerobic bacteria and ≤ 1 CFU/cm2 for S. aureus (53% and 35%, respectively) to a higher extent compared to textiles (19% and 30%, respectively) (P = 0.0488). The number of bacterial genera was higher on textiles than on the hard surfaces. Staphylococcus (30.4%) and Corynebacterium (10.9%) were the most representative genera for textiles and Streptococcus (13.3%) for hard surfaces. The fact that a big percentage of the textiles did not fulfil the criteria for cleanliness, combined with the higher bacterial diversity, compared to hard surfaces, are indicators that textiles were bacterial reservoirs and potential risk vectors for bacterial transmission. However, since most of the bacteria found in the study belonged to the normal flora, it was not possible to draw conclusions of textiles and hard surfaces as sources of healthcare associated infections.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37418451</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0287855</doi><tpages>e0287855</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-8483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-1245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0287855-e0287855 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2834455627 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SWEPUB Freely available online; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Aerobic bacteria aerobic bacterium Bacteria bacterial transmission bacterium bacterium culture Biology and Life Sciences Clostridioides difficile Clostridium difficile colony forming unit Contamination controlled study Corynebacterium Cross-Sectional Studies cross-sectional study disease carrier Disease control Disease transmission DNA 16S DNA sequencing Enterobacteriaceae Evaluation Flora genetics Health aspects Health care healthcare associated infection hospital Hospitals human Humans Infection Infectious diseases Medicine and Health Sciences Methicillin microbial community microbial diversity Microbiological culture Microorganisms Mortality Newborn babies nonhuman Nosocomial infections observational study Occupational health and safety Patients population structure quantitative analysis Research and Analysis Methods risk factor Risk factors rRNA 16S Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus infections surface property Sweden Textiles Touch Vectors |
title | Potential sources of contamination on textiles and hard surfaces identified as high-touch sites near the patient environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A28%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20sources%20of%20contamination%20on%20textiles%20and%20hard%20surfaces%20identified%20as%20high-touch%20sites%20near%20the%20patient%20environment&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Nygren,%20Erik&rft.date=2023-07-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0287855&rft.epage=e0287855&rft.pages=e0287855-e0287855&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0287855&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA756313500%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2834455627&rft_id=info:pmid/37418451&rft_galeid=A756313500&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_073f2be43e124e94a971eebdcc22b019&rfr_iscdi=true |