The effect of preoperative behaviour change interventions on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses
Prehabilitation interventions are being delivered across surgical specialities to improve health risk behaviours leading to better surgical outcomes and potentially reduce length of hospital stay. Most previous research has focused on specific surgery specialities and has not considered the impact o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0286757-e0286757 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0286757 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | e0286757 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Fong, Mackenzie Kaner, Eileen Rowland, Maisie Graham, Henrietta E McEvoy, Louise Hallsworth, Kate Cucato, Gabriel Gibney, Carla Nedkova, Martina Prentis, James Madigan, Claire D |
| description | Prehabilitation interventions are being delivered across surgical specialities to improve health risk behaviours leading to better surgical outcomes and potentially reduce length of hospital stay. Most previous research has focused on specific surgery specialities and has not considered the impact of interventions on health inequalities, nor whether prehabilitation improves health behaviour risk profiles beyond surgery. The aim of this review was to examine behavioural Prehabilitation interventions across surgeries to inform policy makers and commissioners of the best available evidence.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effect of behavioural prehabilitation interventions targeting at least one of: smoking behaviour, alcohol use, physical activity, dietary intake (including weight loss interventions) on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities. The comparator was usual care or no treatment. MEDLINE, PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Clinical trials and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2021, and the MEDLINE search was updated twice, most recently in March 2023. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Outcomes were length of stay, six-minute walk test, behaviours (smoking, diet, physical activity, weight change, and alcohol), and quality of life. Sixty-seven trials were included; 49 interventions targeted a single behaviour and 18 targeted multiple behaviours. No trials examined effects by equality measures. Length of stay in the intervention group was 1.5 days shorter than the comparator (n = 9 trials, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.4, p = 0.01, I2 83%), although in sensitivity analysis prehabilitation had the most impact in lung cancer patients (-3.5 days). Pre-surgery, there was a mean difference of 31.8 m in the six-minute walk test favouring the prehabilitation group (n = 19 trials, 95% CI 21.2 to 42.4m, I2 55%, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0286757 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2833614315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A755923259</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4197369af7c5462c92b17dbe5f54b4b6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A755923259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-265f5860f16f9f6660c4d23a8822d1c84a24f2dd773b7abf35b6dd346d6245af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsVUIgkcWHxEm4QVXFoVKlSlC4tRx7vOsqibe2s7BPx6vh3U1LF_UC5SLx5Pvn5Jkse07wjLCKvLtyox9kN1u6AWaY1rwqqwfZIWkYzTnF7OGd74PsSQhXGJes5vxxdsCqAnOM6WH2-3IBCIwBFZEzaOnBLcHLaFeAWljIlU1hkFrIYQ7IDhH8CoZo3RCQGzZ4juSg0dKFmIfRz8Gv0QJkFxd_5eHtjcmNUbkekmEjmox2gOtRdjZaCOmApB67GN6jExTWIUKfklHIw8rCz62shyhzmUpfBwhPs0dGdgGeTe-j7Punj5enX_Lzi89npyfnueINiznlpSlrjg3hpjGcc6wKTZmsa0o1UXUhaWGo1lXF2kq2hpUt15oVXHNalNKwo-zlzu-yc0FMvQ-C1oxxUjBSJuJsR2gnr8TS2176tXDSiq3B-bmQPpXSgShIUzHeSFOpsuBUNbQllW4h5Vi0RcuTrw9TtLHtQavUci-7Paf7fwa7EHO3EgQzSni696Ps9eTBu-sRQhS9DQq6Tg7gxm3iBcYJrxJ6_A96f3kTNZepAjsYlwKrjVNxUpVlQxktN2Fn91Dp0dBblSbV2GTfE7zZEyQmwq84l2MI4uzb1_9nL37ss6_usLtJC64bt6O7DxY7UHkXggdz22WCxWbRbrohNosmpkVLshd3b-hWdLNZ7A8Lxybb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2833614315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of preoperative behaviour change interventions on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Fong, Mackenzie ; Kaner, Eileen ; Rowland, Maisie ; Graham, Henrietta E ; McEvoy, Louise ; Hallsworth, Kate ; Cucato, Gabriel ; Gibney, Carla ; Nedkova, Martina ; Prentis, James ; Madigan, Claire D</creator><contributor>Singh, Favil</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fong, Mackenzie ; Kaner, Eileen ; Rowland, Maisie ; Graham, Henrietta E ; McEvoy, Louise ; Hallsworth, Kate ; Cucato, Gabriel ; Gibney, Carla ; Nedkova, Martina ; Prentis, James ; Madigan, Claire D ; Singh, Favil</creatorcontrib><description>Prehabilitation interventions are being delivered across surgical specialities to improve health risk behaviours leading to better surgical outcomes and potentially reduce length of hospital stay. Most previous research has focused on specific surgery specialities and has not considered the impact of interventions on health inequalities, nor whether prehabilitation improves health behaviour risk profiles beyond surgery. The aim of this review was to examine behavioural Prehabilitation interventions across surgeries to inform policy makers and commissioners of the best available evidence.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effect of behavioural prehabilitation interventions targeting at least one of: smoking behaviour, alcohol use, physical activity, dietary intake (including weight loss interventions) on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities. The comparator was usual care or no treatment. MEDLINE, PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Clinical trials and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2021, and the MEDLINE search was updated twice, most recently in March 2023. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Outcomes were length of stay, six-minute walk test, behaviours (smoking, diet, physical activity, weight change, and alcohol), and quality of life. Sixty-seven trials were included; 49 interventions targeted a single behaviour and 18 targeted multiple behaviours. No trials examined effects by equality measures. Length of stay in the intervention group was 1.5 days shorter than the comparator (n = 9 trials, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.4, p = 0.01, I2 83%), although in sensitivity analysis prehabilitation had the most impact in lung cancer patients (-3.5 days). Pre-surgery, there was a mean difference of 31.8 m in the six-minute walk test favouring the prehabilitation group (n = 19 trials, 95% CI 21.2 to 42.4m, I2 55%, P <0.001) and this was sustained to 4-weeks post-surgery (n = 9 trials, mean difference = 34.4m (95%CI 12.8 to 56.0, I2 72%, P = 0.002)). Smoking cessation was greater in the prehabilitation group before surgery (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.8, I2 84%), and this was sustained at 12 months post-surgery (RR 1.74 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.55, I2 43%, Tau2 0.09, p = 0.004)There was no difference in pre-surgery quality of life (n = 12 trials) or BMI (n = 4 trials).
Behavioural prehabilitation interventions reduced length of stay by 1.5 days, although in sensitivity analysis the difference was only found for Prehabilitation interventions for lung cancer. Prehabilitation can improve functional capacity and smoking outcomes just before surgery. That improvements in smoking outcomes were sustained at 12-months post-surgery suggests that the surgical encounter holds promise as a teachable moment for longer-term behavioural change. Given the paucity of data on the effects on other behavioural risk factors, more research grounded in behavioural science and with longer-term follow-up is needed to further investigate this potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286757</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37406002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Alcohol use ; Analysis ; Bias ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body weight loss ; Cigarette smoking ; Clinical trials ; Comparators ; Complications and side effects ; COVID-19 ; Diet ; Dietary intake ; Drug addiction ; Evaluation ; Exercise ; Food intake ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Health aspects ; Health behavior ; Health disparities ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Inequalities ; Intervention ; Lung cancer ; Lung diseases ; Lung Neoplasms ; Medical research ; Medical waiting lists ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Pandemics ; Patient outcomes ; Physical activity ; Physical fitness ; Physical Sciences ; Quality of life ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk taking ; Search engines ; Sensitivity analysis ; Smoking ; Smoking Cessation ; Social Sciences ; Software ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Systematic review ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0286757-e0286757</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Fong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Fong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Fong et al 2023 Fong et al</rights><rights>2023 Fong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-265f5860f16f9f6660c4d23a8822d1c84a24f2dd773b7abf35b6dd346d6245af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-265f5860f16f9f6660c4d23a8822d1c84a24f2dd773b7abf35b6dd346d6245af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7237-9038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321619/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321619/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37406002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Singh, Favil</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fong, Mackenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaner, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Maisie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Henrietta E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallsworth, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucato, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibney, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedkova, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentis, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madigan, Claire D</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of preoperative behaviour change interventions on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Prehabilitation interventions are being delivered across surgical specialities to improve health risk behaviours leading to better surgical outcomes and potentially reduce length of hospital stay. Most previous research has focused on specific surgery specialities and has not considered the impact of interventions on health inequalities, nor whether prehabilitation improves health behaviour risk profiles beyond surgery. The aim of this review was to examine behavioural Prehabilitation interventions across surgeries to inform policy makers and commissioners of the best available evidence.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effect of behavioural prehabilitation interventions targeting at least one of: smoking behaviour, alcohol use, physical activity, dietary intake (including weight loss interventions) on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities. The comparator was usual care or no treatment. MEDLINE, PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Clinical trials and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2021, and the MEDLINE search was updated twice, most recently in March 2023. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Outcomes were length of stay, six-minute walk test, behaviours (smoking, diet, physical activity, weight change, and alcohol), and quality of life. Sixty-seven trials were included; 49 interventions targeted a single behaviour and 18 targeted multiple behaviours. No trials examined effects by equality measures. Length of stay in the intervention group was 1.5 days shorter than the comparator (n = 9 trials, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.4, p = 0.01, I2 83%), although in sensitivity analysis prehabilitation had the most impact in lung cancer patients (-3.5 days). Pre-surgery, there was a mean difference of 31.8 m in the six-minute walk test favouring the prehabilitation group (n = 19 trials, 95% CI 21.2 to 42.4m, I2 55%, P <0.001) and this was sustained to 4-weeks post-surgery (n = 9 trials, mean difference = 34.4m (95%CI 12.8 to 56.0, I2 72%, P = 0.002)). Smoking cessation was greater in the prehabilitation group before surgery (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.8, I2 84%), and this was sustained at 12 months post-surgery (RR 1.74 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.55, I2 43%, Tau2 0.09, p = 0.004)There was no difference in pre-surgery quality of life (n = 12 trials) or BMI (n = 4 trials).
Behavioural prehabilitation interventions reduced length of stay by 1.5 days, although in sensitivity analysis the difference was only found for Prehabilitation interventions for lung cancer. Prehabilitation can improve functional capacity and smoking outcomes just before surgery. That improvements in smoking outcomes were sustained at 12-months post-surgery suggests that the surgical encounter holds promise as a teachable moment for longer-term behavioural change. Given the paucity of data on the effects on other behavioural risk factors, more research grounded in behavioural science and with longer-term follow-up is needed to further investigate this potential.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body weight loss</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparators</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Drug addiction</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inequalities</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical waiting lists</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggsVUIgkcWHxEm4QVXFoVKlSlC4tRx7vOsqibe2s7BPx6vh3U1LF_UC5SLx5Pvn5Jkse07wjLCKvLtyox9kN1u6AWaY1rwqqwfZIWkYzTnF7OGd74PsSQhXGJes5vxxdsCqAnOM6WH2-3IBCIwBFZEzaOnBLcHLaFeAWljIlU1hkFrIYQ7IDhH8CoZo3RCQGzZ4juSg0dKFmIfRz8Gv0QJkFxd_5eHtjcmNUbkekmEjmox2gOtRdjZaCOmApB67GN6jExTWIUKfklHIw8rCz62shyhzmUpfBwhPs0dGdgGeTe-j7Punj5enX_Lzi89npyfnueINiznlpSlrjg3hpjGcc6wKTZmsa0o1UXUhaWGo1lXF2kq2hpUt15oVXHNalNKwo-zlzu-yc0FMvQ-C1oxxUjBSJuJsR2gnr8TS2176tXDSiq3B-bmQPpXSgShIUzHeSFOpsuBUNbQllW4h5Vi0RcuTrw9TtLHtQavUci-7Paf7fwa7EHO3EgQzSni696Ps9eTBu-sRQhS9DQq6Tg7gxm3iBcYJrxJ6_A96f3kTNZepAjsYlwKrjVNxUpVlQxktN2Fn91Dp0dBblSbV2GTfE7zZEyQmwq84l2MI4uzb1_9nL37ss6_usLtJC64bt6O7DxY7UHkXggdz22WCxWbRbrohNosmpkVLshd3b-hWdLNZ7A8Lxybb</recordid><startdate>20230705</startdate><enddate>20230705</enddate><creator>Fong, Mackenzie</creator><creator>Kaner, Eileen</creator><creator>Rowland, Maisie</creator><creator>Graham, Henrietta E</creator><creator>McEvoy, Louise</creator><creator>Hallsworth, Kate</creator><creator>Cucato, Gabriel</creator><creator>Gibney, Carla</creator><creator>Nedkova, Martina</creator><creator>Prentis, James</creator><creator>Madigan, Claire D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7237-9038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230705</creationdate><title>The effect of preoperative behaviour change interventions on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses</title><author>Fong, Mackenzie ; Kaner, Eileen ; Rowland, Maisie ; Graham, Henrietta E ; McEvoy, Louise ; Hallsworth, Kate ; Cucato, Gabriel ; Gibney, Carla ; Nedkova, Martina ; Prentis, James ; Madigan, Claire D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-265f5860f16f9f6660c4d23a8822d1c84a24f2dd773b7abf35b6dd346d6245af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body weight loss</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparators</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Drug addiction</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inequalities</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical waiting lists</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fong, Mackenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaner, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Maisie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Henrietta E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEvoy, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallsworth, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cucato, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibney, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedkova, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentis, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madigan, Claire D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fong, Mackenzie</au><au>Kaner, Eileen</au><au>Rowland, Maisie</au><au>Graham, Henrietta E</au><au>McEvoy, Louise</au><au>Hallsworth, Kate</au><au>Cucato, Gabriel</au><au>Gibney, Carla</au><au>Nedkova, Martina</au><au>Prentis, James</au><au>Madigan, Claire D</au><au>Singh, Favil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of preoperative behaviour change interventions on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-07-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0286757</spage><epage>e0286757</epage><pages>e0286757-e0286757</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Prehabilitation interventions are being delivered across surgical specialities to improve health risk behaviours leading to better surgical outcomes and potentially reduce length of hospital stay. Most previous research has focused on specific surgery specialities and has not considered the impact of interventions on health inequalities, nor whether prehabilitation improves health behaviour risk profiles beyond surgery. The aim of this review was to examine behavioural Prehabilitation interventions across surgeries to inform policy makers and commissioners of the best available evidence.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to determine the effect of behavioural prehabilitation interventions targeting at least one of: smoking behaviour, alcohol use, physical activity, dietary intake (including weight loss interventions) on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities. The comparator was usual care or no treatment. MEDLINE, PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Clinical trials and Embase databases were searched from inception to May 2021, and the MEDLINE search was updated twice, most recently in March 2023. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Outcomes were length of stay, six-minute walk test, behaviours (smoking, diet, physical activity, weight change, and alcohol), and quality of life. Sixty-seven trials were included; 49 interventions targeted a single behaviour and 18 targeted multiple behaviours. No trials examined effects by equality measures. Length of stay in the intervention group was 1.5 days shorter than the comparator (n = 9 trials, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.4, p = 0.01, I2 83%), although in sensitivity analysis prehabilitation had the most impact in lung cancer patients (-3.5 days). Pre-surgery, there was a mean difference of 31.8 m in the six-minute walk test favouring the prehabilitation group (n = 19 trials, 95% CI 21.2 to 42.4m, I2 55%, P <0.001) and this was sustained to 4-weeks post-surgery (n = 9 trials, mean difference = 34.4m (95%CI 12.8 to 56.0, I2 72%, P = 0.002)). Smoking cessation was greater in the prehabilitation group before surgery (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7 to 4.8, I2 84%), and this was sustained at 12 months post-surgery (RR 1.74 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.55, I2 43%, Tau2 0.09, p = 0.004)There was no difference in pre-surgery quality of life (n = 12 trials) or BMI (n = 4 trials).
Behavioural prehabilitation interventions reduced length of stay by 1.5 days, although in sensitivity analysis the difference was only found for Prehabilitation interventions for lung cancer. Prehabilitation can improve functional capacity and smoking outcomes just before surgery. That improvements in smoking outcomes were sustained at 12-months post-surgery suggests that the surgical encounter holds promise as a teachable moment for longer-term behavioural change. Given the paucity of data on the effects on other behavioural risk factors, more research grounded in behavioural science and with longer-term follow-up is needed to further investigate this potential.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37406002</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0286757</doi><tpages>e0286757</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7237-9038</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.e0286757-e0286757 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2833614315 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Adult Adults Alcohol use Analysis Bias Biology and Life Sciences Body weight loss Cigarette smoking Clinical trials Comparators Complications and side effects COVID-19 Diet Dietary intake Drug addiction Evaluation Exercise Food intake Gastrointestinal surgery Health aspects Health behavior Health disparities Health risk assessment Health risks Hospitals Humans Inequalities Intervention Lung cancer Lung diseases Lung Neoplasms Medical research Medical waiting lists Medicine and Health Sciences Medicine, Experimental Meta-analysis Pandemics Patient outcomes Physical activity Physical fitness Physical Sciences Quality of life Research and Analysis Methods Risk assessment Risk Factors Risk taking Search engines Sensitivity analysis Smoking Smoking Cessation Social Sciences Software Surgery Surgical outcomes Systematic review Weight loss |
| title | The effect of preoperative behaviour change interventions on pre- and post-surgery health behaviours, health outcomes, and health inequalities in adults: A systematic review and meta-analyses |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20preoperative%20behaviour%20change%20interventions%20on%20pre-%20and%20post-surgery%20health%20behaviours,%20health%20outcomes,%20and%20health%20inequalities%20in%20adults:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analyses&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Fong,%20Mackenzie&rft.date=2023-07-05&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0286757&rft.epage=e0286757&rft.pages=e0286757-e0286757&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0286757&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA755923259%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2833614315&rft_id=info:pmid/37406002&rft_galeid=A755923259&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4197369af7c5462c92b17dbe5f54b4b6&rfr_iscdi=true |