The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients

This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0275770-e0275770
Hauptverfasser: Morgan, Susan E, Harrison, Tyler R, Wright, Kallia O, Jia, Xiaofeng, Deal, Bonnie, Malova, Kate
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0275770
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0275770
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator Morgan, Susan E
Harrison, Tyler R
Wright, Kallia O
Jia, Xiaofeng
Deal, Bonnie
Malova, Kate
description This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs' financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0275770
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2828344391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A753960400</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0379373bd2a04f5d84cec7a2314b3b17</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A753960400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-1145e8593713980ee1023d85f8d33a58682eac1efd64686ceba2b691f87fdd203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYqPwBggiISG4aLFjJ3G4QaXio9KkIRjcWo590nq4drGdsb0gz4XTdlWLdoEiJUcnv_M_H_bJsqcYTTCp8ZtL13srzGTtLExQUZd1je5lp7ghxbgqELl_YJ9kj0K4RKgkrKoeZiekJrRomuY0-3OxhNw7A7nr8jV4CfoKVA7XyY46QC6syqPvQ_ztfFxqCyHk2uYeAggvl3mIvbrZUNJoq6UwCdfp7UH6XscV2Pg2_wI-rEHGJB6GTHt2ryOd80pbEZ0PG7lp5xNh8-kKtsbgfG-E_JnPhNdtC8m3FlGnBOFx9qATJsCT3XeUff_44WL2eXx2_mk-m56NZdWQOMaYlsDKJs2PNAwBYFQQxcqOKUJEySpWgJAYOlXRilUSWlG0VYM7VndKpUGOsudb3bVxge-OIPCCFYxQShqciPmWUE5c8rXXK-FvuBOabxzOL7hIk5UGOCJ1qoS0qhCIdqViVIKsRUEwbUmL66T1bpetb1egZOrUC3MkevzH6iVfuCue2mKU4qGaVzsF7371ECJf6SDBGGHB9dvC65qydDNG2Yt_0Lvb21ELkTrQtnMpsRxE-bQuSVMhioYxTe6g0qNgpWW6sJ1O_qOA10cBiYlwHReiD4HPv339f_b8xzH78oBdgjBxGZzpo3Y2HIN0C0rvQvDQ7aeMER_27XYafNg3vtu3FPbs8IT2QbcLRv4CBs4piQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2828344391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Morgan, Susan E ; Harrison, Tyler R ; Wright, Kallia O ; Jia, Xiaofeng ; Deal, Bonnie ; Malova, Kate</creator><contributor>Canzan, Federica</contributor><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Susan E ; Harrison, Tyler R ; Wright, Kallia O ; Jia, Xiaofeng ; Deal, Bonnie ; Malova, Kate ; Canzan, Federica</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs' financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275770</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37342999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Attitude ; Attitudes ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Black or African American ; Black People ; Caribbean Americans ; Caribbean People ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Communication ; Credibility ; Focus Groups ; Health literacy ; Humans ; Information processing ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Medicine, Experimental ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Participation ; Patient Selection ; Patients ; People and places ; Personal appearance ; Professional workers ; Prospective Studies ; Psychological aspects ; Recruitment ; Reliability ; Research administrators ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Training ; Trust ; Trustworthiness ; Truthfulness and falsehood</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0275770-e0275770</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Morgan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Morgan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Morgan et al 2023 Morgan et al</rights><rights>2023 Morgan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-1145e8593713980ee1023d85f8d33a58682eac1efd64686ceba2b691f87fdd203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-1145e8593713980ee1023d85f8d33a58682eac1efd64686ceba2b691f87fdd203</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4034-867X ; 0000-0002-0635-5967 ; 0000-0002-8403-9484</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284411/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284411/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23870,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Canzan, Federica</contributor><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Tyler R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Kallia O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malova, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs' financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Black or African American</subject><subject>Black People</subject><subject>Caribbean Americans</subject><subject>Caribbean People</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Personal appearance</subject><subject>Professional workers</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Research administrators</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Trustworthiness</subject><subject>Truthfulness and falsehood</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk91u0zAUxyMEYqPwBggiISG4aLFjJ3G4QaXio9KkIRjcWo590nq4drGdsb0gz4XTdlWLdoEiJUcnv_M_H_bJsqcYTTCp8ZtL13srzGTtLExQUZd1je5lp7ghxbgqELl_YJ9kj0K4RKgkrKoeZiekJrRomuY0-3OxhNw7A7nr8jV4CfoKVA7XyY46QC6syqPvQ_ztfFxqCyHk2uYeAggvl3mIvbrZUNJoq6UwCdfp7UH6XscV2Pg2_wI-rEHGJB6GTHt2ryOd80pbEZ0PG7lp5xNh8-kKtsbgfG-E_JnPhNdtC8m3FlGnBOFx9qATJsCT3XeUff_44WL2eXx2_mk-m56NZdWQOMaYlsDKJs2PNAwBYFQQxcqOKUJEySpWgJAYOlXRilUSWlG0VYM7VndKpUGOsudb3bVxge-OIPCCFYxQShqciPmWUE5c8rXXK-FvuBOabxzOL7hIk5UGOCJ1qoS0qhCIdqViVIKsRUEwbUmL66T1bpetb1egZOrUC3MkevzH6iVfuCue2mKU4qGaVzsF7371ECJf6SDBGGHB9dvC65qydDNG2Yt_0Lvb21ELkTrQtnMpsRxE-bQuSVMhioYxTe6g0qNgpWW6sJ1O_qOA10cBiYlwHReiD4HPv339f_b8xzH78oBdgjBxGZzpo3Y2HIN0C0rvQvDQ7aeMER_27XYafNg3vtu3FPbs8IT2QbcLRv4CBs4piQ</recordid><startdate>20230621</startdate><enddate>20230621</enddate><creator>Morgan, Susan E</creator><creator>Harrison, Tyler R</creator><creator>Wright, Kallia O</creator><creator>Jia, Xiaofeng</creator><creator>Deal, Bonnie</creator><creator>Malova, Kate</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4034-867X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-5967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-9484</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230621</creationdate><title>The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients</title><author>Morgan, Susan E ; Harrison, Tyler R ; Wright, Kallia O ; Jia, Xiaofeng ; Deal, Bonnie ; Malova, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-1145e8593713980ee1023d85f8d33a58682eac1efd64686ceba2b691f87fdd203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Black or African American</topic><topic>Black People</topic><topic>Caribbean Americans</topic><topic>Caribbean People</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Personal appearance</topic><topic>Professional workers</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Research administrators</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Trustworthiness</topic><topic>Truthfulness and falsehood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Tyler R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Kallia O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malova, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, Susan E</au><au>Harrison, Tyler R</au><au>Wright, Kallia O</au><au>Jia, Xiaofeng</au><au>Deal, Bonnie</au><au>Malova, Kate</au><au>Canzan, Federica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-06-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0275770</spage><epage>e0275770</epage><pages>e0275770-e0275770</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the role of source credibility on minority participant recruitment, particularly African American and Black Caribbean patients. A total of nine focus groups (N = 48 participants) were conducted with both patient groups and clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Using the elaboration likelihood model as a guiding framework for analysis, this study found that the credibility of research coordinators (or other professionals who recruit for research studies and clinical trials) was instrumental in shaping attitudes of prospective participants. The perspectives of patients and CRCs aligned closely, with few exceptions. For both groups, professionalism and professional displays (clothing, institutional artifacts) enhanced perceived expertise, a core component of credibility. Trustworthiness, another important component of credibility, was fostered through homophily between recruiter and patient, expressions of goodwill and assuaging anxiety about CRCs' financial motivations for recruitment. Additionally, CRCs believed that credibility was supported when CRCs could emphasize transparency and truthfulness in communication. The importance of these findings for the development of empirically-based training programs to improve communication practices in recruitment contexts is discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37342999</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0275770</doi><tpages>e0275770</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4034-867X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-5967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-9484</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-06, Vol.18 (6), p.e0275770-e0275770
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2828344391
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects African Americans
Attitude
Attitudes
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Biology and Life Sciences
Black or African American
Black People
Caribbean Americans
Caribbean People
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic
Communication
Credibility
Focus Groups
Health literacy
Humans
Information processing
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Medicine, Experimental
Minority & ethnic groups
Participation
Patient Selection
Patients
People and places
Personal appearance
Professional workers
Prospective Studies
Psychological aspects
Recruitment
Reliability
Research administrators
Research and Analysis Methods
Social Sciences
Training
Trust
Trustworthiness
Truthfulness and falsehood
title The role of perceived expertise and trustworthiness in research study and clinical trial recruitment: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators and African American and Black Caribbean patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T23%3A52%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20perceived%20expertise%20and%20trustworthiness%20in%20research%20study%20and%20clinical%20trial%20recruitment:%20Perspectives%20of%20clinical%20research%20coordinators%20and%20African%20American%20and%20Black%20Caribbean%20patients&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Morgan,%20Susan%20E&rft.date=2023-06-21&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0275770&rft.epage=e0275770&rft.pages=e0275770-e0275770&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0275770&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA753960400%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2828344391&rft_id=info:pmid/37342999&rft_galeid=A753960400&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0379373bd2a04f5d84cec7a2314b3b17&rfr_iscdi=true