University campus breastfeeding, knowledge, and perceptions of support: An exploratory study
Breastfeeding is often considered principally a biological issue but success is impacted by the socio-ecological environment of the lactating parent. Identifying current attitudes towards breastfeeding is essential in the effort toward normalizing breastfeeding in communities, including university c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-05, Vol.18 (5), p.e0285008-e0285008 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0285008 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | e0285008 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Scott, Allison L Lambert, Ann W Wang, Chih-Hsuan Johnson, Kelly V Weiss, Jessica Stankus, Tony |
| description | Breastfeeding is often considered principally a biological issue but success is impacted by the socio-ecological environment of the lactating parent. Identifying current attitudes towards breastfeeding is essential in the effort toward normalizing breastfeeding in communities, including university campuses. The study explored campus community knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about breastfeeding, including available resources and applicable laws on two university campuses in the southern United States. This cross-sectional, self-reporting study utilized the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale and an adaptation of the Breastfeeding Behavior Questionnaire to survey a convenience sample. Results revealed decreased awareness of protective laws, availability of private lactation space, and insufficient public appreciation of breastfeeding's unique advantages to both lactating parent and infant as barriers to breastfeeding. These findings will help develop additional breastfeeding strategies to improve university campus community breastfeeding initiatives. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0285008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2819641561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A750813159</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1ed000ce092648c1b8a3071890ab63bc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A750813159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-d06163d45840901a12c0466e40c25830ff81c2434b01b69f6478884d684b797f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgijcrpOHpqlvZDl8WDg4UM9XQkjTtJu129QkPW-_vdnb3rGVeyF5kTD5zX8yk5kkeY5gjkiO3q3t4DrZznvb6TlgngHwB8kxKgieMQzk4cH5KHni_RogI5yxx8kRyTHJsgKOk5-XnbnSzpuwTZXc9INPS6elD7XWlema0_RXZ_-0umr0aSq7Ku21U7oPxnY-tXXqh763LrxPF12qr_vWOhms26Y-DNX2afKolq3Xz8b9JLn89PH72ZfZ-cXn5dnifKYYxWFWAUOMVDTjFApAEmEFlDFNQeGME6hrjhSmhJaASlbUjOacc1oxTsu8yGtykrzc68b4XoyF8QJzVDCKMoYisdwTlZVr0TuzkW4rrDTixmBdI6QLRrVaIF0BgNJQYEa5QiWXBHLEC5AlI6WKWh_GaEO50ZXSXXCynYhObzqzEo29Eggw4nlGosKbUcHZ34P2QWyMV7ptZaftsHs4BsCEFzyir_5B709vpBoZMzBdbWNgtRMVizwDjgjKikjN76HiqvTGqNhGtYn2icPbiUNkgr4OjRy8F8tvX_-fvfgxZV8fsCst27Dyth1uumoK0j2onPXe6fquygjEbgpuqyF2UyDGKYhuLw5_6M7ptu3JX9LgAHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2819641561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>University campus breastfeeding, knowledge, and perceptions of support: An exploratory study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Scott, Allison L ; Lambert, Ann W ; Wang, Chih-Hsuan ; Johnson, Kelly V ; Weiss, Jessica ; Stankus, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Scott, Allison L ; Lambert, Ann W ; Wang, Chih-Hsuan ; Johnson, Kelly V ; Weiss, Jessica ; Stankus, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>Breastfeeding is often considered principally a biological issue but success is impacted by the socio-ecological environment of the lactating parent. Identifying current attitudes towards breastfeeding is essential in the effort toward normalizing breastfeeding in communities, including university campuses. The study explored campus community knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about breastfeeding, including available resources and applicable laws on two university campuses in the southern United States. This cross-sectional, self-reporting study utilized the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale and an adaptation of the Breastfeeding Behavior Questionnaire to survey a convenience sample. Results revealed decreased awareness of protective laws, availability of private lactation space, and insufficient public appreciation of breastfeeding's unique advantages to both lactating parent and infant as barriers to breastfeeding. These findings will help develop additional breastfeeding strategies to improve university campus community breastfeeding initiatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37235590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Availability ; Babies ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Breast Feeding ; Breastfeeding & lactation ; College campuses ; Colleges & universities ; Consent ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Employees ; Employers ; Evaluation ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Infant ; Infants ; Lactation ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Management ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mothers ; Parents & parenting ; Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US ; People and Places ; Perceptions ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Stigma ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Universities ; University students</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-05, Vol.18 (5), p.e0285008-e0285008</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Scott et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Scott et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Scott et al 2023 Scott et al</rights><rights>2023 Scott et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-d06163d45840901a12c0466e40c25830ff81c2434b01b69f6478884d684b797f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0015-9591 ; 0000-0001-9783-2986</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218753/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10218753/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37235590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scott, Allison L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Ann W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chih-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kelly V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankus, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>University campus breastfeeding, knowledge, and perceptions of support: An exploratory study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Breastfeeding is often considered principally a biological issue but success is impacted by the socio-ecological environment of the lactating parent. Identifying current attitudes towards breastfeeding is essential in the effort toward normalizing breastfeeding in communities, including university campuses. The study explored campus community knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about breastfeeding, including available resources and applicable laws on two university campuses in the southern United States. This cross-sectional, self-reporting study utilized the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale and an adaptation of the Breastfeeding Behavior Questionnaire to survey a convenience sample. Results revealed decreased awareness of protective laws, availability of private lactation space, and insufficient public appreciation of breastfeeding's unique advantages to both lactating parent and infant as barriers to breastfeeding. These findings will help develop additional breastfeeding strategies to improve university campus community breastfeeding initiatives.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Breastfeeding & lactation</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgijcrpOHpqlvZDl8WDg4UM9XQkjTtJu129QkPW-_vdnb3rGVeyF5kTD5zX8yk5kkeY5gjkiO3q3t4DrZznvb6TlgngHwB8kxKgieMQzk4cH5KHni_RogI5yxx8kRyTHJsgKOk5-XnbnSzpuwTZXc9INPS6elD7XWlema0_RXZ_-0umr0aSq7Ku21U7oPxnY-tXXqh763LrxPF12qr_vWOhms26Y-DNX2afKolq3Xz8b9JLn89PH72ZfZ-cXn5dnifKYYxWFWAUOMVDTjFApAEmEFlDFNQeGME6hrjhSmhJaASlbUjOacc1oxTsu8yGtykrzc68b4XoyF8QJzVDCKMoYisdwTlZVr0TuzkW4rrDTixmBdI6QLRrVaIF0BgNJQYEa5QiWXBHLEC5AlI6WKWh_GaEO50ZXSXXCynYhObzqzEo29Eggw4nlGosKbUcHZ34P2QWyMV7ptZaftsHs4BsCEFzyir_5B709vpBoZMzBdbWNgtRMVizwDjgjKikjN76HiqvTGqNhGtYn2icPbiUNkgr4OjRy8F8tvX_-fvfgxZV8fsCst27Dyth1uumoK0j2onPXe6fquygjEbgpuqyF2UyDGKYhuLw5_6M7ptu3JX9LgAHU</recordid><startdate>20230526</startdate><enddate>20230526</enddate><creator>Scott, Allison L</creator><creator>Lambert, Ann W</creator><creator>Wang, Chih-Hsuan</creator><creator>Johnson, Kelly V</creator><creator>Weiss, Jessica</creator><creator>Stankus, Tony</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-9591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9783-2986</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230526</creationdate><title>University campus breastfeeding, knowledge, and perceptions of support: An exploratory study</title><author>Scott, Allison L ; Lambert, Ann W ; Wang, Chih-Hsuan ; Johnson, Kelly V ; Weiss, Jessica ; Stankus, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-d06163d45840901a12c0466e40c25830ff81c2434b01b69f6478884d684b797f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Breastfeeding & lactation</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scott, Allison L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Ann W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chih-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kelly V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stankus, Tony</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scott, Allison L</au><au>Lambert, Ann W</au><au>Wang, Chih-Hsuan</au><au>Johnson, Kelly V</au><au>Weiss, Jessica</au><au>Stankus, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>University campus breastfeeding, knowledge, and perceptions of support: An exploratory study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-05-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0285008</spage><epage>e0285008</epage><pages>e0285008-e0285008</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Breastfeeding is often considered principally a biological issue but success is impacted by the socio-ecological environment of the lactating parent. Identifying current attitudes towards breastfeeding is essential in the effort toward normalizing breastfeeding in communities, including university campuses. The study explored campus community knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about breastfeeding, including available resources and applicable laws on two university campuses in the southern United States. This cross-sectional, self-reporting study utilized the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale and an adaptation of the Breastfeeding Behavior Questionnaire to survey a convenience sample. Results revealed decreased awareness of protective laws, availability of private lactation space, and insufficient public appreciation of breastfeeding's unique advantages to both lactating parent and infant as barriers to breastfeeding. These findings will help develop additional breastfeeding strategies to improve university campus community breastfeeding initiatives.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37235590</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0285008</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-9591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9783-2986</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2023-05, Vol.18 (5), p.e0285008-e0285008 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2819641561 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Attitudes Availability Babies Biology and Life Sciences Breast Feeding Breastfeeding & lactation College campuses Colleges & universities Consent Cross-Sectional Studies Employees Employers Evaluation Female Health aspects Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Infant Infants Lactation Laws, regulations and rules Management Medicine and Health Sciences Mothers Parents & parenting Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US People and Places Perceptions Public health Questionnaires Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Stigma Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires United States Universities University students |
| title | University campus breastfeeding, knowledge, and perceptions of support: An exploratory study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A20%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=University%20campus%20breastfeeding,%20knowledge,%20and%20perceptions%20of%20support:%20An%20exploratory%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Scott,%20Allison%20L&rft.date=2023-05-26&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0285008&rft.epage=e0285008&rft.pages=e0285008-e0285008&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0285008&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA750813159%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2819641561&rft_id=info:pmid/37235590&rft_galeid=A750813159&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1ed000ce092648c1b8a3071890ab63bc&rfr_iscdi=true |