Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems
Much is discussed about the characteristics, efficiency, and externalities of indoor housing and pasture-based beef production systems, but little is known about how these features influence public attitudes towards beef production. This study aimed to explore Chilean citizens' attitudes toward...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0284080 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | e0284080 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel Lemos Teixeira, Dayane Larrain, Rafael Hötzel, Maria Jose |
| description | Much is discussed about the characteristics, efficiency, and externalities of indoor housing and pasture-based beef production systems, but little is known about how these features influence public attitudes towards beef production. This study aimed to explore Chilean citizens' attitudes towards beef production systems and their underlying reasons. Citizens (n = 1,084) were recruited to participate in a survey and given information about one beef production system: indoor housing, continuous grazing or regenerative grazing. Participants had more favourable attitudes (from 1 = most negative attitudes to 5 = most positive attitudes) towards pasture-based systems (regenerative grazing = 2.94; continuous grazing = 2.83) than towards indoor housing (1.94), mainly due to concerns with animal welfare and environmental impacts. Productivity was not as important as the other sustainability aspects for participants as they were not willing to do that trade-off. Support for beef production may benefit if production systems adopt characteristics that are perceived by the public as positive for the environment and animal welfare. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0284080 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2806441991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747087077</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_76d5d27d486c49f8a375072f9bd2db44</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A747087077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-3569daa4fd79e287bb360e94d632ebe03070a42f3e64a18540ec674a3b620dcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rHCEUhofS0qRp_0FpBwqhvdito446VyUs_VgIBPp1K46e2XVxx406bfLv63YnYafkoggq-pxXzzlvUbys0LwivHq_8UPolZvvfA9zhAVFAj0qTquG4BnDiDw-2p8Uz2LcIFQTwdjT4oRw1DRU0NNCLNbWgerL3dA6q0uVkk2DgVgm_1sFE8sWoCt3wZtBJ-v7Mt7GBNv4vHjSKRfhxbieFT8-ffy--DK7vPq8XFxczjRrSJqRmjVGKdoZ3gAWvG0JQ9BQwwiGFhBBHCmKOwKMqkrUFIFmnCrS5n8brclZ8fqgu3M-yjHpKLFAjNKqaapMLA-E8Wojd8FuVbiVXln598CHlVQhWe1AcmZqg7mhgmnadEIRXiOOu6Y12LSUZq0P42tDuwWjoU9BuYno9Ka3a7nyv2SFKoJZvVd4OyoEfz1ATHJrowbnVA9-GD9e54lk9M0_6MPpjdRK5Qxs3_n8sN6LygtOORIccZ6p-QNUHga2VmeLdLnN04B3k4DMJLhJKzXEKJffvv4_e_Vzyp4fsWtQLq2jd8PeO3EK0gOog48xQHdf5QrJvcPvqiH3Dpejw3PYq-MO3QfdWZr8AW_39NE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806441991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina ; Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel ; Lemos Teixeira, Dayane ; Larrain, Rafael ; Hötzel, Maria Jose</creator><contributor>Souza, Julio Cesar de</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina ; Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel ; Lemos Teixeira, Dayane ; Larrain, Rafael ; Hötzel, Maria Jose ; Souza, Julio Cesar de</creatorcontrib><description>Much is discussed about the characteristics, efficiency, and externalities of indoor housing and pasture-based beef production systems, but little is known about how these features influence public attitudes towards beef production. This study aimed to explore Chilean citizens' attitudes towards beef production systems and their underlying reasons. Citizens (n = 1,084) were recruited to participate in a survey and given information about one beef production system: indoor housing, continuous grazing or regenerative grazing. Participants had more favourable attitudes (from 1 = most negative attitudes to 5 = most positive attitudes) towards pasture-based systems (regenerative grazing = 2.94; continuous grazing = 2.83) than towards indoor housing (1.94), mainly due to concerns with animal welfare and environmental impacts. Productivity was not as important as the other sustainability aspects for participants as they were not willing to do that trade-off. Support for beef production may benefit if production systems adopt characteristics that are perceived by the public as positive for the environment and animal welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37099484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animal protection ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Attitude ; Attitudes ; Beef ; Beef industry ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Carbon sequestration ; Cattle ; Chile ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Continuous grazing ; Data collection ; Emissions ; Environmental impact ; Evaluation ; Feeds ; Grazing ; Greenhouse gases ; Housing ; Meat production ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Pasture ; Pastures ; Production data ; Production management ; Productivity ; Public Opinion ; Questionnaires ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; Soil erosion ; Surveys ; Sustainability ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0284080</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Mansky de la Fuente et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Mansky de la Fuente et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Mansky de la Fuente et al 2023 Mansky de la Fuente et al</rights><rights>2023 Mansky de la Fuente et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-3569daa4fd79e287bb360e94d632ebe03070a42f3e64a18540ec674a3b620dcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-3569daa4fd79e287bb360e94d632ebe03070a42f3e64a18540ec674a3b620dcc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6819-9621 ; 0000-0002-6660-0354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132654/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10132654/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Souza, Julio Cesar de</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos Teixeira, Dayane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrain, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hötzel, Maria Jose</creatorcontrib><title>Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Much is discussed about the characteristics, efficiency, and externalities of indoor housing and pasture-based beef production systems, but little is known about how these features influence public attitudes towards beef production. This study aimed to explore Chilean citizens' attitudes towards beef production systems and their underlying reasons. Citizens (n = 1,084) were recruited to participate in a survey and given information about one beef production system: indoor housing, continuous grazing or regenerative grazing. Participants had more favourable attitudes (from 1 = most negative attitudes to 5 = most positive attitudes) towards pasture-based systems (regenerative grazing = 2.94; continuous grazing = 2.83) than towards indoor housing (1.94), mainly due to concerns with animal welfare and environmental impacts. Productivity was not as important as the other sustainability aspects for participants as they were not willing to do that trade-off. Support for beef production may benefit if production systems adopt characteristics that are perceived by the public as positive for the environment and animal welfare.</description><subject>Animal protection</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef industry</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chile</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Continuous grazing</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Meat production</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>Production data</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rHCEUhofS0qRp_0FpBwqhvdito446VyUs_VgIBPp1K46e2XVxx406bfLv63YnYafkoggq-pxXzzlvUbys0LwivHq_8UPolZvvfA9zhAVFAj0qTquG4BnDiDw-2p8Uz2LcIFQTwdjT4oRw1DRU0NNCLNbWgerL3dA6q0uVkk2DgVgm_1sFE8sWoCt3wZtBJ-v7Mt7GBNv4vHjSKRfhxbieFT8-ffy--DK7vPq8XFxczjRrSJqRmjVGKdoZ3gAWvG0JQ9BQwwiGFhBBHCmKOwKMqkrUFIFmnCrS5n8brclZ8fqgu3M-yjHpKLFAjNKqaapMLA-E8Wojd8FuVbiVXln598CHlVQhWe1AcmZqg7mhgmnadEIRXiOOu6Y12LSUZq0P42tDuwWjoU9BuYno9Ka3a7nyv2SFKoJZvVd4OyoEfz1ATHJrowbnVA9-GD9e54lk9M0_6MPpjdRK5Qxs3_n8sN6LygtOORIccZ6p-QNUHga2VmeLdLnN04B3k4DMJLhJKzXEKJffvv4_e_Vzyp4fsWtQLq2jd8PeO3EK0gOog48xQHdf5QrJvcPvqiH3Dpejw3PYq-MO3QfdWZr8AW_39NE</recordid><startdate>20230426</startdate><enddate>20230426</enddate><creator>Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina</creator><creator>Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel</creator><creator>Lemos Teixeira, Dayane</creator><creator>Larrain, Rafael</creator><creator>Hötzel, Maria Jose</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-9621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6660-0354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230426</creationdate><title>Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems</title><author>Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina ; Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel ; Lemos Teixeira, Dayane ; Larrain, Rafael ; Hötzel, Maria Jose</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-3569daa4fd79e287bb360e94d632ebe03070a42f3e64a18540ec674a3b620dcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal protection</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef industry</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chile</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Continuous grazing</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Meat production</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>Production data</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemos Teixeira, Dayane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larrain, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hötzel, Maria Jose</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mansky de la Fuente, Valentina</au><au>Enriquez-Hidalgo, Daniel</au><au>Lemos Teixeira, Dayane</au><au>Larrain, Rafael</au><au>Hötzel, Maria Jose</au><au>Souza, Julio Cesar de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-04-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0284080</spage><pages>e0284080-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Much is discussed about the characteristics, efficiency, and externalities of indoor housing and pasture-based beef production systems, but little is known about how these features influence public attitudes towards beef production. This study aimed to explore Chilean citizens' attitudes towards beef production systems and their underlying reasons. Citizens (n = 1,084) were recruited to participate in a survey and given information about one beef production system: indoor housing, continuous grazing or regenerative grazing. Participants had more favourable attitudes (from 1 = most negative attitudes to 5 = most positive attitudes) towards pasture-based systems (regenerative grazing = 2.94; continuous grazing = 2.83) than towards indoor housing (1.94), mainly due to concerns with animal welfare and environmental impacts. Productivity was not as important as the other sustainability aspects for participants as they were not willing to do that trade-off. Support for beef production may benefit if production systems adopt characteristics that are perceived by the public as positive for the environment and animal welfare.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37099484</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0284080</doi><tpages>e0284080</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-9621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6660-0354</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0284080 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2806441991 |
| source | PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Animal protection Animal Welfare Animals Attitude Attitudes Beef Beef industry Biodiversity Biology and Life Sciences Carbon sequestration Cattle Chile Conservation of Natural Resources Continuous grazing Data collection Emissions Environmental impact Evaluation Feeds Grazing Greenhouse gases Housing Meat production Medicine and Health Sciences Pasture Pastures Production data Production management Productivity Public Opinion Questionnaires Research and Analysis Methods Social networks Social Sciences Soil erosion Surveys Sustainability Water pollution |
| title | Chilean public attitudes towards beef production systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A12%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chilean%20public%20attitudes%20towards%20beef%20production%20systems&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mansky%20de%20la%20Fuente,%20Valentina&rft.date=2023-04-26&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0284080&rft.pages=e0284080-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0284080&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA747087077%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806441991&rft_id=info:pmid/37099484&rft_galeid=A747087077&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_76d5d27d486c49f8a375072f9bd2db44&rfr_iscdi=true |