Utilisation of QSPR ODT modelling and odour vector modelling to predict Cannabis sativa odour
Cannabis flower odour is an important aspect of product quality as it impacts the sensory experience when administered, which can affect therapeutic outcomes in paediatric patient populations who may reject unpalatable products. However, the cannabis industry has a reputation for having products wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0284842 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e0284842 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Wise, Kimber Phan, Nicholas Selby-Pham, Jamie Simovich, Tomer Gill, Harsharn |
description | Cannabis flower odour is an important aspect of product quality as it impacts the sensory experience when administered, which can affect therapeutic outcomes in paediatric patient populations who may reject unpalatable products. However, the cannabis industry has a reputation for having products with inconsistent odour descriptions and misattributed strain names due to the costly and laborious nature of sensory testing. Herein, we evaluate the potential of using odour vector modelling for predicting the odour intensity of cannabis products. Odour vector modelling is proposed as a process for transforming routinely produced volatile profiles into odour intensity (OI) profiles which are hypothesised to be more informative to the overall product odour (sensory descriptor; SD). However, the calculation of OI requires compound odour detection thresholds (ODT), which are not available for many of the compounds present in natural volatile profiles. Accordingly, to apply the odour vector modelling process to cannabis, a QSPR statistical model was first produced to predict ODT from physicochemical properties. The model presented herein was produced by polynomial regression with 10-fold cross-validation from 1,274 median ODT values to produce a model with R2 = 0.6892 and a 10-fold R2 = 0.6484. This model was then applied to terpenes which lacked experimentally determined ODT values to facilitate vector modelling of cannabis OI profiles. Logistic regression and k-means unsupervised cluster analysis was applied to both the raw terpene data and the transformed OI profiles to predict the SD of 265 cannabis samples and the accuracy of the predictions across the two datasets was compared. Out of the 13 SD categories modelled, OI profiles performed equally well or better than the volatile profiles for 11 of the SD, and across all SD the OI data was on average 21.9% more accurate (p = 0.031). The work herein is the first example of the application of odour vector modelling to complex volatile profiles of natural products and demonstrates the utility of OI profiles for the prediction of cannabis odour. These findings advance both the understanding of the odour modelling process which has previously only been applied to simple mixtures, and the cannabis industry which can utilise this process for more accurate prediction of cannabis odour and thereby reduce unpleasant patient experiences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0284842 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2806039371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A746944101</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3af80687757741799382d1d9fb92335d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A746944101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-379023556f1474284263fa071e0748adcc6b8ff033d80a0da2522fbe836f43893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12LEzEUhgdR3HX1H4gOCKIXrfmaSXIlS_0qLFT3wzsJ6SRpU6ZJTTJF_70ZO7t0ZC9kLjIkz_uenJNziuI5BFOIKXy38V1wsp3uvNNTgBhhBD0oTiHHaFIjgB8e_Z8UT2LcAFBhVtePixNMAWeggqfFj5tkWxtlst6V3pTfrr5elosP1-XWK9221q1K6VTpVY5W7nWTfDg6Sr7cBa1sk8qZdE4ubSx7r708KJ4Wj4xso342rGfFzaeP17Mvk4vF5_ns_GLS1BynCaYcIFxVtYGEkpwKqrGRgEINKGFSNU29ZMYAjBUDEiiJKoTMUjNcG4IZx2fFy4PvrvVRDJWJAjFQA8xztTIxPxDKy43YBbuV4bfw0oq_Gz6shAzJNq0WWJqsY5RWlBJIOccMKai4WXKEcaWy1_shWrfcatVol4JsR6bjE2fXYuX3AgKI8m1RdngzOAT_s9Mxia2NTS6qdNp3w8VpfqAeffUPen96A7WSOQPrjM-Bm95UnFNSc0Jy7ExN76Hyp_TWNrmPjM37I8HbkSAzSf9KK9nFKOZXl__PLr6P2ddH7FrLNq2jb7u-C-MYJAewCT7GoM1dlSEQ_RjcVkP0YyCGMciyF8cvdCe67Xv8B7-x_4Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806039371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilisation of QSPR ODT modelling and odour vector modelling to predict Cannabis sativa odour</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wise, Kimber ; Phan, Nicholas ; Selby-Pham, Jamie ; Simovich, Tomer ; Gill, Harsharn</creator><contributor>Mastinu, Andrea</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wise, Kimber ; Phan, Nicholas ; Selby-Pham, Jamie ; Simovich, Tomer ; Gill, Harsharn ; Mastinu, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Cannabis flower odour is an important aspect of product quality as it impacts the sensory experience when administered, which can affect therapeutic outcomes in paediatric patient populations who may reject unpalatable products. However, the cannabis industry has a reputation for having products with inconsistent odour descriptions and misattributed strain names due to the costly and laborious nature of sensory testing. Herein, we evaluate the potential of using odour vector modelling for predicting the odour intensity of cannabis products. Odour vector modelling is proposed as a process for transforming routinely produced volatile profiles into odour intensity (OI) profiles which are hypothesised to be more informative to the overall product odour (sensory descriptor; SD). However, the calculation of OI requires compound odour detection thresholds (ODT), which are not available for many of the compounds present in natural volatile profiles. Accordingly, to apply the odour vector modelling process to cannabis, a QSPR statistical model was first produced to predict ODT from physicochemical properties. The model presented herein was produced by polynomial regression with 10-fold cross-validation from 1,274 median ODT values to produce a model with R2 = 0.6892 and a 10-fold R2 = 0.6484. This model was then applied to terpenes which lacked experimentally determined ODT values to facilitate vector modelling of cannabis OI profiles. Logistic regression and k-means unsupervised cluster analysis was applied to both the raw terpene data and the transformed OI profiles to predict the SD of 265 cannabis samples and the accuracy of the predictions across the two datasets was compared. Out of the 13 SD categories modelled, OI profiles performed equally well or better than the volatile profiles for 11 of the SD, and across all SD the OI data was on average 21.9% more accurate (p = 0.031). The work herein is the first example of the application of odour vector modelling to complex volatile profiles of natural products and demonstrates the utility of OI profiles for the prediction of cannabis odour. These findings advance both the understanding of the odour modelling process which has previously only been applied to simple mixtures, and the cannabis industry which can utilise this process for more accurate prediction of cannabis odour and thereby reduce unpleasant patient experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284842</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37098051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists ; Cannabis ; Cannabis - chemistry ; Child ; Cluster analysis ; Flowers ; Flowers & plants ; Hallucinogens ; Humans ; Mathematical models ; Medical marijuana ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Modelling ; Natural products ; Odor control ; Odor intensity ; Odor thresholds ; Odorants - analysis ; Physical Sciences ; Physicochemical properties ; Polynomials ; Predictions ; Properties ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sensory testing ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Terpenes</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0284842</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Wise et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Wise et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Wise et al 2023 Wise et al</rights><rights>2023 Wise et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-379023556f1474284263fa071e0748adcc6b8ff033d80a0da2522fbe836f43893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-379023556f1474284263fa071e0748adcc6b8ff033d80a0da2522fbe836f43893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3575-7292 ; 0000-0002-8781-0772</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128932/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10128932/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37098051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mastinu, Andrea</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wise, Kimber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby-Pham, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simovich, Tomer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Harsharn</creatorcontrib><title>Utilisation of QSPR ODT modelling and odour vector modelling to predict Cannabis sativa odour</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Cannabis flower odour is an important aspect of product quality as it impacts the sensory experience when administered, which can affect therapeutic outcomes in paediatric patient populations who may reject unpalatable products. However, the cannabis industry has a reputation for having products with inconsistent odour descriptions and misattributed strain names due to the costly and laborious nature of sensory testing. Herein, we evaluate the potential of using odour vector modelling for predicting the odour intensity of cannabis products. Odour vector modelling is proposed as a process for transforming routinely produced volatile profiles into odour intensity (OI) profiles which are hypothesised to be more informative to the overall product odour (sensory descriptor; SD). However, the calculation of OI requires compound odour detection thresholds (ODT), which are not available for many of the compounds present in natural volatile profiles. Accordingly, to apply the odour vector modelling process to cannabis, a QSPR statistical model was first produced to predict ODT from physicochemical properties. The model presented herein was produced by polynomial regression with 10-fold cross-validation from 1,274 median ODT values to produce a model with R2 = 0.6892 and a 10-fold R2 = 0.6484. This model was then applied to terpenes which lacked experimentally determined ODT values to facilitate vector modelling of cannabis OI profiles. Logistic regression and k-means unsupervised cluster analysis was applied to both the raw terpene data and the transformed OI profiles to predict the SD of 265 cannabis samples and the accuracy of the predictions across the two datasets was compared. Out of the 13 SD categories modelled, OI profiles performed equally well or better than the volatile profiles for 11 of the SD, and across all SD the OI data was on average 21.9% more accurate (p = 0.031). The work herein is the first example of the application of odour vector modelling to complex volatile profiles of natural products and demonstrates the utility of OI profiles for the prediction of cannabis odour. These findings advance both the understanding of the odour modelling process which has previously only been applied to simple mixtures, and the cannabis industry which can utilise this process for more accurate prediction of cannabis odour and thereby reduce unpleasant patient experiences.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists</subject><subject>Cannabis</subject><subject>Cannabis - chemistry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Hallucinogens</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical marijuana</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Natural products</subject><subject>Odor control</subject><subject>Odor intensity</subject><subject>Odor thresholds</subject><subject>Odorants - analysis</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sensory testing</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Terpenes</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12LEzEUhgdR3HX1H4gOCKIXrfmaSXIlS_0qLFT3wzsJ6SRpU6ZJTTJF_70ZO7t0ZC9kLjIkz_uenJNziuI5BFOIKXy38V1wsp3uvNNTgBhhBD0oTiHHaFIjgB8e_Z8UT2LcAFBhVtePixNMAWeggqfFj5tkWxtlst6V3pTfrr5elosP1-XWK9221q1K6VTpVY5W7nWTfDg6Sr7cBa1sk8qZdE4ubSx7r708KJ4Wj4xso342rGfFzaeP17Mvk4vF5_ns_GLS1BynCaYcIFxVtYGEkpwKqrGRgEINKGFSNU29ZMYAjBUDEiiJKoTMUjNcG4IZx2fFy4PvrvVRDJWJAjFQA8xztTIxPxDKy43YBbuV4bfw0oq_Gz6shAzJNq0WWJqsY5RWlBJIOccMKai4WXKEcaWy1_shWrfcatVol4JsR6bjE2fXYuX3AgKI8m1RdngzOAT_s9Mxia2NTS6qdNp3w8VpfqAeffUPen96A7WSOQPrjM-Bm95UnFNSc0Jy7ExN76Hyp_TWNrmPjM37I8HbkSAzSf9KK9nFKOZXl__PLr6P2ddH7FrLNq2jb7u-C-MYJAewCT7GoM1dlSEQ_RjcVkP0YyCGMciyF8cvdCe67Xv8B7-x_4Y</recordid><startdate>20230425</startdate><enddate>20230425</enddate><creator>Wise, Kimber</creator><creator>Phan, Nicholas</creator><creator>Selby-Pham, Jamie</creator><creator>Simovich, Tomer</creator><creator>Gill, Harsharn</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3575-7292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-0772</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230425</creationdate><title>Utilisation of QSPR ODT modelling and odour vector modelling to predict Cannabis sativa odour</title><author>Wise, Kimber ; Phan, Nicholas ; Selby-Pham, Jamie ; Simovich, Tomer ; Gill, Harsharn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-379023556f1474284263fa071e0748adcc6b8ff033d80a0da2522fbe836f43893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists</topic><topic>Cannabis</topic><topic>Cannabis - chemistry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Hallucinogens</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical marijuana</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Natural products</topic><topic>Odor control</topic><topic>Odor intensity</topic><topic>Odor thresholds</topic><topic>Odorants - analysis</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sensory testing</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Terpenes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wise, Kimber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phan, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby-Pham, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simovich, Tomer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Harsharn</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wise, Kimber</au><au>Phan, Nicholas</au><au>Selby-Pham, Jamie</au><au>Simovich, Tomer</au><au>Gill, Harsharn</au><au>Mastinu, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilisation of QSPR ODT modelling and odour vector modelling to predict Cannabis sativa odour</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-04-25</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e0284842</spage><pages>e0284842-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Cannabis flower odour is an important aspect of product quality as it impacts the sensory experience when administered, which can affect therapeutic outcomes in paediatric patient populations who may reject unpalatable products. However, the cannabis industry has a reputation for having products with inconsistent odour descriptions and misattributed strain names due to the costly and laborious nature of sensory testing. Herein, we evaluate the potential of using odour vector modelling for predicting the odour intensity of cannabis products. Odour vector modelling is proposed as a process for transforming routinely produced volatile profiles into odour intensity (OI) profiles which are hypothesised to be more informative to the overall product odour (sensory descriptor; SD). However, the calculation of OI requires compound odour detection thresholds (ODT), which are not available for many of the compounds present in natural volatile profiles. Accordingly, to apply the odour vector modelling process to cannabis, a QSPR statistical model was first produced to predict ODT from physicochemical properties. The model presented herein was produced by polynomial regression with 10-fold cross-validation from 1,274 median ODT values to produce a model with R2 = 0.6892 and a 10-fold R2 = 0.6484. This model was then applied to terpenes which lacked experimentally determined ODT values to facilitate vector modelling of cannabis OI profiles. Logistic regression and k-means unsupervised cluster analysis was applied to both the raw terpene data and the transformed OI profiles to predict the SD of 265 cannabis samples and the accuracy of the predictions across the two datasets was compared. Out of the 13 SD categories modelled, OI profiles performed equally well or better than the volatile profiles for 11 of the SD, and across all SD the OI data was on average 21.9% more accurate (p = 0.031). The work herein is the first example of the application of odour vector modelling to complex volatile profiles of natural products and demonstrates the utility of OI profiles for the prediction of cannabis odour. These findings advance both the understanding of the odour modelling process which has previously only been applied to simple mixtures, and the cannabis industry which can utilise this process for more accurate prediction of cannabis odour and thereby reduce unpleasant patient experiences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37098051</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0284842</doi><tpages>e0284842</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3575-7292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8781-0772</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-04, Vol.18 (4), p.e0284842 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2806039371 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists Cannabis Cannabis - chemistry Child Cluster analysis Flowers Flowers & plants Hallucinogens Humans Mathematical models Medical marijuana Medicine and Health Sciences Modelling Natural products Odor control Odor intensity Odor thresholds Odorants - analysis Physical Sciences Physicochemical properties Polynomials Predictions Properties Research and Analysis Methods Sensory testing Social Sciences Statistical analysis Statistical models Terpenes |
title | Utilisation of QSPR ODT modelling and odour vector modelling to predict Cannabis sativa odour |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A45%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilisation%20of%20QSPR%20ODT%20modelling%20and%20odour%20vector%20modelling%20to%20predict%20Cannabis%20sativa%20odour&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wise,%20Kimber&rft.date=2023-04-25&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e0284842&rft.pages=e0284842-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0284842&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA746944101%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806039371&rft_id=info:pmid/37098051&rft_galeid=A746944101&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3af80687757741799382d1d9fb92335d&rfr_iscdi=true |