Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review
Women experiencing incarceration have higher rates of unmet contraceptive needs and rates of abortion than the public. Incarceration presents multiple potential barriers to accessing abortion and contraception care, including prison security protocols, prison locations, lack of access to care provid...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0281481-e0281481 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0281481 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e0281481 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Paynter, Martha Pinzón Hernández, Paula Heggie, Clare McKibbon, Shelley Munro, Sarah |
| description | Women experiencing incarceration have higher rates of unmet contraceptive needs and rates of abortion than the public. Incarceration presents multiple potential barriers to accessing abortion and contraception care, including prison security protocols, prison locations, lack of access to care providers, stigma, and low health literacy. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to contraception and abortion access for people experiencing criminalization and incarceration.
We used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and include empirical research with people experiencing criminalization or incarceration and/or with prison staff; with respect to prescription contraception or abortion access, while in custody or after having experienced incarceration/criminalization. Databases searched include CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Gender Studies, Medline (Ovid), Embase, Sociological Abstracts, and Social Services Abstracts. The search yielded 6096 titles of which 43 were included in the review.
Our search yielded 43 studies published between 2001 and 2021 across six countries. The studies included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs. The main outcomes of interest included contraceptive use; attitudes towards abortion, contraception, and pregnancy; and barriers to care. Barriers identified included lack of onsite access to options, contraceptive coercion by providers, financial costs, and disruptions to medical coverage and insurance status which incarcerated.
Evidence indicates that people in prison face significant barriers to maintaining continuity of contraceptive methods, abortion access, and reproductive health guidance. Some studies articulated participants felt judged when discussing contraception with prison-based health care providers. Geographic location, out-of-pocket payments, and trust in health care providers were reported as barriers to access.
Incarceration presents considerable challenges to the access of contraception and abortion care. Future research should examine the interaction between institutional security policies and procedures on care seeking, the experiences of underserved and hyper-incarcerated groups, and the impact of being denied access to contraception and abortion and experiences of criminalization. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0281481 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2792881858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743645936</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_92f2cfa67f204eefba482d5f4d6d3945</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A743645936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-95ffaf8f6da01f8b9493c87ae2408cf69c5ae1aa1e60e71c59c48eb72cbd7ab33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkttu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWHxLG5QatyWqlSJU631sQZ73qVjYOdFHh7km5abVAvkC9sjb_57Zn5k-QpJUvKC_pm5_vQQL1sfYNLwiTNJL2XnFLF2UIwwu8fnU-SRzHuCMm5FOJhcsKFUoLI4jR5vyp96JxvUmiq1PimC2CwvY5YH1LXGAgGA3RYpS36tsa36SqNxreu2aQBrxz-epw8sFBHfDLtZ8n3jx--nX9eXFx-Wp-vLhZGKN4tVG4tWGlFBYRaWapMcSMLQJYRaaxQJgekABQFwYKaXJlMYlkwU1YFlJyfJc8Pum3to54aEDUrFJOSylwOxPpAVB52ug1uD-GP9uD0dcCHjYahXFOjVswyY0EUlpEM0ZaQSVblNqtExVWWD1rvptf6co-VwbE39Ux0ftO4rd74K00JEUwwOii8mhSC_9lj7PTeRYN1DQ36_vBxRXJVjB9_8Q96d3kTtYGhAtdYP45rFNWrIuMiyxUXA7W8gxpWhXs3jBitG-KzhNezhNEG-LvbQB-jXn_98v_s5Y85-_KI3SLU3Tb6uh_dFedgdgBN8DEGtLddpkSPbr_phh7drie3D2nPjid0m3Rjb_4XnW_6rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792881858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Paynter, Martha ; Pinzón Hernández, Paula ; Heggie, Clare ; McKibbon, Shelley ; Munro, Sarah</creator><contributor>Knittel, Andrea</contributor><creatorcontrib>Paynter, Martha ; Pinzón Hernández, Paula ; Heggie, Clare ; McKibbon, Shelley ; Munro, Sarah ; Knittel, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Women experiencing incarceration have higher rates of unmet contraceptive needs and rates of abortion than the public. Incarceration presents multiple potential barriers to accessing abortion and contraception care, including prison security protocols, prison locations, lack of access to care providers, stigma, and low health literacy. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to contraception and abortion access for people experiencing criminalization and incarceration.
We used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and include empirical research with people experiencing criminalization or incarceration and/or with prison staff; with respect to prescription contraception or abortion access, while in custody or after having experienced incarceration/criminalization. Databases searched include CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Gender Studies, Medline (Ovid), Embase, Sociological Abstracts, and Social Services Abstracts. The search yielded 6096 titles of which 43 were included in the review.
Our search yielded 43 studies published between 2001 and 2021 across six countries. The studies included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs. The main outcomes of interest included contraceptive use; attitudes towards abortion, contraception, and pregnancy; and barriers to care. Barriers identified included lack of onsite access to options, contraceptive coercion by providers, financial costs, and disruptions to medical coverage and insurance status which incarcerated.
Evidence indicates that people in prison face significant barriers to maintaining continuity of contraceptive methods, abortion access, and reproductive health guidance. Some studies articulated participants felt judged when discussing contraception with prison-based health care providers. Geographic location, out-of-pocket payments, and trust in health care providers were reported as barriers to access.
Incarceration presents considerable challenges to the access of contraception and abortion care. Future research should examine the interaction between institutional security policies and procedures on care seeking, the experiences of underserved and hyper-incarcerated groups, and the impact of being denied access to contraception and abortion and experiences of criminalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281481</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36996087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced - methods ; Barriers ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth control ; Clinical trials ; Contraception ; Contraception - methods ; Contraceptive Agents ; Contraceptives ; Criminalization ; Domestic violence ; Evaluation ; Female ; Gender studies ; Geographical locations ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health care access ; Health care expenditures ; Health care industry ; Health services ; Humans ; Imprisonment ; Management ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Payments ; Pregnancy ; Prison administration ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; Qualitative research ; Reproduction ; Reproductive health ; Reproductive systems ; Reviews ; Security ; Sex industry ; Social Sciences ; Social services ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0281481-e0281481</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Paynter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Paynter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Paynter et al 2023 Paynter et al</rights><rights>2023 Paynter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-95ffaf8f6da01f8b9493c87ae2408cf69c5ae1aa1e60e71c59c48eb72cbd7ab33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-95ffaf8f6da01f8b9493c87ae2408cf69c5ae1aa1e60e71c59c48eb72cbd7ab33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4194-8776</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062621/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10062621/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27344,27924,27925,33774,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36996087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Knittel, Andrea</contributor><creatorcontrib>Paynter, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinzón Hernández, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heggie, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKibbon, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munro, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Women experiencing incarceration have higher rates of unmet contraceptive needs and rates of abortion than the public. Incarceration presents multiple potential barriers to accessing abortion and contraception care, including prison security protocols, prison locations, lack of access to care providers, stigma, and low health literacy. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to contraception and abortion access for people experiencing criminalization and incarceration.
We used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and include empirical research with people experiencing criminalization or incarceration and/or with prison staff; with respect to prescription contraception or abortion access, while in custody or after having experienced incarceration/criminalization. Databases searched include CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Gender Studies, Medline (Ovid), Embase, Sociological Abstracts, and Social Services Abstracts. The search yielded 6096 titles of which 43 were included in the review.
Our search yielded 43 studies published between 2001 and 2021 across six countries. The studies included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs. The main outcomes of interest included contraceptive use; attitudes towards abortion, contraception, and pregnancy; and barriers to care. Barriers identified included lack of onsite access to options, contraceptive coercion by providers, financial costs, and disruptions to medical coverage and insurance status which incarcerated.
Evidence indicates that people in prison face significant barriers to maintaining continuity of contraceptive methods, abortion access, and reproductive health guidance. Some studies articulated participants felt judged when discussing contraception with prison-based health care providers. Geographic location, out-of-pocket payments, and trust in health care providers were reported as barriers to access.
Incarceration presents considerable challenges to the access of contraception and abortion care. Future research should examine the interaction between institutional security policies and procedures on care seeking, the experiences of underserved and hyper-incarcerated groups, and the impact of being denied access to contraception and abortion and experiences of criminalization.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - methods</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Contraceptive Agents</subject><subject>Contraceptives</subject><subject>Criminalization</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender studies</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prison administration</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Reproductive systems</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Sex industry</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkttu1DAQhiMEoqXwBggiISG42MWHxLG5QatyWqlSJU631sQZ73qVjYOdFHh7km5abVAvkC9sjb_57Zn5k-QpJUvKC_pm5_vQQL1sfYNLwiTNJL2XnFLF2UIwwu8fnU-SRzHuCMm5FOJhcsKFUoLI4jR5vyp96JxvUmiq1PimC2CwvY5YH1LXGAgGA3RYpS36tsa36SqNxreu2aQBrxz-epw8sFBHfDLtZ8n3jx--nX9eXFx-Wp-vLhZGKN4tVG4tWGlFBYRaWapMcSMLQJYRaaxQJgekABQFwYKaXJlMYlkwU1YFlJyfJc8Pum3to54aEDUrFJOSylwOxPpAVB52ug1uD-GP9uD0dcCHjYahXFOjVswyY0EUlpEM0ZaQSVblNqtExVWWD1rvptf6co-VwbE39Ux0ftO4rd74K00JEUwwOii8mhSC_9lj7PTeRYN1DQ36_vBxRXJVjB9_8Q96d3kTtYGhAtdYP45rFNWrIuMiyxUXA7W8gxpWhXs3jBitG-KzhNezhNEG-LvbQB-jXn_98v_s5Y85-_KI3SLU3Tb6uh_dFedgdgBN8DEGtLddpkSPbr_phh7drie3D2nPjid0m3Rjb_4XnW_6rw</recordid><startdate>20230330</startdate><enddate>20230330</enddate><creator>Paynter, Martha</creator><creator>Pinzón Hernández, Paula</creator><creator>Heggie, Clare</creator><creator>McKibbon, Shelley</creator><creator>Munro, Sarah</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4194-8776</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230330</creationdate><title>Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review</title><author>Paynter, Martha ; Pinzón Hernández, Paula ; Heggie, Clare ; McKibbon, Shelley ; Munro, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-95ffaf8f6da01f8b9493c87ae2408cf69c5ae1aa1e60e71c59c48eb72cbd7ab33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - methods</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Contraceptive Agents</topic><topic>Contraceptives</topic><topic>Criminalization</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender studies</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prison administration</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Reproductive systems</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Sex industry</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paynter, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinzón Hernández, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heggie, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKibbon, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munro, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paynter, Martha</au><au>Pinzón Hernández, Paula</au><au>Heggie, Clare</au><au>McKibbon, Shelley</au><au>Munro, Sarah</au><au>Knittel, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-03-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0281481</spage><epage>e0281481</epage><pages>e0281481-e0281481</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Women experiencing incarceration have higher rates of unmet contraceptive needs and rates of abortion than the public. Incarceration presents multiple potential barriers to accessing abortion and contraception care, including prison security protocols, prison locations, lack of access to care providers, stigma, and low health literacy. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to contraception and abortion access for people experiencing criminalization and incarceration.
We used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and include empirical research with people experiencing criminalization or incarceration and/or with prison staff; with respect to prescription contraception or abortion access, while in custody or after having experienced incarceration/criminalization. Databases searched include CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Gender Studies, Medline (Ovid), Embase, Sociological Abstracts, and Social Services Abstracts. The search yielded 6096 titles of which 43 were included in the review.
Our search yielded 43 studies published between 2001 and 2021 across six countries. The studies included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs. The main outcomes of interest included contraceptive use; attitudes towards abortion, contraception, and pregnancy; and barriers to care. Barriers identified included lack of onsite access to options, contraceptive coercion by providers, financial costs, and disruptions to medical coverage and insurance status which incarcerated.
Evidence indicates that people in prison face significant barriers to maintaining continuity of contraceptive methods, abortion access, and reproductive health guidance. Some studies articulated participants felt judged when discussing contraception with prison-based health care providers. Geographic location, out-of-pocket payments, and trust in health care providers were reported as barriers to access.
Incarceration presents considerable challenges to the access of contraception and abortion care. Future research should examine the interaction between institutional security policies and procedures on care seeking, the experiences of underserved and hyper-incarcerated groups, and the impact of being denied access to contraception and abortion and experiences of criminalization.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36996087</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0281481</doi><tpages>e0281481</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4194-8776</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0281481-e0281481 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2792881858 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Abortion Abortion, Induced - methods Barriers Biology and Life Sciences Birth control Clinical trials Contraception Contraception - methods Contraceptive Agents Contraceptives Criminalization Domestic violence Evaluation Female Gender studies Geographical locations Health aspects Health care Health care access Health care expenditures Health care industry Health services Humans Imprisonment Management Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Payments Pregnancy Prison administration Prisoners Prisons Qualitative research Reproduction Reproductive health Reproductive systems Reviews Security Sex industry Social Sciences Social services Womens health |
| title | Abortion and contraception for incarcerated people: A scoping review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T10%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abortion%20and%20contraception%20for%20incarcerated%20people:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Paynter,%20Martha&rft.date=2023-03-30&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0281481&rft.epage=e0281481&rft.pages=e0281481-e0281481&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0281481&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA743645936%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792881858&rft_id=info:pmid/36996087&rft_galeid=A743645936&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_92f2cfa67f204eefba482d5f4d6d3945&rfr_iscdi=true |