Effectiveness of healthcare workers and volunteers training on improving tuberculosis case detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Tuberculosis is the second most common infectious cause of death globally. Low TB case detection remains a major challenge to achieve the global End TB targets. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether training of health professionals and volunteers increase TB case detect...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0271825-e0271825 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0271825 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e0271825 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Amare, Desalegne Getahun, Fentie Ambaw Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku Dessie, Getenet Shiferaw, Melashu Balew Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw Alene, Kefyalew Addis |
| description | Tuberculosis is the second most common infectious cause of death globally. Low TB case detection remains a major challenge to achieve the global End TB targets. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether training of health professionals and volunteers increase TB case detection.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials and non-randomized control trials reporting on the effectiveness of health professionals and volunteers training on TB case detection. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and reference sections of included articles from inception through to 15 February 2021, for studies published in English. Study screening, data extraction, and bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers with third and fourth reviewers participating to resolve conflicts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Meta-analyses were performed with a random effect model to estimate the effectiveness of training intervention on TB case detection.
Of the 2015 unique records identified through our search strategies, 2007 records were excluded following the screening, leaving eight studies to be included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that providing training to health professionals and volunteers significantly increased TB case detection (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.53, 1.66). There was not a significant degree of heterogeneity across the included study on the outcome of interest (I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.667).
Providing training to healthcare workers and volunteers can increase TB case detection. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0271825 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2789993191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A742733199</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_06da93867a3d43248dc88ae10ff5905c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A742733199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-d1f9506bc1f6454d235d5c3e832a217e3c524e178a78b1bb0a92d831800fc4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKPfJkbVE0DKk2aBBO3lmOftB6JXWyno7-BP42zZlODdoFy4dh5zuvznpyTJC8xWmBa4g_XtndGtIutNbBApMQVyR8lp5hRMi8Ioo-P3k-SZ95fI5TTqiieJie0YDnJCDtN_pw3Dcigd2DA-9Q26QZEGzZSOEhvrPsJzqfCqHRn294EGLbBCW20WafWpLrbOrsbNqGvwcm-tV77VAoPqYIwSFvzMV2mfu8DdCJomTrYabi5Ve0giLmINvYx6nnypBGthxfjOkuuPp9fnX2dX1x-WZ0tL-ayYDTMFW5Yjopa4qbI8kwRmqtcUqgoEQSXQGX0BrisRFnVuK6RYERVFFcINTJTdJa8PshuY658LKPnpKwYYxQzHInVgVBWXPOt051we26F5rcH1q25cNFJCxwVSrBY1VJQlVGSVUpWlQCMmiZnKKY1Sz6Nt_V1B0qCieVrJ6LTL0Zv-NruOEaI5hUto8K7UcHZXz34wDvtJbStMGD7IfGYcomKoojom3_Qh-2N1FpEB9o0Nl4sB1G-LDNS0kixSC0eoOKjoNMyNl2j4_kk4P0kIDIBfoe16L3nq-_f_p-9_DFl3x6xh_b0sRuHzvJTMDuA0lnvHTT3VcaIDzNzVw0-zAwfZyaGvTr-Q_dBd0NC_wLTthQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789993191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of healthcare workers and volunteers training on improving tuberculosis case detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Amare, Desalegne ; Getahun, Fentie Ambaw ; Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku ; Dessie, Getenet ; Shiferaw, Melashu Balew ; Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw ; Alene, Kefyalew Addis</creator><contributor>Atluri, Paavani</contributor><creatorcontrib>Amare, Desalegne ; Getahun, Fentie Ambaw ; Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku ; Dessie, Getenet ; Shiferaw, Melashu Balew ; Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw ; Alene, Kefyalew Addis ; Atluri, Paavani</creatorcontrib><description>Tuberculosis is the second most common infectious cause of death globally. Low TB case detection remains a major challenge to achieve the global End TB targets. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether training of health professionals and volunteers increase TB case detection.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials and non-randomized control trials reporting on the effectiveness of health professionals and volunteers training on TB case detection. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and reference sections of included articles from inception through to 15 February 2021, for studies published in English. Study screening, data extraction, and bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers with third and fourth reviewers participating to resolve conflicts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Meta-analyses were performed with a random effect model to estimate the effectiveness of training intervention on TB case detection.
Of the 2015 unique records identified through our search strategies, 2007 records were excluded following the screening, leaving eight studies to be included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that providing training to health professionals and volunteers significantly increased TB case detection (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.53, 1.66). There was not a significant degree of heterogeneity across the included study on the outcome of interest (I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.667).
Providing training to healthcare workers and volunteers can increase TB case detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36952429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Bias ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Conflict management ; Data analysis ; Diagnosis ; Effectiveness ; Health care ; Health Personnel ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Intervention ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Meta-analysis ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Professionals ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Reviews ; Systematic review ; Training ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis - diagnosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis ; Volunteers</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0271825-e0271825</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Amare et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Amare et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Amare et al 2023 Amare et al</rights><rights>2023 Amare et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-d1f9506bc1f6454d235d5c3e832a217e3c524e178a78b1bb0a92d831800fc4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-d1f9506bc1f6454d235d5c3e832a217e3c524e178a78b1bb0a92d831800fc4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0965-6984</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035837/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10035837/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23868,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36952429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Atluri, Paavani</contributor><creatorcontrib>Amare, Desalegne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Getahun, Fentie Ambaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dessie, Getenet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiferaw, Melashu Balew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alene, Kefyalew Addis</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of healthcare workers and volunteers training on improving tuberculosis case detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Tuberculosis is the second most common infectious cause of death globally. Low TB case detection remains a major challenge to achieve the global End TB targets. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether training of health professionals and volunteers increase TB case detection.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials and non-randomized control trials reporting on the effectiveness of health professionals and volunteers training on TB case detection. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and reference sections of included articles from inception through to 15 February 2021, for studies published in English. Study screening, data extraction, and bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers with third and fourth reviewers participating to resolve conflicts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Meta-analyses were performed with a random effect model to estimate the effectiveness of training intervention on TB case detection.
Of the 2015 unique records identified through our search strategies, 2007 records were excluded following the screening, leaving eight studies to be included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that providing training to health professionals and volunteers significantly increased TB case detection (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.53, 1.66). There was not a significant degree of heterogeneity across the included study on the outcome of interest (I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.667).
Providing training to healthcare workers and volunteers can increase TB case detection.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Conflict management</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKPfJkbVE0DKk2aBBO3lmOftB6JXWyno7-BP42zZlODdoFy4dh5zuvznpyTJC8xWmBa4g_XtndGtIutNbBApMQVyR8lp5hRMi8Ioo-P3k-SZ95fI5TTqiieJie0YDnJCDtN_pw3Dcigd2DA-9Q26QZEGzZSOEhvrPsJzqfCqHRn294EGLbBCW20WafWpLrbOrsbNqGvwcm-tV77VAoPqYIwSFvzMV2mfu8DdCJomTrYabi5Ve0giLmINvYx6nnypBGthxfjOkuuPp9fnX2dX1x-WZ0tL-ayYDTMFW5Yjopa4qbI8kwRmqtcUqgoEQSXQGX0BrisRFnVuK6RYERVFFcINTJTdJa8PshuY658LKPnpKwYYxQzHInVgVBWXPOt051we26F5rcH1q25cNFJCxwVSrBY1VJQlVGSVUpWlQCMmiZnKKY1Sz6Nt_V1B0qCieVrJ6LTL0Zv-NruOEaI5hUto8K7UcHZXz34wDvtJbStMGD7IfGYcomKoojom3_Qh-2N1FpEB9o0Nl4sB1G-LDNS0kixSC0eoOKjoNMyNl2j4_kk4P0kIDIBfoe16L3nq-_f_p-9_DFl3x6xh_b0sRuHzvJTMDuA0lnvHTT3VcaIDzNzVw0-zAwfZyaGvTr-Q_dBd0NC_wLTthQA</recordid><startdate>20230323</startdate><enddate>20230323</enddate><creator>Amare, Desalegne</creator><creator>Getahun, Fentie Ambaw</creator><creator>Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku</creator><creator>Dessie, Getenet</creator><creator>Shiferaw, Melashu Balew</creator><creator>Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw</creator><creator>Alene, Kefyalew Addis</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-6984</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230323</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of healthcare workers and volunteers training on improving tuberculosis case detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Amare, Desalegne ; Getahun, Fentie Ambaw ; Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku ; Dessie, Getenet ; Shiferaw, Melashu Balew ; Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw ; Alene, Kefyalew Addis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-d1f9506bc1f6454d235d5c3e832a217e3c524e178a78b1bb0a92d831800fc4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Conflict management</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amare, Desalegne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Getahun, Fentie Ambaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dessie, Getenet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiferaw, Melashu Balew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alene, Kefyalew Addis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amare, Desalegne</au><au>Getahun, Fentie Ambaw</au><au>Mengesha, Endalkachew Worku</au><au>Dessie, Getenet</au><au>Shiferaw, Melashu Balew</au><au>Dires, Tegenaw Asemamaw</au><au>Alene, Kefyalew Addis</au><au>Atluri, Paavani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of healthcare workers and volunteers training on improving tuberculosis case detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-03-23</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0271825</spage><epage>e0271825</epage><pages>e0271825-e0271825</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Tuberculosis is the second most common infectious cause of death globally. Low TB case detection remains a major challenge to achieve the global End TB targets. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether training of health professionals and volunteers increase TB case detection.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials and non-randomized control trials reporting on the effectiveness of health professionals and volunteers training on TB case detection. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and reference sections of included articles from inception through to 15 February 2021, for studies published in English. Study screening, data extraction, and bias assessments were performed independently by two reviewers with third and fourth reviewers participating to resolve conflicts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Meta-analyses were performed with a random effect model to estimate the effectiveness of training intervention on TB case detection.
Of the 2015 unique records identified through our search strategies, 2007 records were excluded following the screening, leaving eight studies to be included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that providing training to health professionals and volunteers significantly increased TB case detection (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.53, 1.66). There was not a significant degree of heterogeneity across the included study on the outcome of interest (I2 = 0.00%, p = 0.667).
Providing training to healthcare workers and volunteers can increase TB case detection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36952429</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0271825</doi><tpages>e0271825</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-6984</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0271825-e0271825 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2789993191 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Bias Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Conflict management Data analysis Diagnosis Effectiveness Health care Health Personnel Heterogeneity Humans Intervention Medical diagnosis Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences Meta-analysis People and Places Physical Sciences Professionals Research and Analysis Methods Reviews Systematic review Training Tuberculosis Tuberculosis - diagnosis Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis Volunteers |
| title | Effectiveness of healthcare workers and volunteers training on improving tuberculosis case detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A17%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20healthcare%20workers%20and%20volunteers%20training%20on%20improving%20tuberculosis%20case%20detection:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Amare,%20Desalegne&rft.date=2023-03-23&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0271825&rft.epage=e0271825&rft.pages=e0271825-e0271825&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0271825&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA742733199%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789993191&rft_id=info:pmid/36952429&rft_galeid=A742733199&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_06da93867a3d43248dc88ae10ff5905c&rfr_iscdi=true |