Structure vs. chemistry: Alternate mechanisms for controlling leaf microbiomes
The analysis of phyllosphere microbiomes traditionally relied on DNA extracted from whole leaves. To investigate the microbial communities on the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) leaf surfaces, swabs were collected from both surfaces of two garden plants, Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa. S...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0275734-e0275734 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0275734 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0275734 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Lau, Kenny J X Gusareva, Elena S Luhung, Irvan Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V Wong, Anthony Poh, Tuang Yeow Uchida, Akira Oliveira, Elaine L Drautz-Moses, Daniela I Junqueira, Ana Carolina M Schuster, Stephan C |
description | The analysis of phyllosphere microbiomes traditionally relied on DNA extracted from whole leaves. To investigate the microbial communities on the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) leaf surfaces, swabs were collected from both surfaces of two garden plants, Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa. Samples were collected at noon and midnight and at five different locations to investigate if the phyllosphere microbial communities change with time and location. The abaxial surface of Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa had fewer bacteria in contrast to its adaxial counterpart. This observation was consistent between noon and midnight and across five different locations. Our co-occurrence network analysis further showed that bacteria were found almost exclusively on the adaxial surface while only a small group of leaf blotch fungi thrived on the abaxial surface. There are higher densities of stomata on the abaxial surface and these openings are vulnerable ports of entry into the plant host. While one might argue about the settling of dust particles and microorganisms on the adaxial surface, we detected differences in reactive chemical activities and microstructures between the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. Our results further suggest that both plant species deploy different defence strategies to deter invading pathogens on the abaxial surface. We hypothesize that chemical and mechanical defence strategies evolved independently for harnessing and controlling phyllosphere microbiomes. Our findings have also advanced our understanding that the abaxial leaf surface is distinct from the adaxial surface and that the reduced microbial diversity is likely a consequence of plant-microbe interactions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0275734 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2789211647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A742377154</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5713cc912bf9475abb1441c28b96df05</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A742377154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-d84778e962c1fdada40f0465fea9004a76a6bc843b3ddaedd01a45852a9ee0be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKv2Ak3qJr4qDQxiQG3luOctK6cuNjOtP37uTSbGrQLlItEznPe4_OeN8teYrTAVOAPWzf4XtnFzvWwQEQUgrJH2SmuKJlzgujjo--T7FkIW4QKWnL-NDuhvGK0pNVp9v0y-kHHwUN-FRa53kBnQvQ3H_OljZAaRMg70BvVm9CFvHU-166P3llr-nVuQbV5Z7R3tXEdhOfZk1bZAC_G9yz79eXzz7Nv8_OLr6uz5flcc0bivCmZECVUnGjcNqpRDLWI8aIFVSHElOCK17pktKZNo6BpEFasKAuiKgBUA51lrw-6O-uCHK0IkoiyIhhzJhKxOhCNU1u586ZT_kY6ZeTfA-fXUvlotAVZCEy1rjCp24qJQtU1ZgxrUtYVb9pk2iz7NHYb6g4aDckAZSei0z-92ci1u5IYIZrmQUnh3ajg3Z8BQpTJZg3Wqh7cMF6ccsJ4Qt_8gz483kitVZrA9K1LjfVeVC4FI1QIXLBELR6g0tOkNac9QmvS-aTg_aRgv2u4jms1hCBXlz_-n734PWXfHrEbUDZugrNDNK4PU5AdwBSpEDy09y5jJPe5v3ND7nMvx9ynslfHG7ovugs6vQVp6P3O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789211647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structure vs. chemistry: Alternate mechanisms for controlling leaf microbiomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Lau, Kenny J X ; Gusareva, Elena S ; Luhung, Irvan ; Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V ; Wong, Anthony ; Poh, Tuang Yeow ; Uchida, Akira ; Oliveira, Elaine L ; Drautz-Moses, Daniela I ; Junqueira, Ana Carolina M ; Schuster, Stephan C</creator><contributor>Muth, Theodore Raymond</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lau, Kenny J X ; Gusareva, Elena S ; Luhung, Irvan ; Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V ; Wong, Anthony ; Poh, Tuang Yeow ; Uchida, Akira ; Oliveira, Elaine L ; Drautz-Moses, Daniela I ; Junqueira, Ana Carolina M ; Schuster, Stephan C ; Muth, Theodore Raymond</creatorcontrib><description>The analysis of phyllosphere microbiomes traditionally relied on DNA extracted from whole leaves. To investigate the microbial communities on the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) leaf surfaces, swabs were collected from both surfaces of two garden plants, Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa. Samples were collected at noon and midnight and at five different locations to investigate if the phyllosphere microbial communities change with time and location. The abaxial surface of Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa had fewer bacteria in contrast to its adaxial counterpart. This observation was consistent between noon and midnight and across five different locations. Our co-occurrence network analysis further showed that bacteria were found almost exclusively on the adaxial surface while only a small group of leaf blotch fungi thrived on the abaxial surface. There are higher densities of stomata on the abaxial surface and these openings are vulnerable ports of entry into the plant host. While one might argue about the settling of dust particles and microorganisms on the adaxial surface, we detected differences in reactive chemical activities and microstructures between the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. Our results further suggest that both plant species deploy different defence strategies to deter invading pathogens on the abaxial surface. We hypothesize that chemical and mechanical defence strategies evolved independently for harnessing and controlling phyllosphere microbiomes. Our findings have also advanced our understanding that the abaxial leaf surface is distinct from the adaxial surface and that the reduced microbial diversity is likely a consequence of plant-microbe interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275734</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36943839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bacteria ; Bacteria, Phytopathogenic ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chemical properties ; Composition ; Control ; Cordyline fruticosa ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Dust particles ; Flowers & plants ; Fungi ; Genetic testing ; Host plants ; Identification and classification ; Leaf blotch ; Leaves ; Microbial activity ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Microorganisms ; Network analysis ; Nucleotide sequencing ; Phyllosphere ; Plant Leaves - chemistry ; Plant species ; Plants (botany) ; Reagents ; Stomata ; Structure ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0275734-e0275734</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Lau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Lau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Lau et al 2023 Lau et al</rights><rights>2023 Lau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-d84778e962c1fdada40f0465fea9004a76a6bc843b3ddaedd01a45852a9ee0be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3666-5253 ; 0000-0002-3739-0917 ; 0000-0001-9082-7527</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030040/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030040/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Muth, Theodore Raymond</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lau, Kenny J X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusareva, Elena S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luhung, Irvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poh, Tuang Yeow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Elaine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drautz-Moses, Daniela I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junqueira, Ana Carolina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Stephan C</creatorcontrib><title>Structure vs. chemistry: Alternate mechanisms for controlling leaf microbiomes</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The analysis of phyllosphere microbiomes traditionally relied on DNA extracted from whole leaves. To investigate the microbial communities on the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) leaf surfaces, swabs were collected from both surfaces of two garden plants, Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa. Samples were collected at noon and midnight and at five different locations to investigate if the phyllosphere microbial communities change with time and location. The abaxial surface of Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa had fewer bacteria in contrast to its adaxial counterpart. This observation was consistent between noon and midnight and across five different locations. Our co-occurrence network analysis further showed that bacteria were found almost exclusively on the adaxial surface while only a small group of leaf blotch fungi thrived on the abaxial surface. There are higher densities of stomata on the abaxial surface and these openings are vulnerable ports of entry into the plant host. While one might argue about the settling of dust particles and microorganisms on the adaxial surface, we detected differences in reactive chemical activities and microstructures between the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. Our results further suggest that both plant species deploy different defence strategies to deter invading pathogens on the abaxial surface. We hypothesize that chemical and mechanical defence strategies evolved independently for harnessing and controlling phyllosphere microbiomes. Our findings have also advanced our understanding that the abaxial leaf surface is distinct from the adaxial surface and that the reduced microbial diversity is likely a consequence of plant-microbe interactions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria, Phytopathogenic</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cordyline fruticosa</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Dust particles</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Leaf blotch</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Microbial activity</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequencing</subject><subject>Phyllosphere</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Structure</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBEQkJw0eKv2Ak3qJr4qDQxiQG3luOctK6cuNjOtP37uTSbGrQLlItEznPe4_OeN8teYrTAVOAPWzf4XtnFzvWwQEQUgrJH2SmuKJlzgujjo--T7FkIW4QKWnL-NDuhvGK0pNVp9v0y-kHHwUN-FRa53kBnQvQ3H_OljZAaRMg70BvVm9CFvHU-166P3llr-nVuQbV5Z7R3tXEdhOfZk1bZAC_G9yz79eXzz7Nv8_OLr6uz5flcc0bivCmZECVUnGjcNqpRDLWI8aIFVSHElOCK17pktKZNo6BpEFasKAuiKgBUA51lrw-6O-uCHK0IkoiyIhhzJhKxOhCNU1u586ZT_kY6ZeTfA-fXUvlotAVZCEy1rjCp24qJQtU1ZgxrUtYVb9pk2iz7NHYb6g4aDckAZSei0z-92ci1u5IYIZrmQUnh3ajg3Z8BQpTJZg3Wqh7cMF6ccsJ4Qt_8gz483kitVZrA9K1LjfVeVC4FI1QIXLBELR6g0tOkNac9QmvS-aTg_aRgv2u4jms1hCBXlz_-n734PWXfHrEbUDZugrNDNK4PU5AdwBSpEDy09y5jJPe5v3ND7nMvx9ynslfHG7ovugs6vQVp6P3O</recordid><startdate>20230321</startdate><enddate>20230321</enddate><creator>Lau, Kenny J X</creator><creator>Gusareva, Elena S</creator><creator>Luhung, Irvan</creator><creator>Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V</creator><creator>Wong, Anthony</creator><creator>Poh, Tuang Yeow</creator><creator>Uchida, Akira</creator><creator>Oliveira, Elaine L</creator><creator>Drautz-Moses, Daniela I</creator><creator>Junqueira, Ana Carolina M</creator><creator>Schuster, Stephan C</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3666-5253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3739-0917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9082-7527</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230321</creationdate><title>Structure vs. chemistry: Alternate mechanisms for controlling leaf microbiomes</title><author>Lau, Kenny J X ; Gusareva, Elena S ; Luhung, Irvan ; Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V ; Wong, Anthony ; Poh, Tuang Yeow ; Uchida, Akira ; Oliveira, Elaine L ; Drautz-Moses, Daniela I ; Junqueira, Ana Carolina M ; Schuster, Stephan C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-d84778e962c1fdada40f0465fea9004a76a6bc843b3ddaedd01a45852a9ee0be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria, Phytopathogenic</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cordyline fruticosa</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Dust particles</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Leaf blotch</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Microbial activity</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequencing</topic><topic>Phyllosphere</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Structure</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lau, Kenny J X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusareva, Elena S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luhung, Irvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poh, Tuang Yeow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Elaine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drautz-Moses, Daniela I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junqueira, Ana Carolina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Stephan C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lau, Kenny J X</au><au>Gusareva, Elena S</au><au>Luhung, Irvan</au><au>Premkrishnan, Balakrishnan N V</au><au>Wong, Anthony</au><au>Poh, Tuang Yeow</au><au>Uchida, Akira</au><au>Oliveira, Elaine L</au><au>Drautz-Moses, Daniela I</au><au>Junqueira, Ana Carolina M</au><au>Schuster, Stephan C</au><au>Muth, Theodore Raymond</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structure vs. chemistry: Alternate mechanisms for controlling leaf microbiomes</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-03-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0275734</spage><epage>e0275734</epage><pages>e0275734-e0275734</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The analysis of phyllosphere microbiomes traditionally relied on DNA extracted from whole leaves. To investigate the microbial communities on the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) leaf surfaces, swabs were collected from both surfaces of two garden plants, Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa. Samples were collected at noon and midnight and at five different locations to investigate if the phyllosphere microbial communities change with time and location. The abaxial surface of Rhapis excelsa and Cordyline fruticosa had fewer bacteria in contrast to its adaxial counterpart. This observation was consistent between noon and midnight and across five different locations. Our co-occurrence network analysis further showed that bacteria were found almost exclusively on the adaxial surface while only a small group of leaf blotch fungi thrived on the abaxial surface. There are higher densities of stomata on the abaxial surface and these openings are vulnerable ports of entry into the plant host. While one might argue about the settling of dust particles and microorganisms on the adaxial surface, we detected differences in reactive chemical activities and microstructures between the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. Our results further suggest that both plant species deploy different defence strategies to deter invading pathogens on the abaxial surface. We hypothesize that chemical and mechanical defence strategies evolved independently for harnessing and controlling phyllosphere microbiomes. Our findings have also advanced our understanding that the abaxial leaf surface is distinct from the adaxial surface and that the reduced microbial diversity is likely a consequence of plant-microbe interactions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36943839</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0275734</doi><tpages>e0275734</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3666-5253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3739-0917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9082-7527</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0275734-e0275734 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2789211647 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Analysis Bacteria Bacteria, Phytopathogenic Biology and Life Sciences Chemical properties Composition Control Cordyline fruticosa Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA sequencing Dust particles Flowers & plants Fungi Genetic testing Host plants Identification and classification Leaf blotch Leaves Microbial activity Microbiomes Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Microorganisms Network analysis Nucleotide sequencing Phyllosphere Plant Leaves - chemistry Plant species Plants (botany) Reagents Stomata Structure Taxonomy |
title | Structure vs. chemistry: Alternate mechanisms for controlling leaf microbiomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structure%20vs.%20chemistry:%20Alternate%20mechanisms%20for%20controlling%20leaf%20microbiomes&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lau,%20Kenny%20J%20X&rft.date=2023-03-21&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0275734&rft.epage=e0275734&rft.pages=e0275734-e0275734&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0275734&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA742377154%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789211647&rft_id=info:pmid/36943839&rft_galeid=A742377154&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5713cc912bf9475abb1441c28b96df05&rfr_iscdi=true |