Effects of aspect ratios and vertical loads on in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry walls: A numerical simulation

The in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures is closely related to the aspect ratio of the wall and vertical load. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between the failure mode of the model and the horizontal load using the finite element model (FEM)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0282430-e0282430
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Yukun, Ma, Pengfei, Yao, Jitao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0282430
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0282430
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator Hu, Yukun
Ma, Pengfei
Yao, Jitao
description The in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures is closely related to the aspect ratio of the wall and vertical load. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between the failure mode of the model and the horizontal load using the finite element model (FEM) under the action of aspect ratio (0.50 to 2.00) and vertical load (0.2 MPa to 0.70 MPa). The overall macro model was established using the Abaqus software, and the corresponding simulation was performed. The simulation results indicate that: i) the shear failure and flexural failure were the main failure modes of masonry walls; ii) shear failure could be viewed as the main failure mode of the model when the aspect ratio was less than 1.00; however, the flexural failure was considered to be the main failure mode of the model once the aspect ratio was greater than 1.00; iii) when a vertical load of 0.20 MPa was applied to the model, only flexural failure was observed, regardless of whether the aspect ratio of the model increased or decreased; the flexural shear mixed failure was captured within the range of 0.30 MPa- 0.50 MPa; the shear failure was the main failure mode within the range of 0.60 MPa- 0.70 MPa; and iv) the wall with an aspect ratio less than 1.00 could bear a higher horizontal load, and the increase in vertical load can significantly improve the horizontal load of the wall. In contrast, once the aspect ratio of the wall reaches or exceeds 1.00, the increase in the vertical load has little effect on the increase in the horizontal load of the wall.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0282430
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2781563234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A739277938</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c6708fa9e4c54b66af22aedb6fb9cccf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A739277938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-d013cf6d907ba4bc489f5ce94f753a7285fea810171b489e05badc52e713103c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIHqxaz5mkhkvhKVUXSgU_LoNZzLJbkomWZOZ1d742810t6UrvZBcJCTPeU_ynpyieE7wnDBB3l2GMXpw803weo5pTUuGHxTHpGF0xilmD--sj4onKV1iXLGa88fFEeM1pwKL4-LPmTFaDQkFgyBt8hJFGGxICHyHtjoOVoFDLkCXGY-sn20ceI2Stqm3CrV6DVsb4iQw-qitNyEq3aEeUvDxCv0C59J7tEB-7HW8Vku2H92UxT8tHhlwST_bzyfF949n304_z84vPi1PF-czxUsyzDpMmDK8a7BooWxVWTemUropjagYCFpXRkNNMBGkzWcaVy10qqJaEEYwU-ykeLnT3biQ5N66JKmoScUZZWUmljuiC3ApN9H2EK9kACuvN0JcSZjMcFoqLnBtoNGlqsqWczCUgu5abtpGKWWy1od9trHtdae0HyK4A9HDE2_XchW2smlqLJo6C7zZC8Twc9RpkL1NSrvJ-TDu7s0paSjL6Kt_0Ptft6dWkB8w1SjnVZOoXAjWUCEaNqWd30Pl0elc6vzPjM37BwFvDwIyM-jfwwrGlOTy65f_Zy9-HLKv77BrDW5Yp-DG6cukQ7DcgSqGlKI2tyYTLKc2uXFDTm0i922Sw17cLdBt0E1fsL9xQA_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2781563234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of aspect ratios and vertical loads on in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry walls: A numerical simulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Hu, Yukun ; Ma, Pengfei ; Yao, Jitao</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun ; Ma, Pengfei ; Yao, Jitao</creatorcontrib><description>The in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures is closely related to the aspect ratio of the wall and vertical load. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between the failure mode of the model and the horizontal load using the finite element model (FEM) under the action of aspect ratio (0.50 to 2.00) and vertical load (0.2 MPa to 0.70 MPa). The overall macro model was established using the Abaqus software, and the corresponding simulation was performed. The simulation results indicate that: i) the shear failure and flexural failure were the main failure modes of masonry walls; ii) shear failure could be viewed as the main failure mode of the model when the aspect ratio was less than 1.00; however, the flexural failure was considered to be the main failure mode of the model once the aspect ratio was greater than 1.00; iii) when a vertical load of 0.20 MPa was applied to the model, only flexural failure was observed, regardless of whether the aspect ratio of the model increased or decreased; the flexural shear mixed failure was captured within the range of 0.30 MPa- 0.50 MPa; the shear failure was the main failure mode within the range of 0.60 MPa- 0.70 MPa; and iv) the wall with an aspect ratio less than 1.00 could bear a higher horizontal load, and the increase in vertical load can significantly improve the horizontal load of the wall. In contrast, once the aspect ratio of the wall reaches or exceeds 1.00, the increase in the vertical load has little effect on the increase in the horizontal load of the wall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36862707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aspect ratio ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Construction costs ; Earthquakes ; Engineering and Technology ; Engineering research ; Epoxy resins ; Failure modes ; Finite element method ; Load ; Masonry ; Mathematical models ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Modelling ; Numerical analysis ; Numerical simulations ; Physical Sciences ; Ratios ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Seismic activity ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic response ; Shear ; Shear strength ; Simulation ; Simulation methods ; Software ; Structural failures ; Vertical loads</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0282430-e0282430</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Hu et al 2023 Hu et al</rights><rights>2023 Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-d013cf6d907ba4bc489f5ce94f753a7285fea810171b489e05badc52e713103c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3380-6292</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980798/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980798/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jitao</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of aspect ratios and vertical loads on in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry walls: A numerical simulation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures is closely related to the aspect ratio of the wall and vertical load. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between the failure mode of the model and the horizontal load using the finite element model (FEM) under the action of aspect ratio (0.50 to 2.00) and vertical load (0.2 MPa to 0.70 MPa). The overall macro model was established using the Abaqus software, and the corresponding simulation was performed. The simulation results indicate that: i) the shear failure and flexural failure were the main failure modes of masonry walls; ii) shear failure could be viewed as the main failure mode of the model when the aspect ratio was less than 1.00; however, the flexural failure was considered to be the main failure mode of the model once the aspect ratio was greater than 1.00; iii) when a vertical load of 0.20 MPa was applied to the model, only flexural failure was observed, regardless of whether the aspect ratio of the model increased or decreased; the flexural shear mixed failure was captured within the range of 0.30 MPa- 0.50 MPa; the shear failure was the main failure mode within the range of 0.60 MPa- 0.70 MPa; and iv) the wall with an aspect ratio less than 1.00 could bear a higher horizontal load, and the increase in vertical load can significantly improve the horizontal load of the wall. In contrast, once the aspect ratio of the wall reaches or exceeds 1.00, the increase in the vertical load has little effect on the increase in the horizontal load of the wall.</description><subject>Aspect ratio</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Engineering research</subject><subject>Epoxy resins</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation methods</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Structural failures</subject><subject>Vertical loads</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIHqxaz5mkhkvhKVUXSgU_LoNZzLJbkomWZOZ1d742810t6UrvZBcJCTPeU_ynpyieE7wnDBB3l2GMXpw803weo5pTUuGHxTHpGF0xilmD--sj4onKV1iXLGa88fFEeM1pwKL4-LPmTFaDQkFgyBt8hJFGGxICHyHtjoOVoFDLkCXGY-sn20ceI2Stqm3CrV6DVsb4iQw-qitNyEq3aEeUvDxCv0C59J7tEB-7HW8Vku2H92UxT8tHhlwST_bzyfF949n304_z84vPi1PF-czxUsyzDpMmDK8a7BooWxVWTemUropjagYCFpXRkNNMBGkzWcaVy10qqJaEEYwU-ykeLnT3biQ5N66JKmoScUZZWUmljuiC3ApN9H2EK9kACuvN0JcSZjMcFoqLnBtoNGlqsqWczCUgu5abtpGKWWy1od9trHtdae0HyK4A9HDE2_XchW2smlqLJo6C7zZC8Twc9RpkL1NSrvJ-TDu7s0paSjL6Kt_0Ptft6dWkB8w1SjnVZOoXAjWUCEaNqWd30Pl0elc6vzPjM37BwFvDwIyM-jfwwrGlOTy65f_Zy9-HLKv77BrDW5Yp-DG6cukQ7DcgSqGlKI2tyYTLKc2uXFDTm0i922Sw17cLdBt0E1fsL9xQA_A</recordid><startdate>20230302</startdate><enddate>20230302</enddate><creator>Hu, Yukun</creator><creator>Ma, Pengfei</creator><creator>Yao, Jitao</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3380-6292</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230302</creationdate><title>Effects of aspect ratios and vertical loads on in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry walls: A numerical simulation</title><author>Hu, Yukun ; Ma, Pengfei ; Yao, Jitao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-d013cf6d907ba4bc489f5ce94f753a7285fea810171b489e05badc52e713103c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aspect ratio</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Engineering research</topic><topic>Epoxy resins</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation methods</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Structural failures</topic><topic>Vertical loads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Jitao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Yukun</au><au>Ma, Pengfei</au><au>Yao, Jitao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of aspect ratios and vertical loads on in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry walls: A numerical simulation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-03-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0282430</spage><epage>e0282430</epage><pages>e0282430-e0282430</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures is closely related to the aspect ratio of the wall and vertical load. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between the failure mode of the model and the horizontal load using the finite element model (FEM) under the action of aspect ratio (0.50 to 2.00) and vertical load (0.2 MPa to 0.70 MPa). The overall macro model was established using the Abaqus software, and the corresponding simulation was performed. The simulation results indicate that: i) the shear failure and flexural failure were the main failure modes of masonry walls; ii) shear failure could be viewed as the main failure mode of the model when the aspect ratio was less than 1.00; however, the flexural failure was considered to be the main failure mode of the model once the aspect ratio was greater than 1.00; iii) when a vertical load of 0.20 MPa was applied to the model, only flexural failure was observed, regardless of whether the aspect ratio of the model increased or decreased; the flexural shear mixed failure was captured within the range of 0.30 MPa- 0.50 MPa; the shear failure was the main failure mode within the range of 0.60 MPa- 0.70 MPa; and iv) the wall with an aspect ratio less than 1.00 could bear a higher horizontal load, and the increase in vertical load can significantly improve the horizontal load of the wall. In contrast, once the aspect ratio of the wall reaches or exceeds 1.00, the increase in the vertical load has little effect on the increase in the horizontal load of the wall.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36862707</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0282430</doi><tpages>e0282430</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3380-6292</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-03, Vol.18 (3), p.e0282430-e0282430
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2781563234
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
subjects Aspect ratio
Biology and Life Sciences
Computer and Information Sciences
Computer Simulation
Construction costs
Earthquakes
Engineering and Technology
Engineering research
Epoxy resins
Failure modes
Finite element method
Load
Masonry
Mathematical models
Medicine and Health Sciences
Modelling
Numerical analysis
Numerical simulations
Physical Sciences
Ratios
Research and Analysis Methods
Seismic activity
Seismic engineering
Seismic response
Shear
Shear strength
Simulation
Simulation methods
Software
Structural failures
Vertical loads
title Effects of aspect ratios and vertical loads on in-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry walls: A numerical simulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A24%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20aspect%20ratios%20and%20vertical%20loads%20on%20in-plane%20seismic%20behavior%20of%20unreinforced%20masonry%20walls:%20A%20numerical%20simulation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hu,%20Yukun&rft.date=2023-03-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0282430&rft.epage=e0282430&rft.pages=e0282430-e0282430&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0282430&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA739277938%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2781563234&rft_id=info:pmid/36862707&rft_galeid=A739277938&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c6708fa9e4c54b66af22aedb6fb9cccf&rfr_iscdi=true