First and second wave dynamics of emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study in 3 hospitals in The Netherlands
During certain phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease was observed in emergency department (ED) utilization. Although this phenomenon has been thoroughly characterized for the first wave (FW), second wave (SW) studies are limited. We examined the changes in ED utilization between the FW and SW,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0279105-e0279105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0279105 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0279105 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Dijk, Robi Plaum, Patricia Tummers, Stan van Osch, Frits H M Barten, Dennis G Latten, Gideon H P |
description | During certain phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease was observed in emergency department (ED) utilization. Although this phenomenon has been thoroughly characterized for the first wave (FW), second wave (SW) studies are limited. We examined the changes in ED utilization between the FW and SW, compared to 2019 reference periods.
We performed a retrospective analysis of ED utilization in 3 Dutch hospitals in 2020. The FW and SW (March-June and September-December, respectively) were compared to the reference periods in 2019. ED visits were labeled as (non-)COVID-suspected.
During the FW and SW ED visits decreased by 20.3% and 15.3%, respectively, when compared to reference periods in 2019. During both waves high urgency visits significantly increased with 3.1% and 2.1%, and admission rates (ARs) increased with 5.0% and 10.4%. Trauma related visits decreased by 5.2% and 3.4%. During the SW we observed less COVID-related visits compared to the FW (4,407 vs 3,102 patients). COVID-related visits were significantly more often in higher need of urgent care and ARs were at least 24.0% higher compared to non-COVID visits.
During both COVID-19 waves, ED visits were significantly reduced. ED patients were more often triaged as high urgent, the ED length of stay was longer and ARs were increased compared to the reference period in 2019, reflecting a high burden on ED resources. During the FW, the reduction in ED visits was most pronounced. Here, ARs were also higher and patient were more often triaged as high urgency. These findings stress the need to gain better insight into the motives of patients to delay or avoid emergency care during pandemics, as well as to better prepare EDs for future outbreaks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0279105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2777358701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6e625b8dfcd24cc7a961b693ba4ccc6a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2777358701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-1170324e7818fbe480be1917bbe4a0a84d77933912ff52327ba30eac7353dc703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBY4sJlF38kdswBqVoorFTRS-FqOfZk16skDrZTtPwSfi5eNq1axMkf876PZ8ZTFC8JXhImyLudn8Kgu-XoB1hiKiTB1aPilEhGF5xi9vje_qR4FuMO44rVnD8tThgXshKYnha_L1yICenBogjG5-WnvgFk94PunYnItwh6CBsYzB5ZGHVIPQwJTcl17pdOzg_ITsENG5S2gFZX39cfF0SiMRMhE96jcxQgBR9HMMlldEyT3SM3IIa2-dYl3cXD8Trbv0KGhC574_PiSZsj8GJez4pvF5-uV18Wl1ef16vzy4WpKE8LQgRmtARRk7ptoKxxA0QS0eS9xrourRCSMUlo21aUUdFohkEbwSpmTfaeFa-P3LHzUc1NjYoKkSW1wCQr1keF9XqnxuB6HfbKa6f-XviwUbkrznSgOHBaNbVtjaWlMUJLThouWaPzyXCdWR_m16amB2tyK4PuHkAfRga3VRt_o6RkJcMyA97OgOB_TBCT6l000OWegZ-OeZe4pPxQ2Zt_pP-vrjyqTP6jGKC9S4ZgdRi0W5c6DJqaBy3bXt0v5M50O1nsD26S04E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777358701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>First and second wave dynamics of emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study in 3 hospitals in The Netherlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Dijk, Robi ; Plaum, Patricia ; Tummers, Stan ; van Osch, Frits H M ; Barten, Dennis G ; Latten, Gideon H P</creator><contributor>Kuo, Yong-Hong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Robi ; Plaum, Patricia ; Tummers, Stan ; van Osch, Frits H M ; Barten, Dennis G ; Latten, Gideon H P ; Kuo, Yong-Hong</creatorcontrib><description>During certain phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease was observed in emergency department (ED) utilization. Although this phenomenon has been thoroughly characterized for the first wave (FW), second wave (SW) studies are limited. We examined the changes in ED utilization between the FW and SW, compared to 2019 reference periods.
We performed a retrospective analysis of ED utilization in 3 Dutch hospitals in 2020. The FW and SW (March-June and September-December, respectively) were compared to the reference periods in 2019. ED visits were labeled as (non-)COVID-suspected.
During the FW and SW ED visits decreased by 20.3% and 15.3%, respectively, when compared to reference periods in 2019. During both waves high urgency visits significantly increased with 3.1% and 2.1%, and admission rates (ARs) increased with 5.0% and 10.4%. Trauma related visits decreased by 5.2% and 3.4%. During the SW we observed less COVID-related visits compared to the FW (4,407 vs 3,102 patients). COVID-related visits were significantly more often in higher need of urgent care and ARs were at least 24.0% higher compared to non-COVID visits.
During both COVID-19 waves, ED visits were significantly reduced. ED patients were more often triaged as high urgent, the ED length of stay was longer and ARs were increased compared to the reference period in 2019, reflecting a high burden on ED resources. During the FW, the reduction in ED visits was most pronounced. Here, ARs were also higher and patient were more often triaged as high urgency. These findings stress the need to gain better insight into the motives of patients to delay or avoid emergency care during pandemics, as well as to better prepare EDs for future outbreaks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36795702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; Emergencies ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Engineering and Technology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infections ; Length of stay ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Observational studies ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Trauma ; Utilization</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0279105-e0279105</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Dijk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>2023 Dijk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Dijk et al 2023 Dijk et al</rights><rights>2023 Dijk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-1170324e7818fbe480be1917bbe4a0a84d77933912ff52327ba30eac7353dc703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-1170324e7818fbe480be1917bbe4a0a84d77933912ff52327ba30eac7353dc703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7185-9491 ; 0000-0002-4110-5242 ; 0000-0003-4329-2560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934309/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934309/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2095,2914,23846,27903,27904,53770,53772,79347,79348</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kuo, Yong-Hong</contributor><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Robi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plaum, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tummers, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Osch, Frits H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barten, Dennis G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latten, Gideon H P</creatorcontrib><title>First and second wave dynamics of emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study in 3 hospitals in The Netherlands</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>During certain phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease was observed in emergency department (ED) utilization. Although this phenomenon has been thoroughly characterized for the first wave (FW), second wave (SW) studies are limited. We examined the changes in ED utilization between the FW and SW, compared to 2019 reference periods.
We performed a retrospective analysis of ED utilization in 3 Dutch hospitals in 2020. The FW and SW (March-June and September-December, respectively) were compared to the reference periods in 2019. ED visits were labeled as (non-)COVID-suspected.
During the FW and SW ED visits decreased by 20.3% and 15.3%, respectively, when compared to reference periods in 2019. During both waves high urgency visits significantly increased with 3.1% and 2.1%, and admission rates (ARs) increased with 5.0% and 10.4%. Trauma related visits decreased by 5.2% and 3.4%. During the SW we observed less COVID-related visits compared to the FW (4,407 vs 3,102 patients). COVID-related visits were significantly more often in higher need of urgent care and ARs were at least 24.0% higher compared to non-COVID visits.
During both COVID-19 waves, ED visits were significantly reduced. ED patients were more often triaged as high urgent, the ED length of stay was longer and ARs were increased compared to the reference period in 2019, reflecting a high burden on ED resources. During the FW, the reduction in ED visits was most pronounced. Here, ARs were also higher and patient were more often triaged as high urgency. These findings stress the need to gain better insight into the motives of patients to delay or avoid emergency care during pandemics, as well as to better prepare EDs for future outbreaks.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBY4sJlF38kdswBqVoorFTRS-FqOfZk16skDrZTtPwSfi5eNq1axMkf876PZ8ZTFC8JXhImyLudn8Kgu-XoB1hiKiTB1aPilEhGF5xi9vje_qR4FuMO44rVnD8tThgXshKYnha_L1yICenBogjG5-WnvgFk94PunYnItwh6CBsYzB5ZGHVIPQwJTcl17pdOzg_ITsENG5S2gFZX39cfF0SiMRMhE96jcxQgBR9HMMlldEyT3SM3IIa2-dYl3cXD8Trbv0KGhC574_PiSZsj8GJez4pvF5-uV18Wl1ef16vzy4WpKE8LQgRmtARRk7ptoKxxA0QS0eS9xrourRCSMUlo21aUUdFohkEbwSpmTfaeFa-P3LHzUc1NjYoKkSW1wCQr1keF9XqnxuB6HfbKa6f-XviwUbkrznSgOHBaNbVtjaWlMUJLThouWaPzyXCdWR_m16amB2tyK4PuHkAfRga3VRt_o6RkJcMyA97OgOB_TBCT6l000OWegZ-OeZe4pPxQ2Zt_pP-vrjyqTP6jGKC9S4ZgdRi0W5c6DJqaBy3bXt0v5M50O1nsD26S04E</recordid><startdate>20230216</startdate><enddate>20230216</enddate><creator>Dijk, Robi</creator><creator>Plaum, Patricia</creator><creator>Tummers, Stan</creator><creator>van Osch, Frits H M</creator><creator>Barten, Dennis G</creator><creator>Latten, Gideon H P</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-9491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-5242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-2560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230216</creationdate><title>First and second wave dynamics of emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study in 3 hospitals in The Netherlands</title><author>Dijk, Robi ; Plaum, Patricia ; Tummers, Stan ; van Osch, Frits H M ; Barten, Dennis G ; Latten, Gideon H P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-1170324e7818fbe480be1917bbe4a0a84d77933912ff52327ba30eac7353dc703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dijk, Robi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plaum, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tummers, Stan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Osch, Frits H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barten, Dennis G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latten, Gideon H P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dijk, Robi</au><au>Plaum, Patricia</au><au>Tummers, Stan</au><au>van Osch, Frits H M</au><au>Barten, Dennis G</au><au>Latten, Gideon H P</au><au>Kuo, Yong-Hong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>First and second wave dynamics of emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study in 3 hospitals in The Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-02-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0279105</spage><epage>e0279105</epage><pages>e0279105-e0279105</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>During certain phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease was observed in emergency department (ED) utilization. Although this phenomenon has been thoroughly characterized for the first wave (FW), second wave (SW) studies are limited. We examined the changes in ED utilization between the FW and SW, compared to 2019 reference periods.
We performed a retrospective analysis of ED utilization in 3 Dutch hospitals in 2020. The FW and SW (March-June and September-December, respectively) were compared to the reference periods in 2019. ED visits were labeled as (non-)COVID-suspected.
During the FW and SW ED visits decreased by 20.3% and 15.3%, respectively, when compared to reference periods in 2019. During both waves high urgency visits significantly increased with 3.1% and 2.1%, and admission rates (ARs) increased with 5.0% and 10.4%. Trauma related visits decreased by 5.2% and 3.4%. During the SW we observed less COVID-related visits compared to the FW (4,407 vs 3,102 patients). COVID-related visits were significantly more often in higher need of urgent care and ARs were at least 24.0% higher compared to non-COVID visits.
During both COVID-19 waves, ED visits were significantly reduced. ED patients were more often triaged as high urgent, the ED length of stay was longer and ARs were increased compared to the reference period in 2019, reflecting a high burden on ED resources. During the FW, the reduction in ED visits was most pronounced. Here, ARs were also higher and patient were more often triaged as high urgency. These findings stress the need to gain better insight into the motives of patients to delay or avoid emergency care during pandemics, as well as to better prepare EDs for future outbreaks.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36795702</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0279105</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-9491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-5242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-2560</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0279105-e0279105 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2777358701 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology Emergencies Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital Engineering and Technology Hospitals Humans Infections Length of stay Medicine and Health Sciences Netherlands - epidemiology Observational studies Pandemics Patients Retrospective Studies Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Trauma Utilization |
title | First and second wave dynamics of emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study in 3 hospitals in The Netherlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A54%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=First%20and%20second%20wave%20dynamics%20of%20emergency%20department%20utilization%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20in%203%20hospitals%20in%20The%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Dijk,%20Robi&rft.date=2023-02-16&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0279105&rft.epage=e0279105&rft.pages=e0279105-e0279105&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0279105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E2777358701%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777358701&rft_id=info:pmid/36795702&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6e625b8dfcd24cc7a961b693ba4ccc6a&rfr_iscdi=true |