Should my automated car drive as I do? Investigating speed preferences of drivengers in various driving conditions
Studies investigating the question of how automated cars (ACs) should drive converge to show that a personalized automated driving-style, i.e., mimicking the driving-style of the human behind the wheel, has a positive influence on various aspects of his experience (e.g., comfort). However, few studi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0281702-e0281702 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0281702 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0281702 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Delmas, Maxime Camps, Valérie Lemercier, Céline |
description | Studies investigating the question of how automated cars (ACs) should drive converge to show that a personalized automated driving-style, i.e., mimicking the driving-style of the human behind the wheel, has a positive influence on various aspects of his experience (e.g., comfort). However, few studies have investigated the fact that these benefits might vary with respect to driver-related variables, such as trust in ACs, and contextual variables of the driving activity, such as weather conditions. Additionally, the context of intermediate levels of automation, such as SAE level 3, remains largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate these points. In a scenario-based experimental protocol, participants were exposed to written scenarios in which a character is driven by a SAE level 3 AC in different combinations of conditions (i.e., types of roads, weather conditions and traffic congestion levels). For each condition, participants were asked to indicate how fast they would prefer their AC to drive and how fast they would manually drive in the same situation. Through analyses of variance and equivalence tests, results showed a tendency for participants to overall prefer a slightly lower AC speed than their own. However, a linear regression analysis showed that while participants with the lowest levels of trust preferred an AC speed lower than theirs, those with the highest levels preferred an AC speed nearly identical to theirs. Overall, the results of this study suggest that it would be more beneficial to implement a personalization approach for the design of automated driving-styles rather than a one for all approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0281702 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2774826046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A736413271</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0eb7cebd1f4541f89fc4650949e6e814</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A736413271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-86bd46cdfed1323c7c927fedbbf40fb5ee36c4e1221274b610baf5a6163a2e393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkLsosVfsZMbUDUBq1RpEgNuLcc5ST0ldmcnFfv3OG03NdMuUC6cHD_ve-JzfJLkLUZzTAX-fOMGb1U73zgLc0RyLBB5lpzigpIZJ4g-P3o_SV6FcINQRnPOXyYnlIssR1l-mvjrtRvaKu3uUjX0rlM9VKlWPq282UKqQrpMK_c1XdothN40qje2ScMGIrbxUIMHqyGkrt4rbAM-pMamW-WNG8IuOkq0s5XpjbPhdfKiVm2AN4f1LPn9_duvi8vZ6urH8mKxmmlBeD_LeVkxrqsaKkwJ1UIXRMSPsqwZqssMgHLNABOCiWAlx6hUdaY45lQRoAU9S97vfTetC_JQriCJECwnHDEeieWeqJy6kRtvOuXvpFNG7gLON1L53ugWJIJSaCgrXLOM4Tovas14hgpWAIccs-j15ZBtKDuoNNjeq3ZiOt2xZi0bt5VFgZHYGZzvDdaPZJeLlRxjiBY5yRja4sh-OiTz7naIjZGdCRraVlmIRd-fscgZohH98Ah9uhIHqlHxsMbWLv6jHk3lQlDOYgfEmHb-BBWfCjoTGwy1ifGJ4HwiiEwPf_tGDSHI5fXP_2ev_kzZj0fsGlTbr4Nrh939moJsD2rvQoj39aGyGMlxjO6rIccxkocxirJ3x818EN3PDf0HPzoYLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774826046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should my automated car drive as I do? Investigating speed preferences of drivengers in various driving conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Delmas, Maxime ; Camps, Valérie ; Lemercier, Céline</creator><creatorcontrib>Delmas, Maxime ; Camps, Valérie ; Lemercier, Céline</creatorcontrib><description>Studies investigating the question of how automated cars (ACs) should drive converge to show that a personalized automated driving-style, i.e., mimicking the driving-style of the human behind the wheel, has a positive influence on various aspects of his experience (e.g., comfort). However, few studies have investigated the fact that these benefits might vary with respect to driver-related variables, such as trust in ACs, and contextual variables of the driving activity, such as weather conditions. Additionally, the context of intermediate levels of automation, such as SAE level 3, remains largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate these points. In a scenario-based experimental protocol, participants were exposed to written scenarios in which a character is driven by a SAE level 3 AC in different combinations of conditions (i.e., types of roads, weather conditions and traffic congestion levels). For each condition, participants were asked to indicate how fast they would prefer their AC to drive and how fast they would manually drive in the same situation. Through analyses of variance and equivalence tests, results showed a tendency for participants to overall prefer a slightly lower AC speed than their own. However, a linear regression analysis showed that while participants with the lowest levels of trust preferred an AC speed lower than theirs, those with the highest levels preferred an AC speed nearly identical to theirs. Overall, the results of this study suggest that it would be more beneficial to implement a personalization approach for the design of automated driving-styles rather than a one for all approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281702</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36758058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control ; Automation ; Automobile Driving ; Automobiles ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cognitive science ; Computer Science ; Customization ; Driverless cars ; Driving ability ; Driving conditions ; Engineering and Technology ; Evaluation ; Humans ; Mechanization ; Physical Sciences ; Psychology ; Regression analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Social Sciences ; Technology application ; Traffic congestion ; Traffic safety ; Trust ; Variance analysis ; Vehicles ; Weather ; Weather conditions</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0281702-e0281702</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Delmas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Delmas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><rights>2023 Delmas et al 2023 Delmas et al</rights><rights>2023 Delmas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-86bd46cdfed1323c7c927fedbbf40fb5ee36c4e1221274b610baf5a6163a2e393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-86bd46cdfed1323c7c927fedbbf40fb5ee36c4e1221274b610baf5a6163a2e393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2832-8724 ; 0000-0002-8109-1113 ; 0000-0002-4768-2710</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910714/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910714/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36758058$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03982540$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delmas, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camps, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemercier, Céline</creatorcontrib><title>Should my automated car drive as I do? Investigating speed preferences of drivengers in various driving conditions</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Studies investigating the question of how automated cars (ACs) should drive converge to show that a personalized automated driving-style, i.e., mimicking the driving-style of the human behind the wheel, has a positive influence on various aspects of his experience (e.g., comfort). However, few studies have investigated the fact that these benefits might vary with respect to driver-related variables, such as trust in ACs, and contextual variables of the driving activity, such as weather conditions. Additionally, the context of intermediate levels of automation, such as SAE level 3, remains largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate these points. In a scenario-based experimental protocol, participants were exposed to written scenarios in which a character is driven by a SAE level 3 AC in different combinations of conditions (i.e., types of roads, weather conditions and traffic congestion levels). For each condition, participants were asked to indicate how fast they would prefer their AC to drive and how fast they would manually drive in the same situation. Through analyses of variance and equivalence tests, results showed a tendency for participants to overall prefer a slightly lower AC speed than their own. However, a linear regression analysis showed that while participants with the lowest levels of trust preferred an AC speed lower than theirs, those with the highest levels preferred an AC speed nearly identical to theirs. Overall, the results of this study suggest that it would be more beneficial to implement a personalization approach for the design of automated driving-styles rather than a one for all approach.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Automobile Driving</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Driverless cars</subject><subject>Driving ability</subject><subject>Driving conditions</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mechanization</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Traffic congestion</subject><subject>Traffic safety</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather conditions</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkLsosVfsZMbUDUBq1RpEgNuLcc5ST0ldmcnFfv3OG03NdMuUC6cHD_ve-JzfJLkLUZzTAX-fOMGb1U73zgLc0RyLBB5lpzigpIZJ4g-P3o_SV6FcINQRnPOXyYnlIssR1l-mvjrtRvaKu3uUjX0rlM9VKlWPq282UKqQrpMK_c1XdothN40qje2ScMGIrbxUIMHqyGkrt4rbAM-pMamW-WNG8IuOkq0s5XpjbPhdfKiVm2AN4f1LPn9_duvi8vZ6urH8mKxmmlBeD_LeVkxrqsaKkwJ1UIXRMSPsqwZqssMgHLNABOCiWAlx6hUdaY45lQRoAU9S97vfTetC_JQriCJECwnHDEeieWeqJy6kRtvOuXvpFNG7gLON1L53ugWJIJSaCgrXLOM4Tovas14hgpWAIccs-j15ZBtKDuoNNjeq3ZiOt2xZi0bt5VFgZHYGZzvDdaPZJeLlRxjiBY5yRja4sh-OiTz7naIjZGdCRraVlmIRd-fscgZohH98Ah9uhIHqlHxsMbWLv6jHk3lQlDOYgfEmHb-BBWfCjoTGwy1ifGJ4HwiiEwPf_tGDSHI5fXP_2ev_kzZj0fsGlTbr4Nrh939moJsD2rvQoj39aGyGMlxjO6rIccxkocxirJ3x818EN3PDf0HPzoYLA</recordid><startdate>20230209</startdate><enddate>20230209</enddate><creator>Delmas, Maxime</creator><creator>Camps, Valérie</creator><creator>Lemercier, Céline</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-8724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-1113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4768-2710</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230209</creationdate><title>Should my automated car drive as I do? Investigating speed preferences of drivengers in various driving conditions</title><author>Delmas, Maxime ; Camps, Valérie ; Lemercier, Céline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-86bd46cdfed1323c7c927fedbbf40fb5ee36c4e1221274b610baf5a6163a2e393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Automobile Driving</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Driverless cars</topic><topic>Driving ability</topic><topic>Driving conditions</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mechanization</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Traffic congestion</topic><topic>Traffic safety</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delmas, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camps, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemercier, Céline</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delmas, Maxime</au><au>Camps, Valérie</au><au>Lemercier, Céline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should my automated car drive as I do? Investigating speed preferences of drivengers in various driving conditions</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-02-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0281702</spage><epage>e0281702</epage><pages>e0281702-e0281702</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Studies investigating the question of how automated cars (ACs) should drive converge to show that a personalized automated driving-style, i.e., mimicking the driving-style of the human behind the wheel, has a positive influence on various aspects of his experience (e.g., comfort). However, few studies have investigated the fact that these benefits might vary with respect to driver-related variables, such as trust in ACs, and contextual variables of the driving activity, such as weather conditions. Additionally, the context of intermediate levels of automation, such as SAE level 3, remains largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate these points. In a scenario-based experimental protocol, participants were exposed to written scenarios in which a character is driven by a SAE level 3 AC in different combinations of conditions (i.e., types of roads, weather conditions and traffic congestion levels). For each condition, participants were asked to indicate how fast they would prefer their AC to drive and how fast they would manually drive in the same situation. Through analyses of variance and equivalence tests, results showed a tendency for participants to overall prefer a slightly lower AC speed than their own. However, a linear regression analysis showed that while participants with the lowest levels of trust preferred an AC speed lower than theirs, those with the highest levels preferred an AC speed nearly identical to theirs. Overall, the results of this study suggest that it would be more beneficial to implement a personalization approach for the design of automated driving-styles rather than a one for all approach.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36758058</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0281702</doi><tpages>e0281702</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2832-8724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-1113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4768-2710</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0281702-e0281702 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2774826046 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control Automation Automobile Driving Automobiles Biology and Life Sciences Cognitive science Computer Science Customization Driverless cars Driving ability Driving conditions Engineering and Technology Evaluation Humans Mechanization Physical Sciences Psychology Regression analysis Research and Analysis Methods Social Sciences Technology application Traffic congestion Traffic safety Trust Variance analysis Vehicles Weather Weather conditions |
title | Should my automated car drive as I do? Investigating speed preferences of drivengers in various driving conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T10%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20my%20automated%20car%20drive%20as%20I%20do?%20Investigating%20speed%20preferences%20of%20drivengers%20in%20various%20driving%20conditions&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Delmas,%20Maxime&rft.date=2023-02-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0281702&rft.epage=e0281702&rft.pages=e0281702-e0281702&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0281702&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA736413271%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774826046&rft_id=info:pmid/36758058&rft_galeid=A736413271&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0eb7cebd1f4541f89fc4650949e6e814&rfr_iscdi=true |