The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya
Despite Kenya's encouraging progress in increasing access to modern contraception among youth, several barriers remain preventing large-scale efforts to reduce demand-side unmet need for family planning. Shifting social norms around the use and acceptability of modern contraception may represen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0275824-e0275824 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0275824 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e0275824 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Lahiri, Shaon Bingenheimer, Jeffrey Sedlander, Erica Munar, Wolfgang Rimal, Rajiv |
description | Despite Kenya's encouraging progress in increasing access to modern contraception among youth, several barriers remain preventing large-scale efforts to reduce demand-side unmet need for family planning. Shifting social norms around the use and acceptability of modern contraception may represent a potent target for future interventions. However, the structure of normative influence on individual modern contraceptive use among youth needs to be determined. Therefore, our aim was to estimate the influence of individual and group-level normative influence on modern contraceptive use among adolescents from two villages in rural Kenya.
Trained enumerators collected data from individuals aged 15-24 who provided oral informed consent, or parental informed consent, in two villages in rural Kilifi county. Participants completed a questionnaire related to modern contraceptive use and were asked to nominate one to five people (referents) with whom they spend free time. The enumerators photographed each individual who nominated at least one referent using Android phones and matched them with their nominated referents. Using this social network data, we estimated group-level normative influence by taking an average of referents' modern contraception use. We then explored associations between descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and network modern contraceptive use on individual modern contraceptive use, controlling for known confounders using logistic regression models. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to test a pattern of differential referent influence on individual modern contraceptive use.
There was a positive association between pro-modern contraception descriptive and injunctive norms and individual modern contraception use (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.6, and aOR = 1.31, CI = 1.06-1.62, respectively). Network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual use in the bivariate model (aOR = 2.57, CI = 1.6-4.12), but not in the multivariable model (aOR = 1.67, CI = 0.98-2.87). When stratified by sex and marital status, network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual modern contraceptive use among female participants (aOR = 2.9, CI = 1.31-6.42), and unmarried female participants (aOR = 5.26, CI = 1.34-20.69), but not among males. No interactive effects between norms variables were detected. Sensitivity analyses with a different estimate of network modern contraceptive use showed similar result |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0275824 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2771911076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A735606399</galeid><sourcerecordid>A735606399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-bb8b13696778f53de306087af52155f8b7e93dafe86ed7b7f02306e1e574e8f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIArumkwmyeRGKMWP0kJBV29DZuZkNyWTbJMZcf-9GTotu9ILyUVCznPec_LmFMVLgpeECvLxOozRa7fcBg9LXApWl9Wj4phIWi54ienjvfNR8Syla4wZrTl_WhxRLiimpTwuVqsNoBgcoGBQCq3VDvkQ-4SCR7rLgdSCH5DRvXU7tHXae-vXyHoUx5jhC-ussagNox92H9AF-J1-Xjwx2iV4Me8nxc8vn1dn3xaXV1_Pz04vFy0TbFg0Td0QyiUXojaMdkAxx7XQhpWEMVM3AiTttIGaQycaYXCZCSDARAW1EfSkeH2ru3UhqdmQpEohiCQEC56JTzMxNj1001Ny02obba_jTgVt1WHE241ah99K1rKqyioLvJsFYrgZIQ2qt9kRl32AMM61KirxhL75B324o5laawfKehNy3XYSVaeCMo45lTJTyweovDrobZt_3Nh8f5Dw_iAhMwP8GdZ6TEmd__j-_-zVr0P27R67Ae2GTQpuHGzw6RCsbsE2hpQimHuTCVbTwN65oaaBVfPA5rRX-x90n3Q3ofQv3WflTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771911076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lahiri, Shaon ; Bingenheimer, Jeffrey ; Sedlander, Erica ; Munar, Wolfgang ; Rimal, Rajiv</creator><contributor>Ummarino, Dario</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lahiri, Shaon ; Bingenheimer, Jeffrey ; Sedlander, Erica ; Munar, Wolfgang ; Rimal, Rajiv ; Ummarino, Dario</creatorcontrib><description>Despite Kenya's encouraging progress in increasing access to modern contraception among youth, several barriers remain preventing large-scale efforts to reduce demand-side unmet need for family planning. Shifting social norms around the use and acceptability of modern contraception may represent a potent target for future interventions. However, the structure of normative influence on individual modern contraceptive use among youth needs to be determined. Therefore, our aim was to estimate the influence of individual and group-level normative influence on modern contraceptive use among adolescents from two villages in rural Kenya.
Trained enumerators collected data from individuals aged 15-24 who provided oral informed consent, or parental informed consent, in two villages in rural Kilifi county. Participants completed a questionnaire related to modern contraceptive use and were asked to nominate one to five people (referents) with whom they spend free time. The enumerators photographed each individual who nominated at least one referent using Android phones and matched them with their nominated referents. Using this social network data, we estimated group-level normative influence by taking an average of referents' modern contraception use. We then explored associations between descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and network modern contraceptive use on individual modern contraceptive use, controlling for known confounders using logistic regression models. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to test a pattern of differential referent influence on individual modern contraceptive use.
There was a positive association between pro-modern contraception descriptive and injunctive norms and individual modern contraception use (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.6, and aOR = 1.31, CI = 1.06-1.62, respectively). Network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual use in the bivariate model (aOR = 2.57, CI = 1.6-4.12), but not in the multivariable model (aOR = 1.67, CI = 0.98-2.87). When stratified by sex and marital status, network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual modern contraceptive use among female participants (aOR = 2.9, CI = 1.31-6.42), and unmarried female participants (aOR = 5.26, CI = 1.34-20.69), but not among males. No interactive effects between norms variables were detected. Sensitivity analyses with a different estimate of network modern contraceptive use showed similar results.
Social norms are multilevel phenomena that influence youth modern contraceptive use, especially among young women in rural Kenya. Unmarried women with modern contraceptive users in their social network may feel less stigma to use contraception themselves. This may reflect gendered differences in norms and social influence effects for modern contraceptive use. Future research should investigate group-level normative influence in relation to family planning behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275824</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36730329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescence ; Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Behavior ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth control ; Bivariate analysis ; Children & youth ; Confidence intervals ; Consent ; Contraception ; Contraception Behavior ; Contraceptive Agents ; Contraceptives ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Data collection ; Demographic aspects ; Engineering and Technology ; Evaluation ; Family ; Family planning ; Family Planning Services ; Female ; Fertility ; Girls ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Infertility ; Influence ; Informed consent ; Kenya ; Male ; Marriage ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methyltestosterone ; Norms ; Pandemics ; People and Places ; Perceptions ; Pregnancy ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Reproductive health ; School dropouts ; Sensitivity analysis ; Smartphones ; Social aspects ; Social networks ; Social Norms ; Social organization ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Teenagers ; Villages ; Women ; Womens health ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0275824-e0275824</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Lahiri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Lahiri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Lahiri et al 2023 Lahiri et al</rights><rights>2023 Lahiri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-bb8b13696778f53de306087af52155f8b7e93dafe86ed7b7f02306e1e574e8f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9797-9566</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894424/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894424/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36730329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ummarino, Dario</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lahiri, Shaon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingenheimer, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedlander, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munar, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimal, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><title>The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Despite Kenya's encouraging progress in increasing access to modern contraception among youth, several barriers remain preventing large-scale efforts to reduce demand-side unmet need for family planning. Shifting social norms around the use and acceptability of modern contraception may represent a potent target for future interventions. However, the structure of normative influence on individual modern contraceptive use among youth needs to be determined. Therefore, our aim was to estimate the influence of individual and group-level normative influence on modern contraceptive use among adolescents from two villages in rural Kenya.
Trained enumerators collected data from individuals aged 15-24 who provided oral informed consent, or parental informed consent, in two villages in rural Kilifi county. Participants completed a questionnaire related to modern contraceptive use and were asked to nominate one to five people (referents) with whom they spend free time. The enumerators photographed each individual who nominated at least one referent using Android phones and matched them with their nominated referents. Using this social network data, we estimated group-level normative influence by taking an average of referents' modern contraception use. We then explored associations between descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and network modern contraceptive use on individual modern contraceptive use, controlling for known confounders using logistic regression models. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to test a pattern of differential referent influence on individual modern contraceptive use.
There was a positive association between pro-modern contraception descriptive and injunctive norms and individual modern contraception use (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.6, and aOR = 1.31, CI = 1.06-1.62, respectively). Network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual use in the bivariate model (aOR = 2.57, CI = 1.6-4.12), but not in the multivariable model (aOR = 1.67, CI = 0.98-2.87). When stratified by sex and marital status, network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual modern contraceptive use among female participants (aOR = 2.9, CI = 1.31-6.42), and unmarried female participants (aOR = 5.26, CI = 1.34-20.69), but not among males. No interactive effects between norms variables were detected. Sensitivity analyses with a different estimate of network modern contraceptive use showed similar results.
Social norms are multilevel phenomena that influence youth modern contraceptive use, especially among young women in rural Kenya. Unmarried women with modern contraceptive users in their social network may feel less stigma to use contraception themselves. This may reflect gendered differences in norms and social influence effects for modern contraceptive use. Future research should investigate group-level normative influence in relation to family planning behaviors.</description><subject>Adolescence</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior</subject><subject>Contraceptive Agents</subject><subject>Contraceptives</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Family Planning Services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Girls</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methyltestosterone</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>School dropouts</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Norms</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GAIArumkwmyeRGKMWP0kJBV29DZuZkNyWTbJMZcf-9GTotu9ILyUVCznPec_LmFMVLgpeECvLxOozRa7fcBg9LXApWl9Wj4phIWi54ienjvfNR8Syla4wZrTl_WhxRLiimpTwuVqsNoBgcoGBQCq3VDvkQ-4SCR7rLgdSCH5DRvXU7tHXae-vXyHoUx5jhC-ussagNox92H9AF-J1-Xjwx2iV4Me8nxc8vn1dn3xaXV1_Pz04vFy0TbFg0Td0QyiUXojaMdkAxx7XQhpWEMVM3AiTttIGaQycaYXCZCSDARAW1EfSkeH2ru3UhqdmQpEohiCQEC56JTzMxNj1001Ny02obba_jTgVt1WHE241ah99K1rKqyioLvJsFYrgZIQ2qt9kRl32AMM61KirxhL75B324o5laawfKehNy3XYSVaeCMo45lTJTyweovDrobZt_3Nh8f5Dw_iAhMwP8GdZ6TEmd__j-_-zVr0P27R67Ae2GTQpuHGzw6RCsbsE2hpQimHuTCVbTwN65oaaBVfPA5rRX-x90n3Q3ofQv3WflTA</recordid><startdate>20230202</startdate><enddate>20230202</enddate><creator>Lahiri, Shaon</creator><creator>Bingenheimer, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Sedlander, Erica</creator><creator>Munar, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Rimal, Rajiv</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9797-9566</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230202</creationdate><title>The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya</title><author>Lahiri, Shaon ; Bingenheimer, Jeffrey ; Sedlander, Erica ; Munar, Wolfgang ; Rimal, Rajiv</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-bb8b13696778f53de306087af52155f8b7e93dafe86ed7b7f02306e1e574e8f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescence</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior</topic><topic>Contraceptive Agents</topic><topic>Contraceptives</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Family Planning Services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Girls</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methyltestosterone</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>School dropouts</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Norms</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lahiri, Shaon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingenheimer, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedlander, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munar, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimal, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lahiri, Shaon</au><au>Bingenheimer, Jeffrey</au><au>Sedlander, Erica</au><au>Munar, Wolfgang</au><au>Rimal, Rajiv</au><au>Ummarino, Dario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-02-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e0275824</spage><epage>e0275824</epage><pages>e0275824-e0275824</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Despite Kenya's encouraging progress in increasing access to modern contraception among youth, several barriers remain preventing large-scale efforts to reduce demand-side unmet need for family planning. Shifting social norms around the use and acceptability of modern contraception may represent a potent target for future interventions. However, the structure of normative influence on individual modern contraceptive use among youth needs to be determined. Therefore, our aim was to estimate the influence of individual and group-level normative influence on modern contraceptive use among adolescents from two villages in rural Kenya.
Trained enumerators collected data from individuals aged 15-24 who provided oral informed consent, or parental informed consent, in two villages in rural Kilifi county. Participants completed a questionnaire related to modern contraceptive use and were asked to nominate one to five people (referents) with whom they spend free time. The enumerators photographed each individual who nominated at least one referent using Android phones and matched them with their nominated referents. Using this social network data, we estimated group-level normative influence by taking an average of referents' modern contraception use. We then explored associations between descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and network modern contraceptive use on individual modern contraceptive use, controlling for known confounders using logistic regression models. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to test a pattern of differential referent influence on individual modern contraceptive use.
There was a positive association between pro-modern contraception descriptive and injunctive norms and individual modern contraception use (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.6, and aOR = 1.31, CI = 1.06-1.62, respectively). Network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual use in the bivariate model (aOR = 2.57, CI = 1.6-4.12), but not in the multivariable model (aOR = 1.67, CI = 0.98-2.87). When stratified by sex and marital status, network modern contraceptive use was associated with individual modern contraceptive use among female participants (aOR = 2.9, CI = 1.31-6.42), and unmarried female participants (aOR = 5.26, CI = 1.34-20.69), but not among males. No interactive effects between norms variables were detected. Sensitivity analyses with a different estimate of network modern contraceptive use showed similar results.
Social norms are multilevel phenomena that influence youth modern contraceptive use, especially among young women in rural Kenya. Unmarried women with modern contraceptive users in their social network may feel less stigma to use contraception themselves. This may reflect gendered differences in norms and social influence effects for modern contraceptive use. Future research should investigate group-level normative influence in relation to family planning behaviors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36730329</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0275824</doi><tpages>e0275824</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9797-9566</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-02, Vol.18 (2), p.e0275824-e0275824 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2771911076 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Adolescence Adolescent Adolescents Behavior Biology and Life Sciences Birth control Bivariate analysis Children & youth Confidence intervals Consent Contraception Contraception Behavior Contraceptive Agents Contraceptives Coronaviruses COVID-19 Data collection Demographic aspects Engineering and Technology Evaluation Family Family planning Family Planning Services Female Fertility Girls Health aspects Humans Infertility Influence Informed consent Kenya Male Marriage Medical research Medicine and Health Sciences Methyltestosterone Norms Pandemics People and Places Perceptions Pregnancy Regression analysis Regression models Reproductive health School dropouts Sensitivity analysis Smartphones Social aspects Social networks Social Norms Social organization Social Sciences Statistical analysis Teenagers Villages Women Womens health Young adults |
title | The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T17%3A05%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20social%20norms%20on%20adolescent%20family%20planning%20in%20rural%20Kilifi%20county,%20Kenya&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lahiri,%20Shaon&rft.date=2023-02-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e0275824&rft.epage=e0275824&rft.pages=e0275824-e0275824&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0275824&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA735606399%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771911076&rft_id=info:pmid/36730329&rft_galeid=A735606399&rfr_iscdi=true |