Occurrence, fate, and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical pharmaceutical manufactories and receiving water bodies from different regions
This study aimed to investigate the presence and persistence of antibiotics in wastewater of four typical pharmaceutical manufactories in China and receiving water bodies and suggest the removal of antibiotics by the wastewater treatment process. It also evaluated the environmental impact of antibio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0270945 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0270945 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Liu, Yuanfei Cai, Dan Li, Xin Wu, Qingyao Ding, Ping Shen, Liangchen Yang, Jian Hu, Guocheng Wu, Jinhua Zhang, Lijuan |
description | This study aimed to investigate the presence and persistence of antibiotics in wastewater of four typical pharmaceutical manufactories in China and receiving water bodies and suggest the removal of antibiotics by the wastewater treatment process. It also evaluated the environmental impact of antibiotic residues through wastewater discharge into receiving water bodies. The results indicated that thirteen antibiotics were detected in wastewater samples with concentrations ranging from 57.03 to 726.79 ng/L. Fluoroquinolones and macrolides were the most abundant antibiotic classes found in wastewater samples, accounting for 42.5% and 38.7% of total antibiotic concentrations, respectively, followed by sulfonamides (16.4%) and tetracyclines (2.4%). Erythromycin-H2O, lincomycin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim were the most frequently detected antibiotics; among these antibiotics, the concentration of ofloxacin was the highest in most wastewater samples. No significant difference was found in different treatment processes used to remove antibiotics in wastewater samples. More than 50% of antibiotics were not completely removed with a removal efficiency of less than 70%. The concentration of detected antibiotics in the receiving water bodies was an order of magnitude lower than that in the wastewater sample due to dilution. An environmental risk assessment showed that lincomycin and ofloxacin could pose a high risk at the concentrations detected in effluents and a medium risk in their receiving water bodies, highlighting a potential hazard to the health of the aquatic ecosystem. Overall, The investigation was aimed to determine and monitor the concentration of selected antibiotics in 4 typical PMFs and their receiving water bodies, and to study the removal of these substances in PMFs. This study will provide significant data and findings for future studies on antibiotics-related pollution control and management in water bodies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0270945 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2767425016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A733942846</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a1ae6328344547df983ad53b344b6ee9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A733942846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bccfd6e45fb9e80e7f8889e443ebf05245d082c995552cc2ebe95948284e374e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgiC4a5unJm-E4_Bh4WDBp7chTSe7WdtmTdLT-xJ-ZtPb3rEFBSltmslv_pkZZrLsaVksS1yVb3Zu8L1ql3vXw7JAVSEIvZedlgKjBUMFvn_0f5I9CmFXFBRzxh5mJ5gxhpioTrPfa60H76HX8Do3Kqav6pvc2_A9VyFACB30MXcmmaOtrYtWh9z2ebzeW63afL9VvlMahniz7VQ_GKWj8xbCQQo02Cvbb_KfSd7ntWvGI-NdlzfWGPDjBR421vXhcfbAqDbAk2k9y76-f_fl4uPicv1hdXF-udBMoLiotTYNA0JNLYAXUBnOuQBCMNSmoIjQpuBIC0EpRVojqEFQQTjiBHCV3rPs-UF337ogp1IGiSpWEUSLkiVidSAap3Zy722n_LV0ysobg_MbqXzKuQWpSgUMI44JoaRqjOBYNRTXaV8zAJG03k63DXUHjU4Je9XOROcnvd3KjbuSglOO6RjMi0nAux8DhPiPkCdqo1JUtjcuienOBi3PK4wFSemP1PIvVHoa6KxOzWRsss8cXs0cEhPhV9yoIQS5-vzp_9n1tzn78ojdgmrjNrg2NVJqhDlIDqD2LgQP5q5yZSHHWbithhxnQU6zkNyeHVf9zum2-fEfc24Hew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767425016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Occurrence, fate, and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical pharmaceutical manufactories and receiving water bodies from different regions</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Liu, Yuanfei ; Cai, Dan ; Li, Xin ; Wu, Qingyao ; Ding, Ping ; Shen, Liangchen ; Yang, Jian ; Hu, Guocheng ; Wu, Jinhua ; Zhang, Lijuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuanfei ; Cai, Dan ; Li, Xin ; Wu, Qingyao ; Ding, Ping ; Shen, Liangchen ; Yang, Jian ; Hu, Guocheng ; Wu, Jinhua ; Zhang, Lijuan</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to investigate the presence and persistence of antibiotics in wastewater of four typical pharmaceutical manufactories in China and receiving water bodies and suggest the removal of antibiotics by the wastewater treatment process. It also evaluated the environmental impact of antibiotic residues through wastewater discharge into receiving water bodies. The results indicated that thirteen antibiotics were detected in wastewater samples with concentrations ranging from 57.03 to 726.79 ng/L. Fluoroquinolones and macrolides were the most abundant antibiotic classes found in wastewater samples, accounting for 42.5% and 38.7% of total antibiotic concentrations, respectively, followed by sulfonamides (16.4%) and tetracyclines (2.4%). Erythromycin-H2O, lincomycin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim were the most frequently detected antibiotics; among these antibiotics, the concentration of ofloxacin was the highest in most wastewater samples. No significant difference was found in different treatment processes used to remove antibiotics in wastewater samples. More than 50% of antibiotics were not completely removed with a removal efficiency of less than 70%. The concentration of detected antibiotics in the receiving water bodies was an order of magnitude lower than that in the wastewater sample due to dilution. An environmental risk assessment showed that lincomycin and ofloxacin could pose a high risk at the concentrations detected in effluents and a medium risk in their receiving water bodies, highlighting a potential hazard to the health of the aquatic ecosystem. Overall, The investigation was aimed to determine and monitor the concentration of selected antibiotics in 4 typical PMFs and their receiving water bodies, and to study the removal of these substances in PMFs. This study will provide significant data and findings for future studies on antibiotics-related pollution control and management in water bodies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270945</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36662697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis ; Antibiotics ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Biology and Life Sciences ; China ; Chromatography ; Composition ; Dilution ; Drug resistance ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem ; Effluents ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental risk ; Erythromycin ; Fluoroquinolones ; Health risks ; Lincomycin ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Ofloxacin ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pollution control ; Purification ; R&D ; Receiving waters ; Research & development ; Risk Assessment ; Rivers ; Sewage ; Sulfonamides ; Surface water ; Tetracyclines ; Trimethoprim ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Wastewater ; Wastewater dilution ; Wastewater discharges ; Wastewater treatment ; Water ; Water discharge ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water pollution ; Water sampling ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0270945</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Liu et al 2023 Liu et al</rights><rights>2023 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bccfd6e45fb9e80e7f8889e443ebf05245d082c995552cc2ebe95948284e374e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bccfd6e45fb9e80e7f8889e443ebf05245d082c995552cc2ebe95948284e374e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2137-459X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858356/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9858356/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36662697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuanfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qingyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Liangchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guocheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jinhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lijuan</creatorcontrib><title>Occurrence, fate, and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical pharmaceutical manufactories and receiving water bodies from different regions</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>This study aimed to investigate the presence and persistence of antibiotics in wastewater of four typical pharmaceutical manufactories in China and receiving water bodies and suggest the removal of antibiotics by the wastewater treatment process. It also evaluated the environmental impact of antibiotic residues through wastewater discharge into receiving water bodies. The results indicated that thirteen antibiotics were detected in wastewater samples with concentrations ranging from 57.03 to 726.79 ng/L. Fluoroquinolones and macrolides were the most abundant antibiotic classes found in wastewater samples, accounting for 42.5% and 38.7% of total antibiotic concentrations, respectively, followed by sulfonamides (16.4%) and tetracyclines (2.4%). Erythromycin-H2O, lincomycin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim were the most frequently detected antibiotics; among these antibiotics, the concentration of ofloxacin was the highest in most wastewater samples. No significant difference was found in different treatment processes used to remove antibiotics in wastewater samples. More than 50% of antibiotics were not completely removed with a removal efficiency of less than 70%. The concentration of detected antibiotics in the receiving water bodies was an order of magnitude lower than that in the wastewater sample due to dilution. An environmental risk assessment showed that lincomycin and ofloxacin could pose a high risk at the concentrations detected in effluents and a medium risk in their receiving water bodies, highlighting a potential hazard to the health of the aquatic ecosystem. Overall, The investigation was aimed to determine and monitor the concentration of selected antibiotics in 4 typical PMFs and their receiving water bodies, and to study the removal of these substances in PMFs. This study will provide significant data and findings for future studies on antibiotics-related pollution control and management in water bodies.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Erythromycin</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Lincomycin</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Ofloxacin</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Receiving waters</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sulfonamides</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Tetracyclines</subject><subject>Trimethoprim</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater dilution</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water discharge</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQLgiC4a5unJm-E4_Bh4WDBp7chTSe7WdtmTdLT-xJ-ZtPb3rEFBSltmslv_pkZZrLsaVksS1yVb3Zu8L1ql3vXw7JAVSEIvZedlgKjBUMFvn_0f5I9CmFXFBRzxh5mJ5gxhpioTrPfa60H76HX8Do3Kqav6pvc2_A9VyFACB30MXcmmaOtrYtWh9z2ebzeW63afL9VvlMahniz7VQ_GKWj8xbCQQo02Cvbb_KfSd7ntWvGI-NdlzfWGPDjBR421vXhcfbAqDbAk2k9y76-f_fl4uPicv1hdXF-udBMoLiotTYNA0JNLYAXUBnOuQBCMNSmoIjQpuBIC0EpRVojqEFQQTjiBHCV3rPs-UF337ogp1IGiSpWEUSLkiVidSAap3Zy722n_LV0ysobg_MbqXzKuQWpSgUMI44JoaRqjOBYNRTXaV8zAJG03k63DXUHjU4Je9XOROcnvd3KjbuSglOO6RjMi0nAux8DhPiPkCdqo1JUtjcuienOBi3PK4wFSemP1PIvVHoa6KxOzWRsss8cXs0cEhPhV9yoIQS5-vzp_9n1tzn78ojdgmrjNrg2NVJqhDlIDqD2LgQP5q5yZSHHWbithhxnQU6zkNyeHVf9zum2-fEfc24Hew</recordid><startdate>20230120</startdate><enddate>20230120</enddate><creator>Liu, Yuanfei</creator><creator>Cai, Dan</creator><creator>Li, Xin</creator><creator>Wu, Qingyao</creator><creator>Ding, Ping</creator><creator>Shen, Liangchen</creator><creator>Yang, Jian</creator><creator>Hu, Guocheng</creator><creator>Wu, Jinhua</creator><creator>Zhang, Lijuan</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-459X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230120</creationdate><title>Occurrence, fate, and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical pharmaceutical manufactories and receiving water bodies from different regions</title><author>Liu, Yuanfei ; Cai, Dan ; Li, Xin ; Wu, Qingyao ; Ding, Ping ; Shen, Liangchen ; Yang, Jian ; Hu, Guocheng ; Wu, Jinhua ; Zhang, Lijuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-bccfd6e45fb9e80e7f8889e443ebf05245d082c995552cc2ebe95948284e374e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Erythromycin</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Lincomycin</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Ofloxacin</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Receiving waters</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sulfonamides</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Tetracyclines</topic><topic>Trimethoprim</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater dilution</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water discharge</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuanfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qingyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Liangchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guocheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jinhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lijuan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Yuanfei</au><au>Cai, Dan</au><au>Li, Xin</au><au>Wu, Qingyao</au><au>Ding, Ping</au><au>Shen, Liangchen</au><au>Yang, Jian</au><au>Hu, Guocheng</au><au>Wu, Jinhua</au><au>Zhang, Lijuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Occurrence, fate, and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical pharmaceutical manufactories and receiving water bodies from different regions</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-01-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0270945</spage><pages>e0270945-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to investigate the presence and persistence of antibiotics in wastewater of four typical pharmaceutical manufactories in China and receiving water bodies and suggest the removal of antibiotics by the wastewater treatment process. It also evaluated the environmental impact of antibiotic residues through wastewater discharge into receiving water bodies. The results indicated that thirteen antibiotics were detected in wastewater samples with concentrations ranging from 57.03 to 726.79 ng/L. Fluoroquinolones and macrolides were the most abundant antibiotic classes found in wastewater samples, accounting for 42.5% and 38.7% of total antibiotic concentrations, respectively, followed by sulfonamides (16.4%) and tetracyclines (2.4%). Erythromycin-H2O, lincomycin, ofloxacin, and trimethoprim were the most frequently detected antibiotics; among these antibiotics, the concentration of ofloxacin was the highest in most wastewater samples. No significant difference was found in different treatment processes used to remove antibiotics in wastewater samples. More than 50% of antibiotics were not completely removed with a removal efficiency of less than 70%. The concentration of detected antibiotics in the receiving water bodies was an order of magnitude lower than that in the wastewater sample due to dilution. An environmental risk assessment showed that lincomycin and ofloxacin could pose a high risk at the concentrations detected in effluents and a medium risk in their receiving water bodies, highlighting a potential hazard to the health of the aquatic ecosystem. Overall, The investigation was aimed to determine and monitor the concentration of selected antibiotics in 4 typical PMFs and their receiving water bodies, and to study the removal of these substances in PMFs. This study will provide significant data and findings for future studies on antibiotics-related pollution control and management in water bodies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36662697</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0270945</doi><tpages>e0270945</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-459X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0270945 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2767425016 |
source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis Antibiotics Aquatic ecosystems Biology and Life Sciences China Chromatography Composition Dilution Drug resistance Earth Sciences Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem Effluents Engineering and Technology Environmental assessment Environmental impact Environmental Monitoring Environmental risk Erythromycin Fluoroquinolones Health risks Lincomycin Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Ofloxacin Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceutical Preparations Pharmaceuticals Pollution control Purification R&D Receiving waters Research & development Risk Assessment Rivers Sewage Sulfonamides Surface water Tetracyclines Trimethoprim Waste Disposal, Fluid Wastewater Wastewater dilution Wastewater discharges Wastewater treatment Water Water discharge Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water pollution Water sampling Water treatment |
title | Occurrence, fate, and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical pharmaceutical manufactories and receiving water bodies from different regions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A21%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Occurrence,%20fate,%20and%20risk%20assessment%20of%20antibiotics%20in%20typical%20pharmaceutical%20manufactories%20and%20receiving%20water%20bodies%20from%20different%20regions&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Liu,%20Yuanfei&rft.date=2023-01-20&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0270945&rft.pages=e0270945-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0270945&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA733942846%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767425016&rft_id=info:pmid/36662697&rft_galeid=A733942846&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a1ae6328344547df983ad53b344b6ee9&rfr_iscdi=true |