The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands
To examine cross-national differences in gestational age over time in the U.S. and across three wealthy countries in 2020 as well as examine patterns of birth timing by hour of the day in home and spontaneous vaginal hospital births in the three countries. We did a comparative cohort analysis with d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0278856-e0278856 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0278856 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0278856 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Declercq, Eugene Wolterink, Anneke Rowe, Rachel de Jonge, Ank De Vries, Raymond Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne Verhoeven, Corine Shah, Neel |
description | To examine cross-national differences in gestational age over time in the U.S. and across three wealthy countries in 2020 as well as examine patterns of birth timing by hour of the day in home and spontaneous vaginal hospital births in the three countries.
We did a comparative cohort analysis with data on gestational age and the timing of birth from the United States, England and the Netherlands, comparing hospital and home births. For overall gestational age comparisons, we drew on national birth cohorts from the U.S. (1990, 2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014 & 2020) and England (2020). Birth timing data was drawn from national data from the U.S. (2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014) and from a large representative sample from England (2008-10). We compared timing of births by hour of the day in hospital and home births in all three countries.
The U.S. overall mean gestational age distribution, based on last menstrual period, decreased by more than half a week between 1990 (39.1 weeks) and 2020 (38.5 weeks). The 2020 U.S. gestational age distribution (76% births prior to 40 weeks) was distinct from England (60%) and the Netherlands (56%). The gestational age distribution and timing of home births was comparable in the three countries. Home births peaked in early morning between 2:00 am and 5:00 am. In England and the Netherlands, hospital spontaneous vaginal births showed a generally similar timing pattern to home births. In the U.S., the pattern was reversed with a prolonged peak of spontaneous vaginal hospital births between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
The findings suggest organizational priorities can potentially disturb natural patterns of gestation and birth timing with a potential to improve U.S. perinatal outcomes with organizational models that more closely resemble those of England and the Netherlands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0278856 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2766699793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A733672430</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_57bf6505a67845d7be207501ba431ff2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A733672430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-cf5135ce22ee8ce405f4a2212336ec30565715113004f53b5883983daa2c834e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk-9r1DAYx4sobk7_A9GAIApezY8mad8IY0w9GA7c5tuQS5_2cvSaM0lF_3vTXTeushdSaMPTz_f7NN_mybKXBOeESfJx4wbf6y7fuR5yTGVZcvEoOyYVowtBMXt8sD7KnoWwwZizUoin2RETgtOCsOOsu14D6nUcvO7QTscIvkeuQSvr4xpFu7V9i3RfoxZC1NG61BLpFpDtUUzSm_wqR8Ztd9pDjaJD533bJf7DrWgkvkG6-7EWnmdPGt0FeDE9T7Kbz-fXZ18XF5dflmenFwsjKhoXpuGEcQOUApQGCsybQlNKKGMCDMNccEk4IQzjouFsxcuSVSWrtaamZAWwk-z13nfXuaCmoIKiUghRVbJiiVjuidrpjdp5u9X-j3LaqtuC863SPlrTgeJy1QiOuRayLHgtV0Cx5JisdMFI09Dk9WnqNqy2UBvoYwpzZjp_09u1at0vVZWFrHCZDN5NBt79HFLOamuDgS5lBm7Yf7ekBGOS0Df_oA_vbqJanTZg-8alvmY0VacyhShpwXCi8geodNWwtSadqsam-kzwfiZITITfsdVDCGp59f3_2csfc_btAbsG3cV1cN0wnrYwB4s9aLwLwUNzHzLBahyKuzTUOBRqGooke3X4g-5Fd1PA_gIuqASe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2766699793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Declercq, Eugene ; Wolterink, Anneke ; Rowe, Rachel ; de Jonge, Ank ; De Vries, Raymond ; Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne ; Verhoeven, Corine ; Shah, Neel</creator><creatorcontrib>Declercq, Eugene ; Wolterink, Anneke ; Rowe, Rachel ; de Jonge, Ank ; De Vries, Raymond ; Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne ; Verhoeven, Corine ; Shah, Neel</creatorcontrib><description>To examine cross-national differences in gestational age over time in the U.S. and across three wealthy countries in 2020 as well as examine patterns of birth timing by hour of the day in home and spontaneous vaginal hospital births in the three countries.
We did a comparative cohort analysis with data on gestational age and the timing of birth from the United States, England and the Netherlands, comparing hospital and home births. For overall gestational age comparisons, we drew on national birth cohorts from the U.S. (1990, 2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014 & 2020) and England (2020). Birth timing data was drawn from national data from the U.S. (2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014) and from a large representative sample from England (2008-10). We compared timing of births by hour of the day in hospital and home births in all three countries.
The U.S. overall mean gestational age distribution, based on last menstrual period, decreased by more than half a week between 1990 (39.1 weeks) and 2020 (38.5 weeks). The 2020 U.S. gestational age distribution (76% births prior to 40 weeks) was distinct from England (60%) and the Netherlands (56%). The gestational age distribution and timing of home births was comparable in the three countries. Home births peaked in early morning between 2:00 am and 5:00 am. In England and the Netherlands, hospital spontaneous vaginal births showed a generally similar timing pattern to home births. In the U.S., the pattern was reversed with a prolonged peak of spontaneous vaginal hospital births between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
The findings suggest organizational priorities can potentially disturb natural patterns of gestation and birth timing with a potential to improve U.S. perinatal outcomes with organizational models that more closely resemble those of England and the Netherlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278856</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36652413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Age ; Age comparisons ; Age composition ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Birth ; Birthing centers ; Births ; Childbirth ; Childbirth & labor ; Cohort Studies ; Comparative analysis ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; England ; Female ; Forecasts and trends ; Gestational Age ; Health risks ; Home births ; Human subjects ; Humans ; Infant ; Maternal child nursing ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Menstruation ; Midwifery ; Netherlands ; Obstetrics ; Organizational aspects ; Parturition ; People and places ; Pregnancy ; Time Factors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; United States ; Vagina ; Vital statistics</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0278856-e0278856</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Declercq et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Declercq et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Declercq et al 2023 Declercq et al</rights><rights>2023 Declercq et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-cf5135ce22ee8ce405f4a2212336ec30565715113004f53b5883983daa2c834e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-cf5135ce22ee8ce405f4a2212336ec30565715113004f53b5883983daa2c834e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5411-3033 ; 0000-0003-3087-3040 ; 0000-0002-0001-0888 ; 0000-0003-2994-3240 ; 0000-0001-6120-4152</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847908/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9847908/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36652413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Declercq, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolterink, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Ank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vries, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Corine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Neel</creatorcontrib><title>The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To examine cross-national differences in gestational age over time in the U.S. and across three wealthy countries in 2020 as well as examine patterns of birth timing by hour of the day in home and spontaneous vaginal hospital births in the three countries.
We did a comparative cohort analysis with data on gestational age and the timing of birth from the United States, England and the Netherlands, comparing hospital and home births. For overall gestational age comparisons, we drew on national birth cohorts from the U.S. (1990, 2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014 & 2020) and England (2020). Birth timing data was drawn from national data from the U.S. (2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014) and from a large representative sample from England (2008-10). We compared timing of births by hour of the day in hospital and home births in all three countries.
The U.S. overall mean gestational age distribution, based on last menstrual period, decreased by more than half a week between 1990 (39.1 weeks) and 2020 (38.5 weeks). The 2020 U.S. gestational age distribution (76% births prior to 40 weeks) was distinct from England (60%) and the Netherlands (56%). The gestational age distribution and timing of home births was comparable in the three countries. Home births peaked in early morning between 2:00 am and 5:00 am. In England and the Netherlands, hospital spontaneous vaginal births showed a generally similar timing pattern to home births. In the U.S., the pattern was reversed with a prolonged peak of spontaneous vaginal hospital births between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
The findings suggest organizational priorities can potentially disturb natural patterns of gestation and birth timing with a potential to improve U.S. perinatal outcomes with organizational models that more closely resemble those of England and the Netherlands.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age comparisons</subject><subject>Age composition</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Birthing centers</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Cultural Comparison</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Home births</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Maternal child nursing</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Vital statistics</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk-9r1DAYx4sobk7_A9GAIApezY8mad8IY0w9GA7c5tuQS5_2cvSaM0lF_3vTXTeushdSaMPTz_f7NN_mybKXBOeESfJx4wbf6y7fuR5yTGVZcvEoOyYVowtBMXt8sD7KnoWwwZizUoin2RETgtOCsOOsu14D6nUcvO7QTscIvkeuQSvr4xpFu7V9i3RfoxZC1NG61BLpFpDtUUzSm_wqR8Ztd9pDjaJD533bJf7DrWgkvkG6-7EWnmdPGt0FeDE9T7Kbz-fXZ18XF5dflmenFwsjKhoXpuGEcQOUApQGCsybQlNKKGMCDMNccEk4IQzjouFsxcuSVSWrtaamZAWwk-z13nfXuaCmoIKiUghRVbJiiVjuidrpjdp5u9X-j3LaqtuC863SPlrTgeJy1QiOuRayLHgtV0Cx5JisdMFI09Dk9WnqNqy2UBvoYwpzZjp_09u1at0vVZWFrHCZDN5NBt79HFLOamuDgS5lBm7Yf7ekBGOS0Df_oA_vbqJanTZg-8alvmY0VacyhShpwXCi8geodNWwtSadqsam-kzwfiZITITfsdVDCGp59f3_2csfc_btAbsG3cV1cN0wnrYwB4s9aLwLwUNzHzLBahyKuzTUOBRqGooke3X4g-5Fd1PA_gIuqASe</recordid><startdate>20230118</startdate><enddate>20230118</enddate><creator>Declercq, Eugene</creator><creator>Wolterink, Anneke</creator><creator>Rowe, Rachel</creator><creator>de Jonge, Ank</creator><creator>De Vries, Raymond</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne</creator><creator>Verhoeven, Corine</creator><creator>Shah, Neel</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5411-3033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-3040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-0888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-3240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-4152</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230118</creationdate><title>The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands</title><author>Declercq, Eugene ; Wolterink, Anneke ; Rowe, Rachel ; de Jonge, Ank ; De Vries, Raymond ; Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne ; Verhoeven, Corine ; Shah, Neel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-cf5135ce22ee8ce405f4a2212336ec30565715113004f53b5883983daa2c834e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age comparisons</topic><topic>Age composition</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Birthing centers</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Cultural Comparison</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Home births</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Maternal child nursing</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Vital statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Declercq, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolterink, Anneke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Ank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vries, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Corine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Neel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Declercq, Eugene</au><au>Wolterink, Anneke</au><au>Rowe, Rachel</au><au>de Jonge, Ank</au><au>De Vries, Raymond</au><au>Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne</au><au>Verhoeven, Corine</au><au>Shah, Neel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2023-01-18</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0278856</spage><epage>e0278856</epage><pages>e0278856-e0278856</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To examine cross-national differences in gestational age over time in the U.S. and across three wealthy countries in 2020 as well as examine patterns of birth timing by hour of the day in home and spontaneous vaginal hospital births in the three countries.
We did a comparative cohort analysis with data on gestational age and the timing of birth from the United States, England and the Netherlands, comparing hospital and home births. For overall gestational age comparisons, we drew on national birth cohorts from the U.S. (1990, 2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014 & 2020) and England (2020). Birth timing data was drawn from national data from the U.S. (2014 & 2020), the Netherlands (2014) and from a large representative sample from England (2008-10). We compared timing of births by hour of the day in hospital and home births in all three countries.
The U.S. overall mean gestational age distribution, based on last menstrual period, decreased by more than half a week between 1990 (39.1 weeks) and 2020 (38.5 weeks). The 2020 U.S. gestational age distribution (76% births prior to 40 weeks) was distinct from England (60%) and the Netherlands (56%). The gestational age distribution and timing of home births was comparable in the three countries. Home births peaked in early morning between 2:00 am and 5:00 am. In England and the Netherlands, hospital spontaneous vaginal births showed a generally similar timing pattern to home births. In the U.S., the pattern was reversed with a prolonged peak of spontaneous vaginal hospital births between 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.
The findings suggest organizational priorities can potentially disturb natural patterns of gestation and birth timing with a potential to improve U.S. perinatal outcomes with organizational models that more closely resemble those of England and the Netherlands.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36652413</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0278856</doi><tpages>e0278856</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5411-3033</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-3040</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-0888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-3240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6120-4152</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (1), p.e0278856-e0278856 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2766699793 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
subjects | Age Age comparisons Age composition Biology and Life Sciences Birth Birthing centers Births Childbirth Childbirth & labor Cohort Studies Comparative analysis Cross-Cultural Comparison England Female Forecasts and trends Gestational Age Health risks Home births Human subjects Humans Infant Maternal child nursing Medicine and Health Sciences Menstruation Midwifery Netherlands Obstetrics Organizational aspects Parturition People and places Pregnancy Time Factors Ultrasonic imaging United States Vagina Vital statistics |
title | The natural pattern of birth timing and gestational age in the U.S. compared to England, and the Netherlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T00%3A23%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20natural%20pattern%20of%20birth%20timing%20and%20gestational%20age%20in%20the%20U.S.%20compared%20to%20England,%20and%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Declercq,%20Eugene&rft.date=2023-01-18&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0278856&rft.epage=e0278856&rft.pages=e0278856-e0278856&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0278856&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA733672430%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2766699793&rft_id=info:pmid/36652413&rft_galeid=A733672430&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_57bf6505a67845d7be207501ba431ff2&rfr_iscdi=true |