Defining clinical trial quality from the perspective of resource-limited settings: A qualitative study based on interviews with investigators, sponsors, and monitors conducting clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa
Increasing clinical trial cost and complexity, as well as a high waste of clinical trial investment over the past decades, have changed the way clinical trial quality is managed. Recent evidence has highlighted that the lack of a clear clinical trial quality definition may have contributed to previo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2022-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0010121-e0010121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0010121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e0010121 |
container_title | PLoS neglected tropical diseases |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela Fuchs, Claudia van Eeuwijk, Peter Burri, Christian |
description | Increasing clinical trial cost and complexity, as well as a high waste of clinical trial investment over the past decades, have changed the way clinical trial quality is managed. Recent evidence has highlighted that the lack of a clear clinical trial quality definition may have contributed to previous inefficiencies. This study aims to support the understanding of what clinical trial quality entails from the perspective of resource-limited settings.
We conducted 46 semi-structured interviews involving investigators, sponsors, and monitors with experience in conducting clinical trials in 27 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The questionnaire addressed the overall meaning of clinical trial quality and a conclusive clinical trial quality definition, as well as specific aspects of resource-limited settings across the clinical trial process. We held the interviews either in person, via Skype or by phone. They were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and we performed the analysis using The Framework Method. The analysis of clinical trial quality definitions resulted in 11 elements, which were summarised into a clinical trial quality concept consisting of two components: 1) clinical trial quality building factors (Scientific factors and Moral factors) and 2) promoting factors (Context adaptation; Infrastructure; Partnership; Operational excellence; Quality system). 12 resource-limited settings specific themes were identified. These themes were all categorised under the promoting factors "Context adaptation", "Infrastructure", and "Partnership".
We found that in order to enable comprehensive clinical trial quality management, clinical trial quality should be defined by a multidimensional concept that includes not only scientific and ethical, but also quality-promoting factors. Such a concept is of general relevance and not limited to clinical trials in resource-limited settings, where it naturally carries particular weight. In addition, from the perspective of sub-Saharan Africa, we identified specific categories that appear to be critical for the conduct of clinical trials in resource-limited settings, and we propose respective changes to a particular existing clinical trial quality framework (i.e., INQUIRE). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010121 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2762208249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A706536272</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_82fcaa0296014f38b9f61cb11e7520a8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A706536272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-39e232214d775fe6dfb8bf67c652d7befc88cde6ce014db66b1d3c34756dac773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhIR4oCW2EzvhAakavyZN4gF4thz73LpK7M52Ou0f5e_B7bKphSlSbJ8_973z2VcUL3E5x5TjD2s_Bif7-cYlPS9LXGKCHxWnuKX1jHBaPz6YnxTPYlyXZd3WDX5anNC6bGpSkdPiz2cw1lm3RKrPo5I9SsHm_9Uoe5tukAl-QGkFaAMhbkAluwXkDQoQcwIKZr0dbAKNIqSUdeJHtJic5Z6NadQ3qJMxM94h6xKErYXriK5tWuX1FmKyS5l8iO9R3HgX9zPpNBq8szs7Ut7pUaX_84xZAMWxm_2UKxmkQwsT8u7z4onJm_BiGs-K31-__Dr_Prv88e3ifHE5U4xUaUZbIJQQXGnOawNMm67pDOOK1UTzDoxqGqWBKSgz0zHWYU0VrXjNtFSc07Pi9a3upvdRTFcSBeGMkLIhVZuJi1tCe7kWm2AHGW6El1bsDT4shQzJqh5EQ4ySsiQty9EMbbrWMKw6jIHXpJRN1vo0RRu7AbQCl4Lsj0SPd5xdiaXfioa3Fca7ZN5NAsFfjbnuYrBRQd9LB37MeTNCm6aimGT0zT_ow6ebqKXMB7DO-BxX7UTFgpespozwndb8ASp_GgabrzY_wWw_cnh74LAC2adV9P2YbH4dx2B1C6rgYwxg7ouBS7Frk7usxa5NxNQm2e3VYSHvne76gv4FgFIVbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2762208249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining clinical trial quality from the perspective of resource-limited settings: A qualitative study based on interviews with investigators, sponsors, and monitors conducting clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela ; Fuchs, Claudia ; van Eeuwijk, Peter ; Burri, Christian</creator><contributor>Yazdi-Feyzabadi, Vahid</contributor><creatorcontrib>De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela ; Fuchs, Claudia ; van Eeuwijk, Peter ; Burri, Christian ; Yazdi-Feyzabadi, Vahid</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing clinical trial cost and complexity, as well as a high waste of clinical trial investment over the past decades, have changed the way clinical trial quality is managed. Recent evidence has highlighted that the lack of a clear clinical trial quality definition may have contributed to previous inefficiencies. This study aims to support the understanding of what clinical trial quality entails from the perspective of resource-limited settings.
We conducted 46 semi-structured interviews involving investigators, sponsors, and monitors with experience in conducting clinical trials in 27 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The questionnaire addressed the overall meaning of clinical trial quality and a conclusive clinical trial quality definition, as well as specific aspects of resource-limited settings across the clinical trial process. We held the interviews either in person, via Skype or by phone. They were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and we performed the analysis using The Framework Method. The analysis of clinical trial quality definitions resulted in 11 elements, which were summarised into a clinical trial quality concept consisting of two components: 1) clinical trial quality building factors (Scientific factors and Moral factors) and 2) promoting factors (Context adaptation; Infrastructure; Partnership; Operational excellence; Quality system). 12 resource-limited settings specific themes were identified. These themes were all categorised under the promoting factors "Context adaptation", "Infrastructure", and "Partnership".
We found that in order to enable comprehensive clinical trial quality management, clinical trial quality should be defined by a multidimensional concept that includes not only scientific and ethical, but also quality-promoting factors. Such a concept is of general relevance and not limited to clinical trials in resource-limited settings, where it naturally carries particular weight. In addition, from the perspective of sub-Saharan Africa, we identified specific categories that appear to be critical for the conduct of clinical trials in resource-limited settings, and we propose respective changes to a particular existing clinical trial quality framework (i.e., INQUIRE).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010121</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35085242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Africa South of the Sahara ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Context ; Corporate sponsorship ; Data Collection ; Earth Sciences ; Ethics ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Identification ; Infrastructure ; Interviews ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Monitors ; Partnerships ; Patients - psychology ; People and Places ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Qualitative research ; Quality ; Quality Control ; Quality management ; Quality standards ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Research Design ; Research Personnel - psychology ; Sample size ; Science Policy ; Social Sciences ; Stakeholders ; Tropical diseases</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0010121-e0010121</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 De Pretto-Lazarova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 De Pretto-Lazarova et al 2022 De Pretto-Lazarova et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-39e232214d775fe6dfb8bf67c652d7befc88cde6ce014db66b1d3c34756dac773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-39e232214d775fe6dfb8bf67c652d7befc88cde6ce014db66b1d3c34756dac773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7594-0166 ; 0000-0003-3685-3526</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794119/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8794119/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35085242$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Yazdi-Feyzabadi, Vahid</contributor><creatorcontrib>De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eeuwijk, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burri, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Defining clinical trial quality from the perspective of resource-limited settings: A qualitative study based on interviews with investigators, sponsors, and monitors conducting clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>Increasing clinical trial cost and complexity, as well as a high waste of clinical trial investment over the past decades, have changed the way clinical trial quality is managed. Recent evidence has highlighted that the lack of a clear clinical trial quality definition may have contributed to previous inefficiencies. This study aims to support the understanding of what clinical trial quality entails from the perspective of resource-limited settings.
We conducted 46 semi-structured interviews involving investigators, sponsors, and monitors with experience in conducting clinical trials in 27 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The questionnaire addressed the overall meaning of clinical trial quality and a conclusive clinical trial quality definition, as well as specific aspects of resource-limited settings across the clinical trial process. We held the interviews either in person, via Skype or by phone. They were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and we performed the analysis using The Framework Method. The analysis of clinical trial quality definitions resulted in 11 elements, which were summarised into a clinical trial quality concept consisting of two components: 1) clinical trial quality building factors (Scientific factors and Moral factors) and 2) promoting factors (Context adaptation; Infrastructure; Partnership; Operational excellence; Quality system). 12 resource-limited settings specific themes were identified. These themes were all categorised under the promoting factors "Context adaptation", "Infrastructure", and "Partnership".
We found that in order to enable comprehensive clinical trial quality management, clinical trial quality should be defined by a multidimensional concept that includes not only scientific and ethical, but also quality-promoting factors. Such a concept is of general relevance and not limited to clinical trials in resource-limited settings, where it naturally carries particular weight. In addition, from the perspective of sub-Saharan Africa, we identified specific categories that appear to be critical for the conduct of clinical trials in resource-limited settings, and we propose respective changes to a particular existing clinical trial quality framework (i.e., INQUIRE).</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Africa South of the Sahara</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Corporate sponsorship</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Monitors</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality standards</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhIR4oCW2EzvhAakavyZN4gF4thz73LpK7M52Ou0f5e_B7bKphSlSbJ8_973z2VcUL3E5x5TjD2s_Bif7-cYlPS9LXGKCHxWnuKX1jHBaPz6YnxTPYlyXZd3WDX5anNC6bGpSkdPiz2cw1lm3RKrPo5I9SsHm_9Uoe5tukAl-QGkFaAMhbkAluwXkDQoQcwIKZr0dbAKNIqSUdeJHtJic5Z6NadQ3qJMxM94h6xKErYXriK5tWuX1FmKyS5l8iO9R3HgX9zPpNBq8szs7Ut7pUaX_84xZAMWxm_2UKxmkQwsT8u7z4onJm_BiGs-K31-__Dr_Prv88e3ifHE5U4xUaUZbIJQQXGnOawNMm67pDOOK1UTzDoxqGqWBKSgz0zHWYU0VrXjNtFSc07Pi9a3upvdRTFcSBeGMkLIhVZuJi1tCe7kWm2AHGW6El1bsDT4shQzJqh5EQ4ySsiQty9EMbbrWMKw6jIHXpJRN1vo0RRu7AbQCl4Lsj0SPd5xdiaXfioa3Fca7ZN5NAsFfjbnuYrBRQd9LB37MeTNCm6aimGT0zT_ow6ebqKXMB7DO-BxX7UTFgpespozwndb8ASp_GgabrzY_wWw_cnh74LAC2adV9P2YbH4dx2B1C6rgYwxg7ouBS7Frk7usxa5NxNQm2e3VYSHvne76gv4FgFIVbQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela</creator><creator>Fuchs, Claudia</creator><creator>van Eeuwijk, Peter</creator><creator>Burri, Christian</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-0166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3685-3526</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Defining clinical trial quality from the perspective of resource-limited settings: A qualitative study based on interviews with investigators, sponsors, and monitors conducting clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa</title><author>De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela ; Fuchs, Claudia ; van Eeuwijk, Peter ; Burri, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-39e232214d775fe6dfb8bf67c652d7befc88cde6ce014db66b1d3c34756dac773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Africa South of the Sahara</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Corporate sponsorship</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Monitors</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality standards</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eeuwijk, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burri, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Pretto-Lazarova, Angela</au><au>Fuchs, Claudia</au><au>van Eeuwijk, Peter</au><au>Burri, Christian</au><au>Yazdi-Feyzabadi, Vahid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining clinical trial quality from the perspective of resource-limited settings: A qualitative study based on interviews with investigators, sponsors, and monitors conducting clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0010121</spage><epage>e0010121</epage><pages>e0010121-e0010121</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>Increasing clinical trial cost and complexity, as well as a high waste of clinical trial investment over the past decades, have changed the way clinical trial quality is managed. Recent evidence has highlighted that the lack of a clear clinical trial quality definition may have contributed to previous inefficiencies. This study aims to support the understanding of what clinical trial quality entails from the perspective of resource-limited settings.
We conducted 46 semi-structured interviews involving investigators, sponsors, and monitors with experience in conducting clinical trials in 27 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The questionnaire addressed the overall meaning of clinical trial quality and a conclusive clinical trial quality definition, as well as specific aspects of resource-limited settings across the clinical trial process. We held the interviews either in person, via Skype or by phone. They were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and we performed the analysis using The Framework Method. The analysis of clinical trial quality definitions resulted in 11 elements, which were summarised into a clinical trial quality concept consisting of two components: 1) clinical trial quality building factors (Scientific factors and Moral factors) and 2) promoting factors (Context adaptation; Infrastructure; Partnership; Operational excellence; Quality system). 12 resource-limited settings specific themes were identified. These themes were all categorised under the promoting factors "Context adaptation", "Infrastructure", and "Partnership".
We found that in order to enable comprehensive clinical trial quality management, clinical trial quality should be defined by a multidimensional concept that includes not only scientific and ethical, but also quality-promoting factors. Such a concept is of general relevance and not limited to clinical trials in resource-limited settings, where it naturally carries particular weight. In addition, from the perspective of sub-Saharan Africa, we identified specific categories that appear to be critical for the conduct of clinical trials in resource-limited settings, and we propose respective changes to a particular existing clinical trial quality framework (i.e., INQUIRE).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35085242</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0010121</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-0166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3685-3526</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-2735 |
ispartof | PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022-01, Vol.16 (1), p.e0010121-e0010121 |
issn | 1935-2735 1935-2727 1935-2735 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2762208249 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central |
subjects | Adaptation Africa South of the Sahara Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic Computer and Information Sciences Context Corporate sponsorship Data Collection Earth Sciences Ethics Evaluation Female Humans Identification Infrastructure Interviews Male Medicine and Health Sciences Monitors Partnerships Patients - psychology People and Places Practice Patterns, Physicians Qualitative research Quality Quality Control Quality management Quality standards Research and Analysis Methods Research Design Research Personnel - psychology Sample size Science Policy Social Sciences Stakeholders Tropical diseases |
title | Defining clinical trial quality from the perspective of resource-limited settings: A qualitative study based on interviews with investigators, sponsors, and monitors conducting clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20clinical%20trial%20quality%20from%20the%20perspective%20of%20resource-limited%20settings:%20A%20qualitative%20study%20based%20on%20interviews%20with%20investigators,%20sponsors,%20and%20monitors%20conducting%20clinical%20trials%20in%20sub-Saharan%20Africa&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=De%20Pretto-Lazarova,%20Angela&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0010121&rft.epage=e0010121&rft.pages=e0010121-e0010121&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010121&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA706536272%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2762208249&rft_id=info:pmid/35085242&rft_galeid=A706536272&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_82fcaa0296014f38b9f61cb11e7520a8&rfr_iscdi=true |