Parents' intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: A mixed-methods study (CoVAccS-wave 3)
To investigate UK parents' vaccination intention at a time when COVID-19 vaccination was available to some children. Data reported are from the second wave of a prospective cohort study. We conducted a mixed-methods study using an online survey of 270 UK parents (conducted 4-15 October 2021). A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0279285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0279285 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Smith, Louise E Sherman, Susan M Sim, Julius Amlôt, Richard Cutts, Megan Dasch, Hannah Sevdalis, Nick Rubin, G James |
description | To investigate UK parents' vaccination intention at a time when COVID-19 vaccination was available to some children.
Data reported are from the second wave of a prospective cohort study. We conducted a mixed-methods study using an online survey of 270 UK parents (conducted 4-15 October 2021). At this time, vaccination was available to 16- and 17-year-olds and had become available to 12- to 15-year-olds two weeks prior. We asked participants whose child had not yet been vaccinated how likely they were to vaccinate their child for COVID-19. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate factors associated with intention (quantitative component). Parents were also asked for their main reasons behind vaccination intention. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis (qualitative component).
Parental vaccination intention was mixed (likely: 39.3%, 95% CI 32.8%, 45.7%; uncertain: 33.9%, 95% CI 27.7%, 40.2%; unlikely: 26.8%, 95% CI 20.9%, 32.6%). Intention was associated with: parental COVID-19 vaccination status; greater perceived necessity and social norms regarding COVID-19 vaccination; greater COVID-19 threat appraisal; and lower vaccine safety and novelty concerns. In those who intended to vaccinate their child, the main reasons for doing so were to protect the child and others. In those who did not intend to vaccinate their child, the main reason was safety concerns.
Parent COVID-19 vaccination status and psychological factors explained a large percentage of the variance in vaccination intention for one's child. Further study is needed to see whether parents' intention to vaccinate their child is affected by fluctuating infection rates, more children being vaccinated, and the UK's reliance on vaccination as a strategy to live with COVID-19. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0279285 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2758565556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A731345762</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f8ea7740d05042d4b4a1e43d06417d0a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A731345762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-161e9e4bd931692ea6e201964c4dfffba87de8d1dcec761818d48ac2b1518a693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhATbQ4qdOE7CA1JVflWaVMSgr8a1L42rJC62U7b_HpdmU4P2gPzg0_lzX_vOd1H0nOAJSXPydmN624lmsjUdTHCSl0mRPYhOSZkmMUtw-vDIPomeOLfBOEsLxh5HJynLckoTchr9_CosdN69QbrzwdCmQ96gnZBSd8ID8jVoi2StG4UqY9FssZx_iEn5Dk1Rq69BxS342iiHnO_VDTqfmeVUyqv4t9gBSi-eRo8q0Th4Nuxn0Y9PH7_PvsSXi8_z2fQylqxMfEwYgRLoSpUpCQ4QDBJMSkYlVVVVrUSRKygUURJkzkhBCkULIZMVyUghWJmeRS8PutvGOD4Ux_Ekz4qMZVnGAjE_EMqIDd9a3Qp7w43Q_K_D2DUX1mvZAK8KEHlOscIZpomiKyoI0FRhRkmusAha74fb-lUL4VGdt6IZiY5POl3ztdnxMi8pZjgInA8C1vzqwXneaiehaUQHph_enTOW7dFX_6D3ZzdQaxES0F1lwr1yL8qneUpSGtSSQE3uocJS0GoZOqnSwT8KuBgFBMbDtV-L3jk-v_r2_-xiOWZfH7E1iMbXzjT9vgHdGKQHUFrjnIXqrsgE8_0g3FaD7weBD4MQwl4cf9Bd0G3np38AKR8Adw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758565556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parents' intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: A mixed-methods study (CoVAccS-wave 3)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Smith, Louise E ; Sherman, Susan M ; Sim, Julius ; Amlôt, Richard ; Cutts, Megan ; Dasch, Hannah ; Sevdalis, Nick ; Rubin, G James</creator><contributor>Pinto da Costa, Mariana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Smith, Louise E ; Sherman, Susan M ; Sim, Julius ; Amlôt, Richard ; Cutts, Megan ; Dasch, Hannah ; Sevdalis, Nick ; Rubin, G James ; Pinto da Costa, Mariana</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate UK parents' vaccination intention at a time when COVID-19 vaccination was available to some children.
Data reported are from the second wave of a prospective cohort study. We conducted a mixed-methods study using an online survey of 270 UK parents (conducted 4-15 October 2021). At this time, vaccination was available to 16- and 17-year-olds and had become available to 12- to 15-year-olds two weeks prior. We asked participants whose child had not yet been vaccinated how likely they were to vaccinate their child for COVID-19. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate factors associated with intention (quantitative component). Parents were also asked for their main reasons behind vaccination intention. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis (qualitative component).
Parental vaccination intention was mixed (likely: 39.3%, 95% CI 32.8%, 45.7%; uncertain: 33.9%, 95% CI 27.7%, 40.2%; unlikely: 26.8%, 95% CI 20.9%, 32.6%). Intention was associated with: parental COVID-19 vaccination status; greater perceived necessity and social norms regarding COVID-19 vaccination; greater COVID-19 threat appraisal; and lower vaccine safety and novelty concerns. In those who intended to vaccinate their child, the main reasons for doing so were to protect the child and others. In those who did not intend to vaccinate their child, the main reason was safety concerns.
Parent COVID-19 vaccination status and psychological factors explained a large percentage of the variance in vaccination intention for one's child. Further study is needed to see whether parents' intention to vaccinate their child is affected by fluctuating infection rates, more children being vaccinated, and the UK's reliance on vaccination as a strategy to live with COVID-19.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36574421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Child ; Children ; Content analysis ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; COVID-19 vaccines ; COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Evaluation ; Health aspects ; Health behavior ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health risks ; Humans ; Immunization ; Intention ; Management ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mixed methods research ; Norms ; Parenting ; Parents ; Parents - psychology ; Prospective Studies ; Psychological factors ; Qualitative analysis ; Regression analysis ; Safety ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Vaccination ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0279285</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Smith et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Smith et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Smith et al 2022 Smith et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-161e9e4bd931692ea6e201964c4dfffba87de8d1dcec761818d48ac2b1518a693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-161e9e4bd931692ea6e201964c4dfffba87de8d1dcec761818d48ac2b1518a693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1277-2564</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794060/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794060/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36574421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Pinto da Costa, Mariana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Smith, Louise E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amlôt, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutts, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasch, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sevdalis, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, G James</creatorcontrib><title>Parents' intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: A mixed-methods study (CoVAccS-wave 3)</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To investigate UK parents' vaccination intention at a time when COVID-19 vaccination was available to some children.
Data reported are from the second wave of a prospective cohort study. We conducted a mixed-methods study using an online survey of 270 UK parents (conducted 4-15 October 2021). At this time, vaccination was available to 16- and 17-year-olds and had become available to 12- to 15-year-olds two weeks prior. We asked participants whose child had not yet been vaccinated how likely they were to vaccinate their child for COVID-19. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate factors associated with intention (quantitative component). Parents were also asked for their main reasons behind vaccination intention. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis (qualitative component).
Parental vaccination intention was mixed (likely: 39.3%, 95% CI 32.8%, 45.7%; uncertain: 33.9%, 95% CI 27.7%, 40.2%; unlikely: 26.8%, 95% CI 20.9%, 32.6%). Intention was associated with: parental COVID-19 vaccination status; greater perceived necessity and social norms regarding COVID-19 vaccination; greater COVID-19 threat appraisal; and lower vaccine safety and novelty concerns. In those who intended to vaccinate their child, the main reasons for doing so were to protect the child and others. In those who did not intend to vaccinate their child, the main reason was safety concerns.
Parent COVID-19 vaccination status and psychological factors explained a large percentage of the variance in vaccination intention for one's child. Further study is needed to see whether parents' intention to vaccinate their child is affected by fluctuating infection rates, more children being vaccinated, and the UK's reliance on vaccination as a strategy to live with COVID-19.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Parenting</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99v0zAQxyMEYmPwHyCwhATbQ4qdOE7CA1JVflWaVMSgr8a1L42rJC62U7b_HpdmU4P2gPzg0_lzX_vOd1H0nOAJSXPydmN624lmsjUdTHCSl0mRPYhOSZkmMUtw-vDIPomeOLfBOEsLxh5HJynLckoTchr9_CosdN69QbrzwdCmQ96gnZBSd8ID8jVoi2StG4UqY9FssZx_iEn5Dk1Rq69BxS342iiHnO_VDTqfmeVUyqv4t9gBSi-eRo8q0Th4Nuxn0Y9PH7_PvsSXi8_z2fQylqxMfEwYgRLoSpUpCQ4QDBJMSkYlVVVVrUSRKygUURJkzkhBCkULIZMVyUghWJmeRS8PutvGOD4Ux_Ekz4qMZVnGAjE_EMqIDd9a3Qp7w43Q_K_D2DUX1mvZAK8KEHlOscIZpomiKyoI0FRhRkmusAha74fb-lUL4VGdt6IZiY5POl3ztdnxMi8pZjgInA8C1vzqwXneaiehaUQHph_enTOW7dFX_6D3ZzdQaxES0F1lwr1yL8qneUpSGtSSQE3uocJS0GoZOqnSwT8KuBgFBMbDtV-L3jk-v_r2_-xiOWZfH7E1iMbXzjT9vgHdGKQHUFrjnIXqrsgE8_0g3FaD7weBD4MQwl4cf9Bd0G3np38AKR8Adw</recordid><startdate>20221227</startdate><enddate>20221227</enddate><creator>Smith, Louise E</creator><creator>Sherman, Susan M</creator><creator>Sim, Julius</creator><creator>Amlôt, Richard</creator><creator>Cutts, Megan</creator><creator>Dasch, Hannah</creator><creator>Sevdalis, Nick</creator><creator>Rubin, G James</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-2564</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221227</creationdate><title>Parents' intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: A mixed-methods study (CoVAccS-wave 3)</title><author>Smith, Louise E ; Sherman, Susan M ; Sim, Julius ; Amlôt, Richard ; Cutts, Megan ; Dasch, Hannah ; Sevdalis, Nick ; Rubin, G James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-161e9e4bd931692ea6e201964c4dfffba87de8d1dcec761818d48ac2b1518a693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Parenting</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Louise E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amlôt, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutts, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasch, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sevdalis, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, G James</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Louise E</au><au>Sherman, Susan M</au><au>Sim, Julius</au><au>Amlôt, Richard</au><au>Cutts, Megan</au><au>Dasch, Hannah</au><au>Sevdalis, Nick</au><au>Rubin, G James</au><au>Pinto da Costa, Mariana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parents' intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: A mixed-methods study (CoVAccS-wave 3)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-12-27</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0279285</spage><pages>e0279285-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To investigate UK parents' vaccination intention at a time when COVID-19 vaccination was available to some children.
Data reported are from the second wave of a prospective cohort study. We conducted a mixed-methods study using an online survey of 270 UK parents (conducted 4-15 October 2021). At this time, vaccination was available to 16- and 17-year-olds and had become available to 12- to 15-year-olds two weeks prior. We asked participants whose child had not yet been vaccinated how likely they were to vaccinate their child for COVID-19. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate factors associated with intention (quantitative component). Parents were also asked for their main reasons behind vaccination intention. Open-ended responses were analysed using content analysis (qualitative component).
Parental vaccination intention was mixed (likely: 39.3%, 95% CI 32.8%, 45.7%; uncertain: 33.9%, 95% CI 27.7%, 40.2%; unlikely: 26.8%, 95% CI 20.9%, 32.6%). Intention was associated with: parental COVID-19 vaccination status; greater perceived necessity and social norms regarding COVID-19 vaccination; greater COVID-19 threat appraisal; and lower vaccine safety and novelty concerns. In those who intended to vaccinate their child, the main reasons for doing so were to protect the child and others. In those who did not intend to vaccinate their child, the main reason was safety concerns.
Parent COVID-19 vaccination status and psychological factors explained a large percentage of the variance in vaccination intention for one's child. Further study is needed to see whether parents' intention to vaccinate their child is affected by fluctuating infection rates, more children being vaccinated, and the UK's reliance on vaccination as a strategy to live with COVID-19.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36574421</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0279285</doi><tpages>e0279285</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-2564</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0279285 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2758565556 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Biology and Life Sciences Child Children Content analysis Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control COVID-19 vaccines COVID-19 Vaccines - therapeutic use Evaluation Health aspects Health behavior Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health risks Humans Immunization Intention Management Medicine and Health Sciences Mixed methods research Norms Parenting Parents Parents - psychology Prospective Studies Psychological factors Qualitative analysis Regression analysis Safety Social Sciences Sociodemographics Vaccination Vaccines |
title | Parents' intention to vaccinate their child for COVID-19: A mixed-methods study (CoVAccS-wave 3) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T06%3A25%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parents'%20intention%20to%20vaccinate%20their%20child%20for%20COVID-19:%20A%20mixed-methods%20study%20(CoVAccS-wave%203)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Smith,%20Louise%20E&rft.date=2022-12-27&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0279285&rft.pages=e0279285-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0279285&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA731345762%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758565556&rft_id=info:pmid/36574421&rft_galeid=A731345762&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f8ea7740d05042d4b4a1e43d06417d0a&rfr_iscdi=true |