Evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile application to improve the quality, collection, and usability of forensic documentation of sexual violence
Survivors of sexual violence deserve timely and high-quality forensic examination, evidence collection, and documentation as part of comprehensive care. However, in many countries, the quality of medical-legal documentation is severely limited. MediCapt is an innovative digital application that enab...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0278312-e0278312 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0278312 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0278312 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Kidenda, Suzanne Muchai, Roseline Green, Lindsey McHale, Thomas Mishori, Ranit Nelson, Brett D |
description | Survivors of sexual violence deserve timely and high-quality forensic examination, evidence collection, and documentation as part of comprehensive care. However, in many countries, the quality of medical-legal documentation is severely limited. MediCapt is an innovative digital application that enables clinicians to document forensic medical evidence as well as capture and securely store forensic photographs of injuries. This study evaluated the effectiveness and usability of MediCapt to document forensic medical evidence of sexual violence.
This mixed-methods evaluation involved key-informant interviews, usability questionnaires, and forensic record reviews. Participants included clinicians, medical records personnel, information technology personnel, and health facility administrators, as well as law enforcement and legal professionals in Kenya.
The Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) data quality checklist found that using MediCapt led to significantly higher data-quality scores compared to paper-based forms. MediCapt forms scored higher on 23 of 26 checklist items. While a wide difference in quality was seen among paper-based forms, MediCapt appeared to both standardize and improve quality of documentation across sites. MediCapt strengths included data security and confidentiality, accuracy and efficiency, and supplemental documentation with photography. Weaknesses included infrastructure challenges, required technological proficiencies, and time to learn the new system. Although it is early to assess the impact of MediCapt on prosecutions, providers and law and justice sector professionals were optimistic about its usefulness. They identified MediCapt as appropriate for use with survivors of sexual violence and reported MediCapt's legibility and photography features had already been commended by the court.
MediCapt was well-received across all sectors, its use was perceived as feasible and sustainable, and it significantly improved the quality of collected forensic data. It is anticipated this improvement in forensic documentation will increase successful prosecutions, strengthen accountability for perpetrators, and improve justice for survivors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0278312 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2754486265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A730031563</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_18b1ba9406bd4b5faab69216b2304c77</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A730031563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-5bc984fbbdb583a42659aa329fb4936e1c585e9280277ff7d448b4e50c20cfb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99q2zAUxs3YWLtubzA2wWBs0GSSZcn2zaCUbgsUCvt3KyT5KFGQJdeyQ_sce-EpTVri0YvhCxmf3_fJ-nROlr0meE5oST6tw9h76eZd8DDHeVlRkj_JjklN8xnPMX168H6UvYhxjTGjFefPsyPKGeGE0-Psz8VGulEO1i_RsAIExoAe7AY8xIiCQRK1QVkHSHadszqRwaMhINt2fdjAneh6lM4Ot6dIB-e28uBPkfQNGqNM2lTaOpnQg49WoybosQU_7LxSJcJNckAbGxx4DS-zZ0a6CK_260n268vFz_Nvs8urr4vzs8uZ5gUZZkzpuiqMUo1iFZVFzlktJc1ro4qaciCaVQzqvErhlMaUTVFUqgCGdY51YuhJ9nbn27kQxT7PKPKSJZInu0QsdkQT5Fp0vW1lfyuCtOLuQ-iXQvaD1Q4EqRRRsi4wV02hmJFS8TonXOUUF7osk9fn_W6jaqHRKYBeuonptOLtSizDRtQlwxjXyeDD3qAP1yPEQbQ2anBOegjj7r8ZJiyvEvruH_Tx0-2ppUwHsN6EtK_emoqzkmJMCeM0UfNHqPQ00Fqdms-k7pgKPk4EiRngZljKMUax-PH9_9mr31P2_QG7AumGVQxu3HZRnILFDtR9iLEH8xAywWI7O_dpiO3siP3sJNmbwwt6EN0PC_0Lz3UWgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2754486265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile application to improve the quality, collection, and usability of forensic documentation of sexual violence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kidenda, Suzanne ; Muchai, Roseline ; Green, Lindsey ; McHale, Thomas ; Mishori, Ranit ; Nelson, Brett D</creator><contributor>Alipour, Jahanpour</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kidenda, Suzanne ; Muchai, Roseline ; Green, Lindsey ; McHale, Thomas ; Mishori, Ranit ; Nelson, Brett D ; Alipour, Jahanpour</creatorcontrib><description>Survivors of sexual violence deserve timely and high-quality forensic examination, evidence collection, and documentation as part of comprehensive care. However, in many countries, the quality of medical-legal documentation is severely limited. MediCapt is an innovative digital application that enables clinicians to document forensic medical evidence as well as capture and securely store forensic photographs of injuries. This study evaluated the effectiveness and usability of MediCapt to document forensic medical evidence of sexual violence.
This mixed-methods evaluation involved key-informant interviews, usability questionnaires, and forensic record reviews. Participants included clinicians, medical records personnel, information technology personnel, and health facility administrators, as well as law enforcement and legal professionals in Kenya.
The Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) data quality checklist found that using MediCapt led to significantly higher data-quality scores compared to paper-based forms. MediCapt forms scored higher on 23 of 26 checklist items. While a wide difference in quality was seen among paper-based forms, MediCapt appeared to both standardize and improve quality of documentation across sites. MediCapt strengths included data security and confidentiality, accuracy and efficiency, and supplemental documentation with photography. Weaknesses included infrastructure challenges, required technological proficiencies, and time to learn the new system. Although it is early to assess the impact of MediCapt on prosecutions, providers and law and justice sector professionals were optimistic about its usefulness. They identified MediCapt as appropriate for use with survivors of sexual violence and reported MediCapt's legibility and photography features had already been commended by the court.
MediCapt was well-received across all sectors, its use was perceived as feasible and sustainable, and it significantly improved the quality of collected forensic data. It is anticipated this improvement in forensic documentation will increase successful prosecutions, strengthen accountability for perpetrators, and improve justice for survivors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36516163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Applications programs ; Check lists ; Collaboration ; Computer forensics ; Data collection ; Data entry ; Documentation ; Documentation - methods ; Documents ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Forensic Medicine ; Forensic science ; Forensic sciences ; Health care facilities ; Human rights ; Humans ; Information management ; Information technology ; Injuries ; Investigations ; Law ; Law Enforcement ; Legibility ; Legislation ; Medical personnel ; Medical records ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Mobile Applications ; Mobile computing ; Pandemics ; People and Places ; Photography ; Questionnaires ; Rape ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Security ; Sex crimes ; Sex Offenses ; Sexual assault ; Social Sciences ; Survival ; Usability ; Violence</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0278312-e0278312</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Kidenda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Kidenda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Kidenda et al 2022 Kidenda et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-5bc984fbbdb583a42659aa329fb4936e1c585e9280277ff7d448b4e50c20cfb43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7754-1559 ; 0000-0003-4585-7879 ; 0000-0002-4292-0580 ; 0000-0002-5049-1798 ; 0000-0001-6317-2617</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750009/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750009/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516163$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Alipour, Jahanpour</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kidenda, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchai, Roseline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHale, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishori, Ranit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brett D</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile application to improve the quality, collection, and usability of forensic documentation of sexual violence</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Survivors of sexual violence deserve timely and high-quality forensic examination, evidence collection, and documentation as part of comprehensive care. However, in many countries, the quality of medical-legal documentation is severely limited. MediCapt is an innovative digital application that enables clinicians to document forensic medical evidence as well as capture and securely store forensic photographs of injuries. This study evaluated the effectiveness and usability of MediCapt to document forensic medical evidence of sexual violence.
This mixed-methods evaluation involved key-informant interviews, usability questionnaires, and forensic record reviews. Participants included clinicians, medical records personnel, information technology personnel, and health facility administrators, as well as law enforcement and legal professionals in Kenya.
The Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) data quality checklist found that using MediCapt led to significantly higher data-quality scores compared to paper-based forms. MediCapt forms scored higher on 23 of 26 checklist items. While a wide difference in quality was seen among paper-based forms, MediCapt appeared to both standardize and improve quality of documentation across sites. MediCapt strengths included data security and confidentiality, accuracy and efficiency, and supplemental documentation with photography. Weaknesses included infrastructure challenges, required technological proficiencies, and time to learn the new system. Although it is early to assess the impact of MediCapt on prosecutions, providers and law and justice sector professionals were optimistic about its usefulness. They identified MediCapt as appropriate for use with survivors of sexual violence and reported MediCapt's legibility and photography features had already been commended by the court.
MediCapt was well-received across all sectors, its use was perceived as feasible and sustainable, and it significantly improved the quality of collected forensic data. It is anticipated this improvement in forensic documentation will increase successful prosecutions, strengthen accountability for perpetrators, and improve justice for survivors.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Applications programs</subject><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer forensics</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data entry</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Documentation - methods</subject><subject>Documents</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>Legibility</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mobile Applications</subject><subject>Mobile computing</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sex Offenses</subject><subject>Sexual assault</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99q2zAUxs3YWLtubzA2wWBs0GSSZcn2zaCUbgsUCvt3KyT5KFGQJdeyQ_sce-EpTVri0YvhCxmf3_fJ-nROlr0meE5oST6tw9h76eZd8DDHeVlRkj_JjklN8xnPMX168H6UvYhxjTGjFefPsyPKGeGE0-Psz8VGulEO1i_RsAIExoAe7AY8xIiCQRK1QVkHSHadszqRwaMhINt2fdjAneh6lM4Ot6dIB-e28uBPkfQNGqNM2lTaOpnQg49WoybosQU_7LxSJcJNckAbGxx4DS-zZ0a6CK_260n268vFz_Nvs8urr4vzs8uZ5gUZZkzpuiqMUo1iFZVFzlktJc1ro4qaciCaVQzqvErhlMaUTVFUqgCGdY51YuhJ9nbn27kQxT7PKPKSJZInu0QsdkQT5Fp0vW1lfyuCtOLuQ-iXQvaD1Q4EqRRRsi4wV02hmJFS8TonXOUUF7osk9fn_W6jaqHRKYBeuonptOLtSizDRtQlwxjXyeDD3qAP1yPEQbQ2anBOegjj7r8ZJiyvEvruH_Tx0-2ppUwHsN6EtK_emoqzkmJMCeM0UfNHqPQ00Fqdms-k7pgKPk4EiRngZljKMUax-PH9_9mr31P2_QG7AumGVQxu3HZRnILFDtR9iLEH8xAywWI7O_dpiO3siP3sJNmbwwt6EN0PC_0Lz3UWgw</recordid><startdate>20221214</startdate><enddate>20221214</enddate><creator>Kidenda, Suzanne</creator><creator>Muchai, Roseline</creator><creator>Green, Lindsey</creator><creator>McHale, Thomas</creator><creator>Mishori, Ranit</creator><creator>Nelson, Brett D</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-1559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4585-7879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4292-0580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-1798</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-2617</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221214</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile application to improve the quality, collection, and usability of forensic documentation of sexual violence</title><author>Kidenda, Suzanne ; Muchai, Roseline ; Green, Lindsey ; McHale, Thomas ; Mishori, Ranit ; Nelson, Brett D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-5bc984fbbdb583a42659aa329fb4936e1c585e9280277ff7d448b4e50c20cfb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Applications programs</topic><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer forensics</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data entry</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Documentation - methods</topic><topic>Documents</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>Legibility</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mobile Applications</topic><topic>Mobile computing</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sex Offenses</topic><topic>Sexual assault</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kidenda, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muchai, Roseline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHale, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishori, Ranit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brett D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kidenda, Suzanne</au><au>Muchai, Roseline</au><au>Green, Lindsey</au><au>McHale, Thomas</au><au>Mishori, Ranit</au><au>Nelson, Brett D</au><au>Alipour, Jahanpour</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile application to improve the quality, collection, and usability of forensic documentation of sexual violence</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-12-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0278312</spage><epage>e0278312</epage><pages>e0278312-e0278312</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Survivors of sexual violence deserve timely and high-quality forensic examination, evidence collection, and documentation as part of comprehensive care. However, in many countries, the quality of medical-legal documentation is severely limited. MediCapt is an innovative digital application that enables clinicians to document forensic medical evidence as well as capture and securely store forensic photographs of injuries. This study evaluated the effectiveness and usability of MediCapt to document forensic medical evidence of sexual violence.
This mixed-methods evaluation involved key-informant interviews, usability questionnaires, and forensic record reviews. Participants included clinicians, medical records personnel, information technology personnel, and health facility administrators, as well as law enforcement and legal professionals in Kenya.
The Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) data quality checklist found that using MediCapt led to significantly higher data-quality scores compared to paper-based forms. MediCapt forms scored higher on 23 of 26 checklist items. While a wide difference in quality was seen among paper-based forms, MediCapt appeared to both standardize and improve quality of documentation across sites. MediCapt strengths included data security and confidentiality, accuracy and efficiency, and supplemental documentation with photography. Weaknesses included infrastructure challenges, required technological proficiencies, and time to learn the new system. Although it is early to assess the impact of MediCapt on prosecutions, providers and law and justice sector professionals were optimistic about its usefulness. They identified MediCapt as appropriate for use with survivors of sexual violence and reported MediCapt's legibility and photography features had already been commended by the court.
MediCapt was well-received across all sectors, its use was perceived as feasible and sustainable, and it significantly improved the quality of collected forensic data. It is anticipated this improvement in forensic documentation will increase successful prosecutions, strengthen accountability for perpetrators, and improve justice for survivors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36516163</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0278312</doi><tpages>e0278312</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-1559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4585-7879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4292-0580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-1798</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6317-2617</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0278312-e0278312 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2754486265 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Aggression Applications programs Check lists Collaboration Computer forensics Data collection Data entry Documentation Documentation - methods Documents Effectiveness Evaluation Forensic Medicine Forensic science Forensic sciences Health care facilities Human rights Humans Information management Information technology Injuries Investigations Law Law Enforcement Legibility Legislation Medical personnel Medical records Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Mobile Applications Mobile computing Pandemics People and Places Photography Questionnaires Rape Research and Analysis Methods Security Sex crimes Sex Offenses Sexual assault Social Sciences Survival Usability Violence |
title | Evaluating the effectiveness of a mobile application to improve the quality, collection, and usability of forensic documentation of sexual violence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A06%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20a%20mobile%20application%20to%20improve%20the%20quality,%20collection,%20and%20usability%20of%20forensic%20documentation%20of%20sexual%20violence&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Kidenda,%20Suzanne&rft.date=2022-12-14&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0278312&rft.epage=e0278312&rft.pages=e0278312-e0278312&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0278312&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA730031563%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2754486265&rft_id=info:pmid/36516163&rft_galeid=A730031563&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_18b1ba9406bd4b5faab69216b2304c77&rfr_iscdi=true |