Rural parents' attitudes and beliefs on the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine: An explanatory study
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first came to the Unites States in January 2020. Though adult and pediatric vaccines became available to the public, vaccine uptake among youth and particularly younger children has been gradual. This explanatory study aimed to better understand parents'...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0278611-e0278611 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0278611 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | e0278611 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Lacy, Rachael Puma, Jini Tubolino, Michael LaRocca, David Crane, Lori A Miller, Lisa Morris, Chad D O'Leary, Sean T Leiferman, Jenn A |
| description | The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first came to the Unites States in January 2020. Though adult and pediatric vaccines became available to the public, vaccine uptake among youth and particularly younger children has been gradual. This explanatory study aimed to better understand parents' attitudes and beliefs of the pediatric COVID-19 vaccine and the barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake in a rural community through a brief, online demographic survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews. Forty-one in depth interviews were conducted with parents (31-English and 10-Spanish-speaking) residing in rural and frontier counties in Colorado between September 2021 and February 2022. Six emergent themes related to COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake were identified among the population. These themes spanned the three levels of influence in the Social Ecological Model (individual, interpersonal, and community levels). The six themes were identified as such; 1) Vaccine accessibility was associated with pediatric COVID vaccine uptake in rural communities, 2) Previous pediatric vaccine behaviors were not associated with COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake, 3) Perceived health status of a child or family member influenced pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake, 4) COVID-19 health seeking behaviors, like COVID pediatric vaccine uptake, are influenced by an individual's prosocial or individualistic perspectives, 5) Child autonomy and "age of consent" frames vaccine decision making behaviors in parents, and lastly 6) Social networks impacted COVID-19 pediatric vaccine decision making. These findings inform next steps for COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake including targeted and tailored messaging for communities (cues to actions), engaging youth stakeholders, and identifying trusted sources to build rapport and trust between health professionals and community members. The growing vaccine hesitancy among parents has serious implications for disease eradication and future viral outbreaks. Understanding the perceived barriers and facilitators to pediatric vaccine uptake is important to maintain the health of our youth and communities. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0278611 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2747887614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A729200263</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_50489cb7ac3a47389ecc66d329ba2df4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A729200263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-c6dccbbe0dd582b22d45b1e1509907ce70ad55686e947b2ba1b2c57b45bd94193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgh8XMyZpmzReCMP4NbAwsOpeCSFfncnSaWqSLjv_3tTpLlPZCwk04fQ57-l5m5NlzxGco5yi91eu961o5p1rzRxiWhGEHmSniOV4RjDMHx6dT7InIVxBWOYVIY-zk5wUlCICT7NfF70XDeiEN20Mb4CI0cZemwBEq4E0jTV1AK4FcWvAcn25-jRDDHRGWxG9VeBaKGVb8wEsWmBuuka0Ijq_ByGJ7J9mj2rRBPNs3M-yn18-_1h-m52vv66Wi_OZIgWK6amVktJArcsKS4x1UUpkUAkZg1QZCoUuS1IRwwoqsRRIYlVSmSjNitTkWfbyoNs1LvDRmMAxLWhVUYKKRKwOhHbiinfe7oTfcycs_xtwfsOFj1Y1hpewqJiSVKhcFDSvmFGKEJ1jJgXW9aD1cazWy53RKhmXLJyITt-0dss37poziiuG8yTwdhTw7ndvQuQ7G5RpknnG9cN3l3kOMSEwoa_-Qe_vbqQ2IjVg29qlumoQ5QuKGYZJbCg7v4dKS5udVekW1TbFJwnvJgmJieYmbkQfAl99v_h_dn05ZV8fsVsjmrgNrumjdW2YgsUBVN6F4E19ZzKCfBiCWzf4MAR8HIKU9uL4B90l3d76_A_p9QCj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2747887614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rural parents' attitudes and beliefs on the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine: An explanatory study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><creator>Lacy, Rachael ; Puma, Jini ; Tubolino, Michael ; LaRocca, David ; Crane, Lori A ; Miller, Lisa ; Morris, Chad D ; O'Leary, Sean T ; Leiferman, Jenn A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lacy, Rachael ; Puma, Jini ; Tubolino, Michael ; LaRocca, David ; Crane, Lori A ; Miller, Lisa ; Morris, Chad D ; O'Leary, Sean T ; Leiferman, Jenn A</creatorcontrib><description>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first came to the Unites States in January 2020. Though adult and pediatric vaccines became available to the public, vaccine uptake among youth and particularly younger children has been gradual. This explanatory study aimed to better understand parents' attitudes and beliefs of the pediatric COVID-19 vaccine and the barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake in a rural community through a brief, online demographic survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews. Forty-one in depth interviews were conducted with parents (31-English and 10-Spanish-speaking) residing in rural and frontier counties in Colorado between September 2021 and February 2022. Six emergent themes related to COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake were identified among the population. These themes spanned the three levels of influence in the Social Ecological Model (individual, interpersonal, and community levels). The six themes were identified as such; 1) Vaccine accessibility was associated with pediatric COVID vaccine uptake in rural communities, 2) Previous pediatric vaccine behaviors were not associated with COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake, 3) Perceived health status of a child or family member influenced pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake, 4) COVID-19 health seeking behaviors, like COVID pediatric vaccine uptake, are influenced by an individual's prosocial or individualistic perspectives, 5) Child autonomy and "age of consent" frames vaccine decision making behaviors in parents, and lastly 6) Social networks impacted COVID-19 pediatric vaccine decision making. These findings inform next steps for COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake including targeted and tailored messaging for communities (cues to actions), engaging youth stakeholders, and identifying trusted sources to build rapport and trust between health professionals and community members. The growing vaccine hesitancy among parents has serious implications for disease eradication and future viral outbreaks. Understanding the perceived barriers and facilitators to pediatric vaccine uptake is important to maintain the health of our youth and communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36477160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age ; Attitudes ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Caregivers ; Child ; Children ; Children & youth ; Codes ; Community ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Credibility ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Ecological effects ; Ecological models ; Ethnicity ; Evaluation ; Family ; Family income ; FDA approval ; Grass roots movement ; Health aspects ; Health behavior ; Hispanic Americans ; Humans ; Immunization ; Interviews ; Medical personnel ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; Pediatrics ; Qualitative research ; Questionnaires ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural Population ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Social Sciences ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases ; Youth</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0278611-e0278611</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Lacy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Lacy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Lacy et al 2022 Lacy et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-c6dccbbe0dd582b22d45b1e1509907ce70ad55686e947b2ba1b2c57b45bd94193</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4040-9877</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728923/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728923/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lacy, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puma, Jini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubolino, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaRocca, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Chad D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiferman, Jenn A</creatorcontrib><title>Rural parents' attitudes and beliefs on the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine: An explanatory study</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first came to the Unites States in January 2020. Though adult and pediatric vaccines became available to the public, vaccine uptake among youth and particularly younger children has been gradual. This explanatory study aimed to better understand parents' attitudes and beliefs of the pediatric COVID-19 vaccine and the barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake in a rural community through a brief, online demographic survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews. Forty-one in depth interviews were conducted with parents (31-English and 10-Spanish-speaking) residing in rural and frontier counties in Colorado between September 2021 and February 2022. Six emergent themes related to COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake were identified among the population. These themes spanned the three levels of influence in the Social Ecological Model (individual, interpersonal, and community levels). The six themes were identified as such; 1) Vaccine accessibility was associated with pediatric COVID vaccine uptake in rural communities, 2) Previous pediatric vaccine behaviors were not associated with COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake, 3) Perceived health status of a child or family member influenced pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake, 4) COVID-19 health seeking behaviors, like COVID pediatric vaccine uptake, are influenced by an individual's prosocial or individualistic perspectives, 5) Child autonomy and "age of consent" frames vaccine decision making behaviors in parents, and lastly 6) Social networks impacted COVID-19 pediatric vaccine decision making. These findings inform next steps for COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake including targeted and tailored messaging for communities (cues to actions), engaging youth stakeholders, and identifying trusted sources to build rapport and trust between health professionals and community members. The growing vaccine hesitancy among parents has serious implications for disease eradication and future viral outbreaks. Understanding the perceived barriers and facilitators to pediatric vaccine uptake is important to maintain the health of our youth and communities.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological models</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Grass roots movement</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QDgh8XMyZpmzReCMP4NbAwsOpeCSFfncnSaWqSLjv_3tTpLlPZCwk04fQ57-l5m5NlzxGco5yi91eu961o5p1rzRxiWhGEHmSniOV4RjDMHx6dT7InIVxBWOYVIY-zk5wUlCICT7NfF70XDeiEN20Mb4CI0cZemwBEq4E0jTV1AK4FcWvAcn25-jRDDHRGWxG9VeBaKGVb8wEsWmBuuka0Ijq_ByGJ7J9mj2rRBPNs3M-yn18-_1h-m52vv66Wi_OZIgWK6amVktJArcsKS4x1UUpkUAkZg1QZCoUuS1IRwwoqsRRIYlVSmSjNitTkWfbyoNs1LvDRmMAxLWhVUYKKRKwOhHbiinfe7oTfcycs_xtwfsOFj1Y1hpewqJiSVKhcFDSvmFGKEJ1jJgXW9aD1cazWy53RKhmXLJyITt-0dss37poziiuG8yTwdhTw7ndvQuQ7G5RpknnG9cN3l3kOMSEwoa_-Qe_vbqQ2IjVg29qlumoQ5QuKGYZJbCg7v4dKS5udVekW1TbFJwnvJgmJieYmbkQfAl99v_h_dn05ZV8fsVsjmrgNrumjdW2YgsUBVN6F4E19ZzKCfBiCWzf4MAR8HIKU9uL4B90l3d76_A_p9QCj</recordid><startdate>20221207</startdate><enddate>20221207</enddate><creator>Lacy, Rachael</creator><creator>Puma, Jini</creator><creator>Tubolino, Michael</creator><creator>LaRocca, David</creator><creator>Crane, Lori A</creator><creator>Miller, Lisa</creator><creator>Morris, Chad D</creator><creator>O'Leary, Sean T</creator><creator>Leiferman, Jenn A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-9877</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221207</creationdate><title>Rural parents' attitudes and beliefs on the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine: An explanatory study</title><author>Lacy, Rachael ; Puma, Jini ; Tubolino, Michael ; LaRocca, David ; Crane, Lori A ; Miller, Lisa ; Morris, Chad D ; O'Leary, Sean T ; Leiferman, Jenn A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-c6dccbbe0dd582b22d45b1e1509907ce70ad55686e947b2ba1b2c57b45bd94193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological models</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Grass roots movement</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lacy, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puma, Jini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tubolino, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaRocca, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Chad D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiferman, Jenn A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lacy, Rachael</au><au>Puma, Jini</au><au>Tubolino, Michael</au><au>LaRocca, David</au><au>Crane, Lori A</au><au>Miller, Lisa</au><au>Morris, Chad D</au><au>O'Leary, Sean T</au><au>Leiferman, Jenn A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rural parents' attitudes and beliefs on the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine: An explanatory study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-12-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0278611</spage><epage>e0278611</epage><pages>e0278611-e0278611</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first came to the Unites States in January 2020. Though adult and pediatric vaccines became available to the public, vaccine uptake among youth and particularly younger children has been gradual. This explanatory study aimed to better understand parents' attitudes and beliefs of the pediatric COVID-19 vaccine and the barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake in a rural community through a brief, online demographic survey, and in-depth qualitative interviews. Forty-one in depth interviews were conducted with parents (31-English and 10-Spanish-speaking) residing in rural and frontier counties in Colorado between September 2021 and February 2022. Six emergent themes related to COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake were identified among the population. These themes spanned the three levels of influence in the Social Ecological Model (individual, interpersonal, and community levels). The six themes were identified as such; 1) Vaccine accessibility was associated with pediatric COVID vaccine uptake in rural communities, 2) Previous pediatric vaccine behaviors were not associated with COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake, 3) Perceived health status of a child or family member influenced pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake, 4) COVID-19 health seeking behaviors, like COVID pediatric vaccine uptake, are influenced by an individual's prosocial or individualistic perspectives, 5) Child autonomy and "age of consent" frames vaccine decision making behaviors in parents, and lastly 6) Social networks impacted COVID-19 pediatric vaccine decision making. These findings inform next steps for COVID-19 pediatric vaccine uptake including targeted and tailored messaging for communities (cues to actions), engaging youth stakeholders, and identifying trusted sources to build rapport and trust between health professionals and community members. The growing vaccine hesitancy among parents has serious implications for disease eradication and future viral outbreaks. Understanding the perceived barriers and facilitators to pediatric vaccine uptake is important to maintain the health of our youth and communities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36477160</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0278611</doi><tpages>e0278611</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4040-9877</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2022-12, Vol.17 (12), p.e0278611-e0278611 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2747887614 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| subjects | Adolescent Age Attitudes Biology and Life Sciences Caregivers Child Children Children & youth Codes Community Coronaviruses COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control COVID-19 Vaccines Credibility Data collection Decision making Ecological effects Ecological models Ethnicity Evaluation Family Family income FDA approval Grass roots movement Health aspects Health behavior Hispanic Americans Humans Immunization Interviews Medical personnel Medicine and Health Sciences Parents Parents & parenting Pediatrics Qualitative research Questionnaires Rural areas Rural communities Rural Population Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Social networks Social organization Social Sciences Vaccines Viral diseases Youth |
| title | Rural parents' attitudes and beliefs on the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine: An explanatory study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rural%20parents'%20attitudes%20and%20beliefs%20on%20the%20COVID-19%20pediatric%20vaccine:%20An%20explanatory%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lacy,%20Rachael&rft.date=2022-12-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0278611&rft.epage=e0278611&rft.pages=e0278611-e0278611&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0278611&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA729200263%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2747887614&rft_id=info:pmid/36477160&rft_galeid=A729200263&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_50489cb7ac3a47389ecc66d329ba2df4&rfr_iscdi=true |