Optimal noise level for coding with tightly balanced networks of spiking neurons in the presence of transmission delays
Neural circuits consist of many noisy, slow components, with individual neurons subject to ion channel noise, axonal propagation delays, and unreliable and slow synaptic transmission. This raises a fundamental question: how can reliable computation emerge from such unreliable components? A classic s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS computational biology 2022-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e1010593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e1010593 |
container_title | PLoS computational biology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Timcheck, Jonathan Kadmon, Jonathan Boahen, Kwabena Ganguli, Surya |
description | Neural circuits consist of many noisy, slow components, with individual neurons subject to ion channel noise, axonal propagation delays, and unreliable and slow synaptic transmission. This raises a fundamental question: how can reliable computation emerge from such unreliable components? A classic strategy is to simply average over a population of N weakly-coupled neurons to achieve errors that scale as [Formula: see text]. But more interestingly, recent work has introduced networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons that achieve coding errors that scale superclassically as 1/N by combining the principles of predictive coding and fast and tight inhibitory-excitatory balance. However, spike transmission delays preclude such fast inhibition, and computational studies have observed that such delays can cause pathological synchronization that in turn destroys superclassical coding performance. Intriguingly, it has also been observed in simulations that noise can actually improve coding performance, and that there exists some optimal level of noise that minimizes coding error. However, we lack a quantitative theory that describes this fascinating interplay between delays, noise and neural coding performance in spiking networks. In this work, we elucidate the mechanisms underpinning this beneficial role of noise by deriving analytical expressions for coding error as a function of spike propagation delay and noise levels in predictive coding tight-balance networks of LIF neurons. Furthermore, we compute the minimal coding error and the associated optimal noise level, finding that they grow as power-laws with the delay. Our analysis reveals quantitatively how optimal levels of noise can rescue neural coding performance in spiking neural networks with delays by preventing the build up of pathological synchrony without overwhelming the overall spiking dynamics. This analysis can serve as a foundation for the further study of precise computation in the presence of noise and delays in efficient spiking neural circuits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010593 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2737143044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724759346</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_662922f4d8fc43b48e47cb66da8719be</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A724759346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-160c3a7cf78800a13e150bffb08e118a41de14def5e7df42bce9c020bb542f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl9vFCEUxSdGY2v1Gxgl8UUfdoWBGWZemjSNfzZpbKJ9JwxzmWXLwghM1_32su626RpfDA8Q-N0D93CK4jXBc0I5-bjyU3DSzkfVmTnBBFctfVKckqqiM06r5umj9UnxIsYVxnnZ1s-LE1qXFalbelpsrsdk1tIi500EZOEOLNI-IOV74wa0MWmJkhmWyW5RJ610CnrkIG18uI3IaxRHc7sjHUzBu4iMQ2kJaAwQIcM7JAXp4trEaLxDPVi5jS-LZ1raCK8O81lx8_nTzeXX2dX1l8XlxdVM1ZSmGamxopIrzZsGY0kokAp3Wne4AUIayUgPhPWgK-C9ZmWnoFW4xF1XsVI39Kx4u5cdrY_iYFkUJc8OMooZy8RiT_RersQYshlhK7w04s-GD4OQIRllQdR12ZalZn2jFaMda4Bx1dV1LxtO2g6y1vnhtqlbQ6_A5c7tkejxiTNLMfg70Va8zh-YBd4fBIL_OUFMIrumwGbbwU-7d5cVY6wkbUbf_YX-u7v5nhpkbsA47fO9Ko8e1kZ5B9rk_QteMp7jw-pc8OGoIDMJfqVBTjGKxY_v_8F-O2bZnlXBxxhAP7hCsNjl-f75YpdncchzLnvz2NGHovsA09_lePQq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737143044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal noise level for coding with tightly balanced networks of spiking neurons in the presence of transmission delays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Timcheck, Jonathan ; Kadmon, Jonathan ; Boahen, Kwabena ; Ganguli, Surya</creator><contributor>Blohm, Gunnar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Timcheck, Jonathan ; Kadmon, Jonathan ; Boahen, Kwabena ; Ganguli, Surya ; Blohm, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><description>Neural circuits consist of many noisy, slow components, with individual neurons subject to ion channel noise, axonal propagation delays, and unreliable and slow synaptic transmission. This raises a fundamental question: how can reliable computation emerge from such unreliable components? A classic strategy is to simply average over a population of N weakly-coupled neurons to achieve errors that scale as [Formula: see text]. But more interestingly, recent work has introduced networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons that achieve coding errors that scale superclassically as 1/N by combining the principles of predictive coding and fast and tight inhibitory-excitatory balance. However, spike transmission delays preclude such fast inhibition, and computational studies have observed that such delays can cause pathological synchronization that in turn destroys superclassical coding performance. Intriguingly, it has also been observed in simulations that noise can actually improve coding performance, and that there exists some optimal level of noise that minimizes coding error. However, we lack a quantitative theory that describes this fascinating interplay between delays, noise and neural coding performance in spiking networks. In this work, we elucidate the mechanisms underpinning this beneficial role of noise by deriving analytical expressions for coding error as a function of spike propagation delay and noise levels in predictive coding tight-balance networks of LIF neurons. Furthermore, we compute the minimal coding error and the associated optimal noise level, finding that they grow as power-laws with the delay. Our analysis reveals quantitatively how optimal levels of noise can rescue neural coding performance in spiking neural networks with delays by preventing the build up of pathological synchrony without overwhelming the overall spiking dynamics. This analysis can serve as a foundation for the further study of precise computation in the presence of noise and delays in efficient spiking neural circuits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010593</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36251693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - physiology ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Channel noise ; Circuits ; Coding ; Computational neuroscience ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Dynamic tests ; Efficiency ; Error analysis ; Firing pattern ; Ion channels ; Mathematical analysis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Models, Neurological ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Neural circuitry ; Neural coding ; Neural networks ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Neurons ; Neurons - physiology ; Noise control ; Noise levels ; Noise prediction ; Noise propagation ; Spiking ; Synaptic transmission ; Synaptic Transmission - physiology ; Synchronism ; Synchronization</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2022-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e1010593</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Timcheck et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Timcheck et al 2022 Timcheck et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-160c3a7cf78800a13e150bffb08e118a41de14def5e7df42bce9c020bb542f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-160c3a7cf78800a13e150bffb08e118a41de14def5e7df42bce9c020bb542f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9264-7551 ; 0000-0002-2071-2668</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576105/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576105/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27923,27924,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36251693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Blohm, Gunnar</contributor><creatorcontrib>Timcheck, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadmon, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boahen, Kwabena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguli, Surya</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal noise level for coding with tightly balanced networks of spiking neurons in the presence of transmission delays</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><description>Neural circuits consist of many noisy, slow components, with individual neurons subject to ion channel noise, axonal propagation delays, and unreliable and slow synaptic transmission. This raises a fundamental question: how can reliable computation emerge from such unreliable components? A classic strategy is to simply average over a population of N weakly-coupled neurons to achieve errors that scale as [Formula: see text]. But more interestingly, recent work has introduced networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons that achieve coding errors that scale superclassically as 1/N by combining the principles of predictive coding and fast and tight inhibitory-excitatory balance. However, spike transmission delays preclude such fast inhibition, and computational studies have observed that such delays can cause pathological synchronization that in turn destroys superclassical coding performance. Intriguingly, it has also been observed in simulations that noise can actually improve coding performance, and that there exists some optimal level of noise that minimizes coding error. However, we lack a quantitative theory that describes this fascinating interplay between delays, noise and neural coding performance in spiking networks. In this work, we elucidate the mechanisms underpinning this beneficial role of noise by deriving analytical expressions for coding error as a function of spike propagation delay and noise levels in predictive coding tight-balance networks of LIF neurons. Furthermore, we compute the minimal coding error and the associated optimal noise level, finding that they grow as power-laws with the delay. Our analysis reveals quantitatively how optimal levels of noise can rescue neural coding performance in spiking neural networks with delays by preventing the build up of pathological synchrony without overwhelming the overall spiking dynamics. This analysis can serve as a foundation for the further study of precise computation in the presence of noise and delays in efficient spiking neural circuits.</description><subject>Action Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Channel noise</subject><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Computational neuroscience</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Dynamic tests</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Firing pattern</subject><subject>Ion channels</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Neural circuitry</subject><subject>Neural coding</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Noise control</subject><subject>Noise levels</subject><subject>Noise prediction</subject><subject>Noise propagation</subject><subject>Spiking</subject><subject>Synaptic transmission</subject><subject>Synaptic Transmission - physiology</subject><subject>Synchronism</subject><subject>Synchronization</subject><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkl9vFCEUxSdGY2v1Gxgl8UUfdoWBGWZemjSNfzZpbKJ9JwxzmWXLwghM1_32su626RpfDA8Q-N0D93CK4jXBc0I5-bjyU3DSzkfVmTnBBFctfVKckqqiM06r5umj9UnxIsYVxnnZ1s-LE1qXFalbelpsrsdk1tIi500EZOEOLNI-IOV74wa0MWmJkhmWyW5RJ610CnrkIG18uI3IaxRHc7sjHUzBu4iMQ2kJaAwQIcM7JAXp4trEaLxDPVi5jS-LZ1raCK8O81lx8_nTzeXX2dX1l8XlxdVM1ZSmGamxopIrzZsGY0kokAp3Wne4AUIayUgPhPWgK-C9ZmWnoFW4xF1XsVI39Kx4u5cdrY_iYFkUJc8OMooZy8RiT_RersQYshlhK7w04s-GD4OQIRllQdR12ZalZn2jFaMda4Bx1dV1LxtO2g6y1vnhtqlbQ6_A5c7tkejxiTNLMfg70Va8zh-YBd4fBIL_OUFMIrumwGbbwU-7d5cVY6wkbUbf_YX-u7v5nhpkbsA47fO9Ko8e1kZ5B9rk_QteMp7jw-pc8OGoIDMJfqVBTjGKxY_v_8F-O2bZnlXBxxhAP7hCsNjl-f75YpdncchzLnvz2NGHovsA09_lePQq</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Timcheck, Jonathan</creator><creator>Kadmon, Jonathan</creator><creator>Boahen, Kwabena</creator><creator>Ganguli, Surya</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9264-7551</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-2668</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Optimal noise level for coding with tightly balanced networks of spiking neurons in the presence of transmission delays</title><author>Timcheck, Jonathan ; Kadmon, Jonathan ; Boahen, Kwabena ; Ganguli, Surya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-160c3a7cf78800a13e150bffb08e118a41de14def5e7df42bce9c020bb542f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Channel noise</topic><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Computational neuroscience</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Dynamic tests</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Firing pattern</topic><topic>Ion channels</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Neural circuitry</topic><topic>Neural coding</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Noise control</topic><topic>Noise levels</topic><topic>Noise prediction</topic><topic>Noise propagation</topic><topic>Spiking</topic><topic>Synaptic transmission</topic><topic>Synaptic Transmission - physiology</topic><topic>Synchronism</topic><topic>Synchronization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timcheck, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadmon, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boahen, Kwabena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguli, Surya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timcheck, Jonathan</au><au>Kadmon, Jonathan</au><au>Boahen, Kwabena</au><au>Ganguli, Surya</au><au>Blohm, Gunnar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal noise level for coding with tightly balanced networks of spiking neurons in the presence of transmission delays</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e1010593</spage><pages>e1010593-</pages><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>Neural circuits consist of many noisy, slow components, with individual neurons subject to ion channel noise, axonal propagation delays, and unreliable and slow synaptic transmission. This raises a fundamental question: how can reliable computation emerge from such unreliable components? A classic strategy is to simply average over a population of N weakly-coupled neurons to achieve errors that scale as [Formula: see text]. But more interestingly, recent work has introduced networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons that achieve coding errors that scale superclassically as 1/N by combining the principles of predictive coding and fast and tight inhibitory-excitatory balance. However, spike transmission delays preclude such fast inhibition, and computational studies have observed that such delays can cause pathological synchronization that in turn destroys superclassical coding performance. Intriguingly, it has also been observed in simulations that noise can actually improve coding performance, and that there exists some optimal level of noise that minimizes coding error. However, we lack a quantitative theory that describes this fascinating interplay between delays, noise and neural coding performance in spiking networks. In this work, we elucidate the mechanisms underpinning this beneficial role of noise by deriving analytical expressions for coding error as a function of spike propagation delay and noise levels in predictive coding tight-balance networks of LIF neurons. Furthermore, we compute the minimal coding error and the associated optimal noise level, finding that they grow as power-laws with the delay. Our analysis reveals quantitatively how optimal levels of noise can rescue neural coding performance in spiking neural networks with delays by preventing the build up of pathological synchrony without overwhelming the overall spiking dynamics. This analysis can serve as a foundation for the further study of precise computation in the presence of noise and delays in efficient spiking neural circuits.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36251693</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010593</doi><tpages>e1010593</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9264-7551</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-2668</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-7358 |
ispartof | PLoS computational biology, 2022-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e1010593 |
issn | 1553-7358 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2737143044 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Action Potentials - physiology Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Channel noise Circuits Coding Computational neuroscience Computer and Information Sciences Dynamic tests Efficiency Error analysis Firing pattern Ion channels Mathematical analysis Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Models, Neurological Nerve Net - physiology Neural circuitry Neural coding Neural networks Neural Networks, Computer Neurons Neurons - physiology Noise control Noise levels Noise prediction Noise propagation Spiking Synaptic transmission Synaptic Transmission - physiology Synchronism Synchronization |
title | Optimal noise level for coding with tightly balanced networks of spiking neurons in the presence of transmission delays |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20noise%20level%20for%20coding%20with%20tightly%20balanced%20networks%20of%20spiking%20neurons%20in%20the%20presence%20of%20transmission%20delays&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=Timcheck,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e1010593&rft.pages=e1010593-&rft.issn=1553-7358&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010593&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA724759346%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737143044&rft_id=info:pmid/36251693&rft_galeid=A724759346&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_662922f4d8fc43b48e47cb66da8719be&rfr_iscdi=true |