The issue beyond resistance: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation is induced by subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin
Staphylococcus epidermis is one of the most frequent causes of device-associated infections due to biofilm formation. Current reports noted that subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics induce biofilm production in some bacteria. Accordingly, we evaluated the effect of exposure of different subin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-11, Vol.17 (11), p.e0277287 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0277287 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Mirzaei, Rasoul Yousefimashouf, Rasoul Arabestani, Mohammad Reza Sedighi, Iraj Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef |
description | Staphylococcus epidermis is one of the most frequent causes of device-associated infections due to biofilm formation. Current reports noted that subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics induce biofilm production in some bacteria. Accordingly, we evaluated the effect of exposure of different subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentration of antimicrobial agents were determined. MRSE isolates were selected, and their biofilm formation ability was evaluated. The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin, antibiotics selected among common choices in the clinic, on MRSE biofilm formation was determined by the microtitre method. Besides, the effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the expression of the biofilm-associated genes icaA and atlE was evaluated by Reverse-transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of MRSE strains showed a high level of resistance as follows: 80%, 53.3%, 33.3%, 33.3%, and 26.6%, for erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, clindamycin, and gentamicin, respectively. Besides, 73.3% of S. epidermidis strains were Multidrug-resistant (MDR). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were in the range of 0.5 to512 μg/mL and 1 to1024 μg/mL for cloxacillin, 0.125 to256 μg/mL and 1 to512 μg/mL for cefazolin, 0.125 to64 μg/mL and 4 to>1024 μg/mL for clindamycin, and 2 to32 μg/mL and 4 to32 μg/mL for vancomycin, respectively. The findings showed that subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin induce biofilm production in MRSE strains. In particular, the OD values of strains were in the range of 0.09-0.95, 0.05-0.86, and 0.06-1 toward cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin, respectively. On the other hand, exposure to subinhibitory vancomycin concentrations did not increase the biofilm formation in MRSE strains. The findings also demonstrated that sub-MIC of antibiotics up-regulated biofilm-associated genes. In particular, atlE and icaA were up-regulated 0.062 to 1.16 and 0.078 to 1.48 folds, respectively, for cloxacillin, 0.11 to 0.8, and 0.1 to 1.3 folds for cefazolin, 0.18 to 0.9 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0277287 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2734593508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A725966550</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_641d1eabf78a42869db5d53a072ce999</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A725966550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5780f9ede38266bfbc26fe83a10de115db3f6c48c346c3fe396e755c7c6eb0323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRrFb_gWhAEAV3nUkmmRkvhFL8KFQKtnobMsnJTkomWZOMdP1f_j-zHy1d6YXMxRyS57zvyUlOUTyrynlFmurdpZ-CE3a-9A7mJW4a3Db3ikdVR_CM4ZLcvxUfFI9jvCxLSlrGHhYHhBFatqR-VPy5GACZGCdAPay8UyhANDEJJ-E9-gppMNJYa9zsej2h8ySWw8p66aWcIoKlURBGo0xEvfHa2BFpH0aRjHdZGxmnJgkK9SsUp964wfQm-bBC0mcXl8KGjMhrJK2_ElvDt0iCFr_9JhS5MJkjJcaVNO5J8UALG-Hp7n9YfP_08eL4y-z07PPJ8dHpTLIOpxlt2lJ3oIC0mLFe9xIzDS0RVamgqqjqiWaybiWpmSQaSMegoVQ2kkFfEkwOixdb3aX1ke86HjluSE27TQsPi5Mtoby45MtgRhFW3AvDNws-LLgIyUgLnNWVqkD0umlFjVvWqZ4qSkTZYAld12WtDzu3qR9BbVtj90T3d5wZ-ML_4h2rKavW5b7eCQT_c4KY-GiiBGuFAz9t62YVwRuvl_-gd59uRy1EPoBx2mdfuRblRw2mHWOUlpma30HlT8Fo8h1DfhKwn_BmLyEzCa7SQkwx8pPzb__Pnv3YZ1_dYgcQNg3R22nzvPbBegvK4GMMoG-aXJV8PV3X3eDr6eK76cppz29f0E3S9TiRv3M1JV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734593508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The issue beyond resistance: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation is induced by subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mirzaei, Rasoul ; Yousefimashouf, Rasoul ; Arabestani, Mohammad Reza ; Sedighi, Iraj ; Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef</creator><contributor>Hickok, Noreen J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mirzaei, Rasoul ; Yousefimashouf, Rasoul ; Arabestani, Mohammad Reza ; Sedighi, Iraj ; Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef ; Hickok, Noreen J.</creatorcontrib><description>Staphylococcus epidermis is one of the most frequent causes of device-associated infections due to biofilm formation. Current reports noted that subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics induce biofilm production in some bacteria. Accordingly, we evaluated the effect of exposure of different subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentration of antimicrobial agents were determined. MRSE isolates were selected, and their biofilm formation ability was evaluated. The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin, antibiotics selected among common choices in the clinic, on MRSE biofilm formation was determined by the microtitre method. Besides, the effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the expression of the biofilm-associated genes icaA and atlE was evaluated by Reverse-transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of MRSE strains showed a high level of resistance as follows: 80%, 53.3%, 33.3%, 33.3%, and 26.6%, for erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, clindamycin, and gentamicin, respectively. Besides, 73.3% of S. epidermidis strains were Multidrug-resistant (MDR). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were in the range of 0.5 to512 μg/mL and 1 to1024 μg/mL for cloxacillin, 0.125 to256 μg/mL and 1 to512 μg/mL for cefazolin, 0.125 to64 μg/mL and 4 to>1024 μg/mL for clindamycin, and 2 to32 μg/mL and 4 to32 μg/mL for vancomycin, respectively. The findings showed that subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin induce biofilm production in MRSE strains. In particular, the OD values of strains were in the range of 0.09-0.95, 0.05-0.86, and 0.06-1 toward cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin, respectively. On the other hand, exposure to subinhibitory vancomycin concentrations did not increase the biofilm formation in MRSE strains. The findings also demonstrated that sub-MIC of antibiotics up-regulated biofilm-associated genes. In particular, atlE and icaA were up-regulated 0.062 to 1.16 and 0.078 to 1.48 folds, respectively, for cloxacillin, 0.11 to 0.8, and 0.1 to 1.3 folds for cefazolin, 0.18 to 0.98, and 0.19 to 1.4 folds, respectively, for clindamycin. In contrast, the results showed that sub-MIC of vancomycin did not increase the biofilm-associated genes. These findings overall show that exposure to sub-MIC of traditional antibiotics can cause biofilm induction in MRSE, thereby increasing the survival and persistence on various surfaces that worsen the condition of comorbid infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36350834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacterial infections ; Biofilms ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Care and treatment ; Cefazolin ; Cefazolin - pharmacology ; Clindamycin ; Clindamycin - pharmacology ; Cloxacillin ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Diagnosis ; Dosage and administration ; Drug resistance ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Epidermis ; Erythromycin ; Exposure ; Gene expression ; Genes ; Gentamicin ; Humans ; Infections ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methicillin ; Methicillin Resistance ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Minimum inhibitory concentration ; Multidrug resistance ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Prevention ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Staphylococcal infections ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcus epidermidis ; Strains (organisms) ; Sulfamethoxazole ; Trimethoprim ; Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole ; Vancomycin ; Vancomycin - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-11, Vol.17 (11), p.e0277287</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Mirzaei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Mirzaei et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Mirzaei et al 2022 Mirzaei et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5780f9ede38266bfbc26fe83a10de115db3f6c48c346c3fe396e755c7c6eb0323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5780f9ede38266bfbc26fe83a10de115db3f6c48c346c3fe396e755c7c6eb0323</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4148-6495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645612/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645612/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36350834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hickok, Noreen J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mirzaei, Rasoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefimashouf, Rasoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabestani, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedighi, Iraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef</creatorcontrib><title>The issue beyond resistance: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation is induced by subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Staphylococcus epidermis is one of the most frequent causes of device-associated infections due to biofilm formation. Current reports noted that subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics induce biofilm production in some bacteria. Accordingly, we evaluated the effect of exposure of different subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentration of antimicrobial agents were determined. MRSE isolates were selected, and their biofilm formation ability was evaluated. The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin, antibiotics selected among common choices in the clinic, on MRSE biofilm formation was determined by the microtitre method. Besides, the effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the expression of the biofilm-associated genes icaA and atlE was evaluated by Reverse-transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of MRSE strains showed a high level of resistance as follows: 80%, 53.3%, 33.3%, 33.3%, and 26.6%, for erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, clindamycin, and gentamicin, respectively. Besides, 73.3% of S. epidermidis strains were Multidrug-resistant (MDR). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were in the range of 0.5 to512 μg/mL and 1 to1024 μg/mL for cloxacillin, 0.125 to256 μg/mL and 1 to512 μg/mL for cefazolin, 0.125 to64 μg/mL and 4 to>1024 μg/mL for clindamycin, and 2 to32 μg/mL and 4 to32 μg/mL for vancomycin, respectively. The findings showed that subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin induce biofilm production in MRSE strains. In particular, the OD values of strains were in the range of 0.09-0.95, 0.05-0.86, and 0.06-1 toward cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin, respectively. On the other hand, exposure to subinhibitory vancomycin concentrations did not increase the biofilm formation in MRSE strains. The findings also demonstrated that sub-MIC of antibiotics up-regulated biofilm-associated genes. In particular, atlE and icaA were up-regulated 0.062 to 1.16 and 0.078 to 1.48 folds, respectively, for cloxacillin, 0.11 to 0.8, and 0.1 to 1.3 folds for cefazolin, 0.18 to 0.98, and 0.19 to 1.4 folds, respectively, for clindamycin. In contrast, the results showed that sub-MIC of vancomycin did not increase the biofilm-associated genes. These findings overall show that exposure to sub-MIC of traditional antibiotics can cause biofilm induction in MRSE, thereby increasing the survival and persistence on various surfaces that worsen the condition of comorbid infections.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cefazolin</subject><subject>Cefazolin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Clindamycin</subject><subject>Clindamycin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cloxacillin</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Epidermis</subject><subject>Erythromycin</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Gentamicin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>Methicillin Resistance</subject><subject>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Minimum inhibitory concentration</subject><subject>Multidrug resistance</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus epidermidis</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Sulfamethoxazole</subject><subject>Trimethoprim</subject><subject>Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole</subject><subject>Vancomycin</subject><subject>Vancomycin - pharmacology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRrFb_gWhAEAV3nUkmmRkvhFL8KFQKtnobMsnJTkomWZOMdP1f_j-zHy1d6YXMxRyS57zvyUlOUTyrynlFmurdpZ-CE3a-9A7mJW4a3Db3ikdVR_CM4ZLcvxUfFI9jvCxLSlrGHhYHhBFatqR-VPy5GACZGCdAPay8UyhANDEJJ-E9-gppMNJYa9zsej2h8ySWw8p66aWcIoKlURBGo0xEvfHa2BFpH0aRjHdZGxmnJgkK9SsUp964wfQm-bBC0mcXl8KGjMhrJK2_ElvDt0iCFr_9JhS5MJkjJcaVNO5J8UALG-Hp7n9YfP_08eL4y-z07PPJ8dHpTLIOpxlt2lJ3oIC0mLFe9xIzDS0RVamgqqjqiWaybiWpmSQaSMegoVQ2kkFfEkwOixdb3aX1ke86HjluSE27TQsPi5Mtoby45MtgRhFW3AvDNws-LLgIyUgLnNWVqkD0umlFjVvWqZ4qSkTZYAld12WtDzu3qR9BbVtj90T3d5wZ-ML_4h2rKavW5b7eCQT_c4KY-GiiBGuFAz9t62YVwRuvl_-gd59uRy1EPoBx2mdfuRblRw2mHWOUlpma30HlT8Fo8h1DfhKwn_BmLyEzCa7SQkwx8pPzb__Pnv3YZ1_dYgcQNg3R22nzvPbBegvK4GMMoG-aXJV8PV3X3eDr6eK76cppz29f0E3S9TiRv3M1JV4</recordid><startdate>20221109</startdate><enddate>20221109</enddate><creator>Mirzaei, Rasoul</creator><creator>Yousefimashouf, Rasoul</creator><creator>Arabestani, Mohammad Reza</creator><creator>Sedighi, Iraj</creator><creator>Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4148-6495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221109</creationdate><title>The issue beyond resistance: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation is induced by subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin</title><author>Mirzaei, Rasoul ; Yousefimashouf, Rasoul ; Arabestani, Mohammad Reza ; Sedighi, Iraj ; Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-5780f9ede38266bfbc26fe83a10de115db3f6c48c346c3fe396e755c7c6eb0323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cefazolin</topic><topic>Cefazolin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Clindamycin</topic><topic>Clindamycin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cloxacillin</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Epidermis</topic><topic>Erythromycin</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Gentamicin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>Methicillin Resistance</topic><topic>Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Minimum inhibitory concentration</topic><topic>Multidrug resistance</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Sulfamethoxazole</topic><topic>Trimethoprim</topic><topic>Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole</topic><topic>Vancomycin</topic><topic>Vancomycin - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mirzaei, Rasoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefimashouf, Rasoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabestani, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedighi, Iraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mirzaei, Rasoul</au><au>Yousefimashouf, Rasoul</au><au>Arabestani, Mohammad Reza</au><au>Sedighi, Iraj</au><au>Alikhani, Mohammad Yousef</au><au>Hickok, Noreen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The issue beyond resistance: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation is induced by subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2022-11-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0277287</spage><pages>e0277287-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Staphylococcus epidermis is one of the most frequent causes of device-associated infections due to biofilm formation. Current reports noted that subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics induce biofilm production in some bacteria. Accordingly, we evaluated the effect of exposure of different subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentration of antimicrobial agents were determined. MRSE isolates were selected, and their biofilm formation ability was evaluated. The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin, antibiotics selected among common choices in the clinic, on MRSE biofilm formation was determined by the microtitre method. Besides, the effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, clindamycin, and vancomycin on the expression of the biofilm-associated genes icaA and atlE was evaluated by Reverse-transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of MRSE strains showed a high level of resistance as follows: 80%, 53.3%, 33.3%, 33.3%, and 26.6%, for erythromycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, clindamycin, and gentamicin, respectively. Besides, 73.3% of S. epidermidis strains were Multidrug-resistant (MDR). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values were in the range of 0.5 to512 μg/mL and 1 to1024 μg/mL for cloxacillin, 0.125 to256 μg/mL and 1 to512 μg/mL for cefazolin, 0.125 to64 μg/mL and 4 to>1024 μg/mL for clindamycin, and 2 to32 μg/mL and 4 to32 μg/mL for vancomycin, respectively. The findings showed that subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin induce biofilm production in MRSE strains. In particular, the OD values of strains were in the range of 0.09-0.95, 0.05-0.86, and 0.06-1 toward cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin, respectively. On the other hand, exposure to subinhibitory vancomycin concentrations did not increase the biofilm formation in MRSE strains. The findings also demonstrated that sub-MIC of antibiotics up-regulated biofilm-associated genes. In particular, atlE and icaA were up-regulated 0.062 to 1.16 and 0.078 to 1.48 folds, respectively, for cloxacillin, 0.11 to 0.8, and 0.1 to 1.3 folds for cefazolin, 0.18 to 0.98, and 0.19 to 1.4 folds, respectively, for clindamycin. In contrast, the results showed that sub-MIC of vancomycin did not increase the biofilm-associated genes. These findings overall show that exposure to sub-MIC of traditional antibiotics can cause biofilm induction in MRSE, thereby increasing the survival and persistence on various surfaces that worsen the condition of comorbid infections.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36350834</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0277287</doi><tpages>e0277287</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4148-6495</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-11, Vol.17 (11), p.e0277287 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2734593508 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibacterial agents Antibiotics Antiinfectives and antibacterials Antimicrobial agents Bacterial infections Biofilms Biology and Life Sciences Care and treatment Cefazolin Cefazolin - pharmacology Clindamycin Clindamycin - pharmacology Cloxacillin Coronaviruses COVID-19 Diagnosis Dosage and administration Drug resistance Drug resistance in microorganisms Epidermis Erythromycin Exposure Gene expression Genes Gentamicin Humans Infections Medicine and Health Sciences Methicillin Methicillin Resistance Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Microbial Sensitivity Tests Minimum inhibitory concentration Multidrug resistance Polymerase chain reaction Prevention Research and Analysis Methods Staphylococcal infections Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology Staphylococcus epidermidis Strains (organisms) Sulfamethoxazole Trimethoprim Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole Vancomycin Vancomycin - pharmacology |
title | The issue beyond resistance: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation is induced by subinhibitory concentrations of cloxacillin, cefazolin, and clindamycin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A45%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20issue%20beyond%20resistance:%20Methicillin-resistant%20Staphylococcus%20epidermidis%20biofilm%20formation%20is%20induced%20by%20subinhibitory%20concentrations%20of%20cloxacillin,%20cefazolin,%20and%20clindamycin&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mirzaei,%20Rasoul&rft.date=2022-11-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0277287&rft.pages=e0277287-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0277287&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA725966550%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734593508&rft_id=info:pmid/36350834&rft_galeid=A725966550&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_641d1eabf78a42869db5d53a072ce999&rfr_iscdi=true |