The influence of distal and proximal muscle activation on neural crosstalk
Previous research has indicated that neural crosstalk is asymmetric, with the dominant effector exerting a stronger influence on the non-dominant effector than vice versa. Recently, it has been hypothesized that this influence is more substantial for proximal than distal effectors. The current inves...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0275997-e0275997 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0275997 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e0275997 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Wang, Yiyu Neto, Osmar Pinto Weinrich, Madison M Castro, Roberto Wright, Traver Kennedy, Deanna M |
| description | Previous research has indicated that neural crosstalk is asymmetric, with the dominant effector exerting a stronger influence on the non-dominant effector than vice versa. Recently, it has been hypothesized that this influence is more substantial for proximal than distal effectors. The current investigation was designed to determine the effects of distal ((First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI)) and proximal (triceps brachii (TBI)) muscle activation on neural crosstalk. Twelve right-limb dominant participants (mean age = 21.9) were required to rhythmically coordinate a 1:2 pattern of isometric force guided by Lissajous displays. Participants performed 10, 30 s trials with both distal and proximal effectors. Coherence between the two effector groups were calculated using EMG-EMG wavelet coherence. The results indicated that participants could effectively coordinate the goal coordination pattern regardless of the effectors used. However, spatiotemporal performance was more accurate when performing the task with distal than proximal effectors. Force distortion, quantified by harmonicity, indicated that more perturbations occurred in the non-dominant effector than in the dominant effector. The results also indicated significantly lower harmonicity for the non-dominant proximal effector compared to the distal effectors. The current results support the notion that neural crosstalk is asymmetric in nature and is greater for proximal than distal effectors. Additionally, the EMG-EMG coherence results indicated significant neural crosstalk was occurring in the Alpha bands (5–13 Hz), with higher values observed in the proximal condition. Significant coherence in the Alpha bands suggest that the influence of neural crosstalk is occurring at a subcortical level. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0275997 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2728447926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724025500</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6c2fb1d9b3ba4253abc3645c7a0db0e9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A724025500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5bb50f09ffb2c44b7ce5804f016c68feb39fc12260980a8da15fa05a6dc8d69e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkmGLFCEcxoco6Nr6BkEDQXQvdlNn1PFNcBxdbRwc1NVbUUd33Vzd1Dmub59zO8VN3ItwQEd__0cffarqJQQr2FD4bheG6IVbHYLXK4AoZow-qk4ga9CSINA8vjd-Wj1LaQcAbjpCTqrP11tdW2_coL3SdTB1b1MWrha-rw8x3Np9-dkPSTldC5Xtjcg2-Lp8Xg-xrKkY0ljx43n1xAiX9IupX1TfLj5cn39aXl59XJ-fXS5VOVdeYikxMIAZI5FqW0mVxh1oDYBEkc5o2TCjIEIEsA6IrhcQGwGwIL3qesJ0s6heHXUPLiQ-eU8cUdS1LWWIFGJ9JPogdvwQi4f4iwdh-d1EiBsuYrbFEicKGQl7JhspWoQbIVVDWqyoAL0EmhWt99Nug9zrXmmfi-uZ6HzF2y3fhBvOMMMY0iLwdhKI4eegU-Z7m5R2TngdhuncpKXlbRbV63_Qh91N1EYUA-XtQtlXjaL8jKIWIIzBqLV6gCqt13urSlCMLfOzgtNZQWGyvs0bMaTE11-__D979X3OvrnHbrVweZuCG8YYpTnYHsG7REVt_l4yBHzM-Z_b4GPO-ZTz5jdRwPBt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728447926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of distal and proximal muscle activation on neural crosstalk</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wang, Yiyu ; Neto, Osmar Pinto ; Weinrich, Madison M ; Castro, Roberto ; Wright, Traver ; Kennedy, Deanna M</creator><contributor>Ye, Xin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yiyu ; Neto, Osmar Pinto ; Weinrich, Madison M ; Castro, Roberto ; Wright, Traver ; Kennedy, Deanna M ; Ye, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has indicated that neural crosstalk is asymmetric, with the dominant effector exerting a stronger influence on the non-dominant effector than vice versa. Recently, it has been hypothesized that this influence is more substantial for proximal than distal effectors. The current investigation was designed to determine the effects of distal ((First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI)) and proximal (triceps brachii (TBI)) muscle activation on neural crosstalk. Twelve right-limb dominant participants (mean age = 21.9) were required to rhythmically coordinate a 1:2 pattern of isometric force guided by Lissajous displays. Participants performed 10, 30 s trials with both distal and proximal effectors. Coherence between the two effector groups were calculated using EMG-EMG wavelet coherence. The results indicated that participants could effectively coordinate the goal coordination pattern regardless of the effectors used. However, spatiotemporal performance was more accurate when performing the task with distal than proximal effectors. Force distortion, quantified by harmonicity, indicated that more perturbations occurred in the non-dominant effector than in the dominant effector. The results also indicated significantly lower harmonicity for the non-dominant proximal effector compared to the distal effectors. The current results support the notion that neural crosstalk is asymmetric in nature and is greater for proximal than distal effectors. Additionally, the EMG-EMG coherence results indicated significant neural crosstalk was occurring in the Alpha bands (5–13 Hz), with higher values observed in the proximal condition. Significant coherence in the Alpha bands suggest that the influence of neural crosstalk is occurring at a subcortical level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Asymmetry ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Coherence ; Coordination ; Crosstalk ; Effectors ; Electromyography ; Engineering and Technology ; Experiments ; Harmonic analysis ; Influence ; Medical examination ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Muscle cells ; Muscle contraction ; Muscles ; Perturbation ; Physical Sciences ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Time series ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0275997-e0275997</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Wang et al 2022 Wang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5bb50f09ffb2c44b7ce5804f016c68feb39fc12260980a8da15fa05a6dc8d69e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5bb50f09ffb2c44b7ce5804f016c68feb39fc12260980a8da15fa05a6dc8d69e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7796-9555 ; 0000-0001-7020-930X ; 0000-0002-7980-8971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595517/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9595517/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Ye, Xin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Osmar Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinrich, Madison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Traver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Deanna M</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of distal and proximal muscle activation on neural crosstalk</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Previous research has indicated that neural crosstalk is asymmetric, with the dominant effector exerting a stronger influence on the non-dominant effector than vice versa. Recently, it has been hypothesized that this influence is more substantial for proximal than distal effectors. The current investigation was designed to determine the effects of distal ((First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI)) and proximal (triceps brachii (TBI)) muscle activation on neural crosstalk. Twelve right-limb dominant participants (mean age = 21.9) were required to rhythmically coordinate a 1:2 pattern of isometric force guided by Lissajous displays. Participants performed 10, 30 s trials with both distal and proximal effectors. Coherence between the two effector groups were calculated using EMG-EMG wavelet coherence. The results indicated that participants could effectively coordinate the goal coordination pattern regardless of the effectors used. However, spatiotemporal performance was more accurate when performing the task with distal than proximal effectors. Force distortion, quantified by harmonicity, indicated that more perturbations occurred in the non-dominant effector than in the dominant effector. The results also indicated significantly lower harmonicity for the non-dominant proximal effector compared to the distal effectors. The current results support the notion that neural crosstalk is asymmetric in nature and is greater for proximal than distal effectors. Additionally, the EMG-EMG coherence results indicated significant neural crosstalk was occurring in the Alpha bands (5–13 Hz), with higher values observed in the proximal condition. Significant coherence in the Alpha bands suggest that the influence of neural crosstalk is occurring at a subcortical level.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Crosstalk</subject><subject>Effectors</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Harmonic analysis</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Muscle cells</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkmGLFCEcxoco6Nr6BkEDQXQvdlNn1PFNcBxdbRwc1NVbUUd33Vzd1Dmub59zO8VN3ItwQEd__0cffarqJQQr2FD4bheG6IVbHYLXK4AoZow-qk4ga9CSINA8vjd-Wj1LaQcAbjpCTqrP11tdW2_coL3SdTB1b1MWrha-rw8x3Np9-dkPSTldC5Xtjcg2-Lp8Xg-xrKkY0ljx43n1xAiX9IupX1TfLj5cn39aXl59XJ-fXS5VOVdeYikxMIAZI5FqW0mVxh1oDYBEkc5o2TCjIEIEsA6IrhcQGwGwIL3qesJ0s6heHXUPLiQ-eU8cUdS1LWWIFGJ9JPogdvwQi4f4iwdh-d1EiBsuYrbFEicKGQl7JhspWoQbIVVDWqyoAL0EmhWt99Nug9zrXmmfi-uZ6HzF2y3fhBvOMMMY0iLwdhKI4eegU-Z7m5R2TngdhuncpKXlbRbV63_Qh91N1EYUA-XtQtlXjaL8jKIWIIzBqLV6gCqt13urSlCMLfOzgtNZQWGyvs0bMaTE11-__D979X3OvrnHbrVweZuCG8YYpTnYHsG7REVt_l4yBHzM-Z_b4GPO-ZTz5jdRwPBt</recordid><startdate>20221025</startdate><enddate>20221025</enddate><creator>Wang, Yiyu</creator><creator>Neto, Osmar Pinto</creator><creator>Weinrich, Madison M</creator><creator>Castro, Roberto</creator><creator>Wright, Traver</creator><creator>Kennedy, Deanna M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-9555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-930X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-8971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221025</creationdate><title>The influence of distal and proximal muscle activation on neural crosstalk</title><author>Wang, Yiyu ; Neto, Osmar Pinto ; Weinrich, Madison M ; Castro, Roberto ; Wright, Traver ; Kennedy, Deanna M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-5bb50f09ffb2c44b7ce5804f016c68feb39fc12260980a8da15fa05a6dc8d69e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Crosstalk</topic><topic>Effectors</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Harmonic analysis</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Muscle cells</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, Osmar Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinrich, Madison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Traver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Deanna M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Yiyu</au><au>Neto, Osmar Pinto</au><au>Weinrich, Madison M</au><au>Castro, Roberto</au><au>Wright, Traver</au><au>Kennedy, Deanna M</au><au>Ye, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of distal and proximal muscle activation on neural crosstalk</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-10-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0275997</spage><epage>e0275997</epage><pages>e0275997-e0275997</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Previous research has indicated that neural crosstalk is asymmetric, with the dominant effector exerting a stronger influence on the non-dominant effector than vice versa. Recently, it has been hypothesized that this influence is more substantial for proximal than distal effectors. The current investigation was designed to determine the effects of distal ((First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI)) and proximal (triceps brachii (TBI)) muscle activation on neural crosstalk. Twelve right-limb dominant participants (mean age = 21.9) were required to rhythmically coordinate a 1:2 pattern of isometric force guided by Lissajous displays. Participants performed 10, 30 s trials with both distal and proximal effectors. Coherence between the two effector groups were calculated using EMG-EMG wavelet coherence. The results indicated that participants could effectively coordinate the goal coordination pattern regardless of the effectors used. However, spatiotemporal performance was more accurate when performing the task with distal than proximal effectors. Force distortion, quantified by harmonicity, indicated that more perturbations occurred in the non-dominant effector than in the dominant effector. The results also indicated significantly lower harmonicity for the non-dominant proximal effector compared to the distal effectors. The current results support the notion that neural crosstalk is asymmetric in nature and is greater for proximal than distal effectors. Additionally, the EMG-EMG coherence results indicated significant neural crosstalk was occurring in the Alpha bands (5–13 Hz), with higher values observed in the proximal condition. Significant coherence in the Alpha bands suggest that the influence of neural crosstalk is occurring at a subcortical level.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0275997</doi><tpages>e0275997</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-9555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-930X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7980-8971</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0275997-e0275997 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2728447926 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Analysis Asymmetry Biology and Life Sciences Coherence Coordination Crosstalk Effectors Electromyography Engineering and Technology Experiments Harmonic analysis Influence Medical examination Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Muscle cells Muscle contraction Muscles Perturbation Physical Sciences Research and Analysis Methods Time series Velocity |
| title | The influence of distal and proximal muscle activation on neural crosstalk |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A35%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20distal%20and%20proximal%20muscle%20activation%20on%20neural%20crosstalk&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wang,%20Yiyu&rft.date=2022-10-25&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0275997&rft.epage=e0275997&rft.pages=e0275997-e0275997&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0275997&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA724025500%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728447926&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A724025500&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6c2fb1d9b3ba4253abc3645c7a0db0e9&rfr_iscdi=true |