Long-term use of a shark breeding ground: Three decades of mating site fidelity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum

Understanding shark mating dynamics and mating site use may be vital to species management. The Dry Tortugas courtship and mating ground (DTCMG) has been known as a mating site for nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum, since 1895. In a 30-yr (1992-2021) study we have documented long-term site fideli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0275323-e0275323
Hauptverfasser: Pratt, Harold L, Pratt, Theo C, Knotek, Ryan J, Carrier, Jeffrey C, Whitney, Nicholas M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0275323
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0275323
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Pratt, Harold L
Pratt, Theo C
Knotek, Ryan J
Carrier, Jeffrey C
Whitney, Nicholas M
description Understanding shark mating dynamics and mating site use may be vital to species management. The Dry Tortugas courtship and mating ground (DTCMG) has been known as a mating site for nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum, since 1895. In a 30-yr (1992-2021) study we have documented long-term site fidelity to this area with data from 137 adult sharks (89 female, 48 male) tagged with PIT, fin, and acoustic tags. Of 118 sharks tagged from 1993 to 2014, at least 80 (68%) returned to the DTCMG in subsequent years during the June-July mating season. Known individuals returned in up to 16 different mating seasons and over periods of up 28 years, indicating that life span extends well into the forties for this species. Of all returning sharks, 59% (N = 47) have been monitored for over 10 years and 13% (N = 10) have been monitored for over 20 years. Males arrived annually in May and June and departed in July, whereas females arrived biennially or triennially in June, with a secondary peak in site use in September and August, likely associated with thermoregulation during gestation. During the mating season, males made more frequent visits of shorter duration (median = 34 visits for 1 h per visit) to the DTCMG, whereas females made fewer visits but remained on site for longer periods (median = 12.5 visits for 4.4 h per visit). Females typically mated biennially but showed a triennial cycle in 32% of cases, with many females switching cycles at least once. This pattern would reduce the potential reproductive lifetime output of a female by 11% compared to what would be projected from a strict biennial cycle. The long-term mating site fidelity of this shark population reveals the importance of identifying and protecting mating sites for this and other elasmobranch species.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0275323
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2725591556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A722869567</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3f1c9051bb73406b9e6122bebb1a414d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A722869567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-ce8018af809ebb799a4570e2b34b8970758f9b9975ce959afd43e4b59c8915973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDgig4Yz7bxgthWXQdGFjQ1duQpqedjG0zJqk4_nrTnSo7shdeJZzznPd8JCfLnhK8JKwgb7Zu9IPuljs3wBLTQjDK7mWnRDK6yClm92_dT7JHIWwxFqzM84fZCcupIAXjp9mvtRvaRQTfozEAcg3SKGy0_4YqD1DboUWtd-NQv0XXm2RBNRhdQ5jIXsfJH2wE1NgaOhv3yA4obgANo09yN0qv0WXCun3vQnS9RsZ6r-PYP84eNLoL8GQ-z7IvH95fX3xcrK8uVxfn64URUsaFgRKTUjclllBVhZSaiwIDrRivSlngQpSNrKQshAEppG5qzoBXQppSEiELdpY9O-juOhfUPLagaEGFSITIE7E6ELXTW7Xzttd-r5y26sbgfKu0j9Z0oFhDjMSCpEoYx3klISeUVqkyojnhddJ6N2cbqx5qA0P0ujsSPfYMdqNa90NJUeSY4yTwchbw7vsIIareBgNdpwdw46FuzjmVE_r8H_Tu7maq1akBOzQu5TWTqDovKC1zKfJpSss7KD09dm9N-mONTfajgFdHAYmJ8DO2egxBrT5_-n_26usx--IWuwHdxU1w3RitG8IxyA-g8S4ED83fIROsphX5Mw01rYiaV4T9BnFnAgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725591556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term use of a shark breeding ground: Three decades of mating site fidelity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pratt, Harold L ; Pratt, Theo C ; Knotek, Ryan J ; Carrier, Jeffrey C ; Whitney, Nicholas M</creator><contributor>Mourier, Johann</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Harold L ; Pratt, Theo C ; Knotek, Ryan J ; Carrier, Jeffrey C ; Whitney, Nicholas M ; Mourier, Johann</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding shark mating dynamics and mating site use may be vital to species management. The Dry Tortugas courtship and mating ground (DTCMG) has been known as a mating site for nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum, since 1895. In a 30-yr (1992-2021) study we have documented long-term site fidelity to this area with data from 137 adult sharks (89 female, 48 male) tagged with PIT, fin, and acoustic tags. Of 118 sharks tagged from 1993 to 2014, at least 80 (68%) returned to the DTCMG in subsequent years during the June-July mating season. Known individuals returned in up to 16 different mating seasons and over periods of up 28 years, indicating that life span extends well into the forties for this species. Of all returning sharks, 59% (N = 47) have been monitored for over 10 years and 13% (N = 10) have been monitored for over 20 years. Males arrived annually in May and June and departed in July, whereas females arrived biennially or triennially in June, with a secondary peak in site use in September and August, likely associated with thermoregulation during gestation. During the mating season, males made more frequent visits of shorter duration (median = 34 visits for 1 h per visit) to the DTCMG, whereas females made fewer visits but remained on site for longer periods (median = 12.5 visits for 4.4 h per visit). Females typically mated biennially but showed a triennial cycle in 32% of cases, with many females switching cycles at least once. This pattern would reduce the potential reproductive lifetime output of a female by 11% compared to what would be projected from a strict biennial cycle. The long-term mating site fidelity of this shark population reveals the importance of identifying and protecting mating sites for this and other elasmobranch species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275323</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36251734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Acoustics ; Animal breeding ; Animal reproduction ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body temperature ; Breeding grounds ; Courtship ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental aspects ; Females ; Fish populations ; Genetic aspects ; Ginglymostoma cirratum ; Growth ; Identification and classification ; Life span ; Males ; Mating ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; National parks ; People and Places ; Physical Sciences ; Regulation ; Seasons ; Sharks ; Site fidelity ; Social Sciences ; Thermoregulation ; Transmitters</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0275323-e0275323</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Pratt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Pratt et al 2022 Pratt et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-ce8018af809ebb799a4570e2b34b8970758f9b9975ce959afd43e4b59c8915973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-ce8018af809ebb799a4570e2b34b8970758f9b9975ce959afd43e4b59c8915973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8797-6927</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576040/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576040/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Mourier, Johann</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Harold L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Theo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knotek, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Jeffrey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitney, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term use of a shark breeding ground: Three decades of mating site fidelity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Understanding shark mating dynamics and mating site use may be vital to species management. The Dry Tortugas courtship and mating ground (DTCMG) has been known as a mating site for nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum, since 1895. In a 30-yr (1992-2021) study we have documented long-term site fidelity to this area with data from 137 adult sharks (89 female, 48 male) tagged with PIT, fin, and acoustic tags. Of 118 sharks tagged from 1993 to 2014, at least 80 (68%) returned to the DTCMG in subsequent years during the June-July mating season. Known individuals returned in up to 16 different mating seasons and over periods of up 28 years, indicating that life span extends well into the forties for this species. Of all returning sharks, 59% (N = 47) have been monitored for over 10 years and 13% (N = 10) have been monitored for over 20 years. Males arrived annually in May and June and departed in July, whereas females arrived biennially or triennially in June, with a secondary peak in site use in September and August, likely associated with thermoregulation during gestation. During the mating season, males made more frequent visits of shorter duration (median = 34 visits for 1 h per visit) to the DTCMG, whereas females made fewer visits but remained on site for longer periods (median = 12.5 visits for 4.4 h per visit). Females typically mated biennially but showed a triennial cycle in 32% of cases, with many females switching cycles at least once. This pattern would reduce the potential reproductive lifetime output of a female by 11% compared to what would be projected from a strict biennial cycle. The long-term mating site fidelity of this shark population reveals the importance of identifying and protecting mating sites for this and other elasmobranch species.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body temperature</subject><subject>Breeding grounds</subject><subject>Courtship</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Ginglymostoma cirratum</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><subject>Site fidelity</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Thermoregulation</subject><subject>Transmitters</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7rr6DwQDgig4Yz7bxgthWXQdGFjQ1duQpqedjG0zJqk4_nrTnSo7shdeJZzznPd8JCfLnhK8JKwgb7Zu9IPuljs3wBLTQjDK7mWnRDK6yClm92_dT7JHIWwxFqzM84fZCcupIAXjp9mvtRvaRQTfozEAcg3SKGy0_4YqD1DboUWtd-NQv0XXm2RBNRhdQ5jIXsfJH2wE1NgaOhv3yA4obgANo09yN0qv0WXCun3vQnS9RsZ6r-PYP84eNLoL8GQ-z7IvH95fX3xcrK8uVxfn64URUsaFgRKTUjclllBVhZSaiwIDrRivSlngQpSNrKQshAEppG5qzoBXQppSEiELdpY9O-juOhfUPLagaEGFSITIE7E6ELXTW7Xzttd-r5y26sbgfKu0j9Z0oFhDjMSCpEoYx3klISeUVqkyojnhddJ6N2cbqx5qA0P0ujsSPfYMdqNa90NJUeSY4yTwchbw7vsIIareBgNdpwdw46FuzjmVE_r8H_Tu7maq1akBOzQu5TWTqDovKC1zKfJpSss7KD09dm9N-mONTfajgFdHAYmJ8DO2egxBrT5_-n_26usx--IWuwHdxU1w3RitG8IxyA-g8S4ED83fIROsphX5Mw01rYiaV4T9BnFnAgw</recordid><startdate>20221017</startdate><enddate>20221017</enddate><creator>Pratt, Harold L</creator><creator>Pratt, Theo C</creator><creator>Knotek, Ryan J</creator><creator>Carrier, Jeffrey C</creator><creator>Whitney, Nicholas M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-6927</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221017</creationdate><title>Long-term use of a shark breeding ground: Three decades of mating site fidelity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum</title><author>Pratt, Harold L ; Pratt, Theo C ; Knotek, Ryan J ; Carrier, Jeffrey C ; Whitney, Nicholas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c599t-ce8018af809ebb799a4570e2b34b8970758f9b9975ce959afd43e4b59c8915973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body temperature</topic><topic>Breeding grounds</topic><topic>Courtship</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Ginglymostoma cirratum</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><topic>Site fidelity</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Thermoregulation</topic><topic>Transmitters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Harold L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Theo C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knotek, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Jeffrey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitney, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pratt, Harold L</au><au>Pratt, Theo C</au><au>Knotek, Ryan J</au><au>Carrier, Jeffrey C</au><au>Whitney, Nicholas M</au><au>Mourier, Johann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term use of a shark breeding ground: Three decades of mating site fidelity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-10-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0275323</spage><epage>e0275323</epage><pages>e0275323-e0275323</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Understanding shark mating dynamics and mating site use may be vital to species management. The Dry Tortugas courtship and mating ground (DTCMG) has been known as a mating site for nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum, since 1895. In a 30-yr (1992-2021) study we have documented long-term site fidelity to this area with data from 137 adult sharks (89 female, 48 male) tagged with PIT, fin, and acoustic tags. Of 118 sharks tagged from 1993 to 2014, at least 80 (68%) returned to the DTCMG in subsequent years during the June-July mating season. Known individuals returned in up to 16 different mating seasons and over periods of up 28 years, indicating that life span extends well into the forties for this species. Of all returning sharks, 59% (N = 47) have been monitored for over 10 years and 13% (N = 10) have been monitored for over 20 years. Males arrived annually in May and June and departed in July, whereas females arrived biennially or triennially in June, with a secondary peak in site use in September and August, likely associated with thermoregulation during gestation. During the mating season, males made more frequent visits of shorter duration (median = 34 visits for 1 h per visit) to the DTCMG, whereas females made fewer visits but remained on site for longer periods (median = 12.5 visits for 4.4 h per visit). Females typically mated biennially but showed a triennial cycle in 32% of cases, with many females switching cycles at least once. This pattern would reduce the potential reproductive lifetime output of a female by 11% compared to what would be projected from a strict biennial cycle. The long-term mating site fidelity of this shark population reveals the importance of identifying and protecting mating sites for this and other elasmobranch species.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36251734</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0275323</doi><tpages>e0275323</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-6927</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-10, Vol.17 (10), p.e0275323-e0275323
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2725591556
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Accuracy
Acoustics
Animal breeding
Animal reproduction
Biology and Life Sciences
Body temperature
Breeding grounds
Courtship
Earth Sciences
Environmental aspects
Females
Fish populations
Genetic aspects
Ginglymostoma cirratum
Growth
Identification and classification
Life span
Males
Mating
Medicine and Health Sciences
National parks
People and Places
Physical Sciences
Regulation
Seasons
Sharks
Site fidelity
Social Sciences
Thermoregulation
Transmitters
title Long-term use of a shark breeding ground: Three decades of mating site fidelity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T06%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20use%20of%20a%20shark%20breeding%20ground:%20Three%20decades%20of%20mating%20site%20fidelity%20in%20the%20nurse%20shark,%20Ginglymostoma%20cirratum&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pratt,%20Harold%20L&rft.date=2022-10-17&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0275323&rft.epage=e0275323&rft.pages=e0275323-e0275323&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0275323&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA722869567%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725591556&rft_id=info:pmid/36251734&rft_galeid=A722869567&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3f1c9051bb73406b9e6122bebb1a414d&rfr_iscdi=true