Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) provides a process that uses spatial data and models to evaluate environmental, social, economic, cultural, and management trade-offs when siting (i.e., strategically locating) ocean industries. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food sector in the world. The United Sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0267333-e0267333
Hauptverfasser: Farmer, Nicholas A, Powell, Jessica R, Morris, James A, Soldevilla, Melissa S, Wickliffe, Lisa C, Jossart, Jonathan A, MacKay, Jonathan K, Randall, Alyssa L, Bath, Gretchen E, Ruvelas, Penny, Gray, Laura, Lee, Jennifer, Piniak, Wendy, Garrison, Lance, Hardy, Robert, Hart, Kristen M, Sasso, Chris, Stokes, Lesley, Riley, Kenneth L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0267333
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0267333
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Farmer, Nicholas A
Powell, Jessica R
Morris, James A
Soldevilla, Melissa S
Wickliffe, Lisa C
Jossart, Jonathan A
MacKay, Jonathan K
Randall, Alyssa L
Bath, Gretchen E
Ruvelas, Penny
Gray, Laura
Lee, Jennifer
Piniak, Wendy
Garrison, Lance
Hardy, Robert
Hart, Kristen M
Sasso, Chris
Stokes, Lesley
Riley, Kenneth L
description Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) provides a process that uses spatial data and models to evaluate environmental, social, economic, cultural, and management trade-offs when siting (i.e., strategically locating) ocean industries. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food sector in the world. The United States (U.S.) has substantial opportunity for offshore aquaculture development given the size of its exclusive economic zone, habitat diversity, and variety of candidate species for cultivation. However, promising aquaculture areas overlap many protected species habitats. Aquaculture siting surveys, construction, operations, and decommissioning can alter protected species habitat and behavior. Additionally, aquaculture-associated vessel activity, underwater noise, and physical interactions between protected species and farms can increase the risk of injury and mortality. In 2020, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was identified as one of the first regions to be evaluated for offshore aquaculture opportunities as directed by a Presidential Executive Order. We developed a transparent and repeatable method to identify aquaculture opportunity areas (AOAs) with the least conflict with protected species. First, we developed a generalized scoring approach for protected species that captures their vulnerability to adverse effects from anthropogenic activities using conservation status and demographic information. Next, we applied this approach to data layers for eight species listed under the Endangered Species Act, including five species of sea turtles, Rice’s whale, smalltooth sawfish, and giant manta ray. Next, we evaluated four methods for mathematically combining scores (i.e., Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Product, Lowest Scoring layer) to generate a combined protected species data layer. The Product approach provided the most logical ordering of, and the greatest contrast in, site suitability scores. Finally, we integrated the combined protected species data layer into a multi-criteria decision-making modeling framework for MSP. This process identified AOAs with reduced potential for protected species conflict. These modeling methods are transferable to other regions, to other sensitive or protected species, and for spatial planning for other ocean-uses.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0267333
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2719689302</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A720368079</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_69c8e1b0845f40e49bcf7c80cd8efc0c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A720368079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-34c89def80c40237bd31bc42ad7263a4e862cb84832d38fa625c6a7db4d10b833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99uFCEUxidGY-vqG5hINDF6sSsDDMP0wmTTaN2kTRP_3RIGzuzSzMAWGNM-jm8q466ma3phuIBwft8HnMMpiuclXpS0Lt9d-TE41S-23sECE15TSh8Ux2VDyZwTTB_eWR8VT2K8wriigvPHxRHlZS0a2hwXPy-8gd66NdoGn0AnMChuQVuIyNiYgm3HZL2LSDmDNqq1SaWIkkfWdT4MKNo0qafooJxawwAuId-hbVYBhCnoNSiXBWacDCGeoCXSKgKKaTS3KPugs7HvJtUF3FjtkboelR77NAZ4WjzqVB_h2X6eFd8-fvh6-ml-fnm2Ol2ezzVveJpTpkVjoBNYM0xo3RpatpoRZWrCqWIgONGtYIISQ0WnOKk0V7VpmSlxKyidFS92vtveR7nPbpSkLhuec5U9Z8VqRxivruQ22EGFW-mVlb83fFhLFZLVPUjeaAFliwWrOoaBNa3uap3vZgR0Guvs9X5_2tgOYHROWlD9gelhxNmNXPsfsqkI41WVDV7uDHxMVkZtc_E22juXayjLRlBcsQy92Z8S_PUIMcnBRg19rxz4cXocwYxiQeqMvvoHvT8Fe2qt8iunL5AvpydTucxelAtcN5la3EPlYWDI1XXQ2bx_IHh7IMhMgpu0VmOMcvXl8_-zl98P2dd32A2oPm2i73c_-hBkO1AHH2OA7m8lSiyndvuTDTm1m9y3G_0F5CweRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2719689302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Farmer, Nicholas A ; Powell, Jessica R ; Morris, James A ; Soldevilla, Melissa S ; Wickliffe, Lisa C ; Jossart, Jonathan A ; MacKay, Jonathan K ; Randall, Alyssa L ; Bath, Gretchen E ; Ruvelas, Penny ; Gray, Laura ; Lee, Jennifer ; Piniak, Wendy ; Garrison, Lance ; Hardy, Robert ; Hart, Kristen M ; Sasso, Chris ; Stokes, Lesley ; Riley, Kenneth L</creator><contributor>Paiva, Vitor Hugo Rodrigues</contributor><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Nicholas A ; Powell, Jessica R ; Morris, James A ; Soldevilla, Melissa S ; Wickliffe, Lisa C ; Jossart, Jonathan A ; MacKay, Jonathan K ; Randall, Alyssa L ; Bath, Gretchen E ; Ruvelas, Penny ; Gray, Laura ; Lee, Jennifer ; Piniak, Wendy ; Garrison, Lance ; Hardy, Robert ; Hart, Kristen M ; Sasso, Chris ; Stokes, Lesley ; Riley, Kenneth L ; US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) ; Paiva, Vitor Hugo Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><description>Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) provides a process that uses spatial data and models to evaluate environmental, social, economic, cultural, and management trade-offs when siting (i.e., strategically locating) ocean industries. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food sector in the world. The United States (U.S.) has substantial opportunity for offshore aquaculture development given the size of its exclusive economic zone, habitat diversity, and variety of candidate species for cultivation. However, promising aquaculture areas overlap many protected species habitats. Aquaculture siting surveys, construction, operations, and decommissioning can alter protected species habitat and behavior. Additionally, aquaculture-associated vessel activity, underwater noise, and physical interactions between protected species and farms can increase the risk of injury and mortality. In 2020, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was identified as one of the first regions to be evaluated for offshore aquaculture opportunities as directed by a Presidential Executive Order. We developed a transparent and repeatable method to identify aquaculture opportunity areas (AOAs) with the least conflict with protected species. First, we developed a generalized scoring approach for protected species that captures their vulnerability to adverse effects from anthropogenic activities using conservation status and demographic information. Next, we applied this approach to data layers for eight species listed under the Endangered Species Act, including five species of sea turtles, Rice’s whale, smalltooth sawfish, and giant manta ray. Next, we evaluated four methods for mathematically combining scores (i.e., Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Product, Lowest Scoring layer) to generate a combined protected species data layer. The Product approach provided the most logical ordering of, and the greatest contrast in, site suitability scores. Finally, we integrated the combined protected species data layer into a multi-criteria decision-making modeling framework for MSP. This process identified AOAs with reduced potential for protected species conflict. These modeling methods are transferable to other regions, to other sensitive or protected species, and for spatial planning for other ocean-uses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267333</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36178939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquaculture ; Aquaculture development ; Aquatic reptiles ; Arithmetic ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Candidate species ; Caretta caretta ; Case reports ; Chelonia mydas ; Conservation ; Conservation status ; Decision making ; Dermochelys coriacea ; Earth sciences ; Economic models ; Economics ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered species ; Environment models ; Environmental planning ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Eretmochelys imbricata ; Evaluation ; Farms ; Fisheries ; Geospatial data ; Gulf of Mexico ; Habitats ; Health risks ; Identification methods ; Lepidochelys kempii ; Lepidochelys olivacea ; Mariculture ; Marine mammals ; Marine protected areas ; Marine resources ; Mathematical models ; Mathematics ; Methods ; Modelling ; Multiple criterion ; Oceans ; Physical Sciences ; Population ; Protected species ; Protection and preservation ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics ; Sea turtles ; Seafood ; Spatial data ; Standard scores ; Turtles ; Underwater ; Whales ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0267333-e0267333</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-34c89def80c40237bd31bc42ad7263a4e862cb84832d38fa625c6a7db4d10b833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-34c89def80c40237bd31bc42ad7263a4e862cb84832d38fa625c6a7db4d10b833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6551-4737 ; 0000000265514737</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524655/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524655/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79343,79344</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1983054$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Paiva, Vitor Hugo Rodrigues</contributor><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jessica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldevilla, Melissa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickliffe, Lisa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jossart, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Jonathan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, Alyssa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bath, Gretchen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruvelas, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piniak, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Kristen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasso, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E)</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) provides a process that uses spatial data and models to evaluate environmental, social, economic, cultural, and management trade-offs when siting (i.e., strategically locating) ocean industries. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food sector in the world. The United States (U.S.) has substantial opportunity for offshore aquaculture development given the size of its exclusive economic zone, habitat diversity, and variety of candidate species for cultivation. However, promising aquaculture areas overlap many protected species habitats. Aquaculture siting surveys, construction, operations, and decommissioning can alter protected species habitat and behavior. Additionally, aquaculture-associated vessel activity, underwater noise, and physical interactions between protected species and farms can increase the risk of injury and mortality. In 2020, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was identified as one of the first regions to be evaluated for offshore aquaculture opportunities as directed by a Presidential Executive Order. We developed a transparent and repeatable method to identify aquaculture opportunity areas (AOAs) with the least conflict with protected species. First, we developed a generalized scoring approach for protected species that captures their vulnerability to adverse effects from anthropogenic activities using conservation status and demographic information. Next, we applied this approach to data layers for eight species listed under the Endangered Species Act, including five species of sea turtles, Rice’s whale, smalltooth sawfish, and giant manta ray. Next, we evaluated four methods for mathematically combining scores (i.e., Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Product, Lowest Scoring layer) to generate a combined protected species data layer. The Product approach provided the most logical ordering of, and the greatest contrast in, site suitability scores. Finally, we integrated the combined protected species data layer into a multi-criteria decision-making modeling framework for MSP. This process identified AOAs with reduced potential for protected species conflict. These modeling methods are transferable to other regions, to other sensitive or protected species, and for spatial planning for other ocean-uses.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture development</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Candidate species</subject><subject>Caretta caretta</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Chelonia mydas</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dermochelys coriacea</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Environmental planning</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Eretmochelys imbricata</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Gulf of Mexico</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Lepidochelys kempii</subject><subject>Lepidochelys olivacea</subject><subject>Mariculture</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Marine resources</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Sea turtles</subject><subject>Seafood</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Standard scores</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Underwater</subject><subject>Whales</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99uFCEUxidGY-vqG5hINDF6sSsDDMP0wmTTaN2kTRP_3RIGzuzSzMAWGNM-jm8q466ma3phuIBwft8HnMMpiuclXpS0Lt9d-TE41S-23sECE15TSh8Ux2VDyZwTTB_eWR8VT2K8wriigvPHxRHlZS0a2hwXPy-8gd66NdoGn0AnMChuQVuIyNiYgm3HZL2LSDmDNqq1SaWIkkfWdT4MKNo0qafooJxawwAuId-hbVYBhCnoNSiXBWacDCGeoCXSKgKKaTS3KPugs7HvJtUF3FjtkboelR77NAZ4WjzqVB_h2X6eFd8-fvh6-ml-fnm2Ol2ezzVveJpTpkVjoBNYM0xo3RpatpoRZWrCqWIgONGtYIISQ0WnOKk0V7VpmSlxKyidFS92vtveR7nPbpSkLhuec5U9Z8VqRxivruQ22EGFW-mVlb83fFhLFZLVPUjeaAFliwWrOoaBNa3uap3vZgR0Guvs9X5_2tgOYHROWlD9gelhxNmNXPsfsqkI41WVDV7uDHxMVkZtc_E22juXayjLRlBcsQy92Z8S_PUIMcnBRg19rxz4cXocwYxiQeqMvvoHvT8Fe2qt8iunL5AvpydTucxelAtcN5la3EPlYWDI1XXQ2bx_IHh7IMhMgpu0VmOMcvXl8_-zl98P2dd32A2oPm2i73c_-hBkO1AHH2OA7m8lSiyndvuTDTm1m9y3G_0F5CweRg</recordid><startdate>20220930</startdate><enddate>20220930</enddate><creator>Farmer, Nicholas A</creator><creator>Powell, Jessica R</creator><creator>Morris, James A</creator><creator>Soldevilla, Melissa S</creator><creator>Wickliffe, Lisa C</creator><creator>Jossart, Jonathan A</creator><creator>MacKay, Jonathan K</creator><creator>Randall, Alyssa L</creator><creator>Bath, Gretchen E</creator><creator>Ruvelas, Penny</creator><creator>Gray, Laura</creator><creator>Lee, Jennifer</creator><creator>Piniak, Wendy</creator><creator>Garrison, Lance</creator><creator>Hardy, Robert</creator><creator>Hart, Kristen M</creator><creator>Sasso, Chris</creator><creator>Stokes, Lesley</creator><creator>Riley, Kenneth L</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-4737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000265514737</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220930</creationdate><title>Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture</title><author>Farmer, Nicholas A ; Powell, Jessica R ; Morris, James A ; Soldevilla, Melissa S ; Wickliffe, Lisa C ; Jossart, Jonathan A ; MacKay, Jonathan K ; Randall, Alyssa L ; Bath, Gretchen E ; Ruvelas, Penny ; Gray, Laura ; Lee, Jennifer ; Piniak, Wendy ; Garrison, Lance ; Hardy, Robert ; Hart, Kristen M ; Sasso, Chris ; Stokes, Lesley ; Riley, Kenneth L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c696t-34c89def80c40237bd31bc42ad7263a4e862cb84832d38fa625c6a7db4d10b833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture development</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Candidate species</topic><topic>Caretta caretta</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Chelonia mydas</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dermochelys coriacea</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Environmental planning</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Eretmochelys imbricata</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Gulf of Mexico</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Lepidochelys kempii</topic><topic>Lepidochelys olivacea</topic><topic>Mariculture</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Marine resources</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Sea turtles</topic><topic>Seafood</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Standard scores</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Underwater</topic><topic>Whales</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jessica R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldevilla, Melissa S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickliffe, Lisa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jossart, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Jonathan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, Alyssa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bath, Gretchen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruvelas, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piniak, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Kristen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasso, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riley, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farmer, Nicholas A</au><au>Powell, Jessica R</au><au>Morris, James A</au><au>Soldevilla, Melissa S</au><au>Wickliffe, Lisa C</au><au>Jossart, Jonathan A</au><au>MacKay, Jonathan K</au><au>Randall, Alyssa L</au><au>Bath, Gretchen E</au><au>Ruvelas, Penny</au><au>Gray, Laura</au><au>Lee, Jennifer</au><au>Piniak, Wendy</au><au>Garrison, Lance</au><au>Hardy, Robert</au><au>Hart, Kristen M</au><au>Sasso, Chris</au><au>Stokes, Lesley</au><au>Riley, Kenneth L</au><au>Paiva, Vitor Hugo Rodrigues</au><aucorp>US Department of Energy (USDOE), Washington, DC (United States). Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-09-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0267333</spage><epage>e0267333</epage><pages>e0267333-e0267333</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) provides a process that uses spatial data and models to evaluate environmental, social, economic, cultural, and management trade-offs when siting (i.e., strategically locating) ocean industries. Aquaculture is the fastest-growing food sector in the world. The United States (U.S.) has substantial opportunity for offshore aquaculture development given the size of its exclusive economic zone, habitat diversity, and variety of candidate species for cultivation. However, promising aquaculture areas overlap many protected species habitats. Aquaculture siting surveys, construction, operations, and decommissioning can alter protected species habitat and behavior. Additionally, aquaculture-associated vessel activity, underwater noise, and physical interactions between protected species and farms can increase the risk of injury and mortality. In 2020, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was identified as one of the first regions to be evaluated for offshore aquaculture opportunities as directed by a Presidential Executive Order. We developed a transparent and repeatable method to identify aquaculture opportunity areas (AOAs) with the least conflict with protected species. First, we developed a generalized scoring approach for protected species that captures their vulnerability to adverse effects from anthropogenic activities using conservation status and demographic information. Next, we applied this approach to data layers for eight species listed under the Endangered Species Act, including five species of sea turtles, Rice’s whale, smalltooth sawfish, and giant manta ray. Next, we evaluated four methods for mathematically combining scores (i.e., Arithmetic mean, Geometric mean, Product, Lowest Scoring layer) to generate a combined protected species data layer. The Product approach provided the most logical ordering of, and the greatest contrast in, site suitability scores. Finally, we integrated the combined protected species data layer into a multi-criteria decision-making modeling framework for MSP. This process identified AOAs with reduced potential for protected species conflict. These modeling methods are transferable to other regions, to other sensitive or protected species, and for spatial planning for other ocean-uses.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36178939</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0267333</doi><tpages>e0267333</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6551-4737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000265514737</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0267333-e0267333
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2719689302
source Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Anthropogenic factors
Aquaculture
Aquaculture development
Aquatic reptiles
Arithmetic
Biology and Life Sciences
Candidate species
Caretta caretta
Case reports
Chelonia mydas
Conservation
Conservation status
Decision making
Dermochelys coriacea
Earth sciences
Economic models
Economics
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered species
Environment models
Environmental planning
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eretmochelys imbricata
Evaluation
Farms
Fisheries
Geospatial data
Gulf of Mexico
Habitats
Health risks
Identification methods
Lepidochelys kempii
Lepidochelys olivacea
Mariculture
Marine mammals
Marine protected areas
Marine resources
Mathematical models
Mathematics
Methods
Modelling
Multiple criterion
Oceans
Physical Sciences
Population
Protected species
Protection and preservation
Research and Analysis Methods
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Sea turtles
Seafood
Spatial data
Standard scores
Turtles
Underwater
Whales
Wildlife conservation
title Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20protected%20species%20distributions%20and%20habitats%20to%20inform%20siting%20and%20management%20of%20pioneering%20ocean%20industries:%20A%20case%20study%20for%20Gulf%20of%20Mexico%20aquaculture&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Farmer,%20Nicholas%20A&rft.aucorp=US%20Department%20of%20Energy%20(USDOE),%20Washington,%20DC%20(United%20States).%20Advanced%20Research%20Projects%20Agency-Energy%20(ARPA-E)&rft.date=2022-09-30&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0267333&rft.epage=e0267333&rft.pages=e0267333-e0267333&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0267333&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA720368079%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2719689302&rft_id=info:pmid/36178939&rft_galeid=A720368079&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_69c8e1b0845f40e49bcf7c80cd8efc0c&rfr_iscdi=true