A machine learning approach to evaluate the state of hypertension care coverage: From 2016 STEPs survey in Iran
The increasing burden of hypertension in low- to middle-income countries necessitates the assessment of care coverage to monitor progress and guide future policies. This study uses an ensemble learning approach to evaluate hypertension care coverage in a nationally representative Iranian survey. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0273560-e0273560 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0273560 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0273560 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Tavolinejad, Hamed Roshani, Shahin Rezaei, Negar Ghasemi, Erfan Yoosefi, Moein Rezaei, Nazila Ghamari, Azin Shahin, Sarvenaz Azadnajafabad, Sina Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi Farzadfar, Farshad |
description | The increasing burden of hypertension in low- to middle-income countries necessitates the assessment of care coverage to monitor progress and guide future policies. This study uses an ensemble learning approach to evaluate hypertension care coverage in a nationally representative Iranian survey. The data source was the cross-sectional 2016 Iranian STEPwise approach to risk factor surveillance (STEPs). Hypertension was based on blood pressure [greater than or equal to]140/90 mmHg, reported use of anti-hypertensive medications, or a previous hypertension diagnosis. The four steps of care were screening (irrespective of blood pressure value), diagnosis, treatment, and control. The proportion of patients reaching each step was calculated, and a random forest model was used to identify features associated with progression to each step. After model optimization, the six most important variables at each step were considered to demonstrate population-based marginal effects. The total number of participants was 30541 (52.3% female, median age: 42 years). Overall, 9420 (30.8%) had hypertension, among which 89.7% had screening, 62.3% received diagnosis, 49.3% were treated, and 7.9% achieved control. The random forest model indicated that younger age, male sex, lower wealth, and being unmarried/divorced were consistently associated with a lower probability of receiving care in different levels. Dyslipidemia was associated with reaching diagnosis and treatment steps; however, patients with other cardiovascular comorbidities were not likely to receive more intensive blood pressure management. Hypertension care was mostly missing the treatment and control stages. The random forest model identified features associated with receiving care, indicating opportunities to improve effective coverage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0273560 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2716496230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A718803420</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4120a158646a4733b84694e68c87b2a1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A718803420</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de8ea0432dd6d8fc43dcfd472dcbdd0b30751963d969034dc8101ac996870b293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4soeJ7-B4IBQfRh1_xo08YHYTnudOHgxDt9DWky_bG0yZqki_vf27pVrnIPkocMk898JzPMJMlLgteE5eT9zg3eqm69dxbWmOYs4_hRckYEoytOMXt8z36aPAthh3HGCs7PErdBvdJNawF1oLxtbY3Ufu_d6ETRITioblARUGwAhThZrkLNcQ8-gg2ts0grD0i7A3hVwwd05V2PKCYc3d5dfgkoDP4AR9RatPXKPk-eVKoL8GK-z5NvV5d3F59X1zeftheb65XmXMSVgQIUThk1hpui0ikzujJpTo0ujcElw3lGBGdGcIFZanRBMFFaCF7kuKSCnSevTrr7zgU5NyhImhOeCk4ZHontiTBO7eTet73yR-lUK387nK-l8rHVHciUUKxIVvCUqzRnrCxSLlLghS7ykioyan2csw1lD0aDjV51C9Hli20bWbuDFKkgGWWjwNtZwLsfA4Qo-zZo6DplwQ2nf2c0E_mEvv4Hfbi6marVWEBrKzfm1ZOo3OSkKMam0YlaP0CNx0Df6nGaqnb0LwLeLQJGJsLPWKshBLm9_fr_7M33JfvmHtuA6mITXDfEccDCEkxPoPYuBA_V3yYTLKdl-NMNOS2DnJeB_QITK_pf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716496230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A machine learning approach to evaluate the state of hypertension care coverage: From 2016 STEPs survey in Iran</title><source>PLoS</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tavolinejad, Hamed ; Roshani, Shahin ; Rezaei, Negar ; Ghasemi, Erfan ; Yoosefi, Moein ; Rezaei, Nazila ; Ghamari, Azin ; Shahin, Sarvenaz ; Azadnajafabad, Sina ; Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza ; Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi ; Farzadfar, Farshad</creator><creatorcontrib>Tavolinejad, Hamed ; Roshani, Shahin ; Rezaei, Negar ; Ghasemi, Erfan ; Yoosefi, Moein ; Rezaei, Nazila ; Ghamari, Azin ; Shahin, Sarvenaz ; Azadnajafabad, Sina ; Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza ; Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi ; Farzadfar, Farshad</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing burden of hypertension in low- to middle-income countries necessitates the assessment of care coverage to monitor progress and guide future policies. This study uses an ensemble learning approach to evaluate hypertension care coverage in a nationally representative Iranian survey. The data source was the cross-sectional 2016 Iranian STEPwise approach to risk factor surveillance (STEPs). Hypertension was based on blood pressure [greater than or equal to]140/90 mmHg, reported use of anti-hypertensive medications, or a previous hypertension diagnosis. The four steps of care were screening (irrespective of blood pressure value), diagnosis, treatment, and control. The proportion of patients reaching each step was calculated, and a random forest model was used to identify features associated with progression to each step. After model optimization, the six most important variables at each step were considered to demonstrate population-based marginal effects. The total number of participants was 30541 (52.3% female, median age: 42 years). Overall, 9420 (30.8%) had hypertension, among which 89.7% had screening, 62.3% received diagnosis, 49.3% were treated, and 7.9% achieved control. The random forest model indicated that younger age, male sex, lower wealth, and being unmarried/divorced were consistently associated with a lower probability of receiving care in different levels. Dyslipidemia was associated with reaching diagnosis and treatment steps; however, patients with other cardiovascular comorbidities were not likely to receive more intensive blood pressure management. Hypertension care was mostly missing the treatment and control stages. The random forest model identified features associated with receiving care, indicating opportunities to improve effective coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Age ; Algorithms ; Antihypertensive drugs ; Antihypertensives ; Bias ; Blood pressure ; Body mass index ; Care and treatment ; Comorbidity ; Computer and Information Sciences ; Diagnosis ; Dosage and administration ; Dyslipidemia ; Earth Sciences ; Education ; Evaluation ; Hypertension ; Infectious diseases ; Insurance coverage ; Machine learning ; Medical screening ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Metabolic disorders ; Methods ; Modelling ; Optimization ; Patients ; People and Places ; Population ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Social Sciences ; Surveys ; Variables</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0273560-e0273560</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Tavolinejad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Tavolinejad et al 2022 Tavolinejad et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de8ea0432dd6d8fc43dcfd472dcbdd0b30751963d969034dc8101ac996870b293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de8ea0432dd6d8fc43dcfd472dcbdd0b30751963d969034dc8101ac996870b293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8648-5402 ; 0000-0001-8288-4046 ; 0000-0003-0105-3801 ; 0000-0002-0244-5914</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491523/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491523/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,2915,23845,27901,27902,53766,53768,79342,79343</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tavolinejad, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roshani, Shahin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Negar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Erfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoosefi, Moein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Nazila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghamari, Azin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahin, Sarvenaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azadnajafabad, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farzadfar, Farshad</creatorcontrib><title>A machine learning approach to evaluate the state of hypertension care coverage: From 2016 STEPs survey in Iran</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The increasing burden of hypertension in low- to middle-income countries necessitates the assessment of care coverage to monitor progress and guide future policies. This study uses an ensemble learning approach to evaluate hypertension care coverage in a nationally representative Iranian survey. The data source was the cross-sectional 2016 Iranian STEPwise approach to risk factor surveillance (STEPs). Hypertension was based on blood pressure [greater than or equal to]140/90 mmHg, reported use of anti-hypertensive medications, or a previous hypertension diagnosis. The four steps of care were screening (irrespective of blood pressure value), diagnosis, treatment, and control. The proportion of patients reaching each step was calculated, and a random forest model was used to identify features associated with progression to each step. After model optimization, the six most important variables at each step were considered to demonstrate population-based marginal effects. The total number of participants was 30541 (52.3% female, median age: 42 years). Overall, 9420 (30.8%) had hypertension, among which 89.7% had screening, 62.3% received diagnosis, 49.3% were treated, and 7.9% achieved control. The random forest model indicated that younger age, male sex, lower wealth, and being unmarried/divorced were consistently associated with a lower probability of receiving care in different levels. Dyslipidemia was associated with reaching diagnosis and treatment steps; however, patients with other cardiovascular comorbidities were not likely to receive more intensive blood pressure management. Hypertension care was mostly missing the treatment and control stages. The random forest model identified features associated with receiving care, indicating opportunities to improve effective coverage.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Antihypertensive drugs</subject><subject>Antihypertensives</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Dyslipidemia</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolic disorders</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9-L1DAQx4soeJ7-B4IBQfRh1_xo08YHYTnudOHgxDt9DWky_bG0yZqki_vf27pVrnIPkocMk898JzPMJMlLgteE5eT9zg3eqm69dxbWmOYs4_hRckYEoytOMXt8z36aPAthh3HGCs7PErdBvdJNawF1oLxtbY3Ufu_d6ETRITioblARUGwAhThZrkLNcQ8-gg2ts0grD0i7A3hVwwd05V2PKCYc3d5dfgkoDP4AR9RatPXKPk-eVKoL8GK-z5NvV5d3F59X1zeftheb65XmXMSVgQIUThk1hpui0ikzujJpTo0ujcElw3lGBGdGcIFZanRBMFFaCF7kuKSCnSevTrr7zgU5NyhImhOeCk4ZHontiTBO7eTet73yR-lUK387nK-l8rHVHciUUKxIVvCUqzRnrCxSLlLghS7ykioyan2csw1lD0aDjV51C9Hli20bWbuDFKkgGWWjwNtZwLsfA4Qo-zZo6DplwQ2nf2c0E_mEvv4Hfbi6marVWEBrKzfm1ZOo3OSkKMam0YlaP0CNx0Df6nGaqnb0LwLeLQJGJsLPWKshBLm9_fr_7M33JfvmHtuA6mITXDfEccDCEkxPoPYuBA_V3yYTLKdl-NMNOS2DnJeB_QITK_pf</recordid><startdate>20220921</startdate><enddate>20220921</enddate><creator>Tavolinejad, Hamed</creator><creator>Roshani, Shahin</creator><creator>Rezaei, Negar</creator><creator>Ghasemi, Erfan</creator><creator>Yoosefi, Moein</creator><creator>Rezaei, Nazila</creator><creator>Ghamari, Azin</creator><creator>Shahin, Sarvenaz</creator><creator>Azadnajafabad, Sina</creator><creator>Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza</creator><creator>Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi</creator><creator>Farzadfar, Farshad</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8648-5402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-4046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0105-3801</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-5914</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220921</creationdate><title>A machine learning approach to evaluate the state of hypertension care coverage: From 2016 STEPs survey in Iran</title><author>Tavolinejad, Hamed ; Roshani, Shahin ; Rezaei, Negar ; Ghasemi, Erfan ; Yoosefi, Moein ; Rezaei, Nazila ; Ghamari, Azin ; Shahin, Sarvenaz ; Azadnajafabad, Sina ; Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza ; Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi ; Farzadfar, Farshad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-de8ea0432dd6d8fc43dcfd472dcbdd0b30751963d969034dc8101ac996870b293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Antihypertensive drugs</topic><topic>Antihypertensives</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Dyslipidemia</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolic disorders</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tavolinejad, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roshani, Shahin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Negar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghasemi, Erfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoosefi, Moein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Nazila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghamari, Azin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahin, Sarvenaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azadnajafabad, Sina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farzadfar, Farshad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tavolinejad, Hamed</au><au>Roshani, Shahin</au><au>Rezaei, Negar</au><au>Ghasemi, Erfan</au><au>Yoosefi, Moein</au><au>Rezaei, Nazila</au><au>Ghamari, Azin</au><au>Shahin, Sarvenaz</au><au>Azadnajafabad, Sina</au><au>Malekpour, Mohammad-Reza</au><au>Rashidi, Mohammad-Mahdi</au><au>Farzadfar, Farshad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A machine learning approach to evaluate the state of hypertension care coverage: From 2016 STEPs survey in Iran</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-09-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0273560</spage><epage>e0273560</epage><pages>e0273560-e0273560</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The increasing burden of hypertension in low- to middle-income countries necessitates the assessment of care coverage to monitor progress and guide future policies. This study uses an ensemble learning approach to evaluate hypertension care coverage in a nationally representative Iranian survey. The data source was the cross-sectional 2016 Iranian STEPwise approach to risk factor surveillance (STEPs). Hypertension was based on blood pressure [greater than or equal to]140/90 mmHg, reported use of anti-hypertensive medications, or a previous hypertension diagnosis. The four steps of care were screening (irrespective of blood pressure value), diagnosis, treatment, and control. The proportion of patients reaching each step was calculated, and a random forest model was used to identify features associated with progression to each step. After model optimization, the six most important variables at each step were considered to demonstrate population-based marginal effects. The total number of participants was 30541 (52.3% female, median age: 42 years). Overall, 9420 (30.8%) had hypertension, among which 89.7% had screening, 62.3% received diagnosis, 49.3% were treated, and 7.9% achieved control. The random forest model indicated that younger age, male sex, lower wealth, and being unmarried/divorced were consistently associated with a lower probability of receiving care in different levels. Dyslipidemia was associated with reaching diagnosis and treatment steps; however, patients with other cardiovascular comorbidities were not likely to receive more intensive blood pressure management. Hypertension care was mostly missing the treatment and control stages. The random forest model identified features associated with receiving care, indicating opportunities to improve effective coverage.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0273560</doi><tpages>e0273560</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8648-5402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-4046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0105-3801</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-5914</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0273560-e0273560 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2716496230 |
source | PLoS; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); EZB Free E-Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy Age Algorithms Antihypertensive drugs Antihypertensives Bias Blood pressure Body mass index Care and treatment Comorbidity Computer and Information Sciences Diagnosis Dosage and administration Dyslipidemia Earth Sciences Education Evaluation Hypertension Infectious diseases Insurance coverage Machine learning Medical screening Medicine and Health Sciences Metabolic disorders Methods Modelling Optimization Patients People and Places Population Risk analysis Risk factors Social Sciences Surveys Variables |
title | A machine learning approach to evaluate the state of hypertension care coverage: From 2016 STEPs survey in Iran |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20machine%20learning%20approach%20to%20evaluate%20the%20state%20of%20hypertension%20care%20coverage:%20From%202016%20STEPs%20survey%20in%20Iran&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Tavolinejad,%20Hamed&rft.date=2022-09-21&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0273560&rft.epage=e0273560&rft.pages=e0273560-e0273560&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0273560&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA718803420%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716496230&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A718803420&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4120a158646a4733b84694e68c87b2a1&rfr_iscdi=true |