Physicians’ perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention
Background Firearm-related injuries remain a heavy public health and clinical burden in the United States. Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, which create a path through a civil court process to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed to be at risk of harming themselves or others...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0274489-e0274489 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e0274489 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | e0274489 |
| container_title | PloS one |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Hollo, Ashley VanderStoep, Amy Frattaroli, Shannon |
| description | Background Firearm-related injuries remain a heavy public health and clinical burden in the United States. Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, which create a path through a civil court process to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed to be at risk of harming themselves or others and are one strategy designed to reduce firearm violence. Maryland was the first state to authorize clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Objective We aim to document a sample of Maryland physicians' perspectives about the utility of, any barriers to, and other thoughts on clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Design A series of semi-structured interviews with Maryland physicians identified through a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. We coded the transcribed interviews and analyzed the coded transcripts for themes using deductive content analysis. Setting/Participants 13 Maryland-based physicians interviewed over Zoom in and around Baltimore City, Maryland. Results The interviewees had overall positive feedback about ERPO as a gun violence prevention tool in the clinical setting. They identified several barriers to effective implementation such as time spent on paperwork and in court, a lack of awareness among clinicians about ERPO, threats to therapeutic alliance, and a sense of futility in a culture where firearms are easy to obtain. Solutions such as providing clinician education about ERPO laws, allowing for virtual court testimony, and creating a consult service with ERPO specialists to manage ERPO petitions were discussed. Limitations This study includes a small sample of Maryland-based physicians. Conclusions The physicians we interviewed expressed interest in knowing more about ERPO laws and emphasized education as an important tool for improving implementation. Addressing physicians' concerns about ERPO implementation will improve their ability to be effective and efficient petitioners. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0274489 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2714022936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A717391460</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_08cc5b0467324d87be854ea231c4fa96</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A717391460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-de0a6d2adc22f6b536b23ca23099068a002aaf746a7de18095522899d3c410b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUtGK1DAULaK46-ofCAZ8WR9mTJM0bXwQlmHUhYUZFn0OaXrbydgmNWkH982vEPw9v8TUqeLIkoeEc0_OvedykuR5ipcpzdPXezd6q9pl7ywsMckZK8SD5DwVlCw4wfThP--z5EkIe4wzWnD-ODmjHAtBOD1Pvm93d8Foo2z4-e0H6sGHHvRgDhCQs2j9dfDQAbo14TPaejdMtYhvfBWZ6HJ9u92EV8hYNOwA6dZYo1WLAgyDsc0btNqptgXbRDVlK-T63vlhtGYwEamdR81o0cG4yNGAeg8HsFODp8mjWrUBns33RfLp3frj6sPiZvP-enV1s9AZxsOiAqx4RVSlCal5mVFeEqoVodEe5oXCmChV54yrvIK0wCLLCCmEqKhmKS4xvUheHHX71gU5rzRIkqcMEyIoj4zrI6Nyai97bzrl76RTRv4GnG-k8oPRLUhcaJ2VmPGcElYVeQlFxiBOk2pWKzFpvZ27jWUHlY5evWpPRE8r1uxk4w5SMC4Ez6LA5Szg3ZcRwiA7EzS0rbLgxnluTjI2UV_-R73f3cxqVDRgbO1iXz2Jyqs8zalIGZ-2tLyHFU8FndExf7WJ-MkHdvygvQvBQ_3XY4rllN4_w8gpvXJOL_0FgdjlWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714022936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicians’ perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention</title><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hollo, Ashley ; VanderStoep, Amy ; Frattaroli, Shannon</creator><contributor>West, James Curtis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hollo, Ashley ; VanderStoep, Amy ; Frattaroli, Shannon ; West, James Curtis</creatorcontrib><description>Background Firearm-related injuries remain a heavy public health and clinical burden in the United States. Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, which create a path through a civil court process to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed to be at risk of harming themselves or others and are one strategy designed to reduce firearm violence. Maryland was the first state to authorize clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Objective We aim to document a sample of Maryland physicians' perspectives about the utility of, any barriers to, and other thoughts on clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Design A series of semi-structured interviews with Maryland physicians identified through a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. We coded the transcribed interviews and analyzed the coded transcripts for themes using deductive content analysis. Setting/Participants 13 Maryland-based physicians interviewed over Zoom in and around Baltimore City, Maryland. Results The interviewees had overall positive feedback about ERPO as a gun violence prevention tool in the clinical setting. They identified several barriers to effective implementation such as time spent on paperwork and in court, a lack of awareness among clinicians about ERPO, threats to therapeutic alliance, and a sense of futility in a culture where firearms are easy to obtain. Solutions such as providing clinician education about ERPO laws, allowing for virtual court testimony, and creating a consult service with ERPO specialists to manage ERPO petitions were discussed. Limitations This study includes a small sample of Maryland-based physicians. Conclusions The physicians we interviewed expressed interest in knowing more about ERPO laws and emphasized education as an important tool for improving implementation. Addressing physicians' concerns about ERPO implementation will improve their ability to be effective and efficient petitioners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274489</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36099263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Causes of ; Content analysis ; Court hearings & proceedings ; Data collection ; Domestic violence ; Education ; Emergency medical care ; Engineering and Technology ; Firearm laws & regulations ; Firearms ; Gun violence ; Health risks ; Implementation ; Influence ; Injuries ; Injury prevention ; Interviews ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Pediatrics ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Positive feedback ; Prevention ; Protection ; Public health ; Qualitative research ; Risk ; Small arms ; Snowball sampling ; Social Sciences ; Specialists ; Suicidal behavior ; Testimony ; Violence ; Wounds and injuries</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0274489-e0274489</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Hollo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Hollo et al 2022 Hollo et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-de0a6d2adc22f6b536b23ca23099068a002aaf746a7de18095522899d3c410b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-de0a6d2adc22f6b536b23ca23099068a002aaf746a7de18095522899d3c410b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0975-9713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469965/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469965/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,2926,23865,27343,27923,27924,33773,53790,53792,79371,79372</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>West, James Curtis</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hollo, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanderStoep, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frattaroli, Shannon</creatorcontrib><title>Physicians’ perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Background Firearm-related injuries remain a heavy public health and clinical burden in the United States. Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, which create a path through a civil court process to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed to be at risk of harming themselves or others and are one strategy designed to reduce firearm violence. Maryland was the first state to authorize clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Objective We aim to document a sample of Maryland physicians' perspectives about the utility of, any barriers to, and other thoughts on clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Design A series of semi-structured interviews with Maryland physicians identified through a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. We coded the transcribed interviews and analyzed the coded transcripts for themes using deductive content analysis. Setting/Participants 13 Maryland-based physicians interviewed over Zoom in and around Baltimore City, Maryland. Results The interviewees had overall positive feedback about ERPO as a gun violence prevention tool in the clinical setting. They identified several barriers to effective implementation such as time spent on paperwork and in court, a lack of awareness among clinicians about ERPO, threats to therapeutic alliance, and a sense of futility in a culture where firearms are easy to obtain. Solutions such as providing clinician education about ERPO laws, allowing for virtual court testimony, and creating a consult service with ERPO specialists to manage ERPO petitions were discussed. Limitations This study includes a small sample of Maryland-based physicians. Conclusions The physicians we interviewed expressed interest in knowing more about ERPO laws and emphasized education as an important tool for improving implementation. Addressing physicians' concerns about ERPO implementation will improve their ability to be effective and efficient petitioners.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Causes of</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Firearm laws & regulations</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Gun violence</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Positive feedback</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Small arms</subject><subject>Snowball sampling</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><subject>Suicidal behavior</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Wounds and injuries</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUtGK1DAULaK46-ofCAZ8WR9mTJM0bXwQlmHUhYUZFn0OaXrbydgmNWkH982vEPw9v8TUqeLIkoeEc0_OvedykuR5ipcpzdPXezd6q9pl7ywsMckZK8SD5DwVlCw4wfThP--z5EkIe4wzWnD-ODmjHAtBOD1Pvm93d8Foo2z4-e0H6sGHHvRgDhCQs2j9dfDQAbo14TPaejdMtYhvfBWZ6HJ9u92EV8hYNOwA6dZYo1WLAgyDsc0btNqptgXbRDVlK-T63vlhtGYwEamdR81o0cG4yNGAeg8HsFODp8mjWrUBns33RfLp3frj6sPiZvP-enV1s9AZxsOiAqx4RVSlCal5mVFeEqoVodEe5oXCmChV54yrvIK0wCLLCCmEqKhmKS4xvUheHHX71gU5rzRIkqcMEyIoj4zrI6Nyai97bzrl76RTRv4GnG-k8oPRLUhcaJ2VmPGcElYVeQlFxiBOk2pWKzFpvZ27jWUHlY5evWpPRE8r1uxk4w5SMC4Ez6LA5Szg3ZcRwiA7EzS0rbLgxnluTjI2UV_-R73f3cxqVDRgbO1iXz2Jyqs8zalIGZ-2tLyHFU8FndExf7WJ-MkHdvygvQvBQ_3XY4rllN4_w8gpvXJOL_0FgdjlWg</recordid><startdate>20220913</startdate><enddate>20220913</enddate><creator>Hollo, Ashley</creator><creator>VanderStoep, Amy</creator><creator>Frattaroli, Shannon</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-9713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220913</creationdate><title>Physicians’ perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention</title><author>Hollo, Ashley ; VanderStoep, Amy ; Frattaroli, Shannon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-de0a6d2adc22f6b536b23ca23099068a002aaf746a7de18095522899d3c410b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Causes of</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Firearm laws & regulations</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Gun violence</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Positive feedback</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Small arms</topic><topic>Snowball sampling</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><topic>Suicidal behavior</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Wounds and injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hollo, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanderStoep, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frattaroli, Shannon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hollo, Ashley</au><au>VanderStoep, Amy</au><au>Frattaroli, Shannon</au><au>West, James Curtis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicians’ perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-09-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0274489</spage><epage>e0274489</epage><pages>e0274489-e0274489</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Background Firearm-related injuries remain a heavy public health and clinical burden in the United States. Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) laws, which create a path through a civil court process to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed to be at risk of harming themselves or others and are one strategy designed to reduce firearm violence. Maryland was the first state to authorize clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Objective We aim to document a sample of Maryland physicians' perspectives about the utility of, any barriers to, and other thoughts on clinicians as ERPO petitioners. Design A series of semi-structured interviews with Maryland physicians identified through a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. We coded the transcribed interviews and analyzed the coded transcripts for themes using deductive content analysis. Setting/Participants 13 Maryland-based physicians interviewed over Zoom in and around Baltimore City, Maryland. Results The interviewees had overall positive feedback about ERPO as a gun violence prevention tool in the clinical setting. They identified several barriers to effective implementation such as time spent on paperwork and in court, a lack of awareness among clinicians about ERPO, threats to therapeutic alliance, and a sense of futility in a culture where firearms are easy to obtain. Solutions such as providing clinician education about ERPO laws, allowing for virtual court testimony, and creating a consult service with ERPO specialists to manage ERPO petitions were discussed. Limitations This study includes a small sample of Maryland-based physicians. Conclusions The physicians we interviewed expressed interest in knowing more about ERPO laws and emphasized education as an important tool for improving implementation. Addressing physicians' concerns about ERPO implementation will improve their ability to be effective and efficient petitioners.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36099263</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0274489</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0975-9713</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
| ispartof | PloS one, 2022-09, Vol.17 (9), p.e0274489-e0274489 |
| issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2714022936 |
| source | Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed; Sociological Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Aggression Causes of Content analysis Court hearings & proceedings Data collection Domestic violence Education Emergency medical care Engineering and Technology Firearm laws & regulations Firearms Gun violence Health risks Implementation Influence Injuries Injury prevention Interviews Medicine and Health Sciences Pediatrics People and Places Physicians Positive feedback Prevention Protection Public health Qualitative research Risk Small arms Snowball sampling Social Sciences Specialists Suicidal behavior Testimony Violence Wounds and injuries |
| title | Physicians’ perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A41%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicians%E2%80%99%20perspectives%20on%20Extreme%20Risk%20Protection%20Orders%20(ERPOs)%20in%20the%20clinical%20setting:%20Challenges%20and%20opportunities%20for%20gun%20violence%20prevention&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Hollo,%20Ashley&rft.date=2022-09-13&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0274489&rft.epage=e0274489&rft.pages=e0274489-e0274489&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0274489&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA717391460%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714022936&rft_id=info:pmid/36099263&rft_galeid=A717391460&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_08cc5b0467324d87be854ea231c4fa96&rfr_iscdi=true |