Does E-commerce participation increase the use intensity of organic fertilizers in fruit production?–Evidence from China
Commerce has had positive impacts on the whole agri-food value chain at different stages, it was developed rapidly in rural China in the past few years. E-commerce participation can promote the use intensity of organic fertilizers (OF) and this could achieve many benefits for different stakeholders...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0273160-e0273160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0273160 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0273160 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Wang, Cuicui Wang, Hua Xia, Chunping Ali, Abdelrahman |
description | Commerce has had positive impacts on the whole agri-food value chain at different stages, it was developed rapidly in rural China in the past few years. E-commerce participation can promote the use intensity of organic fertilizers (OF) and this could achieve many benefits for different stakeholders including ensuring food safety, positive environmental impacts and promoting the adoption of green production technologies. Therefore, this study has used primary data collected from 733 fruit farmers in rural China to explore the impact of e-commerce participation on fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). Unlike previous studies investigating the dichotomous decision of (OF) adoption, this study captures the use intensity of (OF) from both input quantity and cost aspects. We employed an endogenous switching regression (ESR) model to address selectivity bias caused by observed and unobserved factors. The results show that e-commerce participation significantly increases the use intensity of (OF) in input quantity and cost by 19.48% and 29.50%, respectively. Heterogeneous analysis further reveals that compared to fruit farmers with a low e-commerce participation level, fruit farmers with a high e-commerce participation level have higher (OF) use intensity. The findings also show that risk preference, human capital, cultivated area, cooperative membership and government restraint mechanisms positively and significantly affect the probability of fruit farmers’ participation in e-commerce and fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). The results emphasize that e-commerce promotion is an efficient way to encourage farmers to adopt (OF), which help improve product quality and promote sustainable agricultural development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0273160 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2708227909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A715527686</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_784748e2efb34ef1aa82663059e5b4f5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A715527686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-febabd72c578cb6f83a57631dfc285d0f294877f55aff555857cac3f751e2693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B4ILgujDndlk82NflHKeelAoaPE1ZLOTuxy7yTXZLbZP_g_-h_4l5nqrdKUPEsiEyWe-kxkyWfa8QPOC8OLt1g_BqXa-8w7mCHNSMPQgOy4qgmcMI_LwzvkoexLjFiFKBGOPsyPCUIkEF8fZzQcPMV_OtO86CBrynQq91Xaneutdbp0OoCLk_QbyIVnrenDR9te5N7kPa-Wszg2kmNbeQIgJyE0YbJ_vgm8GvVd5_-vHz-WVbcAlfRN8ly821qmn2SOj2gjPRnuSXXxcXiw-z87OP60Wp2czzVjVzwzUqm441pQLXTMjiKKckaIxGgvaIIOrUnBuKFUmbVRQrpUmhtMCMKvISfbiILtrfZRj16LEHAmMeYX2xOpANF5t5S7YToVr6ZWVt45UpbxtSguSi5KXAjCYmpRgCqUEZowgWgGtS0OT1rsx21B30GhwfVDtRHR64-xGrv2VrErMhBBJ4PUoEPzlALGXnY0a2lY58MP4bioqUSb05T_o_dWN1FqlAqwzPuXVe1F5ygtKMWeCJWp-D5VWA53V6YsZm_yTgDeTgMT08L1fqyFGufr65f_Z829T9tUddgOq7TfRt8P-I8UpWB5AHXyMAczfJhdI7ifkTzfkfkLkOCHkN6QGBHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708227909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does E-commerce participation increase the use intensity of organic fertilizers in fruit production?–Evidence from China</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wang, Cuicui ; Wang, Hua ; Xia, Chunping ; Ali, Abdelrahman</creator><contributor>Zúniga-González, Carlos Alberto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cuicui ; Wang, Hua ; Xia, Chunping ; Ali, Abdelrahman ; Zúniga-González, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Commerce has had positive impacts on the whole agri-food value chain at different stages, it was developed rapidly in rural China in the past few years. E-commerce participation can promote the use intensity of organic fertilizers (OF) and this could achieve many benefits for different stakeholders including ensuring food safety, positive environmental impacts and promoting the adoption of green production technologies. Therefore, this study has used primary data collected from 733 fruit farmers in rural China to explore the impact of e-commerce participation on fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). Unlike previous studies investigating the dichotomous decision of (OF) adoption, this study captures the use intensity of (OF) from both input quantity and cost aspects. We employed an endogenous switching regression (ESR) model to address selectivity bias caused by observed and unobserved factors. The results show that e-commerce participation significantly increases the use intensity of (OF) in input quantity and cost by 19.48% and 29.50%, respectively. Heterogeneous analysis further reveals that compared to fruit farmers with a low e-commerce participation level, fruit farmers with a high e-commerce participation level have higher (OF) use intensity. The findings also show that risk preference, human capital, cultivated area, cooperative membership and government restraint mechanisms positively and significantly affect the probability of fruit farmers’ participation in e-commerce and fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). The results emphasize that e-commerce promotion is an efficient way to encourage farmers to adopt (OF), which help improve product quality and promote sustainable agricultural development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36040878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural development ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Consumers ; Cost analysis ; Costs ; Crop production ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Economic aspects ; Efficiency ; Electronic commerce ; Environmental impact ; Evaluation ; Farmers ; Farms ; Fertilizers ; Food ; Food chains ; Food quality ; Food safety ; Fruit industry ; Fruits ; Households ; Human capital ; Management ; Nonpoint source pollution ; Organic fertilizers ; Participation ; People and Places ; Production management ; Regression models ; Rural areas ; Selectivity ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0273160-e0273160</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Wang et al 2022 Wang et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-febabd72c578cb6f83a57631dfc285d0f294877f55aff555857cac3f751e2693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-febabd72c578cb6f83a57631dfc285d0f294877f55aff555857cac3f751e2693</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4058-4891 ; 0000-0002-1196-5532</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426888/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426888/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793,79600,79601</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Zúniga-González, Carlos Alberto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cuicui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Chunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Abdelrahman</creatorcontrib><title>Does E-commerce participation increase the use intensity of organic fertilizers in fruit production?–Evidence from China</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Commerce has had positive impacts on the whole agri-food value chain at different stages, it was developed rapidly in rural China in the past few years. E-commerce participation can promote the use intensity of organic fertilizers (OF) and this could achieve many benefits for different stakeholders including ensuring food safety, positive environmental impacts and promoting the adoption of green production technologies. Therefore, this study has used primary data collected from 733 fruit farmers in rural China to explore the impact of e-commerce participation on fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). Unlike previous studies investigating the dichotomous decision of (OF) adoption, this study captures the use intensity of (OF) from both input quantity and cost aspects. We employed an endogenous switching regression (ESR) model to address selectivity bias caused by observed and unobserved factors. The results show that e-commerce participation significantly increases the use intensity of (OF) in input quantity and cost by 19.48% and 29.50%, respectively. Heterogeneous analysis further reveals that compared to fruit farmers with a low e-commerce participation level, fruit farmers with a high e-commerce participation level have higher (OF) use intensity. The findings also show that risk preference, human capital, cultivated area, cooperative membership and government restraint mechanisms positively and significantly affect the probability of fruit farmers’ participation in e-commerce and fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). The results emphasize that e-commerce promotion is an efficient way to encourage farmers to adopt (OF), which help improve product quality and promote sustainable agricultural development.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Fruit industry</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Nonpoint source pollution</subject><subject>Organic fertilizers</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B4ILgujDndlk82NflHKeelAoaPE1ZLOTuxy7yTXZLbZP_g_-h_4l5nqrdKUPEsiEyWe-kxkyWfa8QPOC8OLt1g_BqXa-8w7mCHNSMPQgOy4qgmcMI_LwzvkoexLjFiFKBGOPsyPCUIkEF8fZzQcPMV_OtO86CBrynQq91Xaneutdbp0OoCLk_QbyIVnrenDR9te5N7kPa-Wszg2kmNbeQIgJyE0YbJ_vgm8GvVd5_-vHz-WVbcAlfRN8ly821qmn2SOj2gjPRnuSXXxcXiw-z87OP60Wp2czzVjVzwzUqm441pQLXTMjiKKckaIxGgvaIIOrUnBuKFUmbVRQrpUmhtMCMKvISfbiILtrfZRj16LEHAmMeYX2xOpANF5t5S7YToVr6ZWVt45UpbxtSguSi5KXAjCYmpRgCqUEZowgWgGtS0OT1rsx21B30GhwfVDtRHR64-xGrv2VrErMhBBJ4PUoEPzlALGXnY0a2lY58MP4bioqUSb05T_o_dWN1FqlAqwzPuXVe1F5ygtKMWeCJWp-D5VWA53V6YsZm_yTgDeTgMT08L1fqyFGufr65f_Z829T9tUddgOq7TfRt8P-I8UpWB5AHXyMAczfJhdI7ifkTzfkfkLkOCHkN6QGBHY</recordid><startdate>20220830</startdate><enddate>20220830</enddate><creator>Wang, Cuicui</creator><creator>Wang, Hua</creator><creator>Xia, Chunping</creator><creator>Ali, Abdelrahman</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-4891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-5532</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220830</creationdate><title>Does E-commerce participation increase the use intensity of organic fertilizers in fruit production?–Evidence from China</title><author>Wang, Cuicui ; Wang, Hua ; Xia, Chunping ; Ali, Abdelrahman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-febabd72c578cb6f83a57631dfc285d0f294877f55aff555857cac3f751e2693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Fruit industry</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>Organic fertilizers</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cuicui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Chunping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Abdelrahman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Cuicui</au><au>Wang, Hua</au><au>Xia, Chunping</au><au>Ali, Abdelrahman</au><au>Zúniga-González, Carlos Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does E-commerce participation increase the use intensity of organic fertilizers in fruit production?–Evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-08-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0273160</spage><epage>e0273160</epage><pages>e0273160-e0273160</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Commerce has had positive impacts on the whole agri-food value chain at different stages, it was developed rapidly in rural China in the past few years. E-commerce participation can promote the use intensity of organic fertilizers (OF) and this could achieve many benefits for different stakeholders including ensuring food safety, positive environmental impacts and promoting the adoption of green production technologies. Therefore, this study has used primary data collected from 733 fruit farmers in rural China to explore the impact of e-commerce participation on fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). Unlike previous studies investigating the dichotomous decision of (OF) adoption, this study captures the use intensity of (OF) from both input quantity and cost aspects. We employed an endogenous switching regression (ESR) model to address selectivity bias caused by observed and unobserved factors. The results show that e-commerce participation significantly increases the use intensity of (OF) in input quantity and cost by 19.48% and 29.50%, respectively. Heterogeneous analysis further reveals that compared to fruit farmers with a low e-commerce participation level, fruit farmers with a high e-commerce participation level have higher (OF) use intensity. The findings also show that risk preference, human capital, cultivated area, cooperative membership and government restraint mechanisms positively and significantly affect the probability of fruit farmers’ participation in e-commerce and fruit farmers’ use intensity of (OF). The results emphasize that e-commerce promotion is an efficient way to encourage farmers to adopt (OF), which help improve product quality and promote sustainable agricultural development.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>36040878</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0273160</doi><tpages>e0273160</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-4891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-5532</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0273160-e0273160 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_2708227909 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Agribusiness Agricultural development Agricultural production Agriculture Biology and Life Sciences Consumers Cost analysis Costs Crop production Ecology and Environmental Sciences Economic aspects Efficiency Electronic commerce Environmental impact Evaluation Farmers Farms Fertilizers Food Food chains Food quality Food safety Fruit industry Fruits Households Human capital Management Nonpoint source pollution Organic fertilizers Participation People and Places Production management Regression models Rural areas Selectivity Social Sciences Statistical analysis Sustainable agriculture Sustainable development |
title | Does E-commerce participation increase the use intensity of organic fertilizers in fruit production?–Evidence from China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A32%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20E-commerce%20participation%20increase%20the%20use%20intensity%20of%20organic%20fertilizers%20in%20fruit%20production?%E2%80%93Evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Wang,%20Cuicui&rft.date=2022-08-30&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0273160&rft.epage=e0273160&rft.pages=e0273160-e0273160&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0273160&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA715527686%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708227909&rft_id=info:pmid/36040878&rft_galeid=A715527686&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_784748e2efb34ef1aa82663059e5b4f5&rfr_iscdi=true |