Anxiety and depression in Guatemala: Sociodemographic characteristics and service access

Epidemiological data on depression and anxiety in Guatemala is lacking. Using 2016 National Disability Survey data, we explored the sociodemographics of people with anxiety and/or depression and its heightened burden on access to key services. The survey (n = 13,073) used the Washington Group Extend...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0272780-e0272780
Hauptverfasser: Naber, Jonathan, Mactaggart, Islay, Dionicio, Carlos, Polack, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0272780
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0272780
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Naber, Jonathan
Mactaggart, Islay
Dionicio, Carlos
Polack, Sarah
description Epidemiological data on depression and anxiety in Guatemala is lacking. Using 2016 National Disability Survey data, we explored the sociodemographics of people with anxiety and/or depression and its heightened burden on access to key services. The survey (n = 13,073) used the Washington Group Extended Set to estimate disability prevalence, including anxiety and/or depression. A nested case-control study was included to explore the impact of disability on key life areas. Cases (indicating ‘A lot of difficulty’ or ‘Cannot do’ in one or more functional domain) and age-/sex-matched controls were administered a structured questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression and heightened-burden analysis were conducted. Higher odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants who were 50+ (aOR 2.3, 1.8–3.1), female (aOR 1.8, 1.4–2.2), urban (aOR 1.5, 1.2–1.9), divorced/separated (aOR 2.0, 1.3–3.0), and widowed (aOR 1.6, 1.0–2.4), as well as those with impaired communication or cognition (aOR 17.6, 13.0–23.8), self-care (aOR 13.2, 8.5–20.5), walking (aOR 13.3, 9.7–18.3), hearing (aOR 8.5, 5.6–13.1), and vision (aOR 8.5, 6.1–11.8). Lower odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants with a university education (aOR 0.2, 0.5–0.9), and those living in the southeast (aOR 0.2, 0.1–0.3) or northeast (aOR 0.3, 0.2–0.4). Compared to people with impairments that were not depression and/or anxiety, people with depression and/or anxiety were less likely to receive a retirement pension (aOR 0.4, 0.2–0.8), and more likely to receive medication for depression/anxiety (aOR 4.1, 1.9–9.1), report a serious health problem (aOR 1.8, 1.3–2.5), and seek advice/treatment with a government health worker/health post (aOR 6.3, 1.0–39.2).
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0272780
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2701492807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713732684</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1683afef4b1e4dbfb15edbbe7d4aa73c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A713732684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-160ce901ead7e68c67306eee751dc5120af7c3b2aad268eb055e82e2a5101a983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B4ILgujDnfmxm-z6IBxF60GhYFV8C7PJ7F2Ovc2ZZEv735u7W6UrfZA8JEw-853MZCbLXlIyp1zS9xs3-B66-c71OCdMMlmRR9kprTmbCUb443vnk-xZCBtCSl4J8TQ74WUtiBTFafZz0d9ajHc59CY3uPMYgnV9bvv8YoCIW-jgQ37ttHUGt27lYbe2Otdr8KAjehui1eHgHdDfWI05aJ1EnmdPWugCvhj3s-z750_fzr_MLq8ulueLy5kWoo4zKojGmlAEI1FUWkhOBCLKkhpdUkaglZo3DMAwUWFDyhIrhgxKSijUFT_LXh11d50LaixKUEwSWtSsIjIRyyNhHGzUztst-DvlwKqDwfmVAp-y6FBRUXFosS0aioVp2oaWaJoGpSkAJNdJ6-MYbWi2aDT20UM3EZ3e9HatVu5G1VwWjJVJ4O0o4N2vAUNUWxs0dh306IbDuxmtWFGLhL7-B304u5FaQUrA9q1LcfVeVC1kahSeylYkav4AlVb6VKtTB7U22ScO7yYOiYl4G1cwhKCW11__n736MWXf3GPXCF1cB9cNMTVdmILFEdTeheCx_VtkStR-AP5UQ-0HQI0DwH8D9MD3_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2701492807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anxiety and depression in Guatemala: Sociodemographic characteristics and service access</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Naber, Jonathan ; Mactaggart, Islay ; Dionicio, Carlos ; Polack, Sarah</creator><contributor>Hong, Seo Ah</contributor><creatorcontrib>Naber, Jonathan ; Mactaggart, Islay ; Dionicio, Carlos ; Polack, Sarah ; Hong, Seo Ah</creatorcontrib><description>Epidemiological data on depression and anxiety in Guatemala is lacking. Using 2016 National Disability Survey data, we explored the sociodemographics of people with anxiety and/or depression and its heightened burden on access to key services. The survey (n = 13,073) used the Washington Group Extended Set to estimate disability prevalence, including anxiety and/or depression. A nested case-control study was included to explore the impact of disability on key life areas. Cases (indicating ‘A lot of difficulty’ or ‘Cannot do’ in one or more functional domain) and age-/sex-matched controls were administered a structured questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression and heightened-burden analysis were conducted. Higher odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants who were 50+ (aOR 2.3, 1.8–3.1), female (aOR 1.8, 1.4–2.2), urban (aOR 1.5, 1.2–1.9), divorced/separated (aOR 2.0, 1.3–3.0), and widowed (aOR 1.6, 1.0–2.4), as well as those with impaired communication or cognition (aOR 17.6, 13.0–23.8), self-care (aOR 13.2, 8.5–20.5), walking (aOR 13.3, 9.7–18.3), hearing (aOR 8.5, 5.6–13.1), and vision (aOR 8.5, 6.1–11.8). Lower odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants with a university education (aOR 0.2, 0.5–0.9), and those living in the southeast (aOR 0.2, 0.1–0.3) or northeast (aOR 0.3, 0.2–0.4). Compared to people with impairments that were not depression and/or anxiety, people with depression and/or anxiety were less likely to receive a retirement pension (aOR 0.4, 0.2–0.8), and more likely to receive medication for depression/anxiety (aOR 4.1, 1.9–9.1), report a serious health problem (aOR 1.8, 1.3–2.5), and seek advice/treatment with a government health worker/health post (aOR 6.3, 1.0–39.2).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272780</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35960764</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Age ; Anxiety ; Anxiety disorders ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cognition ; Depression, Mental ; Diagnosis ; Disability ; Distribution ; Drug abuse ; Earth Sciences ; Epidemiology ; Medical personnel ; Medical screening ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Mental depression ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Multivariable control ; People and places ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Population ; Public health ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Retirement ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0272780-e0272780</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Naber et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Naber et al 2022 Naber et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-160ce901ead7e68c67306eee751dc5120af7c3b2aad268eb055e82e2a5101a983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-160ce901ead7e68c67306eee751dc5120af7c3b2aad268eb055e82e2a5101a983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4821-6030</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374225/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374225/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2928,23866,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hong, Seo Ah</contributor><creatorcontrib>Naber, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mactaggart, Islay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionicio, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polack, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Anxiety and depression in Guatemala: Sociodemographic characteristics and service access</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Epidemiological data on depression and anxiety in Guatemala is lacking. Using 2016 National Disability Survey data, we explored the sociodemographics of people with anxiety and/or depression and its heightened burden on access to key services. The survey (n = 13,073) used the Washington Group Extended Set to estimate disability prevalence, including anxiety and/or depression. A nested case-control study was included to explore the impact of disability on key life areas. Cases (indicating ‘A lot of difficulty’ or ‘Cannot do’ in one or more functional domain) and age-/sex-matched controls were administered a structured questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression and heightened-burden analysis were conducted. Higher odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants who were 50+ (aOR 2.3, 1.8–3.1), female (aOR 1.8, 1.4–2.2), urban (aOR 1.5, 1.2–1.9), divorced/separated (aOR 2.0, 1.3–3.0), and widowed (aOR 1.6, 1.0–2.4), as well as those with impaired communication or cognition (aOR 17.6, 13.0–23.8), self-care (aOR 13.2, 8.5–20.5), walking (aOR 13.3, 9.7–18.3), hearing (aOR 8.5, 5.6–13.1), and vision (aOR 8.5, 6.1–11.8). Lower odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants with a university education (aOR 0.2, 0.5–0.9), and those living in the southeast (aOR 0.2, 0.1–0.3) or northeast (aOR 0.3, 0.2–0.4). Compared to people with impairments that were not depression and/or anxiety, people with depression and/or anxiety were less likely to receive a retirement pension (aOR 0.4, 0.2–0.8), and more likely to receive medication for depression/anxiety (aOR 4.1, 1.9–9.1), report a serious health problem (aOR 1.8, 1.3–2.5), and seek advice/treatment with a government health worker/health post (aOR 6.3, 1.0–39.2).</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Multivariable control</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Retirement</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B4ILgujDnfmxm-z6IBxF60GhYFV8C7PJ7F2Ovc2ZZEv735u7W6UrfZA8JEw-853MZCbLXlIyp1zS9xs3-B66-c71OCdMMlmRR9kprTmbCUb443vnk-xZCBtCSl4J8TQ74WUtiBTFafZz0d9ajHc59CY3uPMYgnV9bvv8YoCIW-jgQ37ttHUGt27lYbe2Otdr8KAjehui1eHgHdDfWI05aJ1EnmdPWugCvhj3s-z750_fzr_MLq8ulueLy5kWoo4zKojGmlAEI1FUWkhOBCLKkhpdUkaglZo3DMAwUWFDyhIrhgxKSijUFT_LXh11d50LaixKUEwSWtSsIjIRyyNhHGzUztst-DvlwKqDwfmVAp-y6FBRUXFosS0aioVp2oaWaJoGpSkAJNdJ6-MYbWi2aDT20UM3EZ3e9HatVu5G1VwWjJVJ4O0o4N2vAUNUWxs0dh306IbDuxmtWFGLhL7-B304u5FaQUrA9q1LcfVeVC1kahSeylYkav4AlVb6VKtTB7U22ScO7yYOiYl4G1cwhKCW11__n736MWXf3GPXCF1cB9cNMTVdmILFEdTeheCx_VtkStR-AP5UQ-0HQI0DwH8D9MD3_Q</recordid><startdate>20220812</startdate><enddate>20220812</enddate><creator>Naber, Jonathan</creator><creator>Mactaggart, Islay</creator><creator>Dionicio, Carlos</creator><creator>Polack, Sarah</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-6030</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220812</creationdate><title>Anxiety and depression in Guatemala: Sociodemographic characteristics and service access</title><author>Naber, Jonathan ; Mactaggart, Islay ; Dionicio, Carlos ; Polack, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-160ce901ead7e68c67306eee751dc5120af7c3b2aad268eb055e82e2a5101a983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Multivariable control</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Retirement</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naber, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mactaggart, Islay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionicio, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polack, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naber, Jonathan</au><au>Mactaggart, Islay</au><au>Dionicio, Carlos</au><au>Polack, Sarah</au><au>Hong, Seo Ah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anxiety and depression in Guatemala: Sociodemographic characteristics and service access</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-08-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0272780</spage><epage>e0272780</epage><pages>e0272780-e0272780</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Epidemiological data on depression and anxiety in Guatemala is lacking. Using 2016 National Disability Survey data, we explored the sociodemographics of people with anxiety and/or depression and its heightened burden on access to key services. The survey (n = 13,073) used the Washington Group Extended Set to estimate disability prevalence, including anxiety and/or depression. A nested case-control study was included to explore the impact of disability on key life areas. Cases (indicating ‘A lot of difficulty’ or ‘Cannot do’ in one or more functional domain) and age-/sex-matched controls were administered a structured questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression and heightened-burden analysis were conducted. Higher odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants who were 50+ (aOR 2.3, 1.8–3.1), female (aOR 1.8, 1.4–2.2), urban (aOR 1.5, 1.2–1.9), divorced/separated (aOR 2.0, 1.3–3.0), and widowed (aOR 1.6, 1.0–2.4), as well as those with impaired communication or cognition (aOR 17.6, 13.0–23.8), self-care (aOR 13.2, 8.5–20.5), walking (aOR 13.3, 9.7–18.3), hearing (aOR 8.5, 5.6–13.1), and vision (aOR 8.5, 6.1–11.8). Lower odds of anxiety and/or depression were found in participants with a university education (aOR 0.2, 0.5–0.9), and those living in the southeast (aOR 0.2, 0.1–0.3) or northeast (aOR 0.3, 0.2–0.4). Compared to people with impairments that were not depression and/or anxiety, people with depression and/or anxiety were less likely to receive a retirement pension (aOR 0.4, 0.2–0.8), and more likely to receive medication for depression/anxiety (aOR 4.1, 1.9–9.1), report a serious health problem (aOR 1.8, 1.3–2.5), and seek advice/treatment with a government health worker/health post (aOR 6.3, 1.0–39.2).</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35960764</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0272780</doi><tpages>e0272780</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-6030</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-08, Vol.17 (8), p.e0272780-e0272780
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2701492807
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Activities of daily living
Age
Anxiety
Anxiety disorders
Biology and Life Sciences
Cognition
Depression, Mental
Diagnosis
Disability
Distribution
Drug abuse
Earth Sciences
Epidemiology
Medical personnel
Medical screening
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental depression
Mental disorders
Mental health
Multivariable control
People and places
Polls & surveys
Population
Public health
Research and Analysis Methods
Retirement
Social Sciences
Sociodemographics
Surveys
title Anxiety and depression in Guatemala: Sociodemographic characteristics and service access
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A45%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anxiety%20and%20depression%20in%20Guatemala:%20Sociodemographic%20characteristics%20and%20service%20access&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Naber,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2022-08-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0272780&rft.epage=e0272780&rft.pages=e0272780-e0272780&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0272780&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA713732684%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2701492807&rft_id=info:pmid/35960764&rft_galeid=A713732684&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1683afef4b1e4dbfb15edbbe7d4aa73c&rfr_iscdi=true