Does substrate matter in the deep sea? A comparison of bone, wood, and carbonate rock colonizers

Continental margins host methane seeps, animal falls and wood falls, with chemosynthetic communities that may share or exchange species. The goal of this study was to examine the existence and nature of linkages among chemosynthesis-based ecosystems by deploying organic fall mimics (bone and wood) a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271635-e0271635
Hauptverfasser: Pereira, Olívia S, Gonzalez, Jennifer, Mendoza, Guillermo, Le, Jennifer, McNeill, Madison, Ontiveros, Jorge, Lee, Raymond W, Rouse, Greg W, Cortés, Jorge, Levin, Lisa A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0271635
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0271635
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Pereira, Olívia S
Gonzalez, Jennifer
Mendoza, Guillermo
Le, Jennifer
McNeill, Madison
Ontiveros, Jorge
Lee, Raymond W
Rouse, Greg W
Cortés, Jorge
Levin, Lisa A
description Continental margins host methane seeps, animal falls and wood falls, with chemosynthetic communities that may share or exchange species. The goal of this study was to examine the existence and nature of linkages among chemosynthesis-based ecosystems by deploying organic fall mimics (bone and wood) alongside defaunated carbonate rocks within high and lesser levels of seepage activity for 7.4 years. We compared community composition, density, and trophic structure of invertebrates on these hard substrates at active methane seepage and transition (less seepage) sites at Mound 12 at ~1,000 m depth, a methane seep off the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. At transition sites, the community composition on wood and bone was characteristic of natural wood- and whale-fall community composition, which rely on decay of the organic substrates. However, at active sites, seepage activity modified the relationship between fauna and substrate, seepage activity had a stronger effect in defining and homogenizing these communities and they depend less on organic decay. In contrast to community structure, macrofaunal trophic niche overlap between substrates, based on standard ellipse areas, was greater at transition sites than at active sites, except between rock and wood. Our observations suggest that whale- and wood-fall substrates can function as stepping stones for seep fauna even at later successional stages, providing hard substrate for attachment and chemosynthetic food.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0271635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2692042575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710905476</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4c7d8848e9aa4bab97aa3528855b665f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A710905476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-13fee8b321b5e9a910f724ac325b0fdc7b529a15542582438055defde2df538d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DQQDgijsjGnSNMmLMqy3gYUFb68xTU5nsrbNmKTePr0Zp8pW9kHykHDyO_9z4xTF_RIvS8rLp5d-DIPuljs_wBITXtaU3SiOS0nJoiaY3rzyPiruxHiJMaOirm8XR5QJxnkljotPLzxEFMcmpqAToF6nBAG5AaUtIAuwQxH0c7RCxvc7HVz0A_ItanLUU_TNe3uK9GCR0SGb9grBm88Z7vzgfkKId4tbre4i3Jvuk-LDq5fvz94szi9er89W5wtT1zItStoCiIaSsmEgtSxxy0mlDSWswa01vGFE6pKxijBBKiowYxZaC8S2uSpLT4oHB91d56OamhMVqSXB2YezTKwPhPX6Uu2C63X4obx26rfBh43SITnTgaoMt0JUImeiq0Y3kmtNGRGCsaauWZu1nk3RxqYHa2DI7etmovOfwW3Vxn9Vksg8FJkFHk8CwX8ZISbVu2ig6_QAfpzy5kRQmtGH_6DXVzdRG50LcEPrc1yzF1UrXmKJWcXrTC2vofKx0DuTZ9q6bJ85PJk5ZCbB97TRY4xq_e7t_7MXH-fsoyvsFnSXttF3Y3J-iHOwOoAm-BgDtH-bXGK1X4Q_3VD7RVDTItBf1Ov4OA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2692042575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does substrate matter in the deep sea? A comparison of bone, wood, and carbonate rock colonizers</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Pereira, Olívia S ; Gonzalez, Jennifer ; Mendoza, Guillermo ; Le, Jennifer ; McNeill, Madison ; Ontiveros, Jorge ; Lee, Raymond W ; Rouse, Greg W ; Cortés, Jorge ; Levin, Lisa A</creator><contributor>Vermeij, Geerat J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olívia S ; Gonzalez, Jennifer ; Mendoza, Guillermo ; Le, Jennifer ; McNeill, Madison ; Ontiveros, Jorge ; Lee, Raymond W ; Rouse, Greg W ; Cortés, Jorge ; Levin, Lisa A ; Vermeij, Geerat J.</creatorcontrib><description>Continental margins host methane seeps, animal falls and wood falls, with chemosynthetic communities that may share or exchange species. The goal of this study was to examine the existence and nature of linkages among chemosynthesis-based ecosystems by deploying organic fall mimics (bone and wood) alongside defaunated carbonate rocks within high and lesser levels of seepage activity for 7.4 years. We compared community composition, density, and trophic structure of invertebrates on these hard substrates at active methane seepage and transition (less seepage) sites at Mound 12 at ~1,000 m depth, a methane seep off the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. At transition sites, the community composition on wood and bone was characteristic of natural wood- and whale-fall community composition, which rely on decay of the organic substrates. However, at active sites, seepage activity modified the relationship between fauna and substrate, seepage activity had a stronger effect in defining and homogenizing these communities and they depend less on organic decay. In contrast to community structure, macrofaunal trophic niche overlap between substrates, based on standard ellipse areas, was greater at transition sites than at active sites, except between rock and wood. Our observations suggest that whale- and wood-fall substrates can function as stepping stones for seep fauna even at later successional stages, providing hard substrate for attachment and chemosynthetic food.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35857748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Aquatic mammals ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Bone composition ; Bones ; Carbon ; Carbonate rocks ; Carbonates ; Chemosynthesis ; Community composition ; Community structure ; Comparative analysis ; Composition ; Continental margins ; Decay ; Deep sea ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Fauna ; Food ; Gas seepage ; Invertebrates ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methane ; Mollusks ; Niche overlap ; Physical Sciences ; Seepage ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271635-e0271635</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2022 Pereira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Pereira et al 2022 Pereira et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-13fee8b321b5e9a910f724ac325b0fdc7b529a15542582438055defde2df538d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-13fee8b321b5e9a910f724ac325b0fdc7b529a15542582438055defde2df538d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1805-2143</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299329/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9299329/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2929,23871,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Vermeij, Geerat J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olívia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeill, Madison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ontiveros, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Raymond W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouse, Greg W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortés, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><title>Does substrate matter in the deep sea? A comparison of bone, wood, and carbonate rock colonizers</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Continental margins host methane seeps, animal falls and wood falls, with chemosynthetic communities that may share or exchange species. The goal of this study was to examine the existence and nature of linkages among chemosynthesis-based ecosystems by deploying organic fall mimics (bone and wood) alongside defaunated carbonate rocks within high and lesser levels of seepage activity for 7.4 years. We compared community composition, density, and trophic structure of invertebrates on these hard substrates at active methane seepage and transition (less seepage) sites at Mound 12 at ~1,000 m depth, a methane seep off the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. At transition sites, the community composition on wood and bone was characteristic of natural wood- and whale-fall community composition, which rely on decay of the organic substrates. However, at active sites, seepage activity modified the relationship between fauna and substrate, seepage activity had a stronger effect in defining and homogenizing these communities and they depend less on organic decay. In contrast to community structure, macrofaunal trophic niche overlap between substrates, based on standard ellipse areas, was greater at transition sites than at active sites, except between rock and wood. Our observations suggest that whale- and wood-fall substrates can function as stepping stones for seep fauna even at later successional stages, providing hard substrate for attachment and chemosynthetic food.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bone composition</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbonate rocks</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Chemosynthesis</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Continental margins</subject><subject>Decay</subject><subject>Deep sea</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Gas seepage</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Niche overlap</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Seepage</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1uL1DAUx4so7rr6DQQDgijsjGnSNMmLMqy3gYUFb68xTU5nsrbNmKTePr0Zp8pW9kHykHDyO_9z4xTF_RIvS8rLp5d-DIPuljs_wBITXtaU3SiOS0nJoiaY3rzyPiruxHiJMaOirm8XR5QJxnkljotPLzxEFMcmpqAToF6nBAG5AaUtIAuwQxH0c7RCxvc7HVz0A_ItanLUU_TNe3uK9GCR0SGb9grBm88Z7vzgfkKId4tbre4i3Jvuk-LDq5fvz94szi9er89W5wtT1zItStoCiIaSsmEgtSxxy0mlDSWswa01vGFE6pKxijBBKiowYxZaC8S2uSpLT4oHB91d56OamhMVqSXB2YezTKwPhPX6Uu2C63X4obx26rfBh43SITnTgaoMt0JUImeiq0Y3kmtNGRGCsaauWZu1nk3RxqYHa2DI7etmovOfwW3Vxn9Vksg8FJkFHk8CwX8ZISbVu2ig6_QAfpzy5kRQmtGH_6DXVzdRG50LcEPrc1yzF1UrXmKJWcXrTC2vofKx0DuTZ9q6bJ85PJk5ZCbB97TRY4xq_e7t_7MXH-fsoyvsFnSXttF3Y3J-iHOwOoAm-BgDtH-bXGK1X4Q_3VD7RVDTItBf1Ov4OA</recordid><startdate>20220720</startdate><enddate>20220720</enddate><creator>Pereira, Olívia S</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Jennifer</creator><creator>Mendoza, Guillermo</creator><creator>Le, Jennifer</creator><creator>McNeill, Madison</creator><creator>Ontiveros, Jorge</creator><creator>Lee, Raymond W</creator><creator>Rouse, Greg W</creator><creator>Cortés, Jorge</creator><creator>Levin, Lisa A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2143</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220720</creationdate><title>Does substrate matter in the deep sea? A comparison of bone, wood, and carbonate rock colonizers</title><author>Pereira, Olívia S ; Gonzalez, Jennifer ; Mendoza, Guillermo ; Le, Jennifer ; McNeill, Madison ; Ontiveros, Jorge ; Lee, Raymond W ; Rouse, Greg W ; Cortés, Jorge ; Levin, Lisa A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-13fee8b321b5e9a910f724ac325b0fdc7b529a15542582438055defde2df538d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bone composition</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbonate rocks</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Chemosynthesis</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Continental margins</topic><topic>Decay</topic><topic>Deep sea</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Gas seepage</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Niche overlap</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Seepage</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Olívia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeill, Madison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ontiveros, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Raymond W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouse, Greg W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortés, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levin, Lisa A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Olívia S</au><au>Gonzalez, Jennifer</au><au>Mendoza, Guillermo</au><au>Le, Jennifer</au><au>McNeill, Madison</au><au>Ontiveros, Jorge</au><au>Lee, Raymond W</au><au>Rouse, Greg W</au><au>Cortés, Jorge</au><au>Levin, Lisa A</au><au>Vermeij, Geerat J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does substrate matter in the deep sea? A comparison of bone, wood, and carbonate rock colonizers</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-20</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0271635</spage><epage>e0271635</epage><pages>e0271635-e0271635</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Continental margins host methane seeps, animal falls and wood falls, with chemosynthetic communities that may share or exchange species. The goal of this study was to examine the existence and nature of linkages among chemosynthesis-based ecosystems by deploying organic fall mimics (bone and wood) alongside defaunated carbonate rocks within high and lesser levels of seepage activity for 7.4 years. We compared community composition, density, and trophic structure of invertebrates on these hard substrates at active methane seepage and transition (less seepage) sites at Mound 12 at ~1,000 m depth, a methane seep off the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. At transition sites, the community composition on wood and bone was characteristic of natural wood- and whale-fall community composition, which rely on decay of the organic substrates. However, at active sites, seepage activity modified the relationship between fauna and substrate, seepage activity had a stronger effect in defining and homogenizing these communities and they depend less on organic decay. In contrast to community structure, macrofaunal trophic niche overlap between substrates, based on standard ellipse areas, was greater at transition sites than at active sites, except between rock and wood. Our observations suggest that whale- and wood-fall substrates can function as stepping stones for seep fauna even at later successional stages, providing hard substrate for attachment and chemosynthetic food.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>35857748</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0271635</doi><tpages>e0271635</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2143</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0271635-e0271635
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2692042575
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Aquatic mammals
Biology and Life Sciences
Bone composition
Bones
Carbon
Carbonate rocks
Carbonates
Chemosynthesis
Community composition
Community structure
Comparative analysis
Composition
Continental margins
Decay
Deep sea
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ecosystems
Fauna
Food
Gas seepage
Invertebrates
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methane
Mollusks
Niche overlap
Physical Sciences
Seepage
Substrates
title Does substrate matter in the deep sea? A comparison of bone, wood, and carbonate rock colonizers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T15%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20substrate%20matter%20in%20the%20deep%20sea?%20A%20comparison%20of%20bone,%20wood,%20and%20carbonate%20rock%20colonizers&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Pereira,%20Ol%C3%ADvia%20S&rft.date=2022-07-20&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0271635&rft.epage=e0271635&rft.pages=e0271635-e0271635&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0271635&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA710905476%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2692042575&rft_id=info:pmid/35857748&rft_galeid=A710905476&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4c7d8848e9aa4bab97aa3528855b665f&rfr_iscdi=true